Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Last
Quick Write
Flashback
Way back when, we talked about how its possible to
produce infinitely long sentences in a language.
Example:
John said that Mary thought that Robin knew that Angela
saw that Quinton wanted Sam to think that Becky heard
that Steve wished that Forrest hoped that Bronwen
believed that....
Idea: our knowledge of language consists of patterns of
patterns
Flashback
We also talked about sentences like the following...
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
Im memorizing the score of the sonata I hope to
compose someday.
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe
The claim was that these were acceptable sentences of
English, even though they made no sense.
Flashback
In contrast, the following sentences were not acceptable:
Green sleep ideas furiously colorless.
Im memorizing the perform of the score I sonata to
hope someday.
Brillig and, slithy and the toves
Wabe gimble in the gyre and did
What makes these sentences unacceptable, and the
other sentences acceptable?
Syntax
Syntax = the rules a language has for putting words
together into sentences
also: rules for putting words together into phrases
Important terminology: grammatical
= strings of words that form possible sentences of a
language
= conform to the syntactic rules a language has for
putting words together into sentences
What is grammatical is based on a native speakers
judgment of acceptability.
(descriptive grammar)
Game Plan
Our goal for today:
Figure out some basic syntactic rules
i.e., how languages put words together into larger units
Lets start with this observation:
The rules for putting words together into sentences do not
necessarily yield utterances that make sense.
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
Q: If syntactic rules are not based on what words mean,
how do they work?
= morphosyntax
Syntactically:
Check it out!
Words can be categorized on the basis of distributional
and morphosyntactic evidence...
Even if they dont mean anything:
Twas Brillig?
Brillig is actually in the
appropriate syntactic frame
for either an adjective or a
noun.
It was pleasant
It was evening
It was four in the
afternoon.
A First Hypothesis
How do we put words together into (grammatical)
sentences?
A really simple way = string one word category after
another:
S Det N V Det N
( = may consist of)
The child found a puppy.
S Det A N V P Det N
The slithy toves gimbled in the wabe.
These syntactic rules could capture patterns of words.
Important Data
structural ambiguity
Ambiguity (again)
Method 1: Bracketing
a. [more intelligent] leaders
b. more [intelligent leaders]
[[unlock]able]
[un[lockable]]
Ambiguity (again)
Method 2: Phrase Structure Trees
Tree Terminology
node
root node
constituents
more intelligent leaders
Ambiguity (continued)
Recall: in morphology, each node in a tree had to be a real
word
Adj
Adj
Aff
Verb
Aff
[un-]
[lock]
[-able]
Ambiguity (continued)
Recall: in morphology, each node in a tree had to be a real
word
Adj
Verb
Aff
Verb
Aff
[un-]
[lock]
[-able]
= able to be unlocked
Phrases
Phrase Phacts
Every phrase has to have at least one constituent
This constituent is called the head of the phrase.
The head determines the phrases function, behavior and
category.
For example, noun phrases have to consist of at least one
noun.
Robin
the book
a picture of Robin
In General
Theres a pattern to how these things work:
Noun phrases (NPs) are headed by nouns
NP N
Verb phrases (VPs) are headed by verbs
VP V
Prepositional phrases (PPs) are headed by
prepositions
PP P
Adjective phrases (AdjP) are headed by adjectives
AP A
Basic Phrase Structure Rule: XP X
Examples:
1. this book
2. very late
3. often forgets
4. almost in
Complements
X-Bar Theory
Together, heads and their complements form a phrasal
structure known X (X-bar).
Heres the way phrases (of all kinds) normally break
down:
XP
(Specifier)
note: heads are the
only obligatory element
in the phrase
optional stuff is in
parentheses
Head
(Complement)