2 Well Design Process

Schlumberger Private
Well Design and DD

Process
Well Design Process
Without process
there is never
progress
Well design process

flowchart
Obtainspacial
data forfield
Datatransf erprocedure
Obtainlithology,
fractureand
porepressure
data
Input&
validatedata
sets
This phase of the

process is data
acquisitionand
v alidationf rom the
client. Theremust
be a record
maintainedof this
transf erto
Schlumberger
Input&
validatedata
sets
Cementing
Design
Select TOC f or
each hole
sectionf rom
LOF basis
CompletedWell
Design
DetermineTOTC
f orisolation
purposes
Cementing
programme
Get specialist
contractorto
f ormulate
recipes
Determine
v olumes pref lush,
spacerand
cements then
producepumping
schedule
Yes
Input&
validate
T&D, Casing Wear and

Hy draulic study OK?
No
Design
Casing
No
Pressure
containment? No
Yes
There must be design

standards f or:
Conductor
Surf aceCasing
IntermediateCasings
ProductionCasing
ProductionLiners
Yes
Trajectory
Design
Select bit and

system
combination
Bit/BHAstrategy
withdrillstring
DesignDrillstring
Yes
Select Hole
Sizes to
deliv erCasing
Design
Surf ace
CollisionRisk ?
No
Determineprof ile
constraints:
surf ace
reserv oir
wellborestability
Yes
No
No
Welllif e
considerations?
Drillstring
and BHA
DesignBHA
details togiv e
required DLS
Surv ey
Programme
Design
Trajectory
Design
Drilling
system
design
Can
betterSurv ey
Programme
remov erisk?
Conf irm
legislation
requirements
Are
all well positional
requirements
met?
Well Plan
WellPlots
Well drilling plan
DrillingFluid
Select MW
f rom pore
pressureand
wellborestability
MW and
Friction
Factors
DrillingFluid
programme
Obtainwell
requirements
Data validation
Obtainspacial
data forfield
Obtainwell
requirements
Input&
validatedata
sets
Input&
validatedata
sets
Input&
validate
Geodetics
Legacy
survey
validation
Offset
analysis
Well
Obtainlithology,
fractureand
porepressure
data
This phase of the

process is data
acquisitionand
v alidationf rom the
client. Theremust
be a record
maintainedof this
transf erto
Schlumberger
Validated
Good reporting is
essential
Life of project day 1 ->
onwards
1. Survey data
2. BHA
3. Casing strings
DONG
Well
Structure
DD4DONG
1000m Borehole
12.25" SMS
Cum. Len. (m)

5" 19.50 DPS, 10% Wear
124.61
5" HWDP (6 joints)
115.16
Crossover
60.30
BHA DESCRIPTION
ELEMENT
8" Collar (3 joints)
31.03
NM Stabilizer
25.55
Pow erPulse HF w /IWOB
24.02
OD (in)
ID (in)
MAX OD (in)
0.44
12.25
3.75
12.25
A962M5640XP (1.15 deg)
9.29
9.63
7.88
17.25
Float
0.91
9.50
2.81
9.50
9 1/2" NM pony
3.66
9.50
2.81
9.50
NM Stabilizer
1.52
9.50
2.81
12.00
Pow erPulse HF w /IWOB
8.20
9.50
6.25
9.68
NM Stabilizer
1.52
9.50
2.81
12.00
ARC-9
5.49
9.00
3.00
10.00
8" Collar (3 joints)
28.35
8.00
2.81
8.00
Crossover
0.91
8.00
2.81
8.00
5" HWDP (6 joints)
54.86
5.00
3.00
6.50
5" 19.50 DPS, 10% Wear
9.45
4.93
4.28
6.63
Bit to Direction & Inclination Sensor = 19.431 m
Insert Logo
Bit to Gamma Ray Sensor = 19.431 m

Bit to Resistivity Sensor = 27.7338 m
DRILLING OVERVIEW
NM Stabilizer
15.83
9 1/2" NM pony
14.30
Float
10.64
A962M5640XP (1.15 deg)
9.73
12 1/4 " PDC
0.44
Depth in:
850.00 m
Depth out:
3000.00 m
Inclination in:
40.00
To:
90.00
Direction in:
123.00
To:
156.00
Total Drilled
2150.00 m
Dogleg:
Quality Control
Created by: aoag
Checked by:
Date:
Date:
22/04/2004
ARC-9
59.38
LENGTH (m)
12 1/4 " PDC
Wellbore Geometry Report

