Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Y
T
I
L
Y
N
A
I
U P THO
Q AN
IN R A
G
I
S
A
(Q
D
B
QUALITY BY DESIGN
Continuous improvement is a hallmark of
quality by design
G. Taguchi on Robust Design: design changes during
manufacture can result in the last product produced
being different from the first product
QUALITY BY DESIGN
In generic pharmaceutical manufacturing, there are
additional constraints
Fixed bioequivalence targets
Regulatory requirements to duplicate formulation of innovator drug
Lack of access to innovator development data
LEAD POINTS
1.
2.
Steps in QbD
3.
4.
Example Torcetrapib
5.
6.
Conclusion
WHAT IS QUALITY?
Quality
Requirements
= need or
expectations
Target Product
Quality Profile
Patient
Good pharmaceutical quality represents
an acceptably low risk of failing to achieve
the desired quality attributes.
Quality by Design is
Quality by
Testing
and Inspection
Enhanced
product
knowledge
process
understanding
Quality by Design
ICH Q9
Quality Risk
Management
ICHQ10
Quality
Quality by
Design
Quality by Design GMP for the 21st
Century
Merck & Cos Januvia (2006) : first FDA
approved product
OUTLINE
FDA initiatives for quality
The desired state
Quality by design (QbD) and design space (ICH
Q8)
and
process
o
Pr
g
n
i
nd
Quality
by
Design
Product Design
etc.
ance
Dosage fo
rm
,
st
ability,
formulation,
etc.
ed
ge
Pr
o
nt
e
m
e
v
ro
p
Im
s
u
o
u
d
n
ti
n
Co
u
c
Product Sp
Process
Parameters
ecificationst
Kn
Pro
ow
D
esdig
escireess
d PDro
ucnt
Perform
l
Scientific understanding
Holistic approach
Meaningful data
recognised by
authorities
Culture change
cost efficient
Investment up front
Continuous improvement
Up to 30% savings*
Just starting to be
Difficult to apply
retrospectively
w
e
n
e
e
g
h
TFormalgua
Riskn
Management
a
lProcess
1.Risk
2. Risk
Assessment
Control
4. Risk Review
QbD Approach
Focus on robustness
understanding and controlling
variation
Output
CQA1
M1
M2
Material Attributes
Critical
Quality
CQA2Attributes
CQA3
P1
P2
P3
Process
Parameters
Relationships:
CQA1 = function (M1)
CQA2 = function (P1, P3)
CQA3 = function (M1, M2, P1)
PHARMACEUTICAL
DEVELOPMENT & PRODUCT
LIFECYCLE
Product Design & Development
Manufacturing Development
Continuous Improvement
Candidate
Selection
Product
Approval
Pharmaceutical
Development & Product
Lifecycle
Statistical Tool
Design of
Experiments
(DOE)
Model Building
And Evaluation
Manufacturing Development
and Continuous Improvement:
Develop Control Systems
Scale-up Prediction
Tracking and trending
Statistical
Process Control
BACKGROUND OF FDAS
PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY
FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
INITIATIVE
In 2002, FDA identified a series of
ongoing problems and issues in
pharmaceutical manufacturing that
traditional approaches had not solved
FDA undertook an internal and external
assessment of the causes
As a result, the agency started a major
change initiative that is continuing
Stimulating more use of PAT was an
FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES
Inability to predict effects of scale-up
Lack of agility usually takes years to
bring up a new production site
Operations fragmented around globe
Inability to understand reasons for
manufacturing failures
OUTCOMES
High cost of production for products due to
Low efficiencies in manufacturing
Waste
Long manufacturing cycle times based on testing requirements during
production
Drug shortages due to inability to manufacture
Lack of improvements based on new technologies
Slowed development/access for investigational drugs
Need for intensive regulatory oversight
Qbd on cleaning
QUALITY SYSTEMS :
IMPLEMENTATION AND
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS
THE PQS
Manufacturers with a robust quality system and
appropriate process knowledge can implement
many types of improvements and take
responsibility for quality
INTERNATIONAL HARMONIZATION
Global harmonization of
manufacturing standards
Continuous improvement in
manufacturing science
Application of quality risk
management
Quality by design
API
Excipients
Analytics
Simple dosage forms
Advanced drug delivery
system
Devices
3. LINK
MAs AND PPs
TO CQAS
4. ESTABLISH
DESIGN
SPACE
6. PRODUCT
LIFECYCLE
MNGMNT
5. ESTABLISH
CONTROL
STRATEGY
OTHER DELIVERY
SYSTEMS:
Include more product
specific aspects, such
as
Sterility for Parenteral,
Adhesive force for
transdermal patches.
