Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cost
Management
Prepared
Preparedby
by
Douglas
DouglasCloud
Cloud
Pepperdine
PepperdineUniversity
University
17-1
Objectives
Objectives
1. Define quality,
describe
thethis
four types of
After
studying
After
studying
this
quality cost.chapter,
chapter,you
you should
should
able
to:
2. Prepare a qualitybe
cost
report,
be
able
to: and explain its
use.
3. Explain why quality cost information is
needed and how it is used.
4. Describe and prepare three different types of
quality performance reports.
17-2
17-3
Distribution
Distribution of
of Color
Color Density
Density of
of
Sony
Sony Television
Television Sets
Sets
Sony of Tokyo TVs
Sony of San
Diego TVs
Lower
Specification
Limit
Target
Value
Upper
Specification
Limit
17-4
Measuring
Measuring the
the Costs
Costs of
of Quality
Quality
Prevention costs
Appraisal costs
Internal failure costs
External failure costs
17-5
Quality
Quality Cost
Cost Measurement
Measurement
Prevention Costs
Quality engineering
Quality training
Recruiting
Quality audits
Design reviews
Quality circles
Marketing research
Vendor certification
17-6
Quality
Quality Cost
Cost Measurement
Measurement
Internal Failure Costs
Scrap
Rework
Downtime (defect-related)
Reinspection
Retesting
Design changes
Repairs
Estimating
Estimating Hidden
Hidden Quality
Quality Costs
Costs
Hidden Quality Costs are
opportunity costs resulting from
poor quality.
The Multiplier Method
The Market Research Method
The Taguchi Quality Loss
Function
17-8
The
The Multiplier
Multiplier Method
Method
The multiplier method assumes that the total failure
cost is simply some multiple of measured failure
costs:
Total external failure cost = k(Measured external
failure costs)
where k is the multiplier effect
If k = 4, and the measured external failure costs are $3
million, then the actual external failure costs are estimated
to be $12 million.
17-9
The
The Market
Market Research
Research Method
Method
The market research method uses formal market research
methods to assess the effect of poor quality on sales and
market share.
Customer surveys and interviews with members of a
companys sales force can provide significant insights into
the magnitude of a companys hidden costs.
Market research results can be used to project future profit
losses attributable to poor quality.
17-10
The
The Taguchi
Taguchi Quality
Quality Loss
Loss Function
Function
The Taguchi loss function assumes
any variation from the target value of
a quality characteristic causes hidden
quality costs.
Furthermore, the hidden quality
costs increase quadratically as the
actual value deviates from the
target value.
17-11
The
The Taguchi
Taguchi Quality
Quality Loss
Loss Function
Function
L(y) = k(y T)
k = A proportionately constant dependent
upon the organizations external failure
cost structure
y = Actual value of quality characteristic
T = Target value of quality characteristic
L = Quality loss
17-12
The
The Taguchi
Taguchi Quality
Quality Loss
Loss Function
Function
$ Cost
Lower
Specification
Limit
Target
Value
Upper
Specification
Limit
17-13
y-T
-1
(y T)
1
k(y-T)
$ 2.00
8.00
16
32.00
-3
-3
18.00
30
$60.00
7.5
$15.00
Units
Average
17-14
Goates Company
Quality Cost Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2001
Quality Costs
Prevention costs:
Quality training
Reliability engineering
Appraisal costs:
Materials inspection
Product acceptance
Process acceptance
$10,000
65,000
$ 75,000
$ 5,000
20,000
75,000
100,000
% of Sales
1.50 %
2.00
Continued
Continued
17-15
Quality Costs
Internal failure costs:
Scrap
Rework
External failure costs:
Customer complaints
Warranty
Returns and allowances
Total quality costs
