Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bandura's Theory Of
Self-Efficacy
This can be seen as the ability to persist and a person's ability to succeed with
a task. As an example, self-efficacy directly relates to how long someone will
stick to a workout regimen or a diet. High and low self-efficacy determine
whether or not someone will choose to take on a challenging task or "write it
off" as impossible.
Self-efficacy affects every area of human endeavor. By determining the
beliefs a person holds regarding his or her power to affect situations, it
strongly influences both the power a person actually has to face challenges
competently and the choices a person is most likely to make. These effects are
particularly apparent, and compelling, with regard to behaviors affecting
health.
Judge et al. (2002) argued the concepts of locus of control,
neuroticism, generalized self-efficacy (which differs from
Bandura's theory of self-efficacy) and self-esteem measured
the same, single factor and demonstrated them to be related
Bandura's Theory Of
Self-Efficacy
Verbal Persuasion
People can be led into believing that they can
cope successfully with what has overwhelmed
them in the past (by others or themselves).
Weaker than successful performance since
individuals do not have an authentic
experiential base to believe in their own selfefficacy.
Here, it is important not only to persuade one
of their efficacy, but to provide the conditions
which will facilitate effective performance.
Development of self-talk strategies.
Bandura's Theory Of
Self-Efficacy
Emotional/Physiological Arousal:
Physiological States - we judge our own self-efficacy by how
we perceive our anxiety level in different situations.
Anxiety, arousal, and avoidant behavior are largely coeffects
of perceived coping inefficacy. People avoid potentially
threatening situations and activities, not because they
experience anxiety arousal or anticipate they will be
anxious, but because they believe they will be unable to
cope successfully with situations they regard as risky.
Suggests: need to develop effective coping strategies stress reduction techniques (cognitive and physical), use of
various kinds of imagery, biofeedback, massage) - to
develop belief that one has arsenal of coping strategies.
Health promotion is defined as behavior motivated by the desire to increase well-being and actualize
human health potential. It is an approach to wellness.
On the other hand, health protection or illness prevention is described as behavior motivated desire
to actively avoid illness, detect it early, or maintain functioning within the constraints of illness.
Individual characteristics and experiences (prior related behavior and personal factors).
Behavior-specific cognitions and affect (perceived benefits of action, perceived barriers to action,
perceived self-efficacy, activity-related affect, interpersonal influences, and situational influences).
Behavioral outcomes (commitment to a plan of action, immediate competing demands and
preferences, and health-promoting behavior).
the
the
the
the
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
The Precede-Proceed model is a cost-benefit
evaluation framework proposed in 1974 by Dr.
Lawrence W. Green, that can help health program
planners, policy makers, and other evaluators
analyze situations and design health programs
efficiently.
It provides a comprehensive structure for assessing
health and quality of life needs, and for designing,
implementing, and evaluating health promotion and
other public health programs to meet those needs. [
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
One purpose and guiding principle of the PrecedeProceed model is to direct initial attention to
outcomes, rather than inputs. It guides planners
through a process that starts with desired outcomes
and then works backwards in the causal chain to
identify a mix of strategies for achieving those
objectives.
A fundamental assumption of the model is the
active participation of its intended audience that is,
that the participants ("consumers") will take an
active part in defining their own problems,
establishing their goals, and developing their
solutions.
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
In this framework, health behavior is
regarded as being influenced by both
individual and environmental factors, and
hence has two distinct parts.
First is an educational diagnosis PRECEDE, an acronym for Predisposing,
Reinforcing and Enabling Constructs in
Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation.
Second is an ecological diagnosis
PROCEED, for Policy, Regulatory, and
Organizational Constructs in Educational
and Environmental Development.
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
The model is multidimensional and is
founded in the social/behavioral
sciences, epidemiology, administration,
and education. The systematic
utilization of the framework in a series
of clinical and field trials confirmed the
utility and predictive validity of the
model as a planning tool (e.g. Green,
Levine, & Deeds).
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
The PRECEDE-PROCEED model is a participatory
model for creating successful community health
promotion and other public health interventions.
It is based on the premise that behavior change is
by and large voluntary, and that health programs
are more likely to be effective if they are planned
and evaluated with the active participation of
those people who will have to implement them,
and those who are affected by them.
that use the Precede-Proceed model as a
guideline.
Greens Precede-Proceed
Model
Thus health and other issues must be
looked at in the context of the
community. Interventions designed for
behavior change to help prevent injuries
and violence, improve heart-healthy
behaviuors, and those to improve and
increase scholarly productivity among
health education faculty[8] are among the
more than 1000 published applications
that have been developed or evaluated