You are on page 1of 107

General Comparison between

AISC LRFD and ASD


Hamid Zand
GT STRUDL Users Group
Las Vegas, Nevada
June 22-25, 2005
1

AISC ASD and LRFD


AISC = American Institute of Steel
Construction
ASD

= Allowable Stress Design


AISC Ninth Edition

LRFD = Load and Resistance Factor Design


AISC Third Edition
2

AISC Steel Design Manuals

1963 AISC ASD 6th Edition


1969 AISC ASD 7th Edition
1978 AISC ASD 8th Edition
1989 AISC ASD 9th Edition

1986 AISC LRFD 1st Edition


1993 AISC LRFD 2nd Edition
1999 AISC LRFD 3rd Edition
3

ASD and LRFD


Major Differences
Load Combinations and load factors
ASD results are based on the stresses and
LRFD results are based on the forces and
moments capacity
Static analysis is acceptable for ASD but
nonlinear geometric analysis is required for
LRFD
Beams and flexural members
Cb computation
4

ASD Load Combinations


1.0D + 1.0L
0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75W
0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75E

D
L
W
E

=
=
=
=

dead load
live load
wind load
earthquake load
5

ASD Load Combinations


Or you can use following load combinations with the
parameter ALSTRINC to account for the 1/3 allowable
increase for the wind and seismic load
1. 1.0D + 1.0L
2. 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W
3. 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E

PARAMETER $ ALSTRINC based on the % increase


ALSTRINC 33.333 LOADINGS 2 3

LRFD Load Combinations

1.4D
1.2D + 1.6L
1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L
1.2D 1.0E + 0.5L
0.9D (1.6W or 1.0E)

D
L
W
E

=
=
=
=

dead load
live load
wind load
earthquake load
7

Deflection Load Combinations


for ASD and LRFD
1.0D + 1.0L
1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W
1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E

D
L
W
E

=
=
=
=

dead load
live load
wind load
earthquake load
8

Forces and Stresses


ASD

= actual stress values are


compared to the AISC
allowable stress values

LRFD = actual forces and moments


are compared to the AISC
limiting forces and moments
capacity
9

ASTM Steel Grade


Comparison is between Table 1 of the AISC ASD 9th Edition
on Page 1-7 versus Table 2-1 of the AISC LRFD 3rd Edition on
Page 2-24
A529 Gr. 42 of ASD, not available in LRFD
A529 Gr. 50 and 55 are new in LRFD
A441 not available in LRFD
A572 Gr. 55 is new in LRFD
A618 Gr. I, II, & III are new in LRFD
A913 Gr. 50, 60, 65, & 70 are new in LRFD
A992 (Fy = 50, Fu = 65) is new in LRFD (new standard)
A847 is new in LRFD
10

Slenderness Ratio
Compression
KL/r 200

Tension
L/r 300

11

Tension Members
Check L/r ratio
Check Tensile Strength based on the crosssections Gross Area
Check Tensile Strength based on the crosssections Net Area

12

Tension Members
ASD
ft = FX/Ag Ft
ft = FX/Ae Ft

Gross Area
Net Area

LRFD
Pu = FX t Pn = t Ag Fy
Pu = FX t Pn = t Ae Fu

t = 0.9 for Gross Area


t = 0.75 for Net Area
13

Tension Members
ASD
Gross Area

Ft = 0.6Fy

Net Area

Ft = 0.5Fu

(ASD Section D1)

LRFD
Gross Area

t P n = t F y A g

t = 0.9

Net Area

t Pn = t Fu Ae

t = 0.75

(LRFD Section D1)

14

Compare ASD to LRFD


ASD
LRFD

1.0D + 1.0L
1.2D + 1.6L

0.6Fy (ASD) (1.5) = 0.9Fy (LRFD)


0.5Fu (ASD) (1.5) = 0.75Fu (LRFD)
ASD (1.5) = LRFD
15

Tension Members
FIXED JOINT

Y
Z

o
-400.

