Development and

Validation of a
Worktext in
Advanced Statistics
Statement of the Problem
2. What is the level of acceptability of the
1. What in
worktext is terms
the validity
of: of the developed
worktext terms of:
a. objectives,
a. goals/objectives,
b. content organization,
b. procedure
c. sub-topics, and methodology,
d.
c. usefulness,
activities, and
e.
d. effectiveness,
evaluative exercise?
f. illustrations/diagrams, and
g. evaluative exercise?
Scope and Delimitations
The topics included in the worktextare based from the
course outline given by DepEd.
Experts in the field of statistics ascertained its content
validity.
Statistics teachers in Juan G. Macaraeg National High
Shool, Tayug National High School, Mangaldan
National High School and UrdanetaCity National High
School for teacher acceptability of the worktext, while
Special Science Class of JGMNHS students were
utilized for students’ acceptability.
 Methodology
Research Design
Subjects of the Study
Data Gathering Instrument

Data Gathering Procedure

Statistical Treatment
Research Design

BACK
Subjects of the Study
The topics included in the worktextare based from the
course outline given by DepEd.
Subjects of the Study
Experts in the field of statistics will ascertain its content
validity.
Subjects of the Study
Statistics teachers from Juan G. Macaraeg National
High Shool, Tayug National High School, Mangaldan
National High School and UrdanetaCity National High
School for teacher acceptability of the worktext, while
Special Science Class of JGMNHS students were
utilized for students’ acceptability.
 Data Gathering
Instrument

Course Outline in
Advanced Statistics

Checklist on Content Checklist on Acceptability Checklist on Acceptability

Validity (teacher-evaluator) (student-evaluator)
BACK
 Data Gathering
If
it
Procedure
is Revision of the worktext
va
lid
PLAN PHASE an
If DEVELOP PHASE
d
no
ac
t
ce
va
pt
lid
ab
no
le.
r
TRY-OUT PHASE ac VALIDATE PHASE
ce
pt
1.Following a format, each chapter
Content validity by five statistics experts. of
abthe worktextconsisted
Each the objectives,
chapter is considered
valid developmental
if all
Level
1.The aspects
ofcourse
acceptabilityactivities,
included
outline of
in Advanced
15 testchecklist
in SSC
the yourself andserved
le meet evaluative
the required
student-evaluators
Statistics as exercises
minimum
of JGMNHS.
the basis inThe worktext
2.After
rating completing
of 2.60 with
isidentifying
considered the the first draft
an interpretation
acceptable
topics in the of the worktext,
of valid
if allworktext.
aspects it was presented
included in the checklist meetto the
the required
Level adviser
minimum
2.Included and
rating critic
of acceptability reader.
by six statistics
the sub-topics
of 2.60 teacher-evaluators.
and objectives to be attained.The worktext
3.The Developed
second
is Production
considered
3.Determined draft
acceptable
of the
thefinal/Revised
was subjected
if all aspects
sequence
form ofofthe
the Validated
/worktext.
to the judgment
included inand
sub-topics Worktext
theofused
the panel
worktext members.
meet
technical the
details of
minimum rating of 2.60.
presentation of the worktext
Statistical Treatment
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS FOR CONTENT VALIDITY
Rating Interpretation
4.20 – 5.00 Very Highly Valid
3.40 – 4.19 Highly Valid
2.60 – 3.39 Valid
1.80 – 2.59 Lowly Valid
1.00 – 1.79 Not Valid
Statistical Treatment
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS FOR ACCEPTABILITY
Rating Interpretation
4.20 – 5.00 Very Highly Acceptable
3.40 – 4.19 Highly Acceptable
2.60 – 3.39 Acceptable
1.80 – 2.59 Lowly Acceptable
1.00 – 1.79 Not Acceptable
 ANALYSES OF DATA

Content Validity
by Experts
Level of Acceptability
a.By teacher-respondents
b.By student-respondents
Content Validity
Level of Acceptability
 Summary of Findings
Content Validity
Level of Acceptability
LevelThe of Acceptability
level of acceptability
content validity of each of each chapter
chapter of
of the
Based
the on the questionnaire
developed
developed worktext
worktext answered
to tothe by students, the level
the expert-respondents,
teacher evaluators,
ofwith
acceptability
respect
respect of each
toto chapter ofobjectives,
the developed
thethe objectives, worktext
content
sub-topics,
with regards to the objectives, content organizations,
organizations,
activities, and procedure
evaluative and
exercises methodology,
procedure and methodology, usefulness, effectiveness,
ranges from
usefulness,
highly valid
illustrations/ effectiveness,
drawings/diagrams, illustrations/drawings/
to very highly valid. The grand
and evaluative mean
exercises
isdiagrams,
ofverythehigh. and evaluative
evaluators’
The grand rating
mean ofexercises is very
istheequivalent
evaluators’ to high.
4.03
rating is
The
which
4.70 grand meantheofworktext
describe
which describe the worktext
the evaluators’ as rating
as “Highly“Very isHighly
Valid”.4.63
which describe the worktext as “Very Highly
Acceptable”.
Acceptable”.
 Conclusions
The chapters in the developed
worktext are highly valid.
The chapters in the developed
worktext are very highly
acceptable. In general, teachers
and students recognized the
appropriateness of the material.
 Recommendations

Teachers should be encouraged

to develop instructional materials
like the worktext, especially on
subjects where most students find
difficulty.
 Recommendations

Having found the validity is

high and acceptability of the
worktext is very high, the
researcher strongly
recommends the use of the
worktext.
 Recommendations
The development of learning
worktext in the other disciplines
is recommended with strict
compliance on the different steps
and processes in worktext
preparation, in order to achieve
the desired results.
 Recommendations

Further studies along this

line be conducted in other
institutions in the province are
recommended on other topics
and/or subjects.
THANK YOU