Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fractures
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
Demographics/Etiology
5 - 12% of facial fractures
30 year old males
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
Demographics/Etiology
High velocity impacts MVA 71% to 52%
1974-86 to 1987-02
Demographics/Etiology
5%
9%
MVA
Assault
52%
26% Recreational
Accidents
Industrial
Accidents
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
Sports Injuries
20% 25 %
Soccer
6% Rugby
Extreme sports
15% Martial Arts
Other
34%
Maladiere et al. Aetiology and Incidence of Facial Fractures Sustained During Sports: A Prospective Study of 140 Patients. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg, 2001: 30; 291-295.
Fracture Distribution
Wallis et al 13
1974-1986 (18 2 (3%) 55 (79%) 2 70
%)
35
Strong et al
1987-2002 (28 4 (3%) 88 (69%) 3 127
%)
48
Gossman et
1990-2003 (50 0 48 (50%) n/a 96
al
%)
22
Chen et al 1994-2002 (28 0 56 (72%) n/a 78
%)
Associated injuries
Loss of consciousness 72%
Obtunded/intubated 21%
Intracranial injuries
Pneumocephalus 26%
Cerebral contusion 18%
Dural tear 14%
CSF leak 11%
5% with persistent CSF leaks
Epidural hematoma 8%
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
Other Facial Fractures
Multiple facial fractures in 75% of pts.
Pediatric frontal sinus fractures
100% with concomitant orbital fractures
Taiwan
California
datadata
Complications
Major complications 5%
Meningitis
Mucocele
Minor complications 8%
Wound infections, frontal paresthesias, temporal
nerve paresis, frontal bone irregularities, diplopia
on upward gaze
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
CSF leak
12-30% basilar skull fx
Spontaneous resolution 24-48 hrs
Temporal bone > Ant cranial fossa
Sx’s
Postural headache
Bacterial meningitis
7-30%
Friedman, JA et al. Persistent Posttraumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage. Neurosurg Focus. 2000 (9), 1-5.
Management
Weigh intervention risks in critical patients
PE, CT scan
Primary goal
Protect brain from further injury
Secondary goals
+/- Sinus function
Cosmetic
Comminuted fractures
ORIF (mesh vs miniplates)
Ensure no mucosa trapped between fragments
Rice, DH. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
12:46–48. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Posterior Table Management
Separate nasal cavity/sinus from intracranial
cavity
CSF leak
No spontaneous resolution explore
Repair dural tears
Sinus obliteration
Severely comminuted
Cranialization
Rice, DH. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
12:46–48. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Nasofrontal Duct Management
Obliteration
Endoscopic Lothrup procedure
Observation
Minor injury in a reliable patient
Reimage the patient in 1 to 3 months
Rice, DH. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
12:46–48. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chen et al. Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Treatment Algorithm and Assessment of Outcomes Based on 78 Clinical Cases. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg. 118: 457, 2006.
Anterio Frontal
Posterior Ant/Post Total
r recess
Gossman et 48
1990-2003 0 48 (50%) ?? 96
al (50%)
8%
11%
Observation
3% ORIF
47%
Stent
Cranialization
30% Obliteration
Gossman et Laryngoscope al. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Review of 96 Cases., 116: 1357-136, 2006.
Anterior Posterior Ant/Post
Chen et al 94-2002 22 0 56
Chen et al. Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Treatment Algorithm and Assessment of Outcomes Based on 78 Clinical Cases. Plast.
Reconstr. Surg. 118: 457, 2006.
Anterio Frontal
Posterior Ant/Post Total
r recess
Wallis et al 13
1974-1986 2 (3%) 55 (79%) 2 70
(18%)
Strong et al 35
1987-2002 4 (3%) 88 (69%) 3 127
(28%)
Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (2006) 135, 774-
779
Endoscopic Repair
Allows fixation of favorable ant table fxs
Opportunity for nasofrontal aperture
procedures at same setting.