u
b
i
r
t
t
A
y
t
i
l
a
u
Q
Inputs to the process
I Chart
115
UCL=111.55
Individual Value
110
People
105
_
X=99.63
100
95
s
s
e ers
c
Pro met Equipment
ra I
a
P
90
LCL=87.71
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
Observation
74
76
78
80
I Chart
115
UCL=112.65
Individual Value
110
105
100
_
X=97.94
95
control variability
of the Output
90
85
LCL=83.23
80
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
Observation
54
56
58
60
I Chart
115
UCL=112.65
105
100
_
X=97.94
95
90
85
LCL=83.23
80
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
Observation
54
56
58
60
I Chart
120
UCL=116.68
Individual Value
115
110
105
_
X=102.37
100
95
90
LCL=88.05
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
Observation
34
36
38
40
I Chart
115
UCL=111.55
Individual Value
110
105
_
X=99.63
100
95
90
N
P
U
T
S
(X)
y = (x)
Measurement
62
64
66
68
70
72
Observation
74
76
78
UCL=114.17
110
Process
105
100
95
LCL=85.72
85
1
Materials
11
21
31
41
51
61
Observation
I Chart
UCL=111.17
Individual Value
105
_
X=98.76
100
95
Environment
90
LCL=86.35
85
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
Observation
94
96
98
71
81
91
OUTPUT
80
110
_
X=99.95
90
LCL=87.71
60
I Chart
115
Individual Value
Individual Value
110
100
4 DESIGN SPACE
3. LINK
MAs AND PPs
TO CQAS
4. ESTABLISH
DESIGN
SPACE
6. PRODUCT
LIFECYCLE
MNGMNT
5. ESTABLISH
CONTROL
STRATEGY
3. LINK
MAs AND PPs
TO CQAS
4. ESTABLISH
DESIGN
SPACE
6. PRODUCT
LIFECYCLE
MNGMNT
5. ESTABLISH
CONTROL
STRATEGY
CONTROL SPACE
Design Space
Knowledge
Space
Control Space
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
(DOE)
Structured, organized method for determining the
relationship between factors affecting a process
and the response of that process
Application of DOEs:
Scope out initial formulation or process design
Optimize product or process
Determine
design
space,
including
multivariate
relationships
DOE
METHODOLOGY
(1) Choose experimental
design
(e.g., full factorial, doptimal)
A
Factor A
Factor B
Factor C
www.minitab.com
A DOE IS USEFUL TO
Graphical Analysis
Geo-Gram:
The geo-gram is a geometrical representation of the data.
The shape is determined by the number of factors ( i.e. 2
factors is a square, 3 factors is a cube), the number of
levels and the distance between levels.
SQUARE GEO-GRAM
35
+47
Temp
B
-
41
50
Time
A
1a
Response surface plot
Contour plot
QbD
Literature
review
Preformulatio
n studies
formulation
QC and
Evaluati
on
Out
Product
Choose Experimental
Design
(e.g., full factorial, fractional )
2. Conduct Randomized
Experiments
3. Analyze Data
Determine significant
factors
or
multiple
SUGGESTED ACTIONS
Give credit for good performance
Continue to reduce unnecessary
supplements
Continue to develop the Pharmaceutical
Inspectorate
Reward process innovation
Eliminate unnecessary testing requirements
Address oversight of overseas API mfrs
Solid-State Polymorphism
Different crystalline forms of the same drug substance
(ICH Q6A)
Crystalline forms
Solvates (Hydrates)
Amorphous forms
Solubility/Dissolution
Processability /
Manufacturability
Chemical Reactivity
Stability
Form I
Intestinal
Membrane
Form II
Dissolution/Solubility
Limited Oral Absorption
(e.g. chloramphenicol palmitate)
Intestinal
Membrane
Formulation I
X Crystalline/
Amorphous
Formulation II
Optimize the formulation mitigate degradation pathways
(e.g., adjust pH microenvironment to limit degradation,
anti-oxidant to limit oxidative degradation)
Paracetamol Form I I
Direct Compression
Wet Granulation
Paracetamol Form I
E. Joiris , Pharm. Res. 15 (1998) 1122-1130
Paracetamol Form I I
Intrinsic Properties
of Different Forms
Biopharmaceutical Properties
Formulation
Variables
Manufacturing Process
Variables
Regulatory Considerations:
Can One Consider Polymorphs to be the Same Active?
CH3
S
NO2
N
H
C
N
Materials Science
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 585-591
Form I
Form II
Drug Product
Safety/Effectiveness
Sulfate
Co-Crystals
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A+
A+ A+
CCCCA+
C-
CA+
A+
A+
C-
A+
Salts
CA+
G
A
G
A
A
Cocrystals
A
A
A
A
Polymorphs
G
A
A
A
A
A
A+
A+ A+
CCCCA+
C-
CA+
A+
A+
C-
A+
CA+
Salts
Same Active Moiety
Different API
Co-crystals??
Where Do Co-Crystals Fit?
Is a New Regulatory
Class of Solids Needed?
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Polymorphs
Same API
TORCETRAPIB
SUMMARY:
Quality by Design (QbD) presents to the
industry , various pros like reduction in cost , a
better model ,hassle free processes better
interacted with FDA.
Along with that ,new technologies can be
implemented once a thorough understanding of
product is done.
For a manager ,It cuts down time to the industry
, if used effectively.
Thus , it brings about a worthwhile change in
every Pharmaceutical Operation and thus the
popularity of this subject and shift in the
paradigm is signified.
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
CONCLUSION