OCCULTLY COMPOUND

PROPOSITIONS

1. Exclusive proposition

is an occultly
compound proposition in which the word
like only alone implies the entire
clause. Example: Only citizens are
voters.
2. Exceptive Proposition is an occultly
compound proposition in which the
subject term is restricted
in its
application by words such as except
save but. Example: None is safe
except.
3. Inceptive
proposition express the
beginning of a thing, action or state.

4. Reduplicative proposition is an occultly

compound proposition that expresses the
special aspect of the subject by reason of
which the predicate belongs to it. It deals
this by words such as as as much in
as much as
5. Cooperative proposition is an occultly
compound proposition in which we inspire
the way an attribute is present in one
subject with the way it is present of
another. Example:
John is bigger then
Peter; the size of John is greater than the
size of Peter

Legal Logic: Practical

Reasoning

The basic elements may be defined

roughly as follows:

CLAIM is a statement or proposition

that the arguer wants the audience to
accept
DATA is the statement or reason put
forward by the arguer to get the
audience to accept the claim

WARRANT when the arguer relates the

data to the claim, a relationship
between the two is asserted or
assumed. The warrant is the inference
rule that authorizes this relationship.
(warrant are best thought of as
conditional statement inifthen form.
BACKING the principles of the field at
stake in the argument from which the
warrant is abstracted or drawn.

Legal reasoning:
Issue- what specifically is being debated
Rule- what legal rule governs the issue.
Facts- what are the facts relevant to the
rule
Analysis- apply the rule to the facts
Conclusion- having applied the rule to the
facts, what is the outcome.

Warrant Rule

A lawyer , a judge or whomever has to say what a

rule is and where it comes from. The Rule says It
is unlawful to treat someone in a manner that
negatively affect the terms and conditions of
employment, if the affected
person
is in a
protected class and it treated differently from a
similar situated person not in her protected class.
Each of the logical pieces you can break it into are
called the elements of the rule. So, you could say
the elements of discrimination are: A. having the
terms and conditions of employment affected; B.
being in a protected class; C. being treated
differently from a similarly situated person. Cite the
Rule warrant and backing

Ground Fact
We need to know if the boss behavior
affected a terms or conditions or
employment; If the Potential client is in a
protected class; if there are similarly
situated employees and if they have been
treated in t e same manner or differently. The
fact that ought to be relevant are: A. She is a
woman; B. She has not received a raise or
promotion in the 10 years she worked for this
supervisor C. There are men who report to the
same supervisor; and D. No man has worked
for the supervisors has gone 10 years without

Analyze Consider Qualifiers and

Rebuttals
A.Female being a woman means she is part
of the protected class
B.Not receiving a raise
or promotion is
affecting
the terms and condition of
employment
C.There are men working for the same
supervisor, so there are similarly situated
persons who are not in her protected class
D.These men did not go without raise and
promotion, as they were treated differently.
E.Conclusion Claim All elements of the rule
are met ad concluded that her boss engaged

AL REASONING

ND LOGIC: JUSTIFICATION AND DISCOVERY

cal reason is what goes into such everyday decision we mak

ether to Take the car to school or to commute. Many times it
asoning that goes into refraining from lying to ones client.
s sense, practical reason is action oriented