Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lefteris Kailoglou
University of Worcester
E.Kailoglou@worc.ac.uk
Slang
Intra-speaker Variation
Trudgill (2002:167-168) on
Standard English
SE fails to distinguish between the forms of auxiliary forms of the verb do and its main verb
forms. This is true both of the present tense, where many other dialects distinguish between
aux. did and main verb done, as in You done it, did you?
SE has an unusual and irregular Present Tense verb morphology in that only the 3rd sing.
receives morphological marking: he goes Vs he go. Many other dialects use either zero for all
persons or s for all persons.
SE lacks multiple negation, so that no choice is available between I dont want none, which is not
possible, and I dont want any. Most non-standard variities of English around the world permit
multiple negation.
SE has an irregular formation of reflexive pronouns, with some forms based on the possessive
pronouns e.g. myself, and others on the objective pronouns, e.g. hisself, theirselves.
SE fails to distinguish between 2nd person sing. and pl. forms, having you in both cases. Many
non-standard dialects maintain the older English distinction between thou and you, or have
developed newer distinctions such as you versus youse.
SE has irregular forms of the verb to be both in the present tense (am, is, are) and in the past
(was, were). Many non-standard dialects have the same form for all persons, such as I be, you
be, s/he be, we be, they be, and I were, you were, he were, we were, you were, they were.
In the case of many irregular verbs, SE redundantly distinguishes between preterite and perfect
verb forms both by the use of the auxiliary have and by the use of distinct preterite and past
participle forms: I have seen Vs I seen.
SE has only a two-way contrast in its demonstrative system, with this (near to the speaker)
opposed to that (away from the speaker). Many other dialects have a three-way system
involving a further distinction, between for example that (near to the listener) and yon (away
from both speaker and listener).
10
Standard
11
Other non-standard
features
Innovation
Innovations on
Shakespeare
Semantic Neologisms
Word-formation
Derivation
Compounding
Borrowing
14
17
18
Criteria
Dumas and Lighter (1978, 14-16) reject the classical formula
for definition and instead propose four identifying criteria for
slang.
1. Its presence will markedly lower, at least for the moment,
the dignity of formal or serious speech or writing.
2. Its use implies the users special familiarity either with the
referent or with that less statusful or less responsible class of
people who have such special familiarity and use of the term.
3.It is a tabooed term in ordinary discourse with persons of
higher social status or greater responsibility.
4. It is used in place of the well-known conventional synonym,
especially in order a) to protect the user from the discomfort
caused by the conventional item or b) to protect the user from
the discomfort or annoyance of further elaboration.
19
20
Summary of
Characteristics
Slang is ephemeral
Sometimes a new slang form either
replaces an earlier one or provides
another synonym for a notion already
named in slang
Sometimes new slang extends to new
areas of meaning or to areas of meaning
of recent interest to the group inventing
the slang
Some slang terms come back for a
second and third life
22
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.
Main ideas:
Interrelation between lexical innovation and
grammaticalisation processes
Mostly lexical items and certain discourse items (terms
of address, formulaic expressions, discourse markers)
Slang research not ideally conducted via questionnaires
Relation to adolescent networks and particular
subcultures
Distinction between youth specific slang-items from
general slang ones remains vague (Cf. Adams 2009)
Corpus of 2,000 words (face-to-face and mediated
discourse); (1990-1995) recorded conversations,
interviews, informal letters and youth magazines
23
Diminutives
Nominal endings
Compound words
Malapropism constructions
Greek and English compounds
Formations based on a new root + usual nominal
endings
Formations based on an existing root + usual
ending,
combined in a new way
Words with obscure meaning
Obscene words about religion and the saints
Formations based on the change of gender
Back slang
24
The Method
25
26
1.
2.
3.
4.
27
28
Example B. Suspenders
29
30
Meaning
1.
2.
31
32
Central Notions
33
Social
Variables
Linguistic
Variables
Age
H-dropping
Social Class
Th-fronting
Sex
Ethnicity
etc.
Glottal stops
Quotatives
etc.
Eckert 2012
Third Wave
(a) variation constitutes a robust social semiotic
system, potentially expressing the full range of
social concerns in a given community;
(b) the meanings of variables are underspecified,
gaining more specific meanings in the context of
styles, and
(c) variation does not simply reflect, but also
constructs, social meaning and hence is a force in
social change.
36
37
Indexical Order
38
Distinction
39
Goth or Pirate?
40
Authenticity
Distinctions of Taste
45
1.
2.
3.
47
Athens
Exarheia Square, (Anarchists, Rockers,
Students, Hardcore, Electro)
Kolonaki Square,
(businessmen/businesswomen,
intellectuals, stars, artists, politicians)
Mavili Square (Alternative youth,
Rockers, Students, Hardcore, Electro)
Map of Athens
48
Map: www.athens-greece.us
Alternative and
Mainstream
Alternative: originally a sub-genre of rock (Rock FM 96.9 the
1.
2.
3.
4.
49
Overview
50
Examples
Food Stories
(description of a dish of deer leg) (There was a whole leg with the
hair in the hoof staring at you like the old lady. This from the
hoof.)
(Oh, malakas, you are crisps. Crisps. Simply, like that. Of such
quality [you are], crisps.)
51
(Gosh, they are both stupid, re my child. Antifootball-faces that is. They are not human
(commenting on the hosts of a sport show on TV).
(When we say see that, we do not mean for the other one to see
that. We mean I fucked you, did you understand?)
(Because I am Batman!)
(With all these arrows on you, you have become a Christmas tree.
You acquired roots
(You are the worst because you have the look of a cartoon
I fucked you and now Im getting bored, so I will fuck you
again.)
53
Watching TV
(about Oprah Winfrey) (Her face is like a mackerel. She hits her
breasts like a baboon. If she was green, she would be Hulk).
54
55
Selected References:
Adams, M. (2009), Slang: The peoples poetry, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Androutsopoulos, Yannis (1997). (1997). Teenage slang in a comparative perspective. Greek, French, German [in
Greek] Meletes gia tin Elliniki Glossa. 17, 562-576. Thessaloniki: Kyriakides.
Ioardanidou, A. & Androutsopoulos, Y. (2001) Youth slang in Modern Greek, in Georgakopoulou, A. & Spanaki
M. (2001) (eds.), A Reader in Greek Sociolinguistics: Studies in Modern Greek Language, Culture and
Communication, Oxford/Bern: Peter Lang.
Barker, C. (2000), Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, London: Sage
Chatterton, P. and Hollands, R. (2003), Urban Nightscapes: Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces and Corporate Power,
Oxon: Routledge.
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. (1992) Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as
Community-Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21, 461-90. (Reprinted in Camille Roman,
Suzanne Juhasz and Christanne Miller eds. (1994). The Women and Language Debate. New Brunswick:
Rutgers University Press. 432-60).
Eckert, Penelope. (2000) Linguistic variation as social practice: the linguistic construction of identity in Belten
High. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers
Eckert, Penelope. 2005. Variation, convention, and social meaning. Plenary talk. Linguistic Society of America.
San Francisco.
Featherstone, M. (2007), Consumer Culture and Postmodernism (2nd edn.), London: Sage Publications.
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Hebdige, D. (1979), Subculture: The Meaning of Style, London: Methuen
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Mackridge, P. (2009), Language and National Identity in Greece, 1766-1976, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pennycook, A. (2010), Language as a local practice, London/NY : Routledge.
Thornton, S. (1995), Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Polity Press
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
57