Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Demand to Analyze
Markets
Chapter Outline
3.1 Consumer and Producer
Surplus: Who Benefits in a
Market?
3.2 Price Regulations
3.3 Quantity Regulations
3.4 Taxes
3.5 Subsidies
3.6 Conclusion
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-1
Introduction
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-2
3.1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-3
3.1
Demand
choke price
Total consumer
A
surplus (CS)
B
C
D
Market price
E
D
2
1
0
apples (pounds)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-4
3.1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-5
3.1
Price ($/pound)
5
4
3.50
Seller V s
3
producer
2.50
surplus = $1.50
2
1.50
1
0
Z
X
Market price
V
Supply
choke price
1
Quantity of
apples (pounds)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-6
figure it out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-7
figure it out
48P = 144 P* = $3
And using the equation for demand,
QD = 124 18(3) = 70 = Q* = QS
2. The easiest way to calculate consumer and producer
surplus is with a graph; to do this, we must determine
two points for each curve
Equilibrium price/quantity
Choke prices (where QD /QS are equal to zero)
Why do we need only two points to plot the
demand/supply curves?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-8
figure it out
S
A
B
0.67
0
D
70
Quantity of cupcakes
dollars
(thousands)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-9
3.1
Price of cupcakes
(dollars)
P1
P2
B
C
F
G
D2
0
Q2
Q1
D1
Quantity of cupcakes
this market
(thousands)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-10
3.1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-11
figure it out
The weekly supply and demand for tires in a small town are
given as
3-12
figure it out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-13
figure it out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-14
figure it out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-15
3.1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-16
3.2 Price
Regulations
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-17
3.2 Price
Regulations
3-18
3.2Price Regulations
Price
($/pizza)
$20
14
A
B
10
8
5
D
F
z DWL = C + E
C
E
x
w
y
Transfer
of PS
to CS
6
Supply
Demand
10 12
20
Quantity of pizzas
(thousands)/month
Shortage
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-19
3.2 Price
Regulations
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-20
3.2Price Regulations
Price
($/per ton)
$1,000
Transfer
of CS to PS
A
x
B
500
D
F
S
y
Price floor
Consumer surplus before
A+B+C
Consumer surplus after
A
Producer surplus before
D+E+F
Producer surplus afterB + D + F
E
z
D
0
10
20
30
Quantity of peanuts
(millions of tons)
Surplus
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-21
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-22
3.3Quantity Regulations
S2
$125
Pquota = 100
z
B
P = 50
40
35
E
y
S1
D
F
500
(Quota)
1,500 Quantity of
tattoos/year
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-23
Application
The unintended consequences of
immigration quotas
In October, 2003, Congress reduced the annual
number of H-1B visas from 195,000 to 65,000
Targeted highly skilled workers
Quota had never been binding prior to policy change;
government began denying petitions in 2004
Requires a sponsoring U.S. company (a job offer); foreign
students who pursue a U.S. education have a better
chance of finding a sponsor
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-24
Application
The unintended consequences of
immigration quotas
Kato and Sparber (2013) examined whether this
new policy might have reduced the incentive for
highly qualified students to pursue an education in
the U.S.
Considered SAT scores submitted by foreign students
Used five countries as a control; Australia, Canada,
Chile, Mexico, and Singapore have special status, and
their students can obtain visas similar to H-1B without a
quota
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Key findings
Average SAT scores of applicants from foreign countries
affected by the H-1B quota dropped 10 20 points after
2003
Citation: T. Kato and C. Sparber. 2012. Quotas and Quality: the Effects of H-1B Visa Restrictions on the
Pool of Prospective Undergraduate Students from Abroad. Forthcoming in The Review of Economics and
Drop was driven by a reduction in top-quintile scores,
Statistics.
