Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A PRAGMATIC APPROACH
MA Programme LEPC
Year 1
Course: Pragmatics
Student: Itrinescu (Andone) Mariana
CONTENTS
Politeness theoretical considerations
Mens report vs. womens rapport talk
Politeness and face
Different politeness strategies
Negative and positive politeness
Application of theory on 4 dialogues
Conclusion
affective function. While one does not exclude the other, it has been shown that
men often use language to exchange factual information more than they use it to
express feelings, whereas women tend to talk mainly in order to express feelings
and interact with their interlocutors affectively.
MENS REPORT TALK men speak more in public places
- they usually negotiate status
- use language to show off
- use language for information exchange
WOMENS RAPPORT TALK women speak more in private settings
- use language to maintain relationships
- deal with personal, private-life topics
- talk for the sake of interaction
(requests, asking for favours, interruptions, verbal, visual, tactile, olfactory, sonorous
aggressions) or their positive face (reproaches, refusals, insults, injuries, mockery)
In order to maintain a conversation, people are expected to respect instead of
positive face by emphasizing the closeness between them while the negative
politeness strategy is adopted when the speaker performs a face saving act by
showing respect and distance in relation to the person he is talking to.
faces;
Through a set of strategies must be put into work, in order to sweeten it -
APPLICATION OF THEORY
The two films chosen illustrate two different situational contexts one of them
features interactions taking place during a dance class, in which people have
come to learn to dance as well as to socialize, whereas the second one is taken in
an office environment and consists of the first encounter of two people (man and
woman) who are clearly in opposing positions and whose interaction is more of a
battle for status and superiority over the other.
DANCE CLASS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
7 dialogues
Woman man (acquainted)
Man elderly woman
Woman weird man
Man younger woman
Woman sweaty man
Woman younger woman
Man weird man
SUITS
- 1 dialogue
1. Woman man (interrupted by another
man, the womans boss)
DIALOGUE 4
OFFICE
S: Bloody hell.
Donna-Stephen DIALOGUE TRANSCRIPT
ANALYSIS
OF POLITENESS IN DIALOGUE 4
The dialogue is initiated by the woman, who is in fact marking her territory. She uses a politeness
formula (Excuse me), but her tone of voice indicates that she is bothered by his lack of politeness to
her.
The man doesnt seem bothered by her initiating reply and responds with sheer impoliteness (I just
chose to ignore you). The preferred line would have consisted of an apology as a second to her
accusation of impoliteness, not a mere answer to a regular question.
Turn-taking occurs in a natural way, although the rhythm and the tone may sound slightly aggressive.
They both compliment their interlocutor. When Donna compliments him (Youre good) he replies
arrogantly (Im better than good). When Stephen indirectly compliments her (Secretarial pools been
buzzing about a new, feisty ginger), she senses the sarcasm and replies defensively. Neither of them
respond to compliments in the commonly established manner.
The mans turns are longer as he is trying to take the lead. In fact, the whole conversation is a
negotiation of status, which usually occurs when the interlocutors are men.
The first part of the dialogue is not structured as adjacency pairs. When the natural question-answer
order is established (Oh, what were you trying for? // Well, actually, I was trying for), the man is
interrupted by the womans boss who gives her an order. The order is softened by a modal verb (I need
you to) negative politeness
Stephen finally greets Harvey, although he did not apply the same politeness rule at first with Donna,
which shows that in his case at least, politeness is a tool he uses with persons that he is directly
interested in establishing rapport with.
Instead of greeting him back or introducing himself, Harvey abruptly shows his lack of interest in
CONCLUSIONS
All the dialogues involve a man and a woman; I chose them to show that behavior and
politeness towards the opposite sex are sometimes variables of the context and the
interest one manifests in their interlocutors. For example, Dialogue 2 and Dialogue 4
feature 2 pairs of interlocutors of approximately the same age who are attracted (more
or less) to each other. It is interesting to notice that the dialogues in which two
interlocutors of opposing gender who were interested in their interlocutor, increased in
intensity up to the point in which they settled down to adjacency pair exchanges.
Dialogue 1 and Dialogue 3, in which the speakers were not comfortable with their
interlocutors were more clearly organized in adjacency pairs, without too many
variations
Even though women are generally considered to be more sensitive to the face needs
CONCLUSIONS
Both men and women use negative politeness strategies apologies (sweaty
once by women.
Hedges were used by both genders twice by men and twice by women
Although the literature has so far shown that politeness is related to gender in
that women have the tendency to follow social norms inherently, the four
dialogues chosen have proved that politeness is more a matter of context, social
situation, intention of interlocutors (either man or woman), the age of the person
one is addressing (see dialogue 1 - man-elderly woman) and sometimes physical
appearance. Politeness is, therefore, a matter of contextualized speech.