Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Guidelines
Perioperative Transfusion
Triggers
Changes in cardiac output (A) oxygen extraction (B) oxygen delivery (C) and
oxygen consumption (D) as hemoglobin decreases in humans and animals
Klein HG, et al. Lancet 2007; 370:415-426
Do Nothing Study
Retrospective study of 300 JW who underwent surgery
from 1981 - 1994
Even after adjusting for age, cardiovascular disease and
APACHE score, odds of death increased by 2.5 times for
each gram of Hb below 8 g/dL
Do Nothing Study
Retrospective study of 300 JW who underwent surgery
from 1981 - 1994
Even after adjusting for age, cardiovascular disease and
APACHE score, odds of death increased by 2.5 times for
each gram of Hb below 8 g/dL
TRICC - Design
8.7% vs 16.1%
5.7% vs 13.0%
Herbert PC, et al. NEJM 1999
No difference in outcomes
CRIT Study
Prospective, multiple center, observational
cohort study of 4,892 ICU pts in the US
Propensity score matched
Designed to examine the relationship of anemia
and RBC transfusion with clinical outcomes
Almost 95% of patients admitted to the ICU have
a Hb level below normal by day 3
In total, 11,391 RBC units were transfused.
Overall, 44% of pts admitted to the ICU received
one or more RBC units while in the ICU
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):39-52
CRIT Results
35% of Blood transfused in
patients with Hgb 9
n = 27 high-risk pts
undergoing infra-inguinal
arterial bypass
Sx
2001
Retrospective cohort
Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
78,974 patients 65 yrs acute MI
30 day mortality
No Transfusion
Mortality
Infection
Multi-organ dysfunction
ARDS
Crit Care Med 2008;36(9):2667-74
Results
Results
Association
between blood
transfusion and
the risk of ARDS
(OR & 95% CI).
Pooled OR 2.5
(95% CI 1.6-3.3)
Crit Care Med 2008;36(9):2667-74
Millions
Financial Burden
Summary
Post op Hct 15 - very high mortality
At Hct 18 - cognitive dysfunction in healthy
volunteers
Utilization of a transfusion trigger 21 (mean Hct
25) - confers survival benefit for those < 55 yrs
and those with an APACHE < 20
A liberal transfusion policy - trigger 30 (mean
Hct 32) does not benefit patients on critical care
At Hct 27 - ST changes in high risk patients.
Summary
Transfusion may benefit patients during
acute coronary syndromes if Hct < 25-29
There is only rarely an indication to
transfuse ANY patient with a Hct 30
Blood transfusions are not risk free
Decreasing transfusion may not only
decrease cost but also improve outcome
Closing Comments
Good prospective data limited to critical
care setting
Considerable scope for differences in
opinion
Concerning intra-operative transfusion best to come to some agreement pre op
and remain in communication
Give RBCs as single units when possible
Treat the patient not the Hct
Project Goal: To develop standard policies & practices leading to: improved
patient outcomes through the appropriate use of blood products and gain
process efficiencies by removing waste and delays in the blood dispensing &
administration process
In press.
November 2009
Crit Care Med
Viral transmission
Immunosuppression
Noninfectious Hazards
Immunosuppression
Infection
HIV
HCV
HBV
1:1000
1:10,000
1:100,000
1:1,000,000
1:10,000,000
1983 1985
2001
Revised Donor
Deferral Criteria
1987
1989
Non-A, Non-B
Hepatitis
Surrogate Testing
HIV Antibody
Screening
1991 1993
Year
HCV Antibody
Screening
1995
1997
p24 Antigen
Testing
1999
HCV and HIV
Nucleic Acid
Testing
Risks of Transfusion:
Infectious Disease
HBV = 1 in 220,000
2%
Delayed
transfusion
reaction
3%
Transfusion-transmitted
infections
6%
8%
14%
53%
Incorrect blood/
component
transfused
15%
Acute
transfusion
reaction
Williamson LM, et al. BMJ. 1999;319:16-9.
1:5,000
1:100
1:2,500
1:5,000
1:6,000
1:200,000
1:500,000
1:500,000
1:600,000
Rare
Unknown
Trauma subgroup
Common OR 5.26 (range 5.03-5.43)
All studies with p < 0.05 (0.005 0.0001)
Blood Tx associated with greater risk in trauma pts
Project Impact
Nosocomial Infections:
14.3% vs. 5.8%, p <
0.001
Taylor RW et al.
