Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WHY STUDY
ENGINEERING
ETHICS?
INTRODUCTION
What is Ethics?
Ethics is the study of the characteristics of morals.
Ethics also deals with the moral choices that are made
by each person in his or her relationship with other
persons.
ETHICS
Study of human morality
Determining values in human conduct
Deciding the right thing to do - based upon a
set of norms
In Engineering:
dealing with colleagues
dealing with clients
dealing with employees
dealing with users
dealing with public
ENGINEERING ETHICS
Engineering ethics is the study of moral values, issues
and decisions involved in engineering practice.
The moral values take many forms, including
responsibilities
ideal character traits
social policies
relationships desirable for individuals
corporation engaged in technological development.
ENGINEERING ETHICS
Teaching engineering ethics can achieve at least four
desirable outcomes:
increased ethical sensitivity
increased knowledge of relevant standards of conduct
improved ethical judgment
improved ethical will-power (i.e., a greater ability to act
ethically when one wants to).
ENGINEERING AS AN ETHICAL
PROFESSION
What is a Profession?
special expertise
shared moral values
dependent public
self-regulation
promote and protect right actions
The responsibility to be ethical
The right to be ethical
Values embedded in technology
Why Ethics?
Integral part of the success of your career
Integrity can be our most valuable asset,
Leads to trust in work relationships
Frees them from controls necessary
when trust doesnt exist
Quality products
Conservation of resources
Pride in work
Public safety
Timeliness
GOOD BUSINESS
UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR
Shoddy products
Waste, fraud, greed
Abuse of expertise
Guilt, fear
Lack of safety
Cutting corners
-poor design
-rushed testing
DISASTERS!
MORAL DILEMMAS
Moral dilemmas
A situation in which, whatever choice is
made, the agent commits a moral wrong.
1. Something morally
right
2. Something morally
wrong
Bad outcome
Good or better
outcome
Moral Dilemma
A woman was near death from a unique kind of
cancer. There is a drug that might save her. The drug
costs $4,000 per dosage. The sick woman's husband,
Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money
and tried every legal means, but he could only get
together about $2,000. He asked the doctor scientist
who discovered the drug for a discount or that he let
him pay later. But the doctor scientist refused.
Moral Dilemma
Should Heinz break into the laboratory to
steal the drug for his wife?
(Why or why not?)
Moral Stages
Kohlberg
Kohlberg proposed that moral reasoning,
which he thought to be the basis for ethical
behavior, develops through stages.
Moral Stages
Level 1: PRE-CONVENTIONAL
Level 2: CONVENTIONAL
Level 3: POST-CONVENTIONAL
Kohlbergs Stages
Level 1 (Pre-conventional)
Reasoners judge the morality of an action by its direct
consequences
Stage One: Obedience and Punishment
Stage Two: Individualism, Instrumentalism, and
Exchange
Heinz Dilemma
Stage One (obedience): Heinz should not
steal the medicine, because otherwise he will
be put in prison.
Pre-conventional level
Stage One (obedience orientation)
Individuals focus on the direct consequences
that their actions will have for themselves.
Pre-conventional Level
Stage Two (self-interest): Heinz should steal the
medicine, because he will be much happier if he saves
his wife, even if he will have to serve a prison sentence.
Kohlbergs Stages
Stage Two (self-interest orientation):
what's in it for me position. Right behavior is
defined by what is in one's own best interest.
Socrates Dilemma
From a level two perspective, Socrates
should not die because
Kohlbergs Stages
Level 2 (Conventional)
People who reason in a conventional way judge the morality of
actions by comparing these actions to social rules and expectations.
Stage Three: Interpersonal Concordance ("Good boy/girl")
Stage Four: Law and Order
Conventional level
Stage Three (conformity orientation)
Individuals seek approval from other people. They judge the
morality of actions by evaluating the consequences of these
actions for a person's relationships.
Socrates Dilemma
Socrates should die because
Conventional level
Stage Four (law-and-order mentality).
In stage four, individuals think it is important to obey the law
and conventions of society.
Kohlbergs Stages
Level 3 (Post-conventional)
(Most people do not reach this level of moral reasoning)
Stage Five: Human Rights
Stage Six: Universal Ethical Principles (Principled Conscience)
MORAL DILEMMA
Moral dilemmas often test our character and our commitment
to the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Some moral dilemmas are simply complicated decisions
which must be thoroughly evaluated before choosing a
course of action.
Other choices are genuine moral dilemmas which challenge
our ability to makes fair and just choices.
MORAL DILEMMA
Some people have hypothetical minds that like to debate
what is right and wrong.
Sometimes, however, what is right and wrong is not so clear,
as is the case in a moral dilemma.
LONG,SHORT TERM
CONSEQUENCES
Moral dilemmas can also be evaluated on the basis of their
short-term and long-term consequences.
If short-term consequences are overshadowed by longterm benefits, then moral dilemma can find its ethical
solution by pursuing an outcome which obtains the
greatest long-term benefit for the greatest number of
people.
MORAL DILEMMA
SCENARIOS
Debt to your Friend
What would you do?
There is a train that, is about to run over your own son, who
has been tied to its track.
It just so happens that you have only enough time to pull a
lever which will send the train down an alternate track saving
your son.
However, you see that, tied to the other track, is your best
friend, who recently saved your life and you have yet to
repay him for doing so.
SCENARIOS
Friendship
Right or wrong?
You have the responsibility of filling a position in his firm.
Your friend Paul has applied and is qualified, but someone
else seems even more qualified. You wants to give the job to
Paul, but you feels guilty, believing that you ought to be
impartial.
You gives the job to Paul. Was he right?
How to Respond to
an Ethical Dilemma
How to Handle
MORAL Dilemmas
Discuss the issues with a trusted friend or colleague.
Understand that listening to an additional opinion can provide
more insight. It can also help you focus on issues that you may
have overlooked.
Spend time thinking about the appropriate decision to make.
Avoid thinking about your decision in terms of right or wrong,
as this can make it easier to be trapped in your own thoughts.
RESOLVING AN
MORAL DILEMMA
Map out the best way to resolve the problem (e.g., who
should be contacted first if multiple parties are involved? Do
you need outside support? Do you need to talk to a
supervisor?).
Then consider who, if anyone, should know about the
problem (such as a work supervisor, friend, administrator or
colleague).