Air (47.4m)
Water (59.2 m)
24.0in
200.0m
12.25in
2055.0m
13.375in
925.0m
Hole Profile
Hole Size
in
Air
Water
24
16
12.25
8.5
From
m
0.0
47.4
106.6
200.0
925.0
2055.0
To
m
47.4
106.6
200.0
925.0
2055.0
2136.0
Length
m
47.4
59.2
93.4
725.0
1130.0
81.0
Tubulars
Casing
String
20" Casing String
13 3/8" Casing String
9 5/8" Casing String
OD
in
20.0
13.375
9.625
ID
in
18.542
12.259
8.525
Lin Wt
kg/m
197.9
101.2
69.9
Grade
N80
N80
N80
From
m
0.0
0.0
0.0
To
m
200.0
925.0
2055.0
Length
m
200.0
925.0
2055.0
9.625in
2055.0m
Quality Control
8.5in
2136.0m
<-HOLE
DONG
DD4DONG
Structure
Well
1000m Borehole
WG 2d-30deg
CASING->
Created By: aoag
Date: 22-Apr-2004
Checked By:
Date:
16.0in
925.0m
Client:
Field:
Structure:
Well:
Borehole:
Geometry:
20.0in
200.0m
Data analysis
DONG
WELL
FIELD
Well
Magnetic Parameters
Model:
Surface Location
BGGM 2003
-200
STRUCTURE
DD4DONG
UTM Zone 31 on ED50 Datum
Structure
Miscellaneous
Dip:
70.479
Date:
April 23, 2004
Lat:
N56 38 29.200
Northing:
6280026.00 m
Grid Conv:
+1.94020055
Slot:
Slot
TVD Ref:
Rotary Table (47.40 m above MSL)
Mag Dec:
-1.122
FS:
49886.8 nT
Lon:
E5 19 21.081
Easting:
642434.00 m
Scale Fact:
0.9998487778
Plan:
Survey 2d 1400m 60az
Srvy Date:
April 23, 2004
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
1200
1200
1000
800
800
600
600
Survey 2d 1400m60az
400
400
200
200
ti
sb
kop
eoc
Tie-In
Target 1400
13.375
0
target
kop
-200
-200
9.625
-200
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
<<< W Scale = 1(cm):150(m) E >>>
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
Plan
Actual
Survey
data
Performan
ce data
kpi
td
90deg 2000mhorizontal 60az
1000
<<< S Scale = 1(cm):150(m) N >>>
Compare
3200
Survey T-plot
T-plot
T-plot
100
40
90
Prepare
39
70
degrees
degrees
60
50
38
40
Zoom into
30
37
20
10
0
36 0
700
Inclination
Azimuth
Dogleg severity
Tortuosity
500
800
1000
900
1500
Areas of interest
Areas for
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
improvement
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
measured depth (m)
measured depth (m)
inclination
inclination
actual inc
actual inc
80
Dogleg
T-plot
T-plot
8.0
300
Dogleg
7.0
deg/30
m
degrees/30m
degrees
5.0
200
Tortuosit
y
4.0
150
3.0
2.0
100
dls
tortuosity
actual tort
dls
actual
dl
1.0
50
0.0
-1.0 0
00
500
500
1000
1000
1500
1500
2000
2000
2500
2500
measureddepth
depth (m)
(m)
measured
10
3000
3000
3500
3500
4000
4500
5000
250
6.0
Casing design
Design
Casing
Wear
Pressure rating
Number of re-drills
Pressure
containment? No
Yes
Welllif e
considerations?
CWEAR 6.1
Yes
Trajectory
Design
11
No
Impact of sideloading on casing
There must be design

standards f or:
Conductor
Surf aceCasing
IntermediateCasings
ProductionCasing
ProductionLiners
CWEAR 6.2
12
Drill
Re-drill
Ream
Use to
validate
casing
design from
a wear view
point for life
of field
Well profile design
Selec t Hole
Sizes to
deliv erCasing
Design
A/C considerations
Formation
responses
Casing points
Target
Determineprof ile
cons traints:
s urf ace
reserv oir
wellbores tability
W ell Plan
WellPlots
Geological
driller
13
Make platform
spider
Plan exit
Trajectory
Design
Spider
-10
-8
10
-4
-2
10
crest 1
10
crest 2
inject 1
0
30
60
90
0 TVD
driller refresher
grab 2
-2
-4
-2
inject 2
-4
swd
-6
-6
-8
-8
-10
-10
grab 3
-12
-12
inject 3
-10
-8
-6
-4
inject 4
-2
10
<<< W Scale =1(cm):2(m) E >>>
14
Useful to plan exit