16

Tension Members
Member is 15 feet long
Fixed at the top of the member and free at the bottom
Loadings are:
Self weight
400 kips tension force at the free end
Load combinations based on the ASD and
LRFD codes
Steel grade is A992
Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
17

Tension Members
ASD
W18x46

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989

LRFD
W10x49

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989


18

Tension Members
ASD
W18x46
FX = 400.688 kips

Area = 13.5 in.2


Ratio = 0.989

LRFD
W10x49
FX = 640.881 kips

Area = 14.4 in.2


Ratio = 0.989

19

Tension Members
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
640.881 / 400.688 = 1.599
Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
LRFD = (1.5) ASD
Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD
6 4 0 .8 8 1 1 . 0 0 . 9 8 9
A r e a f o r L R F D 1 3 .5

1 4 .3 9 5
4 0 0 . 6 8 8 1 .5 0 . 9 8 9

LRFD

W10x49

Area = 14.4 in.2


20

Tension Members
Code Check based on the ASD9 and using W10x49

FX = 400.734 kips

Ratio = 0.928

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD


640.881 / 400.734 = 1.599
6 4 0 .8 8 1 1 . 0
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D 0 .9 2 8

0 .9 8 9
4 0 0 . 7 3 4 1 .5

LRFD

W10x49

Ratio = 0.989

21

Tension Members
ASD
Example # 1
Live Load = 400 kips
W18x46
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989

LRFD
Example # 1
Live Load = 400 kips
W10x49
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989
Example # 2
Dead Load = 200 kips
Live Load = 200 kips
W14x43
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989
Code check W14x43 based on the ASD9
W14x43
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 1.06
22

Compression Members
Check KL/r ratio
Compute Flexural-Torsional Buckling and
Equivalent (KL/r)e
Find Maximum of KL/r and (KL/r)e
Compute Qs and Qa based on the b/t and h/tw
ratios
Based on the KL/r ratio, compute allowable
stress in ASD or limiting force in LRFD
23

Compression Members
ASD
fa = FX/Ag Fa
LRFD
Pu = FX c Pn = c Ag Fcr
Where c = 0.85
24

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios


for Compression Elements
ASD
b/t = 9 5 /

h/tw = 2 5 3 /

LRFD
b/t = 0 . 5 6 E / F

h/tw = 1 . 4 9 E / F

25

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios


for Compression Elements
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD
b/t = 9 5 /

h/tw = 2 5 3 /

LRFD
b/t = 9 5 . 3 6 /

h/tw = 2 5 3 . 7 4 /

26

Compression Members
ASD

KL/r Cc

(ASD E2-1 or A-B5-11)

LRFD

2
K
L
/
r

Fy
Q 1
2

2 C c

3
5 3K L / r K L / r

3
3
8 C c
8 C c

c Q 1 .5

cr

Q 0 .6 5 8

W h ere

C c

2 2E
Q Fy

(LRFD A-E3-2)
Q c2

W h ere

KL
c
r

F
E
27

Compression Members
ASD

KL/r > Cc

LRFD

(ASD E2-2)

12 2E
2 3K L / r

W h ere

c Q 1 .5
F

cr

0 .8 7 7

2

C c

2 2E
Q Fy

(LRFD A-E3-3)

W h ere

KL
c
r

28

Compression Members
LRFD
F

0 .8 7 7

2

cr

cr


KL
r

0 .8 7 7

cr

W h ere

KL
c
r

Fy
E

/ r

0 .8 7 7 2 E

K L

F cr

2 0 .1 7 1 2 E

2 3K L / r

29

Compression Members
ASD
F

LRFD

12 2E
2 3K L / r

F cr

2 0 .1 7 1 2 E

23K L / r

Fcr / Fa = 1.681
LRFD Fcr = ASD Fa 1.681
30

Compression Members
ASD

K yL

K L / r

W h ere

ry

KL

K zLz KL
,
,

r e
rz

E
Fe

(ASD C-E2-2)

