You are on page 1of 56

Using Supply and

Demand to Analyze
Markets

Chapter Outline
3.1 Consumer and Producer
Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?
3.2 Price Regulations
3.3 Quantity Regulations
3.4 Taxes
3.5 Subsidies
3.6 Conclusion

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-1

Introduction

In this chapter, we use the supply and


demand model to answer the following
questions
How do we measure the benefits that accrue
to producers and consumers in a market?
How do government interventions (e.g.,
taxes) affect markets and the benefits
associated with market exchange?

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-2

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Consumers benefit from market exchange, otherwise


they would not participate
Consumer surplus The difference between the
amount consumers would be willing to pay for a
good or service and the amount they actually pay
(the market price)
In many cases, this difference is positive, and
consumers experience net benefits from market
exchange

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-3

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Figure 3.1 Defining Consumer Surplus


Price ($/pound)
$5.50
5
Person As
4.50
consumer
surplus = $1.50 4
3.50
3

Demand
choke price
Total consumer
A
surplus (CS)
B
C
D
Market price
E
D

2
1
0

The consumer at point


E will not buy any
apples because the
market price is too
high
Quantity of

apples (pounds)

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-4

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Producers benefit from market exchange, otherwise


they would not participate
Producer surplus The difference between the
amount producers are willing to sell goods for and
what they actually receive (the market price)
Producer surplus is not the same as profit, as we will
see in later chapters

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-5

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Figure 3.2 Defining Producer Surplus


The producer at point Z
will not produce any
Total producer apples because the
price is too low
surplus (PS) market
S

Price ($/pound)
5
4
3.50
Seller V s
3
producer
2.50
surplus = $1.50
2
1.50
1
0

Z
X

Market price

V
Supply
choke price
1

Quantity of
apples (pounds)

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-6

The Market for Cupcakes

figure it out

The weekly supply and demand for cupcakes in a


small town are given as

QS = 30P 20 , QD = 124 18P


where P is the price, in dollars, and quantity is
measured in thousands of cupcakes per week
Answer the following questions:
1.Find the equilibrium price and quantity
2.Calculate consumer and producer surplus at the
equilibrium

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-7

The Market for Cupcakes

figure it out

1. Remember: Equilibrium is characterized by QS = QD

30P 20 = 124 18P


Combining terms and solving for P yields

48P = 144 P* = $3
And using the equation for demand,

QD = 124 18(3) = 70 = Q* = QS
2. The easiest way to calculate consumer and producer
surplus is with a graph; to do this, we must determine
two points for each curve
Equilibrium price/quantity
Choke prices (where QD /QS are equal to zero)
Why do we need only two points to plot the
demand/supply curves?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-8

figure it out

The Market for Cupcakes

We already know one point for each curve: P* = $3.00 ; Q* = 70


Demand choke price: QD = 0 = 124 18P P = $6.89
Supply choke price: QS = 0 = 30P 20 P = $0.67
Price of cupcakes
(dollars)
6.9

S
A

Producer surplus is the area above


1 the price (Area B)
supply but below
PS Area B base height
2
1
70 (3 0.67) $81.55
2

B
0.67
0

Consumer surplus is the area


below demand but above the price
1
(Area A)
CS Area A base height
2
1
70 (6.89 3) $136.15
2

D
70

Surplus is generally measured in

Quantity of cupcakes
dollars
(thousands)

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-9

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

What happens to consumer and producer surplus when there is a


shift in supply or demand?

Imagine a pie shop opens up in the same


town. What will happen to the demand for
cupcakes?

Price of cupcakes
(dollars)

Demand will shift left, resulting in a new


equilibrium of P2 andQ2
E

P1
P2

B
C

Old consumer surplus: A + B + F


New consumer surplus: B + C

What happens to producer surplus?

F
G

Old producer surplus: C + D + E + G


New producer surplus: D

D2
0

What happens to consumer surplus?

Q2

Q1

D1

C has transferred from producers to


consumers
A + E + F + G has disappeared from

Quantity of cupcakes
this market
(thousands)

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-10

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Figure 3.3 Consumer Surplus and the Elasticity of


Demand

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-11

The Market for Tires

figure it out

The weekly supply and demand for tires in a small town are
given as

QS = 15P 400 , QD = 2,800 25P


where P is the price, in dollars, and quantity is the number
of tires sold weekly. The equilibrium price is $80 per tire,
and 800 tires are sold each week
Suppose an improvement in technology makes tires
cheaper to produce; specifically, suppose the quantity
supplied rises by 200 at every price

Answer the following questions:


1.What is the new supply curve?
2.What are the new equilibrium price and quantity?
3.What happens to consumer and producer surplus?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-12

The Market for Tires

figure it out

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-13

The Market for Tires

figure it out

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-14

The Market for Tires

figure it out

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-15

Consumer and Producer


Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?

