You are on page 1of 17

Agreement I

Offer
BPP LAW
SCHOOL
BPP LAW
SCHOOL

Elements of a valid contract

Agreement - Offer + Acceptance


Intention to create legal relations
Consideration

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Definition of an Offer

An offer is an expression of willingness to


contract on specified terms made with the
intention that it is to become legally binding as
soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it
is addressed
Treitel

3
BPP LAW SCHOOL

Criteria for a valid Offer

A valid Offer must be:


1. clear and certain
Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] c.f.
Storer v Manchester City Council [1974]
2. communicated
and must :
3. show intention to enter into a legal relationship
(objectively ascertained)
4

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Distinguishing an Offer from an Invitation to Treat

Auctions (generally ITTs)


Payne v Cave (1789)
But without reserve auctions?
Barry v Davies [2000]

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Distinguishing an Offer from an Invitation to Treat


Invitations to Tender (generally ITTs) (industry)
Spencer v Harding (1870)
Case law exceptions
Blackpool &Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool BC [1990]
Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust Co. of Canada
[1985]

6
BPP LAW SCHOOL

Distinguishing an Offer from an Invitation to Treat


Advertisements (generally ITTs)
Partridge v Crittendon
But two exceptions:
i) Clear and certain adverts by manufacturers with
limitless supplies
Grainger v Gough
ii)
7

Unilateral Offers

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Exception to Adverts rule : Unilateral Offers

Definition of a Unilateral Offer?


An offer prescribing performance of a specified act as acceptance
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball [1893]
Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus Store (1957)
All offers must be clear and certain and show intention to be bound
John D.R. Leonard v Pepsico Inc. (US)1999

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Offers must be communicated


Communication may be
Written
Spoken
Conduct
Taylor v Laird 1856

BPP LAW SCHOOL

Termination of an offer
An offer remains open until it is terminated or accepted
Termination may occur by :
i) rejection
ii) revocation
iii) lapse

BPP LAW SCHOOL

10

Rejection of an Offer
Rejection by Counter Offer
An attempt to accept an offer on new terms
Terminates the original offer
Hyde v Wrench (1840)
Often leads to Battle of the Forms
Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O [1979]

BPP LAW SCHOOL

11

Requests for further information


Requests for information
mere enquiry
using tentative language
about a matter ancillary to the offer
do NOT terminate the offer
Stevenson Jacques v McLean (1880)

BPP LAW SCHOOL

12

Lapse of the offer


An Offer may lapse through:
Passage of Time:
Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v. Montefiore (1866)
Death as long as offeree is notified before
acceptance:
Bradbury v Morgan (1862)
Non-fulfillment of a condition:
Financings v Stimson [1962]
BPP LAW SCHOOL

13

Revocation
Rules of revocation
When
Any time before acceptance
Payne v Cave (1789)
How
Must be communicated to Offeree
Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)
Can be communicated by 3rd party
Dickinson v Dodds (1876)
But note Treitels critiscism

BPP LAW SCHOOL

14

Revocation of Unilateral Offer


When?
Before complete performance in principle
GNR v Witham (1873)
Equitable exception
Errington v Errington & Woods (1952)
Equitable exception further discussed
Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees Ltd [1978]
Revocation of unilateral offer in adverts?
The offer is to all the world
Revocation must be given equal notoriety
Shuey v USA (1875)
BPP LAW SCHOOL

15

Next Lecture

Agreement II - Acceptance

BPP LAW SCHOOL

16

BPP LAW SCHOOL

You might also like