ICT4D

Presentation
Home Group 4
Aryo Wicaksono
Bramantya Adji Pratama
Brian Hernanda
Danestyan Arif Pradana
Jason Dominic
M. Rah Adi Satrio
Pandya Dhira

Objective
O Compare between Universitas

Indonesias website (ui.ac.id) with

another universitys website to
compare understanding and
knowledge of ICT between
universities

Criteria of a Good
Website
O Easy Navigation
O Interesting Graphics Design
O Useful content
O Fast loading times

Methods of assessment
O Personal inquiries using the criteria

mentioned
O An online website grader
(website.grader.com)

Universitas Indonesia
Webpage

O University of Choice: University of

Queensland
O Reason
O Top 50 universities in the world
O Partner of UI for Double Degree

Program
O One of the group of 8 in Australia

University of Queensland
Webpage

Universitas Indonesias
Webpage (ui.ac.id)
Advantages
O Plenty of relevant info

regarding UI (history,
academics, enrolment
etc.
O A Quick Access tab for
other relevant webpages
regarding UI (library, SIAKNG, SCELE, etc.)
O Public info regarding the
latest happenings in UI

Disadvantages
O Loading time is very

slow
O Its not that visually
appealing (monotone
design)
O Amount of
information available
can be overwhelming

University of Queenslands
webpage (uq.edu.au)
Advantages

Disadvantages

O More visually

O Slightly more

appealing
O Offers vital
information for
students (future,
current, and
international)

complex
navigation
O Slightly less
effective search
engine

Personal Inquiry
Grading
N
o.

Criteria

UI

UQ

Loading
Time

Navigation

Design

Content

Grading
from
scale 1
to 5

Website Grader
O Website.grader.com
O Grades a website on 4 main

categories
O Performance (Page Size and Speed)
O Mobile (usability on a mobile device)
O SEO / Search Engine Optimization

(Site Map, Page Titles, meta

description, etc.)
O Security

UIs Webpage Grading

O Performance: 9/30
O Moderate Page Size
O Slow Loading Times

O Mobile: 30/30
O Responsive Designs
O Good Viewport (viewing from a smartphone)

O SEO: 25/30
O Good Sitemap & Page Titles
O Bad Meta Description (Page Description for

Search Engines)
O Security: 10/10

UQs Webpage Grading

O Performance: 24/30
O Small page size
O Fast loading times

O Mobile: 30/30
O Mobile-device friendly

O SEO: 15/30
O No site map
O Bad Meta Description

O Security: 10/10

Conclusion
O Both websites are very well made,

but they each have their own

strengths and weaknesses
O UIs webpage is great in content and
navigation but lacks in performance
and design
O UQs website is great in Design and
performance but lacks in SEO and
Navigation

Suggestions
O Further general optimization for both

websites
O Rework of graphics design for UIs
webpage
O Fixing the SEO for UQs webpage
(add a site map, fix meta
descriptions, etc)

THANK YOU
Any Questions, comments, or
critiques?