Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainable Growth
RVS College of Eng. & Technology, July 29-30, 2016
OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION
2. MATHEMATICAL MODELING
3. NUMERICAL SCHEME
4. RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
5. CONCLUSIONS
1 : INTRODUCTION
1.1 World Energy Overview
operties
Wood
~570
19.4-22.3
81-87
Low
~3mm
0.2-1.35
49-52
5.4-7.0
40-44
0.00-0.35
0.00-0.07
Coal
~1500
23-34
16.0-35.0
High
~100m
6.0-23.3
65-85
3.1-5.6
3.4-13.8
0.9-1.6
0.4-4.3
1.3 Pyrolysis:
Pyrolysis is essentially the thermal decomposition of organic
Importance of Pyrolysis:
o
o
o
o
o
2: MATHEMATICAL MODELING
L
r
z
Ro
The
physical model is cylindrical wood of length L, external radius R 0
having initial density oand initially at temperature To, subjected to
furnace temperature.
Governing Equations
Heat conduction equation:
(2.1)
equation(first order):
(2.2)
Initial condition:
T(r, z, 0) = T0for 0 r R0 & 0 z L
(r,z,0) = 0 for 0 r R0 & 0z L
(2.3)
Boundary
conditions:
for 0 z L
for 0 z L
for 0 r
for 0 r
(2.4)
Fractional
Fractional weight loss is the ratio that signifies the amount of volatile
evaporated from wooden dowel at any time. It is the ratio of mass of
evaporated volatile material to the mass of wooden dowel before
inserting it into the furnace.
FWL
(2.5)
The value of the term can be calculated using Simpsons one third
rule.
3: NUMERICAL SCHEME
Governing equations are first expressed in finite difference form.
Explicit Scheme
The basic philosophy of this method is to predict the approximate
value of the variable at internal points. The computation process
involve point by point evaluation in the (k+1)thtime level using the kth
time level.
Heat conduction equation:
= + + +
+G
(3.1)
Kinetics equation:
(3.2)
Stability criteria
(3.3)
Initial Condition
T = To For 0m and 0n
= 0 For 0m and 0n
(3.4)
Boundary conditions:
For 0n
For 0n
For 0m
(3.5)
For 0m
Density of charcoal ()
Thermal
Thermal conductivity
conductivity
of
of wood
wood (k)
(k)
K
K=
= 0.1256
0.1256 W/mK
W/mK
H.
H. C.
C. Kung[4]
Kung[4]
Properties
Value
Velocity constant ()
Convective heat
transfer coefficient (h)
Thermal diffusivity ()
Reference
h=(0.0189T+7.26)1W/m2K
point Density)
Differen
206.79
ce
-
261.76
21%
311.62
16%
350.14
11%
372.49
6%
380.10
2%
383.16
0.8%
Temperature Profile
(a)
(b)
Temperature Profile
(a)
(b)
Density Profile
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4.6 Density variation inside the wooden dowel when furnace temperatur
is 350oC at
(a) t=0s, (b) t=100 s
Density Profile
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4.7 Density variation inside the wooden dowel when furnace temperatu
is 500oC at
(a) t=0 s, (b) t=60 s
Fig 4.8: Center point density variation for different furnace temperature
Fig. 4.9: Fractional Weight Loss (FWL) with respect to time for different
furnace temperatures
Fig. 4.14: Fractional Weight Loss with respect to time for furnace
o
Fig. 4.15: Fractional Weight Loss with respect to time for furnace
temperature 500oC
Fig. 4.16: Fractional Weight Loss with respect to time for furnace
o
Fig. 4.17: Variation of FWL for wooden dowels of different AR for furnace
temperature 350oC
5: Conclusions
5.1 Conclusions
1. Mathematical model for two dimensional unsteady heat conduction and
first order chemical kinetics for pyrolysis of a cylindrical wooden dowel
has been developed.
2. Explicit scheme has been successfully employed to obtain numerical
solution for wide range of parameters and validated with the
experimental results available in the literature.
3. As furnace temperature increases, rate of pyrolysis of wooden dowel
increases.
4. For thermal anisotropy, as the conductivity ratio (k *) increases, the rate
of pyrolysis increases.
5. As the Aspect Ratio (AR) increases, the rate of pyrolysis decreases.
6. There is significant effect of furnace temperature, thermal anisotropy and
aspect ratio on temperature and density profile.
REFERENCES
1. W. D. Weatherford, JR., D. M. Sheppard, 1965,Basic studies of the
mechanism of ignition of cellulosic materials, Tech. symposium
(International) on combustion, pp. 897-910.
2. P. L. Blackshear, JR. and K. A. Murty, 1965, Heat and mass transfer to,
from, and within cellulosic solids burning in air, Tenth symposium
(International) on combustion, pp. 911-923.
3. E. Roy Tinney, 1965,The combustion of wooden dowel in heated air,
Tenth Symposium on comnustion, pp. 925-930.
4. H. C. Kung, 1972, A mathematical model of wood pyrolysis,
Combustion and flame18, pp. 185-195.
5. Key miyanami, Liang-shih fan, L. T. Fan, W. P. Walawender, 1977,A
mathematical model for pyrolysis of a solid particle effects of the heat
of reaction, The Canadian journal of chemical engineering,Vol.55,
pp.317-325.
6. Edward J. Kansa, Henry E. Perlee and Robert F. Chaiken, 1977,
Mathematical model of wood pyrolysis including internal forced
convection, Combustion and Flame 29, pp. 311-324.
7. D. L. Pyle and C. A. Zarore, 1984, Heat transfer and kinetics in the low
temperature pyrolysis of solids, Chemical Engineering Science Vol. 39,
No. 1, pp. 147-158.
THANKS