3.1

Figure 3.5 Changes in Surplus from a Supply Shift

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-16

3.2 Price
Regulations

Politicians often call for the direct regulation of


prices on products and services
Price ceiling a regulation that sets the maximum price
that can be legally paid for a good or service
Price floor a regulation that sets the minimum price that
can be legally paid for a good or service (often called a price
support)

What are the effects of price ceilings/floors on


markets?

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-17

3.2 Price
Regulations

Some important terminology


Transfer surplus that moves from producers to
consumers, or vice versa, as a result of a regulation
Deadweight loss (DWL) the reduction in total surplus
that occurs as a result of a market inefficiency
Remember the cupcake example of changing demand due to a pie
shop

Nonbinding price ceiling a price set at a level above the


equilibrium market price
Nonbinding price floor a price set at a level below the
equilibrium market price
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-18

3.2Price Regulations

Figure 3.7 The Effects of a Price Ceiling

Price
($/pizza)

Consumer surplus before


A+B+C
Consumer surplus after
A+B+D
Producer surplus before
D+E+F
Producer surplus afterF

$20

14

A
B

10
8
5

D
F

z DWL = C + E
C
E
x

w
y

Transfer
of PS
to CS
6

Supply

Demand
10 12

20

Quantity of pizzas
(thousands)/month

Shortage
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-19

3.2 Price
Regulations

3.8 Deadweight Loss and Elasticities

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-20

3.2Price Regulations

Figure 3.9 The Effects of a Price Floor

Price
($/per ton)

$1,000

Transfer
of CS to PS
A

x
B

500
D
F

S
y

Price floor
Consumer surplus before
A+B+C
Consumer surplus after
A
Producer surplus before
D+E+F
Producer surplus afterB + D + F

E
z

D
0

10

20

30

Quantity of peanuts
(millions of tons)

Surplus
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-21

3.3 Quantity Regulations

Like price regulations, quantity regulations restrict


the amount of a good or service provided to a
market
Quota a regulation that sets the quantity of a
good or service provided
Often used to limit imports of certain goods; why might a
government pursue an import quota?
Sometimes used to limit exports (e.g., China and rare
earths)

What are the effects of quotas on markets?

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-22

3.3Quantity Regulations

Figure 3.10 The Effects of a Quota


Price
($/tattoo)

S2

$125
Pquota = 100

z
B

P = 50
40
35

Consumer surplus before


A+B+C
Consumer surplus after
A
Producer surplus before
D+E+F
Producer surplus afterB + D + F
Transfer
of CS to PS
C

E
y

S1
D

F
500
(Quota)

1,500 Quantity of
tattoos/year

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-23

Application
The unintended consequences of
immigration quotas
In October, 2003, Congress reduced the annual
number of H-1B visas from 195,000 to 65,000
Targeted highly skilled workers
Quota had never been binding prior to policy change;
government began denying petitions in 2004
Requires a sponsoring U.S. company (a job offer); foreign
students who pursue a U.S. education have a better
chance of finding a sponsor

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Visa quotas have been shown to reduce


immigration...
Why would the U.S. pursue this policy?
What other consequences might we
Citation: T. Kato and C. Sparber. 2012. Quotas and Quality: the Effects of H-1B Visa Restrictions on the
see?
Pool of Prospective
Undergraduate Students from Abroad. Forthcoming in The Review of Economics and
Statistics.

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-24

Application
The unintended consequences of
immigration quotas
Kato and Sparber (2013) examined whether this
new policy might have reduced the incentive for
highly qualified students to pursue an education in
the U.S.
Considered SAT scores submitted by foreign students
Used five countries as a control; Australia, Canada,
Chile, Mexico, and Singapore have special status, and
their students can obtain visas similar to H-1B without a
quota

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Key findings
Average SAT scores of applicants from foreign countries
affected by the H-1B quota dropped 10 20 points after
2003
Citation: T. Kato and C. Sparber. 2012. Quotas and Quality: the Effects of H-1B Visa Restrictions on the
Pool of Prospective Undergraduate Students from Abroad. Forthcoming in The Review of Economics and
Drop was driven by a reduction in top-quintile scores,
Statistics.
Copyright
2013 Worth Publishers,
All Rights for
Reserved
Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
implying the policy
reduced
incentive
high-quality

3-25

3.3 Quantity Regulations

Government provision of a public good: municipal golf courses


Sometimes, governments attempt to
supplement market supply for things that
benefit communities

Price of a golf
round

Spriv
Stot

P1
Ptot

Qpriv

Q1

Qtot

Q1 + Qgov

What happens to the market for golf when a


local government opens a municipal course?

