You are on page 1of 16

Chapter 4

Governance
Context

Corporate Governance
Way businesses structured and controlled
CG varies across national boundaries:

cultural reasons
social contexts
historical reasons
commercial focus

CG regime impacts nature of accounting


strong shareholding culture will require strong
reporting culture

Importance reasserted by recent frauds etc.


Copyright

Financial Information

Corporate Governance in UK
Anglo/American CG model common to Englishspeaking world
Characterised by:
gulf between directors and owners
board of directors
stock exchange as major source of finance

Financial accounts seen as one means of


bridging gulf between directors and owners

Copyright

Financial Information

Best Practice
Frauds have led to model being questioned
Flaws:
too rigid
open to abuse
too focused on rights of investors
Accounting bodies, government have been proactive
Various reports address different aspects
Best Practice reports and codes

Copyright

Financial Information

Cadbury Report
Commissioned by FRC, Stock Exchange etc.
Chaired by Sir Adrian Cadbury
Reviewed CG with specific reference to:
responsibilities of directors
nature of accounting information required
audit committees
relationship between owners, boards and auditors,
etc.

Copyright

Financial Information

Cadbury recommendations
Board:
importance of efficient board emphasised
separate CEO and Chairman
Executive Directors
service contracts to be limited to 3 years
disclosure of remuneration
Non-Executive Directors
greater role
independence important

Copyright

Financial Information

Cadbury recommendations ctd.

Reporting and Controls:


responsibility of board in relation to accounts
importance of supplementary narrative info.

Audit Committee
critical role in liaising with auditor
should comprise of 3 non-executive directors
has emerged as critical element of CG regime

Copyright

Financial Information

Greenbury Report
CBI formed group to produce code in relation to
directors remuneration
Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury
Recommendations in respect of:
remuneration committee
disclosure provisions
remuneration policy
service contracts and compensation
Directors remuneration still source of
controversy
Copyright

Financial Information

Hampel Report

Group formed to continue work of Cadbury


Chaired by Sir Ronald Hampel
Reiterated much of Cadbury & Greenbury
Important in maintaining momentum
Recommendations:
different individuals as Chairman and CEO
directors contracts not to exceed 1 year
non-executives on remuneration committee
training of directors

Copyright

Financial Information

Turnbull Report
ICAEW set up group to pursue Cadbury ideas
on internal control & risk
Chaired by Sir Nigel Turnbull
Assigns a strategic importance to these areas in
context of CG
Shows directors how these areas are to be
integrated into CG model
In future may be seen as seminal report

Copyright

Financial Information

10

Turnbull Report (Continued).


Focus on principles rather than rules
Emphasis on:
successful risk management as means of
adding value
internal control only possible if embedded in
internal processes
role of board in reviewing and implementing
key risks to be identified and managed

Copyright

Financial Information

11

Higgs
Focus on Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
Reflects increasingly important role:
Independent
Strategy, control and governance roles
Higgs Report (2003) recommended:
NEDs to comprise at least 50% of board
Separation of CEO and Chairman roles
Ideally NEDs might serve two three-year terms
Commended for avoiding perceived excesses of SOX

Copyright

Financial Information

12

Smith
Reflected increased importance of Audit Committee
Now seen as vital element of CG architecture
Recommended that Audit Committee:
Be comprised of at least 3 independent NEDs
One member to have financial experience
Monitor and review integrity of financial
statements, controls, etc.

Copyright

Financial Information

13

Combined Code
Cadbury, Greenbury and Hampel formed basis
of original Combined Code adopted by SE
Supplemented by Turnbull, Higgs and Smith
Code based on Comply or Explain approach
Different to US
Essentially principles-based
Significantly impacts company disclosure, e.g.
in Annual Report

Copyright

Financial Information

14

Stakeholder theory
Looks beyond investors and their needs
Recognises a broader constituency, e.g.:
employees
environmentalists
others
Challenges primacy of financial markets
Champions greater transparency and
accountability
Potential for radical reform of CG model

Copyright

Financial Information

15

Summary
CG a critical influence on nature, content and
focus of the accounting process
CG regime in UK part of Anglo-American
scheme
Characterised by investor emphasis
Frauds, scandals were catalysts for change
Cadbury, Greenbury, Hampel, Turnbull, Higgs
& Smith
Comply or Explain
UK now world-leader in best practice
Copyright

Financial Information

16

You might also like