LRFD
c = Maximum of ( cy , cz , e )
31

Compression Members
LRFD
Where:

cy

cz

K yL
ry

K zL

rz

E
z

32

Compression Members
Flexural-Torsional Buckling
2EC

Fe

K x L

1 .0
I y I

G J

33

Qs Computation
ASD
W h en

95 /
Q

W h en
s

4 .0 5

0 .5 6
Q

/ k

b / t 195 /

1 .2 9 3 0 .0 0 3 0 9 ( b / t ) F

kc

LRFD

/ t

/ k

/ k

i f h / t 7 0 , o t h e r w i s e k c 1 .0

0 .4 6

E / F

b / t 1 .0 3 E / F

1 .4 1 5 0 .7 4 ( b / t ) F

/ E

34

Qs Computation
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD
W h en

95 /

LRFD

/ k

b / t 195 /

9 5 .3 6 /
s

/ k

1 .2 9 3 0 .0 0 3 0 9 ( b / t ) F

W h en
Q

/ k

b / t 1 7 5 .4 /

1 .4 1 5 0 .0 0 4 3 4 5 ( b / t ) F

35

Qs Computation
ASD
b / t 195 /

W h en
Q

26200k

/ F

/ k

b / t

LRFD
b / t 1 .0 3 E / F

W h en

0 .6 9 E / F

b / t

36

Qs Computation
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD

b / t 195 /

W h en
Q

LRFD

26200k

/ F

W h en

b / t 1 7 5 .4 /

20010 / F

/ k

b / t
F

b / t

37

Qa Computation
ASD
be

253t

LRFD
b e 1 .9 1 t

E
f

4 4 .3
(b / t)

0 .3 4
1

(b / t)

A ssu m e E 2 9 0 0 0 k si ,

be

3 2 5 .2 6 t
f

5 7 .9
(b / t)

f
38

Compression Members
o -100.

Y
Z

FIXED JOINT

39

Compression Members
Member is 15 feet long
Fixed at the bottom of the column and free at the top
Loadings are:
Self weight
100 kips compression force at the free end
Load combinations based on the ASD and
LRFD codes
Steel grade is A992
Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
40

Compression Members
ASD
W10x49

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941

LRFD
W10x54

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944


41

Compression Members
ASD
W10x49
FX = 100.734 kips

Area = 14.4 in.2


Ratio = 0.941

LRFD
W10x54
FX = 160.967 kips

Area = 15.8 in.2


Ratio = 0.944
42

Compression Members
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
160.967 / 100.734 = 1.598
Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
LRFD Fcr = (1.681) ASD Fa
Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD
1 6 0 .9 6 7
1 .0
1 .0
0 .9 4 1
A r e a f o r L R F D 1 4 .4

1 6 .0 5
1 0 0 . 7 3 4 1 . 6 8 1 0 .8 5 0 . 9 4 4

LRFD

W10x54

Area = 15.8 inch


43

Compression Members
Code Check based on the ASD9 and use W10x54

FX = 100.806 kips

Ratio = 0.845

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD


160.967 / 100.806 = 1.597
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D 0 .8 4 5

LRFD

W10x54

1 6 0 .9 6 7
1 .0
1 .0

0 .9 4 4
1 0 0 .8 0 6 1 . 6 8 1 0 .8 5

Ratio = 0.944

44

Compression Members
ASD
Example # 1
Live Load = 100 kips
W10x49
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941
LRFD
Example # 1
Live Load = 100 kips
W10x54
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944
Example # 2
Dead Load = 50 kips
Live Load = 50 kips
W10x49
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.921
Code check W10x49 based on the ASD9
W10x49
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941
45

Flexural Members
Based on the b/t and h/tw ratios determine the compactness of
the cross-section
Classify flexural members as Compact, Noncompact, or
Slender
When noncompact section in ASD, allowable stress Fb is
computed based on the l/rt ratio. l is the laterally unbraced
length of the compression flange. Also, Cb has to be computed
When noncompact or slender section in LRFD, LTB, FLB, and
WLB are checked
LTB for noncompact or slender sections is computed using Lb
and Cb. Lb is the laterally unbraced length of the compression
flange
46

Flexural Members
ASD
fb = MZ/SZ Fb
LRFD
Mu = MZ b Mn
Where b = 0.9
47

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios


for Compression Elements
ASD
b / t 65 /

d / tw 640 /

h / t w 3 .7 6

E / F

h / t w 6 4 0 .3 /

LRFD
b / t 0 .3 8

E / F

Assume E = 29000 ksi

b / t 6 4 .7 /

48

Flexural Members
Compact Section
ASD (ASD F1-1)
Fb = 0.66Fy
LRFD

(LRFD A-F1-1)

b Mn = b Mp = b Fy ZZ 1.5Fy SZ
Where b = 0.9
49

-15.00

Flexural Members
Compact Section

FIXED JOINT
Y
Z

-15.00

Braced at 1/3 Points


o
FIXED JOINT

50

Flexural Members
Compact Section
Member is 12 feet long
Fixed at both ends of the member
Loadings are:
Self weight
15 kips/ft uniform load
Load combinations based on the ASD and
LRFD codes
Steel grade is A992
Braced at the 1/3 Points
Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
51