With only for-profit and private courses, supply is


Spriv and the market equilibrium occurs at Q1 and P1
The municipal course increases the quantity of
rounds available by Qgov , and supply shifts out to Stot

However, quantity supplied only increases to


Qtot because private suppliers are not willing to
supply as much at the new, lower market
price

Private producers reduce quantity supplied to Qpriv ,


Quantity of
rounds
this
effect is known as crowding out

Crowding out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-26

3.4 Taxes

Taxes are very prevalent in societies


Product markets (VAT; sales taxes)
Labor markets (income taxes; payroll taxes)
Capital markets (capital gains taxes)

How do taxes impact markets?


Some taxes are imposed to correct market failures (see
Chapter 16)
In general, taxes distort market outcomes
How do we describe the effects of taxes?

Example: In 2003, Bostons Mayor Tom Menino proposed


a $0.50 tax on movie tickets
How should this tax (which was ultimately not adopted by the
legislature)Copyright
affect
the market for movie tickets?
2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-27

3.4Taxes

Figure 3.13 The Effects of a Tax on Boston Movie


Tickets
Price

($/ticket)
$10

Pb = 8.30
P1 = 8.00
Ps = 7.80

6.67
0

Transfer from CS and PS


to government
S2 = S1 + tax
A
y
C
S1
x
B
D
D
E
z
Consumer surplus (CS) before
A+B+
Consumer surplus (CS) after
A
F
C
Producer surplus (PS) before
D+E+F
Producer surplus (PS) after
F
Government revenue B + D
Q2 = 3.4

Q1 = 4

Quantity of tickets
(100,000s)

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-28

3.4 Taxes

We can also describe the effect of a tax on consumer and


producer surplus with equations. Demand and supply for
tickets are given by Q D 20 2 P; Q S 3P 20
where prices are measured in dollars and quantity in hundreds
of thousands of tickets.
occurs
when QD = QS,
20 2Equilibrium
P 3P 20
5 P 40
Before the tax, tickets are $8 1
and 400,000 tickets are sold in Boston
CS Q PDChoke P1
Pre-tax consumer surplus 2

Q D 0 20 2 PDChoke PDChoke $10


where the demand choke price is found by solving
1
CS 400,000 $10 $8 $400,000
2
and consumer
surplus
is equal
to Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
Copyright
2013 Worth Publishers,
All Rights Reserved
3-29

3.4 Taxes

Pre-tax producer surplus surplus


1
PS Q P1 PSChoke
2
where the supply choke price
Q S 0 3PSChoke 20 PSChoke $6.67
Solving for producer surplus yields
1
PS 400,000 $8 $6.67 $266,667
2

PS CS $666,667
And total surplus
What happens after the tax?

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-30

3.4 Taxes

Pb PS $0.50

Q D Q S 20 2 Pb 3PS 20 20 2 PS 0.50 3PS 20


20 2 PS 1 3PS 20 PS $7.80
Pb PS $0.50 $8.30
Q2 20 2 8.30 340,000
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-31

3.4 Taxes

New consumer surplus


1
CS 340,000 $10 $8.30 $289,000
2
and producer surplus
1
PS 340,000 $7.80 $6.67 $192,100
2
How much revenue has been generated by the tax?
Revenue 0.50Q2 $0.50 340,000 $170,000
And the associated deadweight loss associated with this
tax

distortion
is
1
1
DWL Q1 Q2 Pb Ps 400,000 340,000 $0.50 $15,000
2
2
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-32

3.4 Taxes

Pb PS $1.00

Q D Q S 20 2 Pb 3PS 20 20 2 PS 1.00 3PS 20


20 2 PS 2 3PS 20 PS $7.60; Pb $8.60
Q2 20 2 8.60 2.8

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-33

3.4 Taxes
Consumer surplus CS

1
280,000 $10 $8.60 $196,000
2

1
PS 280,000 $7.60 $6.67 $130,200
and producer surplus
2
How much revenue has been generated by the tax?
Revenue 1.00Q2 $1.00 280,000 $280,000
And the associated deadweight
loss associated with this
tax

1 is
1
distortion
DWL Q1 Q2 Pb Ps 400,000 280,000 $1.00 $60,000
2
2
So, while the tax rate has doubled, deadweight loss has
quadrupled from $15,000 to $60,000, and tax revenues have
Copyright by
2013 Worth
Publishers, (from
All Rights Reserved
Microeconomics to
Goolsbee/Levitt/
Syverson 1/e
only increased
78.5%
$170,000
$280,000)

