Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Outline
The Nature of Attitudes
What is Persuasion?
Goals of Persuasion: Why People
Change Their Attitudes and Beliefs
Seeking Accuracy
Being Consistent
Seeking Social Approval
Attitude Strength
Strong attitudes
Are more likely to remain unchanged as
time passes,
Are better able to withstand persuasive
attacks or appeals specifically directed
at them.
Attitude Strength
The two main reasons strong
attitudes resist change are
Commitment
people are sure they are correct,
Embeddedness
people have connected these attitudes
to other features of their self-concept,
values, and identity.
Attitude Strength
The two main reasons strong
attitudes resist change are
Commitment
People review information in a biased
fashion, dismissing evidence that goes
against their attitude.
Embeddedness
Restricts change because an attitude is
tied to many other ideas of the self that
would also have to change
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
Attitude-Behavior
Consistency
The following factors influence the
likelihood that a persons attitude will
be consistent with his behavior:
Knowledge
Personal relevance
Attitude accessibility
Attitude-Behavior Consistency
Subjective Norm
Behavioral
Intention
(Ones aim to
perform the
behavior)
Perceived
Behavioral Control
(Ones perception of how
difficult it would be to
perform
theand
behavior)
Copyright
Allyn
Bacon 2005
10
Behavior
Example of Planned
Behavior
11
What Is
Persuasion?
Persuasion
change in private attitude or belief as
a result of receiving a message
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Persuasion
Attempt
Audience
Factors
Processing
Approach
Persuasion
Outcome
High
motivation and
ability to think
about the
message
Central processing,
focused on the quality of
the message arguments.
Lasting change
that resists
fading and
counterattacks
Low motivation
or ability to
think about the
message
Peripheral processing,
focused on surface
features such as the
communicators
attractiveness or the
number of arguments
presented.
Temporary
change that
that is
susceptible to
fading and
counterattacks
Message
23
esearch
The Effects of
Personal Relevance
24
esearch
The Effects of
Personal Relevance
25
esearch
The Effects of
Personal Relevance
Or low quality
Exams would allow students to
compare performance with other
schools
26
esearch
High
Low
Personal Relevance
Personal Relevance
Argume
nt Qualit
yHigh
Low
Attitude Toward
Exams
1
2
1
0
8
For students
with a personal
stake, more
strong
arguments were
more convincing
6
4
2
0
Number of
Arguments
27
esearch
High
Low
Personal Relevance
Personal Relevance
Argume
nt Qualit
yHigh
Low
Attitude Toward
Exams
12
1
0
8
6
4
2
0
Number of
Arguments
28
esearch
High
Low
Personal Relevance
Personal Relevance
Argume
nt Qualit
yHigh
Low
Attitude Toward
Exams
1
2
10
8
6
Students who
wouldnt be
affected didnt
process quality
4
2
0
Number of
Arguments
29
30
Seeking Accuracy
31
Good Shortcuts
When we cant make a thorough
evaluation of a persuasive argument,
we may rely on shortcuts, such as:
Credibility of communicator
page 161
Others responses
page 162
Ready ideas
page 164
32
Issue Involvement
Mood
Done Deals
Unwelcome Information
Expertise and Complexity
33
Issue Involvement
Cognitive resources are too limited to
think deeply about every issue.
People focus their accuracy concerns
on issues that involve them directly.
34
Mood
A sad mood
Motivates people to acquire accurate
attitudes about the situation at hand
Warns of potential danger of making
errors in immediate environment.
35
Done deals
Desire to be unbiased and accurate
is much stronger before a person
makes a decision.
After the decision, the accuracy
motive fades in favor of the desire to
feel good about the decision.
36
Unwelcome Information
People tend not to expend cognitive
effort looking for flaws in an
argument that supports their beliefs.
Those who encounter information
that doesn't fit search for
weaknesses they can use to form
counterarguments.
37
38
39
Being Consistent
40
Being Consistent
Consistency principle
the principle that people will change
their attitudes, beliefs, perceptions,
and actions to make them consistent
with each other
41
Balance Theory
Fritz Heider
We want to:
Agree with people we like
Disagree with people we dislike
Associate good things with good people
Associate bad things with bad people.