Crit Care Med 2006;
34:23022308
Stored RBCs
Metabolic acidosis
No improvement in oxygen
utilization at the tissue level
Age of Blood
Percentage of Patients
0 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 30
30 - 40
> 40
Composite Outcome:
In-hospital mortality
And Complications
(STS)
CRIT Study
(USA) [2]
Trauma
patients from
CRIT Study
(USA) [3]
TRICC
Investigators
(Canada) [4]
North Thames
Blood Interest
Group (UK)
[5]
ABA
Multicenter
Trials Group
(US, Canada)
[6]
3534
4892
576
5298
1247
666
Mean admission
hemoglobin (g/dL)
11.3 2.3
11.0 2.4
11.1 2.4
9.9 2.2
--
--
Percentage of
patients transfused
in ICU
37.0%
44.1%
55.4%
25.0%
53.4%
74.7%
Mean transfusions
per patient (units)
4.8 5.2
4.6 4.9
5.8 5.5
4.6 6.7
5.7 5.2
13.7 1.1
Mean pretransfusion
hemoglobin (g/dL)
8.4 1.3
8.6 1.7
8.9 1.8
8.6 1.3
--
9.3 0.1
4.5
7.4 7.3
9.4 8.6
4.8 12.6
--
--
ICU mortality
13.5%
13.0%
--
22.0%
21.5%
--
Hospital mortality
20.2%
17.6%
9.9%
--
--
21.0%
ABC Trial
(Western
Europe) [1]
[1] Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, et al. ABC (Anemia and Blood Transfusion in Critical Care ) Investigators. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients.
JAMA 2002;288:1499-1507.
[2] Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, et al. The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care
Med 2004;32:39-52.
[3] Shapiro MJ, Gettinger A, Corwin H, Napolitano LM, Levy M, Abraham E, Fink MP, MacIntyre N, Pearl RG, Shabot MM. Anemia and blood transfusion in trauma
patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Trauma 2003;55:269-274.
[4] Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requireemtns in
Critical Care investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:409-417.
[5] Rao MP, Boralessa H, Morgan C, et al and the North Thames Blood Interest Group. Blood component use in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia 2002 Jun;57(6):530-4.
[6] Palmieri TL, Caruso DM, Foster KN, et al and the American Burn Association (ABA) Multicenter Trials Group. Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn
injury: A multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2006 Jun;34(6):1602-7.
Hebert
Hebert
Wu
Patients
Primary Results
1997
Retrospective
2001
Prospective,
subgroup
analysis
357
No difference in mortality
Increased organ dysfunction
with transfusion
Approx
79,000
Approx
24,000
Increased mortality,
combined death or MI
Increased mortality,
combined death or MI
2001
Retrospective
Rao
2004
Retrospective
Sabatine
2005
Retrospective
Yang
2005
Retrospective
85,111
total
cohort;
74,271 no
CABG
Year
Singla
Aronson
Alexander
2007
2008
2008
Study
Design
Prospective
database
Prospective
database
Primary Results
Increased mortality in
patients with nadir Hb >
8g/dL
2358
Prospective
database
44242
CRUSADE
Initiative
Patients
Increased mortality in
patients with nadir
Hematocrit > 30%
Decreased mortality in
patients with nadir
Hematocrit 24%
FOCUS
NHLBI
Transfusion
Trigger for
Functional
Outcomes in
Cardiovascular
Patients
Undergoing
Surgical Hip
Fracture Repair
N=2600
25 Med Ctrs
US, Canada
J.L. Carson MD
FOCUS
Inclusion criteria:
Undergo surgery for hip fracture
Have a history of cardiovascular disease
Have a postoperative Hgb < 10 g/dL
SURGERY Committee
Effect of Blood
Transfusion on LongTerm Survival
After Cardiac
Operation
Cleveland Clinic, OH
0
1
2
3-5
6
Institution-specific protocols should screen for patients at high risk for blood
transfusion. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include:
(1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease
postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics)
(2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing
interventions)
(3) interventions that protect the patients own blood from the stress of operation (eg,
autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution)
(4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with pointof-care testing, and most importantly
(5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force; Society of Cardiovascular
Anesthesiologists Special task Force on Blood Transfusion. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S27-86.
