Served as an advocate for 18 years and then promoted as a Judge in Bombay High Court. In 1972, he was elevated to the Supreme Court and in 1978, he became the Chief Justice of India. After his retirement from the Supreme Court in 1985, he became an arbitrator in what people call as his 3rd innings in the Legal Profession.
He is the longest serving Chief Justice of the
highest court of the worlds largest democracy. The hallmarks of a good Judge are courage, independence and impartiality and Justice Chandrachud exhibited all of them. Justice Chundrachud is known for the impeccable language that he used while delivering his Judgements. Justice Chandrachud contributed to the Indian Legal System both at the bar and at the bench. As an advocate, his performance as a Public Prosecutor in Nanawatis case is always remembered. He evolved as one of the finest advocates and proved his mettle at the bar.
HIS LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS
Justice Chandrachud is known for his contribution
to the Constitutional and Administrative laws. In Mithus case, he Justice Y.V. Chandrachud held that the death penalty is not unconstitutional. In "Olga Tellis" case, the concept of "Right to life" was extended to "Right to live with Human Dignity" and paved way for Humanistic approach to law. His memorable words are"There can be no estoppel against the Constitution. The Constitution is not only the paramount law of the land, but it is the source of sustenance of all laws.
He was member of the thirteen Judge Bench in Keshavananda
Bharati's case. His judgment in that case became a part of Indian Constitutional history. In Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narain, Justice Chandrachud ,in an eloquent judgment, stuck down clauses 4 and 5 of Article 329A as arbitrary and calculated to destroy the rule of law. He quoted Benlcton's famous passage which contains the admonition that the king ought to be under the law because the law makes him king. In Maneka Gandhi's case, Justice Chandrachud defined the width of personal liberty and the Right of Equality under the Indian Constitution. Shah Banu Begum, Chief Justice Chandrachud held that divorced Muslim women had a right of maintenance from their erstwhile husband under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In Minerva Mills case, he struck down Section 4 of the 42nd Amedment as unconstitutional. He held "that the Preamble of the Constitution was not mere semantics. The edifice of our Constitution is built; upon the concepts crystallised in the Preamble and held that preamble was a part of the Constitution. Justice Chandrachud will continue to inspire the upcoming generations not only by his landmark judgements but also by being a role model for all the members of the Legal fraternity.