3-34

3.4 Taxes

Figure 3.14 The Effect of a Larger Tax on Boston


Movie Tickets

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-35

figure it out

Soda Tax

The supply and demand for soda in a market is represented


by

QS = 50P 60 , QD = 12 8P
where P is the price per bottle, in dollars, and Q is in
millions of bottles per year
The current equilibrium price is $1.24, and 2.07 million
bottles are sold per year

Answer the following questions:


1.Calculate the price elasticity of demand and the price
elasticity of supply at the current equilibrium
2.Calculate the share of a tax that will be borne by
consumers and the share borne by producers
3.If a tax of $0.10 per bottle is created, what do buyers now
pay for a bottle? What will sellers receive?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-36

figure it out

Soda Tax

1. The first step is determining how the subsidy affects


prices
P subsidy P
b

In this problem,

Pb 2 PS

Supply andD demand are givenS by

Q 8, 000 500 Pb ; Q 1, 000 PS 2,500

And substituting
in for PS
S

Q 1, 000 Pb 2 2,500 1, 000 Pb 500

Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-37

figure it out

Soda Tax

1. The first step is determining how the subsidy affects


prices
P subsidy P
b

In this problem,

Pb 2 PS

Supply andD demand are givenS by

Q 8, 000 500 Pb ; Q 1, 000 PS 2,500

And substituting
in for PS
S

Q 1, 000 Pb 2 2,500 1, 000 Pb 500

Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-38

Application

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Citation: Fisman, R. and S. Wei. 2004. Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Missing Imports in
China. The Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 471496.

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-39

Application

Taxation, tax evasion, and smuggling


The authors find the evasion gap to be positively
correlated with tax rates (i.e., highly taxed
products are likely to be mislabeled, undervalued,
or undercounted)
Evasion is almost entirely due to intentional
mislabeling of products (highly taxed products are
labeled as minimally taxed products)
Evasion is negatively correlated with tax rates on
closely related products (e.g., chickens and
turkeys)... why might this be the case?

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Citation: Fisman, R. and S. Wei. 2004. Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Missing Imports in
China. The Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 471496.

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-40

3.4 Taxes

Tax incidence is a term describing who actually bears


the burden of a tax
In the supply and demand model, it does not matter who is
required to pay the tax (e.g., a sales tax vs. a production tax);
tax incidence will be the same in each case!
Consider again the movie theater example

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-41

3.4Taxes
Figure 3.15 Tax Incidence
(a)
Price ($)

(b)
S2
S1

Pb
P1
Ps

Price ($)
Tax = Pb
Ps

S
Pb
P1
Ps
D1

D
Tax = Pb Ps

D2
0

Q2 Q1

Quantity

Q2 Q1

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

Quantity

3-42

3.4 Taxes

Tax incidence is a term describing who actually bears the


burden of a tax
In the simple model presented here, it does not matter who is
required to pay the tax (e.g., a sales tax vs. a production tax); tax
incidence will be the same in each case!
Consider again the movie theater example

Tax incidence and elasticities


Elasticities of supply and demand are major determinants of
incidence
In general, when demand is relatively more elastic, producers will
experience more burden, and vice versa

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-43

3.4 Taxes
Elastic demand with inelastic supply
S2
Wage

tax

Demand, on the other hand, may be elastic


due to the presence of substitutes
(outsourcing)

S1

tax

Wb
W1

Ws

L2 L1

Consider the market for labor; workers


(suppliers), are unlikely to extend or cut hours
very much for a large range of wages

Quantity of labor

What happens when the government puts a


tax on earned income?
The tax shifts the labor supply curve up by
the amount of the tax; the new wage is Wb ,
with quantity L2
The wage received by workers, however, is
only Ws

Wb W1 < W1 Ws ; therefore, the incidence of


the tax falls primarily on suppliers of labor
(workers)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-44

3.4 Taxes

Tax incidence is a term describing who actually bears the


burden of a tax
In the simple model presented here, it does not matter who is
required to pay the tax (e.g., a sales tax vs. a production tax); tax
incidence will be the same in each case!
Consider again the movie theater example

Tax incidence and elasticities


Elasticities of supply and demand are major determinants of
incidence
In general, when demand is relatively more elastic, producers will
experience more burden, and vice versa
D
A general formula(s) for
incidence as a function of Eelasticities
ES