Endoscopic Repair
Fracture reduction
Endoscopic browlift (subperiosteal)
30 degree scope w/endosheath
Fracture camouflage
Old fractures
Alloplastic implant hides defect
Pham, A and Strong, EB. Endoscopic management of facial fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 14:234–241. 2006
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Frontal Depressions
Alloplastic fillers
Acrylic implants
Commonly used
Hydroxyapatite cement
Osseointegration
Good biocompatibility
Friedman, C et al. Reconstruction of the Frontal Sinus and Frontofacial Skeleton With Hydroxyapatite Cement. Arch Facial Plast
Surg.2000;2:124-129
Friedman, C et al. Reconstruction of the Frontal Sinus and Frontofacial Skeleton With Hydroxyapatite Cement. Arch Facial Plast
Surg.2000;2:124-129
Titanium Mesh
Severely Comminuted fxs
Lakhani, Raam S. MD et al. Titanium Mesh Repair of the Severely Comminuted Frontal Sinus Fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg.2001;127:665-669
Closed Reduction
Case report
Lost tip of probe in sinus
Hwang et al. Closed Reduction of Fractured Anterior Wall of the Frontal bone. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2005 (16); 120-
122.
Obliteration History
Dates back to 1950’s (Bergara)
Hypothesis
Transplanted fat would remain vascularized
Non-viable fat would fibrose
•Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
•Fattahi et al. Comparison of 2 Preferred Methods Used for Frontal Sinus Obliteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63; 487-91, 2005.
Obliteration History
Goodale and Montgomery (late 50’s and 60’s)
Fat obliteration standard of care for difficult frontal
sinus disease
No sx recurrence or radiographic recurrence after 5 years
Hardy and Montgomery (1976)
250 patients; median follow-up 8 years
Complication rate 18%
Abdominal wound - 5.2%
Acute postoperative infections (necrosis of implanted fat) - 3%
Recurrent chronic sinusitis - 3%
4% of cases had to be revised
No report on the occurrence of mucoceles
•Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
•Fattahi et al. Comparison of 2 Preferred Methods Used for Frontal Sinus Obliteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63; 487-91, 2005.
Obliteration Indications
Mucopyocele, or
recurrent acute
sinusitis
Severe fractures
Chronic sinusitis
Tumor
Obliteration Principles
Meticulous removal of all visible mucosa
Removal of the inner cortex
Cutting burr for thick bone and a diamond burr for
the dura and orbital roof–periorbita
Results do not depend on the choice of microscope or
Loupe magnification
Permanent occlusion of the nasofrontal duct
Material that forms a fibrous barrier between the
obliterated sinus and the nasal cavity.
Prevents the implanted material from sliding downward
and impairs the ingrowth of nasal mucosa.
Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
Obliteration Materials
Adipose tissue
Pericranium
Hydroxyapatite
Temporalis fascia
Bone chips
Bio glass
Polytetrafluoroethylene carbon fiber
Calcium sulfate methylmethacrylate
Oxidized cellulose
Gelfoam
Lyophilized cartilage
Fattahi et al. Comparison of 2 Preferred Methods Used for Frontal Sinus Obliteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63; 487-91, 2005.
Hydroxyapatite Obliteration
Friedman and Costantino (1991)
HAC obliteration feline frontal sinuses.
30% replacement of the HAC with bone at 12
months
63% at 18 months.
Fattahi et al. Comparison of 2 Preferred Methods Used for Frontal Sinus Obliteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63; 487-91, 2005.
Pericranial Flap Obliteration
Vascularized flap
Does not rely on sinus walls for blood supply
Low post op infection rate
Bulky enough to obliterate frontal sinus
Axial or random flap
Axial flaps
Anterior – supraorbital / supratrochlear arteries
Lateral - anterior division of superficial temporal artery
•Parhiscar et al. Frontal Sinus Obliteration with the Pericranial Flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124: 304-7.
•Ducic, Y et al. Frontal Sinus Obliteration Using a Laterally Based Pedicled Pericranial Flap. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (4), p 541-55.
