Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
Engagement
Team
Player
Star
Wrong hire
Wasted
Talent
Innovation
Excellence
(Capability)
2010-12 Sapience Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
www.sapience.net
Nathan Myhrvold,
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
Types of Innovation
www.sapience.net
Examples of Innovation
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
Before
After
www.sapience.net
Innovation @ VERITAS
VERITAS Software (1992-2004)
Startup to $2.5 billion in 11 years
Acquired by Symantec in 2005
VERITAS in Pune
Outsourced to a vendor Frontier Software (1992-96)
Own subsidiary VERITAS India (1997 onwards)
www.sapience.net
11
Innovation @ VERITAS
Technology Innovation Strategy
Encourage innovative effort 20% beyond 8 hours
Combination of senior architects and new hires (IIT M-Techs)
Define idea, own the prototype implementation,
demonstrate when US VPs visited India
Examples: new features in file system, porting to new
platforms (Volume Replicator to Windows), transformation to
web UI (Netbackup)
www.sapience.net
12
Impact @ VERITAS
Impact @ VERITAS
High retention rates (< 2% attrition between 1999-2003)
Converted diehard opponents of outsourcing (e.g. Netbackup)
Grew rapidly from 40 engineers and 2 teams in 1999 to 600+
engineers and 16 teams by 2003
22% of worldwide engineering
Today
Over 60 ex-VERITians are entrepreneurs, CEOs, VPs at early
and growth stage companies
2010-12 Sapience Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
www.sapience.net
13
Measuring Innovation
www.sapience.net
Innovation Initiative
Based on an initiative at Symphony Services by one of the
founders
Lack of innovation at most Indian IT companies and subsidiaries
Do what the customer asks to do
Cost center or Time & Material contracts
No incentive to encourage innovation
Key Principles
Differentiate Innovation (the unexpected) from Delivery Excellence
(part of the job for a competent team)
Define a system of Innovation Points (IPs)
IPs awarded increase exponentially as ideas actually get implemented
IPs depend on the impact of innovation (moderate, high, gamechanging)
Include the customer in review of the innovations
www.sapience.net
15
Infrastructure
Visibility through Innovation Portal
FAQs, program repository, filing of ideas and innovations, award IPs to users
Innovation statistics at user, group, location, business unit level
Chinese wall between groups to protect customer IP
Differentiate customer specific and non-customer innovations
Participation
Rewards
Accumulate IRPs awards at various thresholds, and eventually title of
Innovator
Quarterly Project Group awards for highest Innovation Intensity (based on
both aggregate IPs and # employees in the group)
www.sapience.net
16
Impact @ Symphony
Energized the entire company
Discovery of previous innovations (surprised even senior
management)
Showcasing innovations (helped in Sales)
Surge in out of the box thinking for customers
Customer Delight scores noticeably higher
Improved employee retention
Alternate career path for highly technical people
www.sapience.net
17
Engagement @ Work
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
19
Capability
Engagemen
t
Efficiency
Reasonable Work
Time
Work-Life balance
www.sapience.net
20
X hrs
hrs on
on Important
Important Work
Work ++ ??Y
on non-core
??
Non-core
work
www.sapience.net
+ Z
?? Non-work
Non-work hours
People put in
Time/Effort
Done
?
www.sapience.net
22
Measuring
Engagement,
and more ..
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
People
Engagement
Project
Efficiency
>
20%
Out
put
Gain
Overall Efficiency
Before Sapience
Deliverables tracked, but Effort is hidden
2010-12 Sapience Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
www.sapience.net
25
Activity Focus
< 40% on core activities
Outlook, meetings take up
lot of time
www.sapience.net
Users can
view longterm trends,
reports and
alerts
2010-12
Sapience Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
www.sapience.net
People Engagement
Encourage team
to increase
work hours
www.sapience.net
28
Accounte Time on On-PC Time Off-PC Time on Time on Daily Est. Unaccoun
d Time
Projects on Projects Time on Corpora Private
Time
ted Time
(A = B + E (B = C +
(C)
Projects
te
(G)
+ F + G)
D)
(D)
(F)
Ideal
8.0
6.5
6.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
NA
NA
Average
7.7
6.9
5.8
1.1
0.3
0.5
9.4
1.7
Sunil
9.3
8.4
7.9
0.5
0.4
0.5
9.3
0.0
Poonam
9.5
8.8
7.4
1.4
0.5
0.2
9.7
0.2
..
8.1
7.7
7.3
0.5
0.1
0.2
11.2
3.1
..
8.0
7.5
6.6
0.9
0.1
0.3
10.0
2.1
7.7
6.6
6.5
0.1
0.1
1.0
9.0
1.3
7.7
7.2
6.2
1.0
0.2
0.3
9.0
1.3
7.6
6.9
6.1
0.8
0.1
0.5
9.2
1.5
7.0
6.6
5.5
1.1
0.2
0.2
8.4
1.4
7.1
6.3
5.4
0.9
0.3
0.5
9.9
2.8
7.3
6.4
5.3
1.1
0.1
0.7
10.1
2.7
7.4
7.0
5.0
2.0
0.2
0.2
8.7
1.3
6.7
6.4
5.0
1.4
0.1
0.3
8.8
2.0
7.6
5.8
4.8
1.0
1.3
0.2
9.4
1.8
8.0
6.1
4.6
1.5
1.2
0.6
11.3
3.3
Ravi
6.9
4.6
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.8
8.5
1.7
Sundar
8.0
6.1
4.2
1.9
0.4
1.6
9.1
1.1
2010-12 Sapience Analytics Pvt. Ltd.
www.sapience.net
29
www.sapience.net
30
Improve
Development
time to 50+%
www.sapience.net
Application Usage
www.sapience.net
32
Role-wise Activities
www.sapience.net
33
www.sapience.net
34
www.sapience.net
www.sapience.net
36
Continuous Improvement
program
Innovati
on
Excelle
nce
Engagemen
t
Work-life balance
www.sapience.net
37
www.sapience.net