Do Blood Transfusions
Improve Outcome
in Sepsis?
Zimmerman JL. Use of blood products in sepsis: An evidence-based review. Crit Care
Med 2004;32[Suppl]S542-547
Study population
Amount transfused
(units)
Ronco et al 1990
PCP pneumonia
1.5 Units
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Fenwick et al 1990
ARDS
24
1.5 Units
Yes
Yes
No
No
Ronco et al 1991
ARDS
17
1.5 Units
Yes
Yes
No
NA
Shah et al 1982
Post-trauma
1 or 2 Units
Yes
No
No
NA
Steffes et al 1991
21
1-2 Units
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Babineau et al 1992
Postoperative
31
328 9 mL
Yes
Yes
No
No
Gilbert et al 1988
Septic
17
20 g/L
Yes
Yes
No
No
Dietrich et al 1990
32
577 mL
Yes
Yes
No
No
Conrad et al 1990
Septic shock
19
30 g/L
Yes
Yes
No
No
Marik et al 1993
Septic
23
3 Units
Yes
Yes
No
No
Lorento et al 1993
Septic
16
2 Units
Yes
Yes
No
NA
Mink et al 1990
Septic shock
2 mo 6 y
Yes
Yes
No
NA
Lucking et al 1990
Septic shock
4 mo 15 y
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Silverman et al 1992
Septic shock
21 88 y
21
2 Units
Yes
Yes
No
No
Gramm et al 1996
Septic shock
46 3 y
19
2 Units
Yes
No
No
NA
Fernandes et al 2001
Septic shock
18-80y
10
1 Units
Yes
No
No
No
Kahn et al 1986
15
7-10 mL/kg
Yes
No
No
NA
Casutt et al 1999
Postoperative
32-81y
67
368 10 mL
Yes
Yes
No
NA
Walsh et al 2004
22
2 Units
Yes
NA
NA
No
Hb
DO2
VO2
Lactate
Placement of oximetric CVP line, CVP goal 8-12, ScVO2 > 70%
Validation Study
Multicenter Trial
20 sites
Derek Angus et al.
Univ. of Pittsburgh
ProCESS
Protocolized Care for
Early Septic Shock
NIH-sponsored
$8.4 Million
Level 1
Level 2
Anemia of
Chronic
Disease or
Anemia of
Inflammation
Dysregulation of iron
homeostasis
Impaired proliferation
of erythroid progenitor
cells
Blunted EPO response
2005
2006
2007
2008
1491
1361
1353
1354
1275
48.2
48.3
49.1
50.5
55.8
Hospital LOS
14.1
14
13.9
12.9
13.5
ICU-LOS
4.1
4.76
4.77
4.22
4.49
Readmissions Rates
6.2
7.9
7.1
8.4
7.4
Active Treatment
56%
51%
57%
63%
64%
Low-Risk Monitor
34%
38%
33%
27%
24%
Oct-Dec 2004
Jul-Sep 2006
Oct-Dec 2004
Jul-Sep 2006
Oct-Dec 2004
Jul-Sep 2006
ICU Mortality
2007
3.36%
6.60%
7.21%
O/E
0.71
0.54
0.47
0.41
Hospital Mortality
2007
5.35%
10.89%
9.67%
O/E
0.74
0.59
0.55
0.56
Summary
Anemia is common
Override Reasons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Active Bleeding
Cardiovascular disease
Hemoglobinopathy
Hemolysis
Oxygen carrying deficit
Refractory Hypotension
Symptomatic anemia
Attending Physician deems necessary
Annual
Review
Evidence
Based
Compliance
Report Capture
(If Order Is
Beyond Trigger)
Blood
Transfusion
Ordered
House Wide
Communication/
Education
Carelink Order
Checkpoints
*Redefines role/scope of
Transfusion Committee to
act as oversight body
Email Sent
To Service
Chief
*Email includes link to patient
level data to assist review
Response
Explanation
Submitted To
Transfusion
Committee
Response
Review By
Transfusion
Committee