NOT a collision
avoidance tool
Equivalent to
Horizontal Plane
scanning
<<< S Scale =1(cm):2(m) N >>>
-6
grab 1
Travelling Cylinder
No rth
Travelling Cylinder Plot
Can scale from

PV/VS
grab1
120
90
60
30
0
driller refresher
inject 1
120
90
60
30
0
crest 2
120
90
60
30
0
inject 2
swinject
d 4
inject 3
grab2
All A/C done in

office
documented
grab3
15
Relative movement
diagram
Fixed reference N
Plot position of
drilling ref to the
plan
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Profile
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
Tie-In
100
200
100
200
KOP
300
300
400
400
500
EOC
600
600
EOC
700
700
EOC
TVD Scale = 1(cm):100(m)
EOC
800
800
EOC
13.375
900
EOC
EOC
EOC (C
urve-H
old)
13.375
13.375
13.375
900
EOC
1000
1000
EOC(Curve-Hold)
1100
EOC
1100
EOC(Curve-Hold)
1200
1200
1300
1300
EOC
1400
1400
EOC
1500
1500
1600
1600
EOC(Curve-Hold)
EOC(Curve-Hold)
1700
1700
9.625
9.625
9.625
9.625
Target
Target
1200
1200
Target
1200
1800
Target 1200
ivb-4
Jivb-3
td
td
td
1800
ivb-2ivb
td td
1900
1900
2000
2000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Vertical Section (m) Azim = 90, Scale = 1(cm):100(m) Origin = 0 N/-S, 0 E/-W
16
1400
1500
1600
Rig
geometry
Vertical
Slant
Build rates
Simple J
IVB
500
Considerati
ons
Surveying the wellbore

Surv ey
Programme
Design
Trajectory
Design
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Can
betterSurv ey
Programme
remov erisk?
Are
all well positional
requirements
met?
Drilling
Petrophysical
Goelogical
Well drilling plan
17
Surf ace
CollisionRisk ?
Links to anticollision
Links to well
profile
Done at lowest
cost to meet
objectives of:
Purpose of a survey
programme
26" Gyro Singleshots
250
500
17 1/2" MWD
750
1000
13 3/8" NSG
1250
Measured Depth
To a known degree
of certainty
1500
1750
Part 2
12 1/4" MWD
2000
Drilling
Petrophysics
Geology
2250
2500
2750
9 5/8" NSG
Hit targets
3000
8 1/2" MWD
Part 3
3250
Geology defined
3500
80
60
40
20
20
40
60
80
Ellipse of Uncertainty
18
Avoid other wells

Know where you
are
Part 1
Drilling fluid specification
The key to efficient mud design
DrillingFluid
Select MW
f rom pore
pressureand
wellborestability
Conf irm
legislation
requirements
MW and
Friction
Factors
DrillingFluid
programme
Our chemical experts will

formulate optimum fluids
for YOUR well!
Results. When???
19
Hydrostatic
T&D depends on:
Mud weight
Hydraulics depends
on:
Mud weight
Rheology
20
Buoyancy
Friction
Friction factor
determination
Cased hole
Open hole
Rotation (tangential)
Translation (axial)
Both !!! (reaming)
21
T&D depends on

Drilling system design

Bit selection
Drillstring
and BHA
Select bit and

sy stem
combination
Bit/BHAstrategy
withdrillstring
DesignBHA
details togiv e
required DLS
BHA selection
DesignDrillstring
22
Drilling
sy stem
design
Optimisation
What is it?
Yes
T&D, Casing Wear and

Hy draulic study OK?
Do all the design inputs give a

satisfactory set of outputs ?
Does the design deliver the
client requirement ?
Predict as best we can

Verify the prediction as we
drill
Continually update the plan
as we proceed to maintain
technical integrity
23
CompletedWell
Design
Happy ?
24
YES
NO
Have we
delivered
what we
said we
would
deliver ?
Directional Drilling Process

DD process
Good well
design
YES
Discuss well
objectives and
technical
proposal
Prespud ?
NO
Successful well
Tool order
EOWR
Lessons
learnt
Logistics of
tools and
personnel
YES
Wellsite
meeting
TD ?
NO
YES
Drill each
hole
section
Satifactory ?
25
NO
Review and
prepare remedial
action plan
Good Well Design