Flexural Members
Compact Section
ASD
W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959

LRFD
W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982


52

Flexural Members
Compact Section
ASD
W18x40
MZ = 2165.777 inch-kips
LRFD
W18x40
MZ = 3462.933 inch-kips

Sz = 68.4 in.3
Ratio = 0.959

Zz = 78.4 in.3
Ratio = 0.982
53

Flexural Members
Compact Section
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989
Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
LRFD = (0.66Sz)(1.5989) / (0.9Zz) ASD
Zz

f o r L R F D 6 8 .4

LRFD

3 4 6 2 .9 3 3 0 .6 6 0 .9 5 9

7 8 .3
2 1 6 5 .7 7 7
0 .9
0 .9 8 2

W18x40

Zz = 78.4 in.3
54

Flexural Members
Compact Section
Code Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40

MZ = 2165.777 inch-kips

Ratio = 0.959

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD


3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D 0 .9 5 9

LRFD

W18x40

3 4 6 2 .9 3 3 0 .6 6 6 8 .4

0 .9 8 1
2 1 6 5 .7 7 7
0 .9
7 8 .4

Ratio = 0.982
55

Flexural Members
Compact Section
ASD
Example # 1
Live Load = 15 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959
LRFD
Example # 1
Live Load = 15 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982
Example # 2
Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ft
Live Load = 7.5 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.859
Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9
W18x40
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959
56

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
Based on b/t, d/tw and h/tw determine if the section is
noncompact
Compute Cb
Compute Qs
Based on the l/rt ratio, compute allowable stress Fb
Laterally unbraced length of the compression flange (l)
has a direct effect on the equations of the noncompact
section

57

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
fb = MZ/SZ Fb
LRFD
Mu = MZ b Mn
Where b = 0.9
58

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios


for Compression Elements
ASD
65

b t 95

d tw 640

h tw 760

Fb

LRFD
0 .3 8

E F

b / t 0 .8 3 E F

3 .7 6

E F

h t w 5 .7

E F

L
y

59

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios


for Compression Elements
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD

65

b t 95

d tw 640

h tw 760

Fb

LRFD
6 4 .7 /

b / t 1 4 1 .3 /

6 4 0 .3 /

h t w 9 7 0 .7 /

60

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD

F b F y 0 .7 9 0 .0 0 2
2t

If

76b

L b L c m in im u m

f
y

or

Fy

(ASD F1-3)

20000
A

(ASD F1-2)

ASD Equations F1-6, F1-7, and F1-8 must to be checked.

61

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
When

102 103C
Fy

l
rT

510 103C
Fy

2
2
F y l / rT
Fb
3 1530 103C

F
b

0 .6 F y Q

(ASD F1-6)

62

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
When

l
rT

Fb

510 103C
Fy

170 103C

/ rT

0 .6 F y Q

(ASD F1-7)

63

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
For any value of l/rT

12 103C
Fb
ld / A f

0 .6 F y Q

(ASD F1-8)

64

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD
1.
2.
3.

LTB, Lateral-Torsional Buckling


FLB, Flange Local Buckling
WLB, Web Local Buckling

65

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD

LTB

FLB

Compute Cb
Based on the Lb, compute limiting moment capacity. Lb is
the lateral unbraced length of the compression flange,
= Lb/ry
Lb has a direct effect on the LTB equations for noncompact
and slender sections
Compute limiting moment capacity based on the b/t ratio of
the flange, = b/t

WLB

Compute limiting moment capacity based on the h/tw ratio of


the web, = h/tw
66

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD
LTB
For p < r

(LRFDMA-F1-2)
n C b M

(Table A-F1.1)