Share born by consumer

E E
S

Share born by producer

ES ED

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-45

3.4 Taxes

Figure 3.16 Tax Incidence and Elasticities

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-46

figure it out

Soda Tax

The supply and demand for soda in a market is represented


by

QS = 50P 60 , QD = 12 8P
Where P is the price per bottle, in dollars, and Q is in
millions of bottles per year
The current equilibrium price is $1.17, and 2.62 million
bottles are sold per year

Answer the following questions:


1.Calculate the price elasticity of demand and the price
elasticity of supply at the current equilibrium
2.Calculate the share of a tax that will be borne by
consumers and the share borne by producers
3.If a tax of $0.10 per bottle is created, what do buyers now
pay for a bottle? What will sellers receive?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-47

figure it out

Soda Tax
1. The elasticity of demand and supply are

Q D P
1.17
E
D 8
3.75
P Q
2.62
D

Q
P
1.17
ES
S 50
22.33
P Q
2.62

2. The proportion of a tax borne by buyers and sellers is:


ES
22.33
Share born by buyer S

85.6%
D
22.33 3.75
E E
Share born by seller

ED
ES ED

3.75
14.4%
22.33 3.75

3. If there is a tax of $0.10 per bottle, buyers pay 85.6%, or


$0.0856 per bottle, and sellers pay 14.4%, or $0.0144 per
bottle
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-48

Application
Is it really the case that it does not matter
how a tax is levied?

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Economic theory tells us tax incidence does not depend


on who is actually taxed
This assumes consumers treat a dollar of taxation in the
same manner as they treat a dollar of product price
Chetty et al. (2009) show this may not always be true.
Consider the differences between sales taxes and excise
taxes
Sales taxes are usually assessed as a percentage of the retail
price of a good or service, and is added at the point of sale;
determining the total cost before purchasing requires calculation
by the consumer
Excise taxes are usually included in the observed retail price
(e.g., the tax on gasoline or alcohol)
R. Chetty, A.Loony, and K. Kroft. 2009. Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.American Economic Review, 99(4):
11451177.

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-49

Application

Is it really the case that it does not matter


how a tax is levied?
The authors examine this issue in two ways
Field experiment to determine how demand for household
items in a supermarket changes when sales taxes are included in
posted prices
Empirical study of state-level changes in excise and sales taxes
on alcohol between 1970 and 2003

Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Both approaches reveal that consumers underreact to


sales taxes relative to excise taxes (i.e., lower ED with
respect to sales taxes)
What does this imply for tax incidence?
How should taxes be structured?

What does this imply for economic theory?


Theory is constantly evolving to take into account evidence from
the field and laboratory
R.Chapter
Chetty, A. Loony,
andhighlights
K. Kroft. 2009. Salience
Taxation: Theory
and Evidence.American
Economic Review, 99(4):
17
someandrecent
advances
in behavioral
11451177.
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
economics

3-50

3.5 Subsidies

Subsidy a payment by the government to a buyer or seller of


a good or service
Subsidies are simply the opposite of a tax

Pb subsidy PS
Governments subsidize many products and production
processes
Producer subsidies ethanol production, research and development
Consumer subsidies education, public transportation

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-51

3.5 Subsidies

Figure 3.17 The Impact of a Producer Subsidy

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-52

Education Grants

figure it out

For years the government has subsidized higher education


through grants; consider the supply and demand for college
credit hours at a local private liberal arts college

QS = 1,000P 2500 , QD = 8,000 500P


where P is the price, in hundreds of dollars, and Q is the
number of credit hours per semester
The current equilibrium price is $700, and 4,500 credit
hours are taken per semester; suppose the government
subsidizes credit hours at a rate of $200 per hour

Answer the following questions:


1.What will happen to the price paid by students, the price
received by the college, and the number of credit hours
completed?
2.What is the cost of the subsidy to the government?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-53

figure it out

Education Grants

1. The first step is determining how the subsidy affects


prices
P subsidy P
b

In this problem,

Pb 2 PS

Supply andD demand are givenS by

Q 8, 000 500 Pb ; Q 1, 000 PS 2,500

And substituting
in for PS
S

Q 1, 000 Pb 2 2500 1, 000 Pb 500

Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-54

Education Grants

figure it out

The new producer price is given by

Pb 200 PS PS $766.7
And the quantity of credit hours taken (using demand
equation)
D

Q 8, 000 500 5.667 5,166.5

So, the price paid by consumers has decreased by about


$133, the price received by the college has increased by
about $67, and the number of credit hours consumed has
increased by about 667

Costdid
subsidy
Qthe
$200
667 $133, 400
2.How much
this cost
government?

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-55

3.6

Conclusion

Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e

3-56

You might also like