Alumni Tracer System with

Decision Support for

Universidad De Manila
Michelle Anne L. Constantino
Proponent

Acknowledgements
O The proponents family
O FEU family colleagues, students,

friends and teaching associates

O Dr. Ace Lagman the proponents
capstone project mentor
O Engr. Elmerito D. Pineda College of
Engineering and Technology Adviser and
Universidad De Manila for the support
O Mr. Simon M. Ogbac

Statement of the
Problem
O What is the profile of the respondents according to

group category?
O What are the current problems in tracking the alumni
of Universidad De Manila?
O What is the development model suitable in designing
and developing the system?
O How does the curriculum of the course taken affect
the track or career choice of the graduate of the
college?
O How does training experience and opportunities
shape their point of view with their respective careers
or the jobs they have undertaken at the moment?

Statement of the
Problem
O How can their career experiences be of help towards

themselves and the direction of what the university will

undertake towards the goal of improving what is within
the institution
O How can the school extend to the graduate with
programs depending on their education and training
experiences?
O How can data driven decision support help
administrators analyze the data delivered by the alumni
through the use of the system?
O Is there any significant difference on the level of
effectiveness within the assessment of the respondents
on the proposed system when grouped according to
category?

General Objective
O To design and develop Alumni Tracer

System with Decision Support for

Universidad De Manila as a facility to
engage communication, network and
promotion by the university and as a
way to monitor their students after
graduation.

Specific Objectives
O To determine the inadequacies, problems and

concerns existing in tracking graduates from

Universidad De Manila.
O To develop the system which had the following
system modules:
O Alumni Profile and Directory
O Alumni News and Engagements
O Alumni Job Corner
O Alumni Tracer
O Report Generation
O Module for Feedback on Curriculum Development

Specific Objectives
O To be able to determine the impact of the

curriculum to which the graduate has finished

within the university.
O To be able to use the training experiences and
opportunities of the graduates in looking at the
curriculum of the institution and devising
programs to benefit perspective and current
students of the University.
O To be able to extend the presence of the
university to the programs that can be extended
to the graduates depending on their career and
training opportunities.

Walk-through the
System

Activate Account

Forgot Password

Alumni Tracer Study

Data Driven Decision

Support
O Data Driven Decision Support is

something that emphasizes access

to and manipulation of a time-series
of internal company data and
sometimes external data.
O It can either be an OLAP which
provides the highest level of
functionality
O Or an EIS or a GDSS.

Data Driven: Executive

Information System
O EIS are computerized systems intended

to provide current and appropriate

information to support executive
decision making for managers using a
networked workstation.
O The emphasis is on graphical displays
and an easy to use interface that
present information from the corporate
database.

# of Respondents per Course

# of Employed Respondents
per Course

Questionnaire Report

Questionnaire Report

Questionnaire Report

Outstanding Alumni based on

Annual Salary parameter

Profile of the
Respondents
Respondent

Percentage (%)

Students

50

83%

Professionals

10

17%

Total

60

100%

Summary of the Proponents

Assessment according to Functionality

Students

Professionals

Interpret

Areas

The
The systems
systems
essential
essential modules
modules
function
function properly
properly
The systems
requirements is
essential to the
alumni
The
The system
system is
is
considered
considered suitable
suitable
for
for the
the conduct
conduct of
of
alumni
alumni tracing
tracing
The system supports
The system supports
evaluation for its
evaluation for its
performance.
performance.

The
The system
system provides
provides
accurate
accurate results.
results.
Composite Mean

Average

Interpret

E
E

Interpret

4.9
4.9

E
E

4.9
4.9

E
E

4.72

4.2

VG

4.46

VG

4.7
4.7

E
E

4.6
4.6

E
E

4.65
4.65

E
E

4.62
4.62

E
E

4.1
4.1

VG
VG

VG
VG

4.66
4.66

E
E

4.4
4.4

VG
VG

4.53
4.53

E
E

4.72

4.44

VG

4.58

4.9
4.9

4.36
4.36

Summary of the Proponents

Assessment according to Usability

Students

Professionals

Average

Areas
X

The system is considered as userfriendly

The systems interface is relevant

to the institution

There is consistency with the user

interface of the system.

The system functions can be easily

understood as it is presented.

Interpret

Interpret

Interpret

4.84

4.6

4.72

4.62

4.5

VG

4.56

4.52

4.6

4.56

4.82

4.3

VG

4.56

The system may be working from

one environment to another.

4.66

4.1

VG

4.35

VG

Composite Mean

4.69

4.42

VG

4.58

Summary of the Proponents

Assessment according to Reliability

Students

Professionals

Average

Areas
Interpret

The system does not show signs

of error or failure within the
testing.

Interpret

4.38

VG

3.9

VG

4.14

VG

4.46

VG

4.40

VG

4.43

VG

4.7

4.3

VG

4.5

4.32

VG

3.9

VG

4.11

VG

The system gives accurate results

of data based on the user input.

The system is able to show

validation from a wrong user
input.
The system can withstand
simultaneous usage from multiple
users.

Interpret

The system can be tested without

bugs and with complete
functionalities.
Composite Mean

4.49

4.6

4.0

VG

4.3

VG

VG

4.10

VG

4.30

VG

Summary of the Proponents

Assessment according to Performance

Students

Professio

Inter

nals
Inte

Areas

The system
runs in a way
that is
acceptable to
the user.
The system
exudes fast
response time
to the user.

pret

rpr

4.84

4.4

4.28

The system is

able to run
without the use 4.34
of too much
resources.
The system has

been able to do
what it is
4.44
supposed to do
with a
reasonable
amount of time.
The system can

handle errors
within the
4.44
input.
Composite
4.47
Mean

et

Average
Interpr

et

VG

4.62

VG

3.9

VG

4.09

VG

VG

4.2

VG

4.27

VG

VG

4.3

VG

4.35

VG

VG

3.8

VG

4.12

VG

VG

4.12

VG

4.30

VG