Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trampas (traps)
Sellos (seals) y migracin
(migration)
Cristian Vallejo, PhD
migration pathway
Hydrocarbon traps
Any geometric arrangement of rock,
regardless of origin, that permits
significant accumulation of oil or gas, or
both, in the subsurface
Critical components
Reservoir
Seal
Geometric arrangement
Stratigraphic trap
Nomenclature of a trap
Crest or culmination
Selley, 1998
Fluid contacts
Sharp
Gradational
Selley, 1983
Classification of traps
Structural traps
Fold Traps
Fault Traps
Stratigraphic Traps
Hydrodynamic Traps
Combination Traps
Structural traps
Formed by
postdepositional
tectonic modification
of the reservoir
Fold-dominated traps
Dip closure
A dome-shaped trap in
which strata dip outwards
in all directions (four-way
dip closure) in which the
integrity of the trap is
determined by the top
seal and any uncertainty
in the mapped structural
spill-point. The fold may
be formed by
compressional tectonics,
by compaction and
drape, or by hanging-wall
deformation in
extensional faulting.
Fault-dominated traps
Fault closure
A trap which requires a lateral
fault seal. In fault enhanced dip
closures, a part of the closure is
dip-closed but a significant
upside exists if the fault seals. If
not, a large part of the trap may
be unfilled, due to along-fault
leakage of hydrocarbons.
Stratigraphic traps
Stratigraphic traps
Stratigraphic/structural
trap
A trap defined by
depositional
geometries (pinch-out,
truncation at
unconformities) or
lateral variations in
diagenesis
(cementation) together
with structural dips. In
addition to a top-seal
and fault seal, lateral
seals and a seat-seal
may be required.
Unconformity related
Stratigraphic traps
Hydrodynamic traps
Hydrodynamic trap
Downward
movement of water
prevents upward
movement of oil or
gas
Trap limitations
Top seals
Top seals prevent the vertical movement of
hydrocarbons
Any rock may act as seal as long as it is
impermeable
Seal may be porous
Fine-grained rocks which have much smaller
pore throat diameters compared with reservoir
rocks
Shales most common seals
Evaporites most effective seals
Top seals
Top seals
Permeable seals allow slow
leakage to take place by
Darcy flow
Flow barriers
Top seals
Fault seals
Faults which prohibit fluid flow
Geometric seals
Fault gouge seals
Fault seals
Geometric seals
Depend on the
geometrical
juxtaposition of
sealing lithologies
Are analysed in
juxtaposition
diagrams created
with the fault slice
technique.
Fault seals
Sealing fault
Geometric (juxtaposition)
Fault seals
Migration
Primary migration
Expulsion of the petroleum from the source rock
Secondary migration
Movement of the hydrocarbons from the source
rock to the trap
Driving force vertical buoyancy force due to the
lower density of petroleum compared to that of
formation water
Capillary pressure differences between oil and
water opposes buoyancy force discouraging entry
into smaller water wet pores
Primary migration
Droste, 1986
Secondary migration
England, 1994
Trap Types
Traps may have structural, stratigraphic or (rarely) diagenetic origins, and are
classified according to geometric elements, expressed either in map or crosssectional view. Four basic categories of traps are: dip closures; fault closures &
structural truncation traps; stratigraphic/structural traps; and pure stratigraphic
traps. Structural setting, or structural style, is an important component of trap
classification and description because it affects:
Definitions
Dip closure
A dome-shaped trap in which strata dip outwards in all directions (four-way dip closure) in which the integrity of the
trap is determined by the top seal and any uncertainty in the mapped structural spill-point. The fold may be formed by
compressional tectonics, by compaction and drape, or by hanging-wall deformation in extensional faulting.
Fault closure
A trap which requires a lateral fault seal. In fault enhanced dip closures, a part of the closure is dip-closed but a
significant upside exists if the fault seals. If not, a large part of the trap may be unfilled, due to along-fault leakage of
hydrocarbons.
Stratigraphic/structural trap
A trap defined by depositional geometries (pinch-out, truncation at unconformities) or lateral variations in diagenesis
(cementation) together with structural dips. In addition to a top-seal and fault seal, lateral seals and a seat-seal may be
required.
Stratigraphic trap
A trap defined purely by the shape of a sedimentary or diagenetic body.
Trap
A combination of structure, reservoir and seal which has the potential to retain hydrocarbons.
Truncation trap
A trap defined by structural dips and an updip lateral seal at an unconformity or against a salt flank.
Top Seals
Hydrocarbon traps may be formed by a top seal dip closure or a combination
of dip- and fault-closures (see entries in Trap Types). Top seals prevent the
vertical movement of hydrocarbons and are commonly formed from fine
grained rocks, which have much smaller pore throat diameters compared with
reservoir rocks. They may also be flow barriers, such as permeable seals
which allow slow leakage to take place by Darcy flow, or diffusing seals
which allow light hydrocarbons (eg. gas) to pass in solution through the pore
fluid in the seal, due to a saturation gradient. A water-wet seal acts as a
capillary seal to hydrocarbons unless the buoyancy pressure exceeds the
capillary entry pressure, at which point leakage occurs by permeable, twophase flow. The pore throats in massive top seals are commonly so small that
they may only leak by hydro-fracturing or by forming linked, permeable
dilatant fractures during deformation. Layered top seals may leak if sufficient
small faults are present to form a tortuous fault-linked leak path due to
juxtaposition of leaky layers.
Fault Seals
Fault seals, ie. faults which prohibit fluid flow, determine the trap volume,
compartmentalisation and production behaviour in many fields. Geometric seals
depend on the geometrical juxtaposition of sealing lithologies, and are analysed in
juxtaposition diagrams created with the fault slice technique. Fault gouge seals are
caused by mechanical or chemical (diagenetic) alteration of fault rocks. In
sediments with low net to gross ratios, along steep syn-sedimentary faults, clays
are squeezed by a viscous flow mechanism into the fault gouge to form clay
smears. These can be predicted with the Clay Smear Potential (CSP) formula. A
sealing/non-sealing CSP cut off can be established by calibrating the prediction
with known hydrocarbon occurrences or pressure anomalies. In clean reservoir
sandstones, fault sealing depends on the brittle deformation mechanism. The
occurrence of particulate flow, cataclastic flow, or cataclasis depends on the
matrix porosity and the effective confining pressure at the time of deformation. Of
these, only cataclasis causes significant permeability reductions. The effectiveness
of fault seals depends on the continuity and 3-D geometry of the sealing
properties in the fault network (ie. whether faults are isolated or linked), and also
on the fault zone width. Under certain circumstances faults can act as migration
pathways, either via tortuous linked pathways, or along the fault itself.