Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Units of Expression
mg/g
ppm
%1
Units of Expression
(mg/L as CaCO3)
The
Ammonia,
Phosphates
expressed as mg/L as P.
atomic weight
EW
molecular weight
EW
10
11
Example 11.2
Answer:
Hardness = 141 mg/L
Alkalinity = 90 mg/L
12
13
14
Coagulation
15
Definitions
Coagulation
is
The
The
The
Flocculation
is
The
16
Colloidal Characteristics
10-8 10-7
Molecules
ions
1m
10-6 10-5
colloids
10-4
10-3
silt
10-2
10-1
sand
cm
Colloids
Have
17
Colloidal Characteristics
Coagulation Theory
F12 k
q1q2
q1q2
k
R2
(r1 r2 ) 2
19
Attractive
Energy/Force
Repulsive
Distance
20
Stabilization/Destabilization
1.
2.
Stabilization/Destabilization
Stabilization/Destabilization
3.
4.
25
Destabilization
Coagulation process
27
Coagulants
Ferric chloride
Lime [Ca(OH)2]
Aluminum salts are cheaper, but iron salts are more effective
over wider pH range (pH 4-9), and are more effective at
removing NOM.
The production of H+ will tend to depress the pH. So, the types
of hydrolysis products formed depend on the pH. Addition of
base to control the pH shift may be required.
29
Ferric Sulfate
31
Ferric Chloride
32
The
more
33
Synthetic Polymers
Three types:
34
Synthetic Polymers
35
pH Adjustment
Used
pH
pH
36
Coagulant
2.
Coagulant aids
3.
pH
4.
Alkalinity
5.
Temperature
6.
Time
7.
Velocity
8.
Zeta potential
37
Water Softening
38
Causes of Hardness
Water
calcium
ions
magnesium ions
Source
geological
formations
39
Types of Hardness
Carbonate
HCO3-
Noncarbonate
Total
Cl-, NO3-
40
Water Hardness
Disadvantages of hardness
excessive soap consumption during laundering
scale-formation in hot water heaters and pipes.
Hardness Ranges
Degree of Hardness
Soft
International
0 60
0 50
Moderate Soft
51 100
Slightly Hard
101 150
Moderately Hard
61 120
151 200
Hard
121 180
201 300
Very Hard
> 180
> 300
42
Softening
bacteria
remove
help
iron
Lime
lime
Quicklime
available
in granular form
contains minimum of 90% CaO
magnesium oxide is the primary impurity
Hydrated Lime
contains
44
CO2
Carbon
dioxide is:
gas
colorless
clear
produced
45
46
Reactions
From
Hardness?
Lime
Next,
Lime
Noncarbonate
Noncarbonate
of precipitation softening:
the
TDS
the
Disadvantage
of precipitation softening:
sodium
Recarbonation
49
Recarbonation Reactions
Recarbonation for removal of excess lime and pH control
(pH 9.5)
CO 2 Ca(OH) 2 CaCO 3 H 2 O
CO 2 Mg(OH) 2 MgCO 3 H 2 O
Recarbonation for pH control (pH 8.5)
CO 2 CaCO 3 H 2 O Ca(HCO 3 ) 2
50
Stoichiometric Requirement
Example
Solution:
The species concentration in meg/L is computed as
mg/L
100
meq/L
50 for CaCO 3
equivalent weight
2
The species concentration in mg/L of CaCO3 is calculated as
mg/L as CaCO 3 meq/L of species 50
mg/L of species 50
equivalent weight of species
52
Solution
MW
EW
Ca2+
40
Mg2+
Na+
HCO3-
Concentration
mg/L
meq/L
mg/L as CaCO3
20
82
200
24.3
12.2
33
2.7
135
23
23
14
0.6
30
Total: 7.3
365
61
61
280
4.6
230
Cl-
35.5
35.5
36
50
SO42-
96.1
48
82
1.7
85
Total: 7.3
65
53
Solution
The calcium equivalent should be placed first on the cationic scale and
be followed by magnesium and other divalent species and then by the
monovalent species sodium equivalent.
200
335
Ca2+
Mg2+
HCO30
Cl230
365
Na+
SO42-
280
365
54
Solution
55
Include
Excess-lime treatment
Split treatment
56
Excess-Lime Softening
57
Excess-Lime Softening
In excess-lime softening:
After
After
In
Water
If
In
Figure 11.13 Schematic flow diagram for a two-stage excess-lime softening plant.
59
Example 11.6
SO42- = 96 mg/L
b)
c)
60
Solution
Figure 11.14 Meq/L bar
graph.
(a) Bar graph and
hypothetical chemical
combinations in the raw
water.
(b) Bar graph of the water
after lime and soda ash
additions and settling but
before recarbonation.
(c) Bar graph of the water
after two-stage
recarbonation and final
filtration.
61
62
63
Example 11.7
64
Solution
Figure 11.16 Bar graph of the softened water after selective calcium removal.