Copyright
2013 Worth Publishers,
All Rights for
Reserved
Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
implying the policy
reduced
incentive
high-quality
3-25
Price of a golf
round
Spriv
Stot
P1
Ptot
Qpriv
Q1
Qtot
Q1 + Qgov
Crowding out
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-26
3.4 Taxes
3-27
3.4Taxes
($/ticket)
$10
Pb = 8.30
P1 = 8.00
Ps = 7.80
6.67
0
Q1 = 4
Quantity of tickets
(100,000s)
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-28
3.4 Taxes
3.4 Taxes
PS CS $666,667
And total surplus
What happens after the tax?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-30
3.4 Taxes
Pb PS $0.50
3-31
3.4 Taxes
distortion
is
1
1
DWL Q1 Q2 Pb Ps 400,000 340,000 $0.50 $15,000
2
2
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-32
3.4 Taxes
Pb PS $1.00
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-33
3.4 Taxes
Consumer surplus CS
1
280,000 $10 $8.60 $196,000
2
1
PS 280,000 $7.60 $6.67 $130,200
and producer surplus
2
How much revenue has been generated by the tax?
Revenue 1.00Q2 $1.00 280,000 $280,000
And the associated deadweight
loss associated with this
tax
1 is
1
distortion
DWL Q1 Q2 Pb Ps 400,000 280,000 $1.00 $60,000
2
2
So, while the tax rate has doubled, deadweight loss has
quadrupled from $15,000 to $60,000, and tax revenues have
Copyright by
2013 Worth
Publishers, (from
All Rights Reserved
Microeconomics to
Goolsbee/Levitt/
Syverson 1/e
only increased
78.5%
$170,000
$280,000)
3-34
3.4 Taxes
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-35
figure it out
Soda Tax
QS = 50P 60 , QD = 12 8P
where P is the price per bottle, in dollars, and Q is in
millions of bottles per year
The current equilibrium price is $1.24, and 2.07 million
bottles are sold per year
3-36
figure it out
Soda Tax
In this problem,
Pb 2 PS
And substituting
in for PS
S
Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-37
figure it out
Soda Tax
In this problem,
Pb 2 PS
And substituting
in for PS
S
Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-38
Application
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Citation: Fisman, R. and S. Wei. 2004. Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Missing Imports in
China. The Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 471496.
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-39
Application
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Citation: Fisman, R. and S. Wei. 2004. Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Missing Imports in
China. The Journal of Political Economy 112(2): 471496.
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-40
3.4 Taxes
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-41
3.4Taxes
Figure 3.15 Tax Incidence
(a)
Price ($)
(b)
S2
S1
Pb
P1
Ps
Price ($)
Tax = Pb
Ps
S
Pb
P1
Ps
D1
D
Tax = Pb Ps
D2
0
Q2 Q1
Quantity
Q2 Q1
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
Quantity
3-42
3.4 Taxes
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-43
3.4 Taxes
Elastic demand with inelastic supply
S2
Wage
tax
S1
tax
Wb
W1
Ws
L2 L1
Quantity of labor
3-44
3.4 Taxes
E E
S
ES ED
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-45
3.4 Taxes
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-46
figure it out
Soda Tax
QS = 50P 60 , QD = 12 8P
Where P is the price per bottle, in dollars, and Q is in
millions of bottles per year
The current equilibrium price is $1.17, and 2.62 million
bottles are sold per year
3-47
figure it out
Soda Tax
1. The elasticity of demand and supply are
Q D P
1.17
E
D 8
3.75
P Q
2.62
D
Q
P
1.17
ES
S 50
22.33
P Q
2.62
85.6%
D
22.33 3.75
E E
Share born by seller
ED
ES ED
3.75
14.4%
22.33 3.75
3-48
Application
Is it really the case that it does not matter
how a tax is levied?
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-49
Application
Images: FreeDigitalPhotos.net
3-50
3.5 Subsidies
Pb subsidy PS
Governments subsidize many products and production
processes
Producer subsidies ethanol production, research and development
Consumer subsidies education, public transportation
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-51
3.5 Subsidies
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-52
Education Grants
figure it out
3-53
figure it out
Education Grants
In this problem,
Pb 2 PS
And substituting
in for PS
S
Equating 8,
supply
000 and
500demand,
Pb 1, 000and
Pb solving
500 for
Pb Pb$566.7
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-54
Education Grants
figure it out
Pb 200 PS PS $766.7
And the quantity of credit hours taken (using demand
equation)
D
Costdid
subsidy
Qthe
$200
667 $133, 400
2.How much
this cost
government?
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-55
3.6
Conclusion
Copyright 2013 Worth Publishers, All Rights Reserved Microeconomics Goolsbee/Levitt/ Syverson 1/e
3-56