Issues in applied linguistics - Michael Mc Carthy -
Applied linguistics as problem
solving Linguistics can offer insights and ways forward in the resolution of problems related to language in a wide variety of contexts that underlies the very existence of applied linguistics Applied linguists offer solutions to real-world problems in which language is a central issue (Brumfit 1991) Problems in real life, professional diversification (more fields): turn to linguistics to seek insight and potential solutions to practical problems (temporarily applied linguists).
AL investigates how language is involved in
branch of human activity: answers significant problems (forensic applications of linguistics, language and the elderly, etc) Complex understanding of human language Different from community of applied linguists, who teach linguistics and suggest applications. Doing applied linguistics should not be only the responsibility of academic community.
Linguistics itself is a broad discipline
as encompasses a large number of interests Aim: how language teachers and others involved directly or indirectly in language learning and teaching may approach their problems via aspects of linguistic study (also non pedagogical applied linguists: foster a shared professional identity).
Linguistics and applied linguistics:
hierarchy or partnership? Applied linguistics is problem-driven discipline rather than theory driven (L), based on solving problems. Lingustics associates with particular schools of thought ot theories; set of agreed theories and instruments that can be readily applied to realworld language-related problems (linguistics applied) Traditional approach: application of L to language problems rather than dialogue between L and AL
Applied linguistics: test the applicability and
replicability of linguistics theory and description and question and challengue them Relationship between L and AL should be fruitful partnership rather than a top-down imposition by theorists on practitioners Both sides of L/AL need to have a regular dialogue with regard to theories and practices Bi-directional accountability: important influence on both applicability of L and evaluation of AL solutions (responsibilities on both disciplines)
Responsibilities for AL and L
L: build testable theories of language, connected to perceived realities L: offer models, descriptions and explanations of language that satisfy intellectual rigour, common sense and intuition AL: misrepresent theories, descriptions and models AL: not to apply theories, descriptions and models to purposes for which they were never intended AL: not just apply linguistics but work towards: relevant models of language
Both: adopt critical position to work
of their peers Both: exchange experience with practitioners (language teachers, psychologists, etc, who do not have a training in L nor time/resources to do applied linguistics research but want to communicate and learn from both groups (are in daily contact with real life problems).