M
r p

Where:
Mp = Fy Zz 1.5Fy Sz
Mr = FLSz

= Lb/ry

FL = Smaller of (Fyf Fr) or Fyw

1 .7 6

E F

yf

67

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD

LTB

(Table A-F1.1)

Where:
r

X
=
F

1 X 2F

X1 =
Sz

E G JA
2

C
X2 = 4
I

Sz

G J

w
y

68

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD

FLB

(Table A-F1.1)

For p < r
M

r p

(LRFD A-F1-3)

Where:
Mp = Fy Zz 1.5Fy Sz
Mr = FLSz

FL = Smaller of (Fyf Fr) or Fyw

= b/t
p = 0 . 3 8 E F

= 0 .8 3 E F

69

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD
WLB
For p < r
M
Where:

(Table A-F1.1)

r p

(LRFD A-F1-3)

Mp = Fy Zz 1.5Fy Sz
Mr = Re Fy Sz
Re = 1.0

for non-hybrid girder

70

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
LRFD

WLB

(Table A-F1.1)

= h/tw

= 3 .7 6 E F

r = 5 . 7 E F

71

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
C

1 .7 5 1 .0 5 M

M 1 M 2
If M m ax b e tw e e n M

LRFD
C
M
M
M

b
A
B
C

2 .5 M

m ax

0 .3 M

and M

1 2 .5 M m a x
3M A 4 M

3M

2 2

2 .3

1 .0

a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t q u a rte r p o in t
a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t c e n te rlin e
a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t th re e q u a rte r p o in t
72

-12.00

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section

o
Pin

Y
Z

-12.00

o
Roller

73

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section

Member is 12 feet long


Pin at the start of the member
Roller at the end of the member
Cross-section is W12x65
Loadings are:
Self weight
12 kips/ft uniform load
Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes
Steel grade is A992
Check code based on the ASD and LRFD codes
74

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
W12x65
Cb = 1.0
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988
LRFD
W12x65
Cb = 1.136
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971
Code check is controlled by FLB.
Cb = 1.0
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.973
75

Flexural Members
Noncompact Section
ASD
Example # 1
Live Load = 12 kips/ft
W12x65
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988
LRFD
Example # 1
Live Load = 12 kips/ft
W12x65
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971
Example # 2
Dead Load = 6 kips/ft
Live Load = 6 kips/ft
W12x65
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.85
Code check W12x65 based on the ASD9
W12x65
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988
76

Design for Shear


ASD

h / tw 380

fv = FY/Aw Fv = 0.4Fy
LRFD

h / t w 2 .4 5 E / F

(ASD F4-1)

yw

Vu = FY vVn = v0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)

Where v = 0.9
77

Design for Shear


Assume E = 29000 ksi
h / tw 380 F y
ASD
fv = FY/Aw Fv = 0.4Fy
LRFD

h / t w 4 1 7 .2 /

(ASD F4-1)

yw

Vu = FY vVn = v0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)

Where v = 0.9
78

Design for Shear


ASD

h / tw 380

fv = FY/Ay F v

LRFD

2 .4 5 E / F

yw

2 .8 9

C v

h / t w 3 .0 7

0 .4 F

Vu = FY vVn = v 0 . 6 F

(ASD F4-2)

E / F

yw

2 .4 5 E / F

yw

Aw

h / tw

yw

(LRFD F2-2)

Where v = 0.9
79

Design for Shear


LRFD

3 .0 7

E / F

yw

h / tw 260

Vu = FY vVn = v A w

4 .5 2 E
h / t w

(LRFD F2-3)

Where v = 0.9

80

-15.00

Design for Shear

FIXED JOINT
Y
Z

-15.00

Braced at 1/3 Points


o
FIXED JOINT

81

Design for Shear


Same as example # 3 which is used for design of flexural
member with compact section
Member is 12 feet long
Fixed at both ends of the member
Loadings are:
Self weight
15 kips/ft uniform load
Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes
Steel grade is A992
Braced at the 1/3 Points
Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
82

Design for Shear


ASD
W18x40
LRFD
W18x40

(Check shear at the end of the member, equation F4-1 Y)

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8


(Check shear at the end of the member, equation A-F2-1 Y)

