Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Whole foods is the world leading natural
Cont
Having 264 stores in US, 6 in Canada and 5
stores in UK
A third of its existing square footage derived
from acquisition
World foods have 50,000 employees with $
6.6 Billion of revenues
Head Quarter is in Austin, Texas, Current
CEO is John Mackey
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Opportunities
Brand Recognition
Good Quality
Huge selection/variety
Positive Employee Environment
Large, customized stores
No. 16 on Fortunes Worlds
through media
Emphasis on organic farming
Expansion
Consumer Health Benefits
Weaknesses
Concentrated just on US
market
Relative Slow Growth
Limited number of suppliers
Advertising Budget is very low
Threats
Supermarkets introducing
organic products
Increasing inflation
Low spend per trip due to
higher prices
Weight
Rating
Weighted
Score
Strengths
0.12
0.15
0.10
0.08
0.10
4
4
4
3
4
0.48
0.60
0.40
0.24
0.40
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.05
0.10
0.10
1
2
1
2
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.20
Total
1.00
Brand Recognition
Good Quality
Huge selection/variety
Positive Employee Environment
Large, customized stores
No. 16 on Fortunes Worlds Most Admired
Companies list
Weaknesses
2.82
Weight
Rating
Weighted
Score
Opportunity
0.25
0.20
0.15
4
2
3
1.0
0.40
0.45
0.15
0.15
0.10
4
3
2
0.60
0.45
0.20
Total
1.00
Expansion
Consumer Health Benefits through media
Emphasis on organic farming
Threat
3.10
Interpretation (EFE)
Matrix
The EFE total score is 3.10 which is above the
average score of 2.5, indicate that the
company is replying in an excellent way to
current possibilities and risks in its industry. In
other terms, the company's techniques
successfully take advantage of current
opportunities and reduce the negative effects
of exterior risks.
CPM
(COMPETITIVE PROFILE
MATRIX)
CPM
Critical success factor
weight
Trader Joe's
Rating
Score
Rating
Score
Brand Recognition
0.20
0.80
0.80
Product Quality
0.13
0.52
0.52
Management
0.10
0.20
0.40
Price Competitiveness
0.15
0.30
0.45
Financial Position
0.15
0.30
0.45
Customer Loyalty
0.15
0.45
0.60
Global Expansion
0.12
0.24
0.24
Total
1.0
2.81
3.46
Interpretation (CPM)
The Competitive Factor Evaluation Matrix
reveals that Whole foods is only partially
positioned against its competitor Trader Joes.
Shoppers spent only few dollars at Whole
Foods while shopper spent more dollars in
nearest competitor because whole foods
prices are high. They have to provide high
quality on low cost and fresh foods in order to
maintain its profitability.
Problems
Minor Problems
Expand into smaller area where
Major Problem
Decision Making
Alternative Strategies
Strengths - S
TOWS
MATRIX
Opportunities O
1. Expansion
2. Emphasis on organic
farming
3. Consumer Health
Benefits through
media
Threats T
1. Supermarkets
introducing organic
products
2. Increasing inflation
3. Low spend per trip
due to higher prices
1.
2.
3.
4.
Brand Recognition
Good Quality
Huge selection/variety
Positive Employee
Environment
5. Large customized stores
6. No. 16 on Fortunes
Worlds Most Admired
Companies list
Weakness W
1. Concentrated in US
2. Relative Slow Growth
3. Limited number of
suppliers
4. Advertising Budget is
very low
SO strategies
WO strategies
(S1,O1)
(S2.O3)
(W2,O1)
(W3,O2)
ST strategies
WT strategies
(S1,S5,T1)
(W1,T1)
(W3,T3)
Interpretation
(S1,O1): Whole foods have to expand their market. Its an opportunity for
them because their brand is highly recognized if they enter into another
market it will be beneficial( Market development)
(W2,O1): Whole foods have the opportunity to enter into another market by
doing this they can overcome their weakness (Market Development)
(S1,S5,T1): Whole foods have recognized products and large number of
stores in US they have to advertise their products in different ways to
attract their customers. They should announce shopping incentives. Threat
will be overcome by doing this. (Market penetration)
(W1,T1): Whole foods can overcome its weakness and threat by expanding
its Market from US to other Markets.( Market Development)
Return on Investment
leverage
Liquidity
Earning per share
Total
Average
+3
+2
+2
+3
+10
+2.5
Total
Average
Total
Average
-3
-4
-3
-10
-3.3
-11
-2.75
Growth Potential
Profit Potential
Financial Stability
Productivity, capacity utilization
+3
+3
+2
+4
Total
Average
+12
+3
F
+ S
7
Conservativ
e
Aggressiv
e
+
6
X-axis =CA + IS
+
5
=
-2.75+(3)
+
4
CA
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
+
3
-2
+
-1
2
-2
+
1-3
-4
= 0.25
-1
+1
+6
+2
+7
+3
+5
IS
Y-axis = FS + ES
= 2.5+(3.3)
=-0.8
-5
-6
Defensive
Competiti
ve
-7
E
Interpretation
According to the space matrix score HP falls in
IE
(INTERNAL-EXTERNAL
MATRIX)
Strong 3.0
4.0
3.0
Average 2.0
2.99
2.0
Weak 1.0
1.99
ii
iii
iv
vi
vii
viii
ix
High
3.0 4.0
3.0
Medium
2.0 2.99
2.0
Low
1.0 1.99
1.0
Interpretation
Whole foods falls in first region of IE matrix
Market penetration
QSPM
(QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC
PLANNING MATRIX)
Strengths
Market
Development
Market
Penetration
Weight
AS
TAS
AS
TAS
Brand Recognition
.12
.24
.48
Good Quality
.15
.30
.45
Huge selection/variety
.10
.20
.30
.08
.10
.40
.20
.05
.10
.10
.15
.45
.60
Slow Growth
.10
.10
.30
.15
.30
.15
Weaknesses
Total weight
1.00
Market
Penetration
Opportunities
weight
AS
TAS
Market
Development
AS
TAS
Expansion
.25
.25
1.0
.20
.60
.20
.15
.30
.45
.15
.75
.60
Increasing inflation
.15
.15
.30
.10
.30
.10
Threats
Total weight
Total Attractive Score
1.00
4.44
5.23