Professional Documents
Culture Documents
emotional bond
between two people.
Its a 2 way process
that endures over time.
2 explanations It leads to certain
of attachment: behaviours, such as
learning &
clinging and serves the
evolutionary function of protecting
theory.
an infant.
Operant conditioning: process by
which an individuals behaviour is
shaped by reinforcement or
punishment. Positive(give something)
& negative(take something)
reinforcement strengthens behaviour.
Punishment weakens behaviour. Type
of learning determined by
consequences. Association made
between action and reward.
Classical conditioning:
Attachments are seen
through classical
conditioning, where
babies learn to associate
care-givers with food.
Through conditioning a
care-giver satisfies a
babies psychological
needs.
The mouse- operant conditioning:
Mouse placed in skinners box and was
fasted for 24 hours so it was hungry.
Never been conditioned. Researcher
imagines line dividing the box. When the
mouse goes in the half nearest to the
lever sugar is released. The mouse
presses the lever and receives a reward,
reward reinforces the action so the
mouse repeats it.
Classical
conditioning
is an
association
made between
the neutral
stimulus and
the innate,
unconditione
d response.
Neutral stimulus:
Anything in the
environment that
doesnt cause you to
respond naturally.
Criteria for
evolutionary theory:
Adaptiveattachments are
adaptive. Meaning
they give our species
an adaptive
advantage making us
more likely to survive
since theyre attached
to a caregiver theyre
kept safe,
given food and
kept warm.
Strange conclusions:
1.Showed individual differences
between infants.
2.Showed most American kids
securely attached.
3.Distinct association
between mothers
behaviour and infants
attachment type.
An individualistic culture is one
which emphasises personal
independence and achievement at the
expense of group goals resulting in a
strong sense of competition.
A collectivist culture is one which
emphasises family and work goals
above individual needs and desires.
High degree of interdependence.
Strange steps:
1.Parent and infant play
2. Parent sits while infant plays- use of secure
base
3.Stranger enters talks to parent- stranger anxiety
4.Parent leaves, stranger offers comfortseparation anxiety
5.Parent returns offers comfort if needed infant
alone- reunion behaviour
6.Parent leaves infant alone- separation anxiety
7.Stranger enters offers comfort- stranger anxiety
8. Parent returns offers comfort-reunion behaviour
Strange evaluation:
Evaluate Bowlbys theory (2marks):
Study seen as unethical since theyre separating A study which supports this theory is
child from mother could cause
Bowlbys study of 44 juvenile thieves(1947).
psychological/emotional stress. Goes against
Aim was to determine whether theres a
guidelines.
Disadvantage is that parents may feel bad they maycorrelation between maternal deprivation
in infancy & adolescent delinquency. 44
be told child is type a or c.
Lacks ecological validity taken place in a lab + juvenile thieves in a child guidance clinic
wouldnt leave kid with stranger the experiment where compared with 44 adolescent who
were thought to be emotionally disturbed,
isnt best representation.
Reliable done in lab can be repeated.
didnt steal. Found more affectionless in
Lacks generalisability (Americans)
44
Strange findings:
Type b- securely attached: cried mother left
positive when return, moderate avoidance,
friendly if mothers there, mother sensitive.
Type a- avoidant insecure: didnt orientate,
not concerned, little interest, avoided
stranger + mother, mother ignored.
Type c- resistant insecure: intense distress,
rejected mom later, ambivalent to stranger
& mother vice versa.
juvenile. Affectionless
psychopaths show
little concern for
others, unable to form
relationships.
Concluded that the
reason for the antisocial behaviour +
emotional problems 1st
group was due to
maternal deprivation.
Summarise table/findings:
Secure attachments were the most common
form in all of the cultures surveyed. The
highest proportion was found in Great
Britain. Avoidant was the next most
common and was mostly found in Germany.
Also the found differences between cultures.
For instance one of their Japanese studies
showed no avoidant attachment in babies
whereas the second found around 20%.
The secure base hypothesis- In the west secure
attachments are seen as providing an infant with a
secure base to explore promoting independence.
Rothbaum said attachment relationships in Japan are
dependent orientated associated with insecure
ambivalent attachment. Amae part of Japanese culture
(depend on each other)
Reasons why:
Britain- women have maternity leave
for nearly 2 years.
US they only have 6 weeks
maternity leave
Britain + US are individualistic
encourage independence hence
exploration behaviour.
Japan most insecure since theyre
always with their mums.
Rothbaums generalisation in Japan
may be unfair because within the
country there are different subcultures,
each of which may have different
childcare practises. A study of
attachment in Tokoyo (urban setting)
found similar distributions of
attachment types to the western studies
whereas a rural sample found over
representation of insecure resistance.
Additional studies:
Tronick et al (1992) they studied the Efe tribe
from Zaire (in Africa) the infants had been
breastfed by different women but usually slept
with their mothers. Despite this they still showed
one primary attachment.
Fox (1977) Studied infants raised in
Kibbbutzim theyd spent most of their time being
cared for in a communial childrens home by a
nurse. They used the strange situation tech and
found the infants were equally attached to both
caregivers except in terms of reunion behaviour
they were more attached to mothers