$150,000
100,000
$150,000
250,000
175,000
% of Sales
250,000
5.00 %
575,000
$1,000,000
11.50
20.00 %
17-16
Quality
Quality Cost
Cost Categories
Categories
8%
10%
External Failure
Prevention
Appraisal
Internal Failure
57%
25%
17-17
AQLQuality
AQLQuality Cost
Cost Graph
Graph
Cost
Failure
Control
0
Optimal
(AQL)
100%
Percent Defects
17-18
Zero-Defect
Zero-Defect Quality
Quality Cost
Cost Graph
Graph
Cost
Failure
Control
0
100%
Percent Defects
17-19
Strategy
Strategy Pricing
Pricing
Revenues (1,000,000 @ $20) $20,000,000
Cost of goods sold
-15,000,000
Operating expenses
- 3,000,000
Product-line income
$ 2,000,000
17-20
Strategy
Strategy Pricing
Pricing
Data from the low-level instruments are:
Quality costs (estimated):
Inspection of materials
$ 200,000
Scrap
800,000
Rejects
500,000
Rework
400,000
Product inspection
300,000
Warranty work
Total estimate
1,000,000
$3,200,000
17-21
$ 500,000
200,000
300,000
$1,000,000
ISO
ISO 9000
9000 Standards
Standards
ISO 8402: QualityVocabulary
ISO 9000: Quality management and quality assurance
standardsGuidelines for selection and use
ISO 9001: Quality systemsModel for quality assurance in
design/development, production, installation, and
servicing
ISO 9002: Quality systemsModel for quality assurance in
production and installation
ISO 9003: Quality systemsModel for quality assurance in
final inspection and test
ISO 9004: Quality management and quality system elements
Guidelines
17-23
Controlling
Controlling Quality
Quality Costs
Costs
Zero-defect standards
reflects a philosophy of total
quality control and calls for
products and services to be
produced and delivered that
meet the targeted value.
17-24
Types
Types of
of Quality
Quality
Performance
Performance Reports
Reports
1. Progress with respect to a current-period
standard or goal (an interim standard report)
2. The progress trend since the inception of the
quality-improvement program (a multipleperiod trend report)
3. Progress with respect to the long-range
standard or goal (a long-range report)
17-25
AMD, Inc.
Interim Standard Performance Report: Quality Costs
For the Year Ended June 30, 2004
Actual Costs
Prevention costs:
Quality training
Reliability engineering
Total prevention costs
Appraisal costs:
Materials inspection
Product acceptance
Process acceptance
Total appraisal costs
Budgeted Costs
Variance
$ 80,000
160,000
$240,000
$ 80,000
160,000
$240,000
$ 75,000
40,000
65,000
$180,000
$ 83,000
40,000
55,000
$178,000
$ 8,000 F
0
10,000 U
$ 2,000 U
Continued
Continued
0
0
0
17-26
AMD, Inc.
Interim Standard Performance Report: Quality Costs
For the Year Ended June 30, 2004
Actual Costs
Budgeted Costs
Variance
$ 50,000
100,000
$150,000
$ 44,000
96,500
$140,500
$ 6,000 U
3,500 U
$ 9,500 U
$ 65,000
78,000
87,000
$230,000
$800,000
10.0%
$ 65,000
68,500
79,000
$212,500
$771,000
9.64%
0
9,500 U
8,000 U
$17,500 U
$29,000 U
0.36% U
17-27
Multiple-Period
Multiple-Period Trend
Trend Report
Report
Quality Costs
Actual Sales
% of Sales
2000
$1,000,000
$5,000,000
2001
990,000
5,500,000
18.0
2002
900,000
6,000,000
15.0
2003
899,000
6,200,000
14.0
2004
800,000
8,000,000
10.0
20.0 %
17-28
Multiple-Period
Multiple-Period Trend
Trend Report
Report
Prevention
Appraisal
Internal
Failure
External
Failure
10.0 %
2000
2.0 %
2.0 %
6.0 %
2001
3.0
2.4
4.0
8.6
2002
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
2003
4.0
3.0
2.5
4.5
2004
4.1
2.4
2.0
1.5
17-29
Percentage of Sales
25
20
15
10
5
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
17-30
Percentage of Sales
Prevention
Appraisal
Internal Failure
Exteral Failure
17-31
Percentage of Sales
Exteral Failure
Internal Failure
Appraisal
Prevention
17-32
End of
Chapter
17-33
17-34