Ducic, Y et al. Frontal Sinus Obliteration Using a Laterally Based Pedicled Pericranial Flap. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (4), p 541-55.
Fat Obliteration
Outcome not influenced by degree of
surviving fat.
Post op fat distribution
< 20% 53% of cases
> 60% 18% of cases
Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
Post op scans
CT
Soft tissue windows
Low attenuation of fat may be confused with air
Range of normal appearances stages of partial
fibrosis of the obliterating fat.
Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
Post op scans
MRI
Fat
High signal intensity (T1)
Intermediate signal (T2)
Fibrotic areas
Low to intermediate signal (T1 and T2)
Patients with persistent symptoms had no distinguishing MRI features
when compared with asymptomatic patients.
Appearance of mucoceles.
Varies according to the protein concentration of the secretions
T1 - low, intermediate, or high signal
T2 - high signal intensity
Fat Obliteration
Catalano 59 patients (1 to 9 years post op)
8.5% needed revision of osteoplastic flap
6.7% required correction of frontal bossing
Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term Results Using
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
Pericranial Flap Cranialization
Donald and Bernstein (1978)
First report of cranialization
By convention; frontal sinus left as dead space or filled
with free adipose tissue.
Consider with displacement > one table width
Severely comminuted fx
Donath et al (2006)
19 patients, no reported complications
One sphenoid CSF leak post op
No post op infections
Donath, A. Frontal Sinus Cranialization Using the Pericranial Flap: An Added Layer of Protection. Laryngoscope, 116:1585–1588, 2006
Donath, A. Frontal Sinus Cranialization Using the Pericranial Flap: An Added Layer of Protection. Laryngoscope, 116:1585–1588, 2006
Donath, A. Frontal Sinus Cranialization Using the Pericranial Flap: An Added Layer of Protection. Laryngoscope, 116:1585–1588, 2006
Donath, A. Frontal Sinus Cranialization Using the Pericranial Flap: An Added Layer of Protection. Laryngoscope, 116:1585–1588, 2006
What would you do?
References
1. Strong, EB et al. Frontal sinus fractures: A 28-year retrospective review. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
(2006) 135, 774-779.
2. Maladiere et al. Aetiology and Incidence of Facial Fractures Sustained During Sports: A Prospective Study of 140
Patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001: 30; 291-295.
3. Friedman, JA et al. Persistent Posttraumatic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage. Neurosurg Focus. 2000 (9), 1-5.
4. Weber, R, Draf, W et al. Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Surgery With Fat Obliteration: Technique and Long-Term
Results Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 82 Operations. Laryngoscope. 2000. 1037-44.
5. Fattahi et al. Comparison of 2 Preferred Methods Used for Frontal Sinus Obliteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63;
487-91, 2005.
6. Gossman et Laryngoscope al. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Review of 96 Cases., 116: 1357-136,
2006.
7. Hwang et al. Closed Reduction of Fractured Anterior Wall of the Frontal bone. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.
2005 (16); 120-122.
8. Pham, A and Strong, EB. Endoscopic management of facial fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
14:234–241. 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9. Friedman, C et al. Reconstruction of the Frontal Sinus and Frontofacial Skeleton With Hydroxyapatite Cement.
Arch Facial Plast Surg.2000;2:124-129
10. Lakhani, Raam S. MD et al. Titanium Mesh Repair of the Severely Comminuted Frontal Sinus Fracture. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2001;127:665-669
11. Rice, DH. Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Curr Opin Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 12:46–48. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
12. Parhiscar et al. Frontal Sinus Obliteration with the Pericranial Flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124: 304-7.
13. Ducic, Y et al. Frontal Sinus Obliteration Using a Laterally Based Pedicled Pericranial Flap. Laryngoscope 1999;
109 (4), p 541-55.
14. Donath, A. Frontal Sinus Cranialization Using the Pericranial Flap: An Added Layer of Protection. Laryngoscope,
116:1585–1588, 2006
15. Chen et al. Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Treatment Algorithm and Assessment of Outcomes Based on 78 Clinical
Cases. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 457, 2006.