65
66
67
Chemistry of Fe and Mn
Fe and Mn are abundant elements in the earths crust. They get into
natural water from dissolution of rocks and soil, from acid mine
drainage, and from corrosion of metals.
reduced
soluble
complexed
with NOM
When exposed to air, they are oxidized to ferric iron Fe3+ and
manganic manganese Mn4+, which are:
oxidized
stable
insoluble
68
Chemistry of Fe and Mn
69
Aeration-Filtration
Aeration-Chemical Oxidation-Sedimentation-Filtration
Water Softening
Greensand Filtration
70
Aeration-Filtration
71
Aeration-Chemical OxidationSedimentation-Filtration
72
Aeration-Chemical OxidationSedimentation-Filtration
The KMnO4 oxidation is many times faster than Cl2 for the
oxidation of Mn. Potassium permanganate oxidizes iron and
manganese at rates faster than dissolved oxygen and its
reaction is relatively pH independent.
Water Softening
75
Greensand Filtration
76
Greensand Filtration
Reaction Equations
Oxidation
Z MnO 2 Fe 2 Z Mn 2 O 3 Fe3
Z MnO 2 Mn 2 Z Mn 2 O 3 Mn 3
Regeneration
Z Mn 2 O 3 KMnO 4 Z MnO 2
78
Disinfection
79
Disinfection
Temperature
pH
Electrolytes
Interfering substances
80
Disinfection
Most
The
Disinfection Methods
Chlorine
Alternative
Ozone
Chlorine
dioxide
UV irradiation
High pH
Other halogens (iodine and bromine)
Reasons:
at low concentration
Cheap
Helpful
phenols
Forms
(most common)
hypochlorite
It
83
Chlorination Reaction
chlorine.
H+
Cl 2 H 2 O HOCl H Cl
The higher the pH, the higher the ionization, the less effective the
Cl2.
HOCl H OCl
So, ACID!!!
84
Figure 11.21
85
Chloramines
pH
86
Chlorination Reaction
Reaction
with organics
Reaction
Reaction
Chloroform (CHCl3)
Bromodichloromethane (CHCl2Br)
Dibromochloromethane (CHClBr2)
87
88
89
90
Completion of
chlorination
reactions
HOCl
C
Hump
Reducing
agents
A
No residual
Breakpoint or dip
92
Reactions in sequence:
Reducing agents
Ammonia
93
Breakpoint Chlorination
The
94
Chloramination
Often
Effective
[Cl2]:[NH3]
= 3-6.
95
Manual-Control Chlorinator
96
Automatic Proportional-Control
Chlorinator
97
Type
of residual chlorine
HOCl
Temperature
The
Normally
According
100
CT and CT Ratio
Dechlorination
Chlorinated
General characteristics
Has
H 2SO 3 H HSO
HSO 3 H SO 32
103
104
Preparation of ClO2
Cl 2 H 2 O HOCl HCl
HOCl HCl 2NaClO 2 2ClO 2 2NaCl H 2 O
ClO2
In
ClO2
107
(3) Ozone
109
Ozone Production
1.
2.
3.
4.
110
Ozonation Processes
Ozonation
3 parts:
Preparation
Production
of O3
Contaction
Ozonation System
Ozone Reactions
Alternatives of Ozonation
Various
Soozone
114
Advantages of Ozonation
When
compared to chlorination:
115
Disadvantages of Ozonation
High
cost of production.
Short-lived with almost no residual effect.
On-site production.
Oxidizes bromide ion (Br-) to bromate (BrO3-)
(difficult to remove), a DBP regulated at 10 g/L.
116
119
U-V Sterilizer
U-V Tube
120
Turbidity
TDS
Depth
122
123
124
salts
Metal ions (e.g., Fe, Mn, Pb, Cu, Zn)
Disinfectants
Organic compounds resulting from industrial activities
Sewage
125
in
Prevention
Preventing taste and odor-producing substances
from reaching surface water should be given
priority.
if
if
127
Treatment
Aeration
Oxidation
Activated
Carbon
128
Aeration
Addition
Rarely
(2) Oxidation
Oxidation
chlorine
chlorine
potassium
Ozone
130
Adsorption
What
Effects
is adsorption?
removal of species
Uses
removal of contaminants
Adsorption on AC
Adsorption on AC is the most effective treatment for the removal of taste and
odor from water.
Main treatment for the removal of tastes and odors, volatile organic
compounds, and synthetic (pesticides) organic chemicals.
The choice depends on the water quality and design of the plant.
132
Power is mixed with water to form slurry. Slurry is added to the water at
several points, starting from intake to the filter influent.
133
134
Fluoridation
135
Fluoridation
The US EPA has set the maximum contaminant level for fluoride in
the drinking water at 4 mg/L.
Table 11.15
137
Fluoridation
Most
Sodium
Sodium
Most
Fluosilicic
Application
138
139
140
throttling valve
Example 11.14
The
Solution:
Synthetic Organic
Chemical Removal
143
Sources of SOCs
Groundwaters
leaching
of agricultural pesticides
seepage from improper disposal of industrial volatile
organic chemicals (VOCs)
Surface
lands
discharge of industrial wastewater
spillage of chemicals
145
Treatment
Conventional
the coagulants
changing the polymers
adjustment of pH
use of activated carbon adsorption poor adsorption due to
pore structure of PAC, short contact time between carbon
particles and dissolved organic chemicals, and interference
by adsorption of other organic compounds.
146
use of filtration through a bed of granular activated carbon
Treatment
Granular
147
When
When
149
152