Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRV m 3, ft3,acre ft
NTG%
N19/12/15
= GRV*NTG**So*FVF*C
Slide 2
%
So %
FVF %
Data Sources
Spatial data:
GRV: maps prepared from seismic and well data define the reservoir
envelope and the fluid contacts
FVF: the proper term is B. This is determined from representative
reservoir fluid samples from wireline samplers, DSTs and
well production tests
Point source data (wells): (or crudely, areal distribution from 3D and 4D
seismic data sets)
19/12/15 Slide 3
HCIIP Methods:
Area-Depth
Deterministic
Probabilistic
Deterministic
Equivalent Oil Column
Initialisation of Reservoir Simulator
Material Balance Equation
when >5% HCIIP produced
19/12/15 Slide 4
Volumetric Construction
BV (oil)= (4.1-0.8)/2=1.65*108m3
N/G = 0.8
Depth, m
1000
= 0.25
x
1100
So = 0.8
1/Bo = 0.9
STOIIP = 23 109m3 * 6.29 = 150 M bbl
1200
1.0
2.0
3.0
Area, km
Area/Depth
B1 Reservoir
19/12/15 Slide 5
ED Services
goc
owc
area
Weight average reservoir thickness
Hang below area line
Measure volumes enclosed (gives GRV)
goc
owc
19/12/15 Slide 6
QUANTIFICATION of UNCERTAINTY
The probabilistic approach
(the actual data is < 10-6 % of the whole)
Problems are mainly seismological: the pick, vertical and horizontal resolution,
time-depth conversion, particularly if fault geometry controls trap. Fluid contacts are
usually known.
Two approaches:
By taking seismic uncertainty into account; Geostatistically generate many structural
maps and establish GRV apparent distribution
Generate most reasonable minimum and maximum maps to accompany the most
likely and be guided by DHIs if present
Seismic Uncertainty
velocity error
timing error
calibration
error
pick error
migration error
19/12/15 Slide 8
fault position?
fault dip?
t/z on flank?
on crest?
shale thickness - N:G?
19/12/15 Slide 9
19/12/15Slide 10
19/12/15Slide 11
ED Services
Volumetric Uncertainty 2
f
30
So
N/G
BV
Monte Carlo
0
50
0.1
0.3
p
100
0
19/12/15Slide 12
STOIIP 300
Expectation Curve
50
STOIIP
300
Network of Excellence in Training
ED Services
Expectation Curves
Cumulative probability
%
100
85
50
15
0
Low Medium High
STOIIP in Mbbls
After appraisal
19/12/15Slide 13
ED Services