CASE ANALYSIS:

BEING THE GOOD GUY

IS NOT A PROFESSION
BY YURIY ONYSHKO

SITUATION
Petro Ivanovich chief doctor at a local hospital
Realized STIs were highly prevalent among the youth
Even though treatable, not addressed due to inhibitions
because of shame and embarrassment
Decided to start a youth friendly clinic
Got all necessary permissions, funding etc
Couldnt manage it along with his present job
Hence a team of 4 doctors headed by Mykita Varylyovch

PROBLEM
Highly qualified-experienced doctors from different fields.
Highly Cooperative & enthusiastic
focussed on own roles, motives and ambitions
Mykita tried to resolve the same in a meeting
no guidance from his side
Sub-groups formed & blamed each other
In the next meeting he tried to intervene
Not successful in convincing anyone
Was bypassed by the sub-groups

ANALYSIS
Q1
Ivanovich correct at implementing the idea
Laid the foundation
vision
But not the only requirement
No structure
No Goals
No leader
Q2
Reasons for Mykitas appointment
Known to Ivanovich - Good Rapport
Professional Proficiencies
Not a good choice
good point of Contact
Lacked Leadership/ Managerial Skills

Q3
Have a role in staffing
Analyse all the recruits independently
multiple management positions
Have a mix of personal and managerial goals/targets.
Q4
Mykita hired on the basis of professional proficiencies
Did not look at individual personality traits and assign roles based
on that
Hence the process was not successful
Admin requirements not fulfilled

Q5
Independent Functioning
Clashes
Formation of Groups
Bypassed Leader
Q6
Effective analysis and feedback
Fixed personal and team goals/targets
Effective guidance and role reversals

Q7
Mykita through his actions didnt seem to be motivated to be
a leader.
During the crucial resolution meeting, he failed
Only Observed
No Guidance
Team members stopped viewing him as a leader