10min presentation summarizing research undertaken for the degree of Masters of mechanical engineering at the University of Edinburgh. CFD modelling of counterfires using FDS5.
Original Title
Fighting Fire With Fire: investigation of counter-firing using FDS5
10min presentation summarizing research undertaken for the degree of Masters of mechanical engineering at the University of Edinburgh. CFD modelling of counterfires using FDS5.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
10min presentation summarizing research undertaken for the degree of Masters of mechanical engineering at the University of Edinburgh. CFD modelling of counterfires using FDS5.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Author: Krzysztof Piotr Wolnicki Supervisor: Dr Guillermo Rein Introduction Counter-firing is a fire-fighting technique in which a small fire is placed at a certain distance form a wildfire. As a result of in-draft small fire is pulled in by the wildfire thereby creating a fire-break, a strip of land with no fuel preventing fire from spreading.
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 2
Introduction Counter-firing enables for fighting of large fires using relatively small human resources; Water is not required and, as a result, counter-firing can be applied almost instantly without having to wait for water to arrive. Small human resources, no need for water, and short fire suppression time result in financial savings. Additionally, there are claims of health benefits to the fire-fighters who are exposed to less smoke than in the conventional attack techniques. Counter-firing is not applicable in a number of fire scenarios including forest and high-canopy fires. It may but may not work depending on topography, weather, fuels and the uniformity of the wildfire front. Very little is known about where to place counter-fires to make them work effectively. As a result counter-firing is used predominantly as a last resort.
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 3
Background There are approximately 500 deaths and 11,000 serious injuries due to fires in the UK each year. As bad as it sounds it is only a small fraction of the problem worldwide where estimates suggest 300,000 deaths and millions of injuries due to fires every year. From the financial point of view the cost of fires is 1-2% of the GDP for the UK as well as 14 other countries where such statistics are available. In the United States alone annual losses due to fires are estimated at $200bn. It is estimated that approximately 1% of the Earth’s surface is burned every year. This figure in some parts of the globe, such as Australia, reaches 2- 4%. Fires have a heavy ecological toll which is manifested mainly in their large contribution to the CO2 emissions. They are also responsible for creation of arid, leached of nutrients, landscapes and loss of wildlife.
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 4
Objectives Assessment if CFD can be used in modeling of counter-fires; Choice of appropriate software; Generation of a CFD model enabling for prediction of: Fire and weather conditions suitable for counter-firing;
Distance at which to place counter-fires effectively.
Evaluation of fire and weather conditions suitable for
counter-firing; Comparison with previous CFD work; Description of a proposed validation procedure providing all the necessary data
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 5
Parametric Studies Literature: Sensitivity study: CFD Time for measurements FDS5 Domain length 2D Domain height Stationary fire model Grid Heat Release Rate Wind profile Fuel surface temperature Pressure correction No counter-fire Mirroring
Immediate Zone always with negative in-draft; Far field Zone has no drop-off distance; Increase in in-draft as result of increase of fire intensity; Decrease in in-draft as result of increase in wind velocity.
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 8
Discussion Validation is needed: Cannot be applied in fighting fires until successfully validated.
Comparison with previous CFD work by Roxburgh et al;
Influence of wind velocity and fire intensity; Magnitude of in-draft; Drop-off distance.
Drop-off distance and length of the fire-line:
2D assumption; Long fire-lines.
BACK TO MODELING: Parabolic wind profile assumption found inadequate; No grid convergence.
May 2010 K P Wolnicki 9
Conclusions Model generated meets the objectives;
Investigated fire and weather conditions;
Compared with previous CFD work;
Needing validation before applied in practice;
More is available on http://counterfires.weebly.com/