KOMATHI A/P ARUMUGAM

821623
REVATHI A/P NATHEN
821474

Blaine Worthen and James Sanders

Formal determination of the quality, effectiveness, or value of a program,
product, project, process, objective or curriculum.

Abbie Brown and Timothy Green

process of judging, based on gathered data, the success level of an
individuals learning or a products effectiveness

Daniel Stufflebeam
the process of delineating, obtaining and providing useful information for
judging decision alternatives.

CURRICULUM EVALUATION

CURRICULUM
ACHIEVED THE
GOAL AND
OBJECTIVE WAS
SETTED

SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
Experimental approach
Compared student achievement through

Score

Learners

Success

 Case

studies and participant observation

Qualitative data
Participants
Actual incidents

Interview and
discussion

Students
Teachers

Interpretive approach

5
5 major
major
Humanistic
Humanistic
Approach
Approach

Artistic approach
Systematic approach
Theory driven
Critical emancipatory

Focus on large groups school or district

Evaluate total group of performances
Programs judge by how they affect the schools overall student population.
Objective and continuation

Programs impact on individuals or small group.

No criteria.

Content of curriculum
Value
Worth ( whether objective and goals)
Effect of delivered the curriculum
Effect on student, teacher, parents and administration.
Involve judgments
Short term result of a curriculum

FORMATIVE APPROACH

Procedures employed by students to assess their

learning and tactics as well as their level of
knowledge.
Improve and intended program
During program development and implementation

SUMMATIVE APPROACH

4 Level

Reaction
Learning
Transfer
Result

STAKE'S CONGRUENCE- CONTINGENCY MODEL. (SCIENTIFIC

APPROACH)

Delineates three new data categories :

Prerequisites
Curriculum
Results

STUFFLEBEAM'S MODEL

(SCIENTIFIC APPROACH)

Evaluation must include the

following:

Context
Evaluation
Input Evaluation
Process
Evaluation
Product
Evaluation

EISNERS CONNOISSEURSHIP AND CRITICISM MODELS

( HUMANISTIC APPROACH)

CONNOISSEURSHIP (5 Dimensions)

1) Intentional evaluation
2) Structural evaluation
3) Curriculum evaluation
4) Pedagogical evaluation
5) Evaluative evaluation

CRITICISM MODEL

1) Description
2) Interpretation
3) Evaluation
4) Thematic

ILLUMINATIVE EVALUATION MODELS ( HUMANISTIC APPROACH)

Has three steps to determine problem and features.

Observation
Further inquiry
Explanation

ACTION-RESEARCH MODELS (SCIENTIFIC AND HUMANISTIC

APROACH)
Teachers are the key players in action research evaluation.
Toward research and assessment
4 steps in this fine- tuning is =
1. Identify goals and purposes
2. Determine means of monitoring
3. Reflect on how to interpret
4. Activate and continues process

Reference

Allan, C. Ornstein Francis, P. Hunkins. (2014). Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues .Sixth
edition. Pearson New International Edition