Optimised well design
26
Lowest possible DDI (combination of

MD, TVD and tortuosity)
Collision risk managed by application
of standards and procedures
Planned hole sections delivered
(casing design and directional plan
integrated)
Targets penetrated
Good Well Design

WELL
FIELD
petroleum 1
Magnetic Parameters
Model:
Surface Location
BGGM 2003
Dip:
Mag Dec:
78.238
-14.365
Date:
FS:
February 17, 2004

58299.0 nT
Lat:
Lon:
STRUCTURE
Competent Field
UTM Zone 55N - WGS84, Meters
N67 40 32.907
E145 59 13.790
Northing:
Easting:
-4500 -4000 -3500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000
7507071.45 m
457068.46 m
-500
beyond
Miscellaneous
Grid Conv:
Scale Fact:
-0.93693758
0.9996225547
500
Slot:
Plan:
1000
1500
beyond #1
polaris
2000
TVD Ref:
Srvy Date:
2500
Rotary Table (33.00 mabove Geoid @MSL)

February 17, 2004
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
-500
5000
EOC
conductor
4500
500
4000
1000
3500
1500
2000
3000
2000
2500
2500
2500
2000
3000
2000
1500
3500
5000
<<< S Scale = 1(cm):500(m) N >>>
4000
3500
3000
star
star
polaris
500
TVD Scale = 1(cm):500(m)
4500
tie-in
wellhead
msl
seabed
EOC
1000
1500
EOC
polaris
500
3500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
Vertical
1000 Section (m) Azim = 321, Scale = 1(cm):500(m) Origin = 0 N/-S, 0 E/-W
1000
500
500
EOC
0
EOC EOC
conductor
msl
wellhead
tie-in
seabed
-500
-500
-4500 -4000 -3500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000
3000
1500
-500
2500
star
-500
500
<<< W Scale = 1(cm):500(m) E >>>
27
6000
6500
-500
Good Well Design

Survey Programme
Collision avoidance
Good standards and procedures
Good ISCSWA tool error modeling
28
Cost effective
Avoid other wells with a degree of
certainty
Hit targets with a degree of certainty
Travelling Cylinder
Wel T
ic k
sT y
p e:
C alcu lati o
n M
e th
o d
:
MD o
n d
ril l1 p
1
No
rm al P
lan e
R in
g In
te rv
a l:
A zim
u th In
t erv al:
1 0
. ft
3 0
. d
e g
c ale :
S
1 IN
CH=
5 .0 ft
G rid
ru e
T
Ma
g
Nor th
Traveling Cylinder
drill 1 rte90ft
WELL
FIELD
well 1
Magnetic Parameters
Model:
BGGM 2003
Dip:
Mag Dec:
71.943
-4.947
Date:
FS:
August 29, 2003

50336.0 nT
STRUCTURE
my new test field
Surface Location
Lat:
N59 0 0.000
Lon:
W2 0 0.000
Northing:
Easting:
UTM Zone 30 on ED50 datum

6540632.58 m
Grid Conv: +0.85719051
557453.80 m
Scale Fact: 0.9996404567
Location 1
Miscellaneous
Slot:
Location 1 Slot#1
Plan:
drill 1 p1
TVD Ref:
Srvy Date:
Rotary Table (90.00 ft above MSL)

August 29, 2003
Legend
drill 2 p1
drill 3 definitive
drill 3 p1
drill 4 v1
Survey while drilling
drill 5 p1
drill 6 v1
998
390
290
190
90
4000
300
200
100
drill 2 p1
985
985
drill33definitive
p1
drill
390
290
190
90
3900
400
300
200
100
Survey while drilling
drill 6 v1
986
4000
300
200
100
drill 4 v1
998
drill 5 p1
996
Location 1 Slot#1
Thu 04:11 PM November 06, 2003
NoG oR egi onEO U' s bas ed on:

Or i en te dE OU Di mens ion
NoG oR egi onA nti -C oll is ion r ule
us ed: M inor Ri s k- Separ ati onFact or
G rid N
r th
o
To
tC o
r (M ->
G -5 .8
4 2)
0
M ag D
ec (-4 .9
4 7)
G rid C
n v
o
( +
.8 5
0
7 1
5 1)
0
9
29
Drawn By:
Date Created:
Checked By:
Checked Date:
Approved By:
Approved Date:
Current User
Thu 04:11 PM November 06, 2003
Pre-spud
30
Agree specific
deliverables
Present the
directional plan to the
drilling team
Inform affected 3rd
parties of the impact
of drilling
Discuss team
interfaces
Review the decision
Tool Ordering
DD Tool and Collar Order
Dumb iron
ordering
Inspection Level:
Rig Fax #:
Rig Phone #:
J ob Number
Client
Rig
Well Name
DSM
Cell Mgr.
Hole Size
Tool Size
Date of Order
Proposed ship date
Is this an Updated Order Y/N
Date of Former Order
Standard or Contingency BHA
M easured Depth
STANDARD / CONTINGENCY
BHT deg C
Survey Equipment
Qty:
Description:
Connections
lengths
Description
Connections
Length
O.D.
Uphole
P/B Dow nhole P/B
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
10
Item
Description
Connections
Length
O.D.
Description
Bored
for
P/B Dow nhole P/B Float?
Connections
Body
Gauge
Uphole
P/B Dow nhole P/B
Shortcode Keys
NM =NON MAG
IB =INTEGRAL BLADE
11
String
Near-bit
Range of ODd
needed
Reamers
Uphole
33
Stabilisers
Stabilizers
Subs/Other
Item
WB =WELDED BLADE
12
Gauge Key
13
A= 0"
e.g. 12E = 12 1/4"

E=
1/4"
14
B= 1/16"
F=
5/16"
J = 9/16"
N= 13/16"
15
C= 1/8"
G=
3/8"
K= 5/8"
O= 7/8"
16
D= 3/16"
H=
7/16"
L= 11/16"
I=
1/2"
M = 3/4"
P = 15/16"
17
18
Notes
For any non Anadrill Equipment. eg VGS, J ars, etc. State Vendor
and w hether R&M or DSM is ordering in comments below .
Lengths
Include a +(plus) or - (minus) sign to indicate whether longer or
shorter than requested lengths are acceptable.
Attempts w ill be made to provide as close as requested.
Cell Manager / FSM comments:

Date:
FEEDBACK : SHOP to CM / FSM:

Date:
Signature
Cell Manager
31
DSM
R&M
Collars
Item
Collars
X-over
Float
Rig E-Mail:
Tool Ordering
MUD MOTORS Tool Order
Motor
requirements
Inspection Level:
Rig Fax #:
Rig Phone #:
J ob Number
Date of Order
Client
Proposed ship date

Rig
DSM
Cell Mgr.
Hole Size
Exact Mud Name/Type
Planned Flow Vertical Depth

Inclination
Coupon Test Done Y/N
Azimuth
Mud Weight (ppg)
Low Pressure Bearing
POWERFIT DATA
YES
NO
Viscosity
Temperature (DegC)
Pow erfit Information to be entered by Directional Driller in Units Stated

Expected M otor Differential P ressure (P si)
TVD (Ft)
Bottom Hole Circulating Temperature (Deg C)
MUD MOTORS
Qty
Tool
BIT
Adjustable
OD
Conn.
Bend
Bend
Setting
Housing
Szr
Power Section
Type
Size
Lobes
Type
Rotor
Catcher
Nozzle
Size
String
Required Fit
1
1
1
1
1
1
Qty
OTHERS
Description
Qty
Description

Date:
ORDERS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED UNLESS THE POWERFIT REQUIREMENT IS ATTACHED!
MOTOR SHOP Return Comments :
Date :
Signature
Cell Manager
32
DSM
Name/Signature :
R&M
Serial No.
Connection @ 70oF shop temp. (Tech to enter)
Stator / Rotor
combination
# power stages
Mud details
Flow-rate range
BHST / BHCT
Differential
pressure
Range of
adjustable bend
Stabilizer spec
Rig E-Mail:
Tool Ordering
RSS Tool and Collar Order
RSS
Inspection Level:
Rig Fax #:
Rig Phone #:
J ob Number
Client
Rig
DSM
Cell Mgr.
Hole Size
Tool Size
Planned flow String Conn.
Inclination
Azimuth
Version of RSS
Hole size
Stabilizer
Flex joint
Flow-rate range
Bit pressure drop
Tool mapping
Date of Order
Proposed ship date
M easured Depth
TSIM Available on Rig?
NAME
CONTROL
B HT deg C
Vertical Depth
Viscosity
Exact M ud type
M ud Density ppg
Personality cable / wand on Rig?
CONTROL EXTENSION
COLLAR
UNIT
SUB
Ideal Version on Rig?
BIAS
EXTENDER
FLEX
UNIT
EXT-F
COLLAR
EXTENDER Receiver
EXT-M
Receiver
EXTENDER
SUB
EXT-M
S/N
CONNECTION
QTY
S/N
S/N
S/N
QTY
STABILISERSTABILISER REGULAR / BORED FOR