42
Balance Theory
Cognitive system out of
balance
Uncomfortable tension
To remove this tension, we will have
to change something in the system.
43
Balance Theory
Rhoda is strongly pro-choice.
Mary is strongly pro-life.
Rhoda considers Mary her best
friend.
Rhoda
+
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
Mary
44
Abortion
Balance Theory
Rhoda could restore balance by
changing her feeling about abortion.
Rhoda
Mary
45
Abortion
Balance Theory
Or she could restore balance by
changing her feelings about her
friend.
Rhoda
+
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
Mary
46
Abortion
Balance Theory
Or she could restore balance by
changing Marys feelings about
abortion.
Rhoda
+
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
Mary
47
Abortion
Cognitive dissonance
the unpleasant state of psychological
arousal resulting from an
inconsistency within one's important
attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors
48
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory
Counterattitudinal action
a behavior that is inconsistent with
an existing attitude
49
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory
In a study by Festinger and Carlsmith
Students first performed a boring task
(turning pegs in holes)
Then were asked to tell another student
it was interestingand for this, they
were paid either $1 or $20.
50
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory
When later asked their attitudes
toward the boring task:
Those receiving $1 payment had come
to see it as more enjoyable
Those receiving $20 hadn't changed
their attitudes at all.
51
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory
Why? Dissonance theory explains:
$20 provided adequate justification for
misleading another student.
$1 was insufficient justification, thus
arousing dissonance.
Changing beliefs about the task reduced
the cognitive discomfort.
52
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory
Postdecisional dissonance is the
conflict one feels between the
knowledge that he or she has
made a decision and the
possibility that the decision may
be wrong.
Just seconds after placing a bet,
gamblers are more confident their
horse will win (Knox & Inkster,
53
Initiation
Amplification
Dissonanc
e begins
with:
More
dissonance
arises when the
action or
decision:
is seen as freely
Motivation
Reduction
Dissonance is Dissonance is
experienced
reduced
as:
through:
chosen
an action
or decision
that
conflicts
with an
important
aspect of
the self.
cannot be justified
as due to strong
rewards or threats
unpleasant
arousal
produces negative
consequences that
were foreseeable
cannot be
withdrawn
54
change
designed to
remove the
unpleasant
arousal
Arousal
No arousal = no dissonance = no
need to change
Cooper, Zanna, and Taves
participants in an experiment who
were given a tranquilizer (eliminating
any dissonant arousal) did not change
their opinions, even after writing a
counter-attitudinal essay.
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
55
Consequences
The more impact your behavior has
had on the world, the more you will
feel motivated to change your
attitudes to fit the behavior.
56
Consequences
57
(page 173)
Assignment 7
58
59
esearch
Rating of Product:
Ad Focus:
+30
+30
Personal
Personal
Benefit
Benefit
Group
Group
Benefit
Benefit
+20
+20
+10
+10
-10
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
Korea
U.S.
Americans had a
more favorable
reaction
to ads
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
stressing
personal
60
Koreans had a
more favorable
reaction to ads
stressing group
61
62
Self-Monitoring
High self-monitors were more
persuaded by ads promoting socially
appealing images associated with
particular brands of coffee, whiskey,
and cigarettes than by ads touting
the quality of the same brands
(Snyder and DeBono).
63
Gender
Like high self-monitors, women tend
to be sensitively attuned to
relationships and interpersonal
issues.
This sensitivity affects the way they
respond to persuasive appeals.
64
The Expectation of
Discussion
People who expect to discuss a topic
tend to hold more moderate
opinions.
Opinion shifts designed to create a
good impression can become lasting
when the process of shifting causes
people to think about the topic in a
different way.
Copyright Allyn and
Bacon 2005
65
Self-Monitoring and
Expectation of Discussion
When expecting a discussion, high
self-monitors (who pay more
attention to social rewards) shift their
attitudes and beliefs more than do
low self-monitors.
66