Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The behaviour of the boundary layer is very different from that of the fluid
above it
Who Cares!?
our knowledge of boundary layers has been the driving force behind radical
improvements in aircraft performance, automobile aerodynamics, naval
hydrodynamics, geophysical modeling, and general bluff body flows to name a
few !!
pipe flow
We see in the clips how there exists a real division in how the flow
behaves within the boundary layer and beyond it
If the Reynolds number is large enough, we can treat the flow as divided
into viscous in the boundary layer and inviscid beyond it
Inspection of the figure reveals that the boundary layer starts as thin
laminar layer, then over distance becomes unstable, goes through a
transitional stage and then goes turbulent
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
Observe the behaviour of a fluid particle in the flow (one within) and one
above the boundary layer
The fluid particles outside the B/L do not rotate as they flow along
(irrotational, or w/o vorticity)
Inside the B/L, particles rotate and distort under the heavy velocity
gradients present there
Once the fluid particles reach the turbulent zone mixing ensues that
affects parcels of fluid of various scales this is characteristic of
turbulent flow
Knowing the B/L thickness is essential in defining its region of influence in a flow
One method for delineating the B/L thickness is to consider the height
above the plate at which the velocity of the boundary layer flow, u, is
equivalent to some fraction of the free stream velocity. This is typically
the location where u=0.99U
This is to say that the thickness of the boundary layer (normal to the
plate) can be estimated to be the vertical location where the boundary
layer flow velocity is 99% that of the free stream flow
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
If we consider a uniform velocity profile (left) and the boundary layer velocity
profile (right), we can attempt to adjust the uniform profile until its flow rate
matches that of the boundary layer profile
- (1)
so we write
- (2)
- (2)
Now, let us imagine that we are considering the flow of momentum over
the plate, the velocity deficit in the non-uniform profile will also produce a
deficit in momentum flow
- (4)
or
- (5)
GIVEN:
boundary layer
displacement thickness for
the given flow:
* = 0.0070 x0.5
assume incompressible
flow (reasonable in this
velocity range)
REQD:
SOLU:
boundary layer
displacement thickness for
the given flow:
* = 0.0070 x0.5
1. Based on mass conservation we know we can write that the flow rate at
section (1) must be very close to that in section (2)
- (E1)
SOLU:
boundary layer
displacement thickness for
the given flow:
* = 0.0070 x0.5
SOLU:
boundary layer
displacement thickness for
the given flow:
* = 0.0070 x0.5
- (ans)
we observe what
happens to U as we
progress further down the
duct what is the reason
for this?
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
One of the powerful aspects of B/L theory is its simple facilitation of drag
force computation
We make some simple assumptions about the CV: that the pressure
throughout is constant, that the incoming velocity profile is uniform, and
that the exiting profile varies from zero at the CV bottom to free stream
speed at the top of the CV
The fluid adjacent to the plate makes up the bottom bounding surface in
the CV, and the top control surface follows a streamline that need only
coincide with the B/L at section (2)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
- (6)
- (7)
D is the drag that the plate exerts on the fluid, we also note the there is no
net force due to the uniform pressures on the CV, further there is no flow
through the top (streamline) or bottom (plate) boundaries, only through (1)
and (2)
- (8)
or
- (9)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
We do not know the height, h straight out, but we can make use of mass
conservation here
- (10)
- (11)
- (12)
(12) gives us the drag in terms of the momentum flux deficit across the
CV outlet
- (5)
- (13)
as (15)
- (7)
- (15)
- (16)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
- (16)
GIVEN:
flow of a laminar,
incompressible fluid past a
flat plate at y=0
the boundary layer is
approximated as
where
REQD:
Determine the shear stress for this profile and compare with the
Blasius solution
SOLU:
SOLU:
- (E3)
3. And we know our expression for momentum thickness
- (E4)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
SOLU:
- (E5)
4. Now we combine (E1), (E3) and (E5), and obtain the differential equation
for
- (E6)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
SOLU:
- (E7)
5. We can integrate (E7) from x=0 (where =0 to some arbitrary location, x,
where the thickness = ), we get
- (E8)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics
SOLU:
- (E9)
we now compare with the much
more labour intensive result for
Blasius solution
- (E10)
this compares fairly well
considering the effort saved in
achieving the result
6. Finally, we combine (E1), (E5), and (E9) to express the shear stress
**this result is within about 13% of Blasius result
- (ans)
87-351 Fluid Mechanics