P ROFILE
SIZE
SHORT HOP
FLOAT
MELON
N/A
N/A
N/A
MELON
N/A
N/A
N/A
MELON
N/A
N/A
N/A
NAME
S/N
CONNECTION
S/N
FLOAT
VALVE
SERI AL
VALVE
FITTED
NUMBER
CONNECTION
S/N
CONNECT ION
SUBS
NAME
S/N
S/N
S/N
S/N
S/N
S/N
S/N
S/N
SLI NGS
BASKET
S/N TO BE FILLED IN BY SHOP PERSONNEL
General
Collar inspection reports
Flow Restrictor Required?
3 or 4 pulses
Nonmag subs essential
Electronic Map Attached
Magnetic or Gravitational
Is Be Cu forbidden
Phase Shift required
90
Stress relief grooves
Digit Time
60
Borebacks
Initial Setting ( Degrees )
3ft Min sub length
Initial Setting ( Percentage )

Date:
FEEDBACK : SHOP to CM / FSM:

Date:
33
Rig E-Mail:
Tool Logistics
Truck arrives when tools are ready
Send the right tools
Send the right number of tools
Ship to rig in time
Be prepared for re-supply
Get them back in time
R&M turn around
34
Rig Meeting
35
Not a meeting to redesign

Informative meeting
with all parties
Discuss rig floor
handling
Discuss drilling
techniques
Reaffirm pre-spud
decisions
Drill hole sections

Spud
Collision avoidance, surveying
Hole opening
Air (33.0m)
Water (123.0 m)
32.0in
306.0m
23.0in
716.0m
26.0in
306.0m
18.625in
716.0m
Surface
Intermediate
16.0in
3090.0m
Wellbore stability
ROP, hole cleaning
13.375in
3090.0m
Production 1
Wellbore stability
ROP, hole cleaning
Production 2 - target
Formation damage
ROP, hole cleaning
12.25in
7213.0m
36
8.5in
7548.0m
<-HOLE
9.625in
7213.0m
7.0in
7548.0m
CASING->
Collision avoidance
EOWR
37
Factual report of activities

Analysis of performance
vs objectives
Details of all lessons
learnt
Details of updates
required for formal
documentation
38
End of module

2 Well Design Process

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2 Well Design Process

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schlumberger Private

Well Design and DD

Well Design Process

Well design process

This phase of the

T&D, Casing Wear and

There must be design

Select bit and

Well drilling plan

This phase of the

Cum. Len. (m)

5" HWDP (6 joints)

8" Collar (3 joints)

Pow erPulse HF w /IWOB

A962M5640XP (1.15 deg)

Pow erPulse HF w /IWOB

8" Collar (3 joints)

5" HWDP (6 joints)

5" 19.50 DPS, 10% Wear

Bit to Direction & Inclination Sensor = 19.431 m

Bit to Gamma Ray Sensor = 19.431 m

A962M5640XP (1.15 deg)

12 1/4 " PDC

12 1/4 " PDC

Wellbore Geometry Report

Created By: aoag

April 23, 2004

Rotary Table (47.40 m above MSL)

Survey 2d 1400m 60az

April 23, 2004

<<< W Scale = 1(cm):150(m) E >>>

90deg 2000mhorizontal 60az

<<< S Scale = 1(cm):150(m) N >>>

Impact of sideloading on casing

There must be design

Well profile design

<<< W Scale =1(cm):2(m) E >>>

Useful to plan exit

<<< S Scale =1(cm):2(m) N >>>

Travelling Cylinder Plot

Can scale from

All A/C done in

TVD Scale = 1(cm):100(m)

Surveying the wellbore

Well drilling plan

26" Gyro Singleshots

Avoid other wells

Drilling fluid specification

The key to efficient mud design

Our chemical experts will

Drilling system design

Select bit and

T&D, Casing Wear and

Do all the design inputs give a

Predict as best we can

Directional Drilling Process

Good Well Design

Lowest possible DDI (combination of

Good Well Design

February 17, 2004

-4500 -4000 -3500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000

Rotary Table (33.00 mabove Geoid @MSL)