Collaborative Group

Work:
Theory and Practice

Janet Batzli - Biology Core

Curriculum (Biocore)
David Gagnon - Academic Technology
/ GLS
Group
GOAL

Cooperation
GOAL

Collaboration
 Collaboration Activity
Timeline
David…not

ns
quite sure

io
we need

at
ge he

ct
this here.

ng
en t

pe

si
ll ing

I think you Ex

es
Ch ct

oc
could say
at
le

Pr
a

ic
Se

the line
un

p
ou
Fo below Te
mm

As

Gr
rm ac Work
Co

h s
es
during
in
g Co nt sm
titleGr ll e
slide. ou ab
p s o ra
ti
o
 A worthy
challenge
requires
everyone to
bring their best Schaffer, D. W. & Resnick, M.
Smith, K, Sheppard, S, Johnson, D
(1999). "Thick" authenticity: New
& Johnson, R (2005) Pedagogies of
media and authentic learning.
Engagement: Classroom – Based
Journal of Interactive Learning
Practices. Journal of
Research 10(2), 195-215
Engineering Education.
 Groups should be
interdependent

Mourtos, N. (1994). The Nuts and

Felder, R, Brent, R. (2001).
Bolts of Cooperative Learning in
Effective Strategies for
Engineering. Frontiers in
Cooperative Learning. Journal of
Education Conference
Cooperation and Collaboration in
College Teaching. 10(2), 69-75.
 Communicate
Expectations

Felder, R, Brent, R. (2001). Johnson, D, & Johnson, R. (1999).

Effective Strategies for Making Cooperative Learning Work.
Cooperative Learning. Journal of Theory Into Practice. 38(2). 67-
Cooperation and Collaboration in 73
College Teaching. 10(2), 69-75.
 Teach them how
to collaborate
Johnson, D & Johnson, R. (1990).
Social Skills for Effective Group
Work. Educational Leadership.
December 1989/January 1990. 29-
33.
Oakley, Hanna, Zuzmyn and Felder
(2007) Best Practices Involving
Teamwork in the Classroom:
Results From a Survey of 6435
Engineering Student Respondents
IEEE Transactions on Education,
50(3)
Criteria for Defining Collabora
Attendance and punctuality

Participation in discussion

Preparedness for meetings

Ability to listen to ideas/concerns of

others

Ability to cooperate and/or compromise

Fulfills assigned group role

(e.g recorder, facilitator, time keeper,
‘devil’s advocate’, reporter etc.)
 Se
le
ct
in
g

Fo
th

rm
e

in
g
Co Ch
mm al

Gr
un le

ou
ic ng

ps
at e
e

Te
ac
Ex

hi
pe

ng
ct
at

Co
io

ll
ns

ab
or
at
io
n
Gr
ou
p
Work

Pr
oc
es
Work Time

si
ng
As
se
ss
me
nt
GOAL: Defining Expectations for
Collaboration Criteria
 Reflection
improves
effectiveness
Smith, K, Sheppard, S, Johnson, D
& Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies
of Engagement: Classroom – Based
Practices. Journal of
Engineering Education.
Kozlowski et al. Enhancing the
Effectiveness of Work Groups and
Teams. Association for
Psychological Science (2006) vol.
7 (3)
 Work
David- Not Time
sure that
this is

ns
e
ng

io
le

necessary at
al

ng
ct
Ch

si
pe

here….

es
Ex
e
th

oc
e

Pr
at
g
in

I think that
ic

p
ct

ou
un

Tea
le

Fo

Gr
mm

rmthe first ch As
Se

Work
Co

in in se
g g ss
slide Gr
ou
of this
Co
ll
me
nt
will be ps fine. ab
or
at
io
n
 Assessment is
more than
grading
Keppell, M., Au, E., Ma, A., &
Chan, C. (2006). Peer Learning
and Learning-Oriented Assessment
in Technology Enhanced
Environments. Assessment and
Evaluation in Higher Education.
31(4), 453-464.
Slavin, R. (1996). Research on
Cooperative Learning and
Achievement: What We Know, What
We Need to Know. Contempory
Educational Psychology. 21, 43-
69.
Debrief