Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DO?
Group 2
Introduction
DIFFERENT MANAGERIAL STYLES
DIRECTIVE
AUTHORITATIVE
AFFILIATIVE
PARTICIPATIVE
PACESETTING
COACHING
DIRECTIVE
The DIRECTIVE (Coercive) style has the primary
objective of immediate compliance from employees:
The do it the way I tell you manager
Closely controls employees
Motivates by threats and discipline
AUTHORITATIVE
AFFILIATIVE
The AFFILIATIVE style has the primary objective of
creating harmony among employees and between
manager and employees:
The people first, task second manager
Avoids conflict and emphasizes good personal
relationships among employees
Motivates by trying to keep people happy
PARTICIPATIVE
The PARTICIPATIVE (Democratic) style has the primary
objective of building commitment and consensus
among employees:
The everyone has input manager1
Encourages employee input in decision making
Motivates by rewarding team effort
PACESETTING
The PACESETTING style has the primary objective of
accomplishing tasks to a high standard of excellence:
The do it myself manager
Performs many tasks personally and expects employees
to follow his/her example
Motivates by setting high standards and expects selfdirection from employees
COACHING
The COACHING style has the primary objective of longterm professional development of employees:
The developmental manager
Helps and encourages employees to develop their
strengths and improve their performance
Motivates by providing opportunities for professional
development
Parent ("exteropsyche)
Adult ("neopsyche)
Child ("archaeopsyche)
Nurturing- Nurturing (positive) and Spoiling (negative).
Controlling- Structuring (positive) and Critical (negative).
1. As Vora was the coordinator of the program he should have been more
commanding in his style of functioning, from Day 1 when Mr. . Advani changed
his seating position he should have asked him not to repeat the same as it is
against the principle of class.
2. He should have been more pro-active in solving the problem of participants
related to classroom teaching and should have planned extra sessions for them
incase they faced any problems.
3. He should have been democratic in his decision making approach and should
have taken the consent of all participants before zeroing on any decision
4. Before allowing Mr.Advani for the conference of Bank Chiefs he should have
taken into consideration the request of other participants also and should have
tried to shift the conference to some other location where all participants can be
accommodated any the above arrangement was not possible then he should not
have allowed Mr.Advani also for the conference. By allowing Advani a wrong
message was sent across other participants and this resulted in a chain of other
events that folowed like people not coming to the knowledge sharing session.
Suggest ways in
which Vora could
effectively use his
style?
Affiliative style should not be used solely
Different situations demand different
reactions
Seating according to alphabetical order
Authoritative
Feedback- Participative
Conclusion
Different managerial style and observed the
managerial style of Mr. Vora, Who has
Affiliative managerial style and lacks
authoritative and participative managerial
style.
Different ego-states : parent adult and child
and how it effects the decision making of any
person. we have also commented on the egostate of Mr. Vora through ego-gram, who is a
highly compassionate person and lacks the
controlling parent ego-state.
Problem faced by Mr. Vora and suggestions to
be incorporated in his style.