The Influence Of Problem Based Learning Model Toward

Motivation and Physics Learning Outcomes Of Students

SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe Gowa Regency

MUHAJIRIN
DEPARTMENT OF
PHYSICS FMIPA UNM
2016

Introduction
Dik:
Dit:
Peny:
more active teachers

passive learners
MODEL
PROBLEM
BASED
LEARNING

Active Learners

The physics difficult

Motivation and
Motivation and
Learning
Learning
Outcomes
Outcomes
Physics Low
Physics Low

The Influence Of Problem Based

Learning Model Toward Motivation and
Physics Learning Outcomes Of
Students SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe
Gowa Regency

Hipotesis Penelitian

Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan motivasi

belajar fisika antara peserta didik yang diajar
melalui model Problem Based Learning dengan
peserta
didik
yang
diajar
melalui
model
pembelajaran langsung (konvensional) di kelas XI
IPA SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe Kabupaten Gowa.

Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar

fisika antara peserta didik yang diajar melalui
model Problem Based Learning dengan peserta
didik yang diajar melalui model pembelajaran
langsung (konvensional) di kelas XI IPA SMA
Negeri 1 Parangloe Kabupaten Gowa

Content and Method

Type and Design Research
Design
Research

Type

Posttest Only Control

Design.
Text

True Eksperiment

O1

O2

Source: Sugiyono (2013: 76)

Location and Time Of Research

Location

Time

Month
Maret May
T.A 2015/2016.

Population and Sample

Population

The population in this study were students of

class XI IPA at SMAN 1 Parangloe Gowa second
semester
of
2015/2016
academic
year
consisting of three classes with the number of
students as many as 105 people.
Sample

The sample in this study come from the study

population were taken by simple random sampling
technique. After rambang obtained Class XI IPA class
3 (experiment), while class XI IPA 2 (control).

Teknik Pengumpulan Data

Motivation
Questionnaire
Analysis

Validity: Korelasi product

moment
Reliability: Alpha
Cronbach

Analysis of
Instruments Test
Results of
Learning Physics

Validity: Korelasi point

biserial
Reliability: KR-20

Data Analysis Technic

Descriptive
analysis

Untuk
mendeskripsikan
karakteristik
distribusi skor
motivasi dan
hasil belajar
fisika peserta
didik

Inferential
analysis
Untuk menguji
hipotesis
penelitian.
Sebelum dilakukan
pengujian
hipotesis, terlebih
dahulu dilakukan
uji prasyarat yaitu
uji normalitas dan
uji homogenitas

Result and Discussion

1. Physics Learn Motivation
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Students motivation in Experiment Class and Control
Class in SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe

Statistics

Statistic value of learn motivation of

physics
Experiment class

average
Ideal score (Maximum)
Ideal score (Minimum)
Maximum Score
Minimum Score
Range of Score
Deviation Standard
Varian

72,43
96
24
88,00
59,00

Control class
66,71
96
24
84,00
56,00

29,00
7,23
52,31

28,00
6,46
41,68

1. Physics Learn Motivation

19

18

16

12

4
1
0

0
Kelas
Eksperimen
Class Experiment

Kelas
ClassKontrol
Control

Grafik 1. Statistics of Students motivation in Experiment Class and Control Class in

SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe

Result and Discussion

2. Physics Learning Outcomes
Table 2 Descriptive Statistics Results of Students Studying Physics in Experiment
Class and Control Class of SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe
Statistic

Statistic value of motivation study physics

Experiment class

Control class

Ideal score (Maximum)

19,97
29

17,37
29

Ideal score (Minimum)

Maximum Score

27,00

24,00

Minimum Score

12,00

14,00

Range of Score

15,00

10,00

Deviation Standard

3,98

4,14

Varian

15,85

17,12

Average

2. Physics Learning Outcomes

20

15

15

9
6
3

0 Kelas Eksperimen
Class Experiment

2
Class
Control
Kelas
Kontrol

Distribution Frequency of Students Studying Physics in Experiment Class

and Control Class of SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe

Result and Discussion

1. Normalitas
Skor

Dk

Eksperimen

3,47

0,05

11,07

Kontrol

2,12

0,05

11,07

Result and Discussion

2. Homogenitas

Motivation
Learning
Fhitung< Ftabel = 1,25 < 1,88

Physics Learning
Outcomes
Fhitung< Ftabel = 0,92< 1,88

Result and Discussion

3. Hypotesis
Motivation
Learning
thitung = 3,48

Physics Learning
Outcomes
thitung = 2,67

ttabel = 2,00

ttabel = 2,00

thitung > ttabel

thitung > ttabel

(H0 ditolak dan H1

diterima)

(H0 ditolak dan H1

diterima)

CONCLUTION

There is a significant difference in learning

motivation among learners that learned
using PBL and conventional learning
models

There are differences in physics learning

outcomes significantly between learners
that learned using PBL and conventional
learning models.