Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REGION
Presented by
ATUL KUMAR SINGH
Under the Guidance of
Prof Dr. P.K.Maiti (Dept. of Civil Engg., IIT(BHU))
Prof. Dr. M.S.Kulkarni (Dept. of Civil Engg., MIT, Pune)
Prof G.S.Ingle (Dept. of Civil Engg., MIT, Pune)
In Association with
INDEX
1)Finite Element Analysis
Continuous system
Time-independent PDE
Time-dependent PDE
Discrete system
Linear algebraic eq.
ODE
In mathematics, the finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for finding approximate
solutions to boundary value problems for partial differential equations. It uses variational methods to
minimize an error function and produce a stable solution.
FEM is best understood from its practical application, known as finite element analysis (FEA). FEA as
applied in engineering is a computational tool for performing engineering analysis. It includes the use of
mesh generation techniques for dividing a complex problem into small elements, as well as the use
of software program coded with FEM algorithm.
Oil Rig
Jacket
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, MIT PUNE
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Length=20m
Diameter=.8m
Figure 6:- Structural
member
where is the angular frequency of the oscillation (related to the period T by =2/T), k is the
wave number (related to the wavelength L by k =2/L), is the kinematic viscosity /, and z is
measured upward from the bottom.
2) Navier- Stokes Equation
These differential equations, are usually based on Darcys Law as the linear macroscopic uid
momentum balance equation, considering the drag terms of the Navier Stokes equation as
dominant, and on the principle of the uid mass conservation.
10
the
12
5) Morison Equation
Inertial Force
Drag Force
Morison Equation gives the linear inertia force (from potential theory and oscillating Flows) and the adapted quadratic
drag force (from real Flows and constant currents) to get the following resultant force (per unit length)
& (Morison Constants) depends on Reynolds Number and KC Number. ( & 1.2 <). It is found that for KC < 10, inertia
forces progressively dominate; for 10 < KC < 20 both inertia and drag force components are significant and for KC > 20,
drag force progressively dominates.
13
1
Natural Frequency= 2.77
2
Natural Frequency= 2.77
Natural Frequency
Natural Frequency
15
Graph shows the time history of CFD horizontal force (wave loads) and the
reaction force (dynamic response) of the structural member for the one-way coupling
simulation of case1. At the time of 0.112s approximately, free surface of the
water touches the bottom side of the cylinder which gradually tends the CFD
force to increase. The maximum horizontal force is attained by the time of around
0.330s.
16
The peak vertical force (slamming force) is attained at the time of around
0.115s with the magnitude of 480kN approximately. The magnitude of the
CFD force starts to decline in a steady way after it achieves the peak value.
17
18
Above figure shows the comparison of horizontal fluid force attained by the numerical
method with result of Morison equation. The formula mentioned in above slide with CM
and CD as 2.0 and 0.65 respectively is used to find horizontal force value. The difference
between peak values of two curves is observed as 100 kN approximately.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, MIT PUNE
19
REFRENCES
1. B.Iwanowski, R.Gladso, M.Lefranc, Wave-in-deck load on a jacket the platform, CFD
derived pressures and non- linear structural response 28 OMAE International conference, Hawaii,
USA. May 31- June 5, 2009.
2. A.K.Pozarlik, J.B.W.Kok, Numerical investigation of one-way and two-way fluid structure
interaction in combustion systems International conference on computational methods for coupled
problems in Science and Engineering, Barcelona.2007.
3. ANSA 13.2.1 BETA CAE Systems S.A. P.O. Box 18623, GR-54005 Thessaloniki, Greece
4. Fluent 14.0. ANSYS, Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA15317, USA.
5. Z.Yun, Y.Hui, Coupled fluid structure flutter analysis of a transonic fan Chinese Journal of
Aeronautics, vol.24, 2011, 258-264.
6. S.A.Anagnostopoulos, Dynamic response of offshore platforms to extreme waves including fluid
structure interaction Eng.Struct.,vol. 4, July, 1982.
20
THANK YOU
21