Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A RISK-BASED APPROACH
TO CONDUCTING A
QUALITY
AUDIT
9th Edition
Karla M. Johnstone | Audrey A. Gramling | Larry E.
Rittenberg
Chapter 1
Auditing: Integral to the Economy
Learning Objectives
1.
2.
3.
4.
1-2
Learning Objectives
5.
6.
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
Learning Objective 1
DEFINE THE OBJECTIVE OF EXTERNAL AUDITING AND
DESCRIBE ITS ROLE IN MEETING SOCIETYS DEMANDS FOR
RELIABLE FINANCIAL AND INTERNAL CONTROL
INFORMATION
1-8
1-9
1-10
1-11
1-12
1-13
1-14
1-15
Remoteness
Organization and users of its financial information
are distant from each other in terms of either
geographic distance or the extent of information
available to the both parties
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning
1-16
Consequences
With unreliable information, investors lose a
significant source of information needed to
make important decisions
1-17
Overall Objectives in
Conducting an Audit
Obtaining assurance about financial
statements being free from material
misstatement
Reporting on financial statements based
on auditors findings
1-18
Overall Objectives in
Conducting an Audit
In completing these objectives, the
auditor:
Complies with relevant ethical requirements
Plans and performs an audit with professional
skepticism
Exercises professional judgment
Obtains sufficient appropriate evidence on
which to base the auditors opinion
Conducts audit in accordance with
professional auditing standards
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning
1-19
1-20
Learning Objective 2
1-22
Learning Objective 3
1-24
1-25
1-26
1-27
1-28
Learning Objective 4
Congress
Due to various failures in auditing profession during
early 2000s Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
This legislation had an impact on audit firms through:
Increasing auditor independence
Enhancing the role and importance of audit committee
Requiring reporting on internal control over financial
reporting
Providing new oversight of external auditing profession
by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1-30
1-31
1-32
1-33
1-34
1-35
1-36
1-37
1-38
Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO)
Provider of thought leadership and
guidance on:
Internal control
Enterprise risk management
Fraudulent deterrence
1-39
Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO)
Sponsored by the following organizations:
Financial Executives International
The American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants
The American Accounting Association
The Institute of Internal Auditors
The Association of Accountants and
Financial Professionals in Business (IMA)
1-40
1-41
1-42
1-43
1-44
Learning Objective 5
DEFINE AUDIT QUALITY AND IDENTIFY DRIVERS OF AUDIT
QUALITY AS SPECIFIED BY THE FINANCIAL REPORTING
COUNCILS AUDIT QUALITY FRAMEWORK
Audit Quality
Performing an audit in accordance with
accepted auditing standards (GAAS)
Providing assurance that audited financial
statements and disclosures are presented in
accordance with GAAP
Providing assurance that those financial
statements are not materially misstated
whether due to errors or fraud
1-46
1-47
1-48
1-49
1-50
1-51
1-52
1-53
1-54
1-55
Learning Objective 6
1-57
PCAOB independence
requirements
Applicable to auditors of public companies
Designed to address requirements in
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
1-58
SEC independence
requirements
Taking principles-based approach
Applicable to auditors of public companies
Principles dictate that auditor independence is
impaired when:
Mutual or conflicting interest between
accountant and audit client
Accountant auditing own work
Accountant acting as management or employee
of audit client
Accountant being an advocate for audit client
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning
1-59
AICPA independence
requirements
Threats to independence
Self-review threat
Advocacy threat
Adverse interest threat
Familiarity threat
Undue influence threat
Financial self-interest threat
Management participation threat
1-60
AICPA independence
requirements
Safeguards to avoid independence
problems include:
Safeguards created by profession or
regulation
Safeguards created by audit client
Safeguards created by audit firm
1-61
Review Programs
1-62
Engagement letter
States scope of work to be done on audit
There should be no doubt in the mind of client,
external auditor, or court system - regarding
expectations agreed to by external auditor
and client
Includes:
Audit fee
Timing description of external auditors work
Documentation that client is expected to
provide to external auditor
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning
1-63
Client Acceptance/Continuance
Decisions
Guidelines established to screen out:
Clients in financial and/or organizational
difficulty
Clients constituting a disproportionate
percentage of firms total practice
Disreputable clients
Clients offering an unreasonably low fee for
auditors services
1-64
1-65
Audit documentation
Document everything done on audit
Documentation should clearly show
evidence of supervisory review
Documentation should indicate:
What tests were performed
Who performed them
Any significant judgments made
1-66