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948


83

Design for Shear


ASD
W18x40
FY = 90.241 kips
LRFD
W18x40
FY = 144.289 kips

Ay = 5.638 in.2
Ratio = 0.8

Ay = 5.638 in.2
Ratio = 0.948
84

Design for Shear


Code Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40
FY = 90.241 kips
Ratio = 0.8
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
144.289 / 90.241 = 1.5989
Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD
LRFD = (0.4)(1.5989) /(0.6)(0.9) ASD
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D 0 .8

LRFD

W18x40

1 4 4 .2 8 9 0 .4 1 .0

0 .9 4 8
9 0 .2 4 1
0 .6 0 .9

Ratio = 0.948
85

Design for Shear


ASD
Example # 1
Live Load = 15 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8
LRFD
Example # 1
Live Load = 15 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948
Example # 2
Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ft
Live Load = 7.5 kips/ft
W18x40
Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.83
Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9
W18x40
Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8
86

Combined Forces
ASD

fa /Fa > 0.15

fa

Fa

fa
0 .6 F

LRFD

m y

f by

fa
F

f by
F by

ey

F by

f bz

m z

fa

1 .0

(ASD H1-1)

ez

f bz
1 .0
F bz

(ASD H1-2)

Pu /Pn 0.2

Pu
M uz
8 M uy

Pn
9 b M ny b M nz

1 . 0

(LRFD H1-1a)

87

Combined Forces
ASD

fa /Fa 0.15

f by
fa
f bz

1 .0
Fa
F by
F bz

LRFD

(ASD H1-1)

Pu /Pn < 0.2

M uy
Pu
M uz

2 P n b M ny b M nz

1 . 0

(LRFD H1-1a)

88

Combined Forces

Y
Z

89

Combined Forces

3D Simple Frame

3 Bays in X direction
2 Bays in Z direction
2 Floors in Y direction

3 @ 15 ft
2 @ 30 ft
2 @ 15 ft

Loadings

Self weight of the Steel


Self weight of the Slab
Other dead loads
Live load on second floor
Live load on roof
Wind load in the X direction
Wind load in the Z direction

62.5
15.0
50.0
20.0
20.0
20.0

psf
psf
psf
psf
psf
psf
90

Combined Forces
ASD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< Active Units
Weight Unit = KIP
Length Unit = INCH
>
<
>
< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE
>
< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members
>
<
>
< Profile Names
Total Length
Total Volume
Total Weight
# of Members >
< W10x33
2.1600E+03
2.0974E+04
5.9418E+00
12
>
< W12x58
1.4400E+03
2.4480E+04
6.9352E+00
4
>
< W12x65
1.4400E+03
2.7504E+04
7.7919E+00
4
>
< W12x72
2.1600E+03
4.5576E+04
1.2912E+01
12
>
< W6x9
3.2400E+03
8.6832E+03
2.4600E+00
18
>
< W8x40
1.4400E+03
1.6848E+04
4.7730E+00
4
>
< W8x48
1.4400E+03
2.0304E+04
5.7521E+00
4
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< ACTIVE UNITS
WEIGHT KIP
LENGTH INCH
>
<
>
< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS
>
<
>
< LENGTH =
1.3320E+04
WEIGHT =
4.6566E+01
VOLUME =
1.6437E+05 >
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

91

Combined Forces
LRFD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< Active Units
Weight Unit = KIP
Length Unit = INCH
>
<
>
< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE
>
< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members
>
<
>
< Profile Names
Total Length
Total Volume
Total Weight
# of Members >
< W10x33
3.6000E+03
3.4956E+04
9.9030E+00
16
>
< W10x39
1.4400E+03
1.6560E+04
4.6914E+00
4
>
< W10x49
7.2000E+02
1.0368E+04
2.9373E+00
4
>
< W12x45
1.4400E+03
1.9008E+04
5.3850E+00
4
>
< W6x9
3.2400E+03
8.6832E+03
2.4600E+00
18
>
< W8x31
1.4400E+03
1.3147E+04
3.7246E+00
4
>
< W8x40
1.4400E+03
1.6848E+04
4.7730E+00
8
>
<
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< ACTIVE UNITS
WEIGHT KIP
LENGTH INCH
>
<
>
< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS
>
<
>
< LENGTH =
1.3320E+04
WEIGHT =
3.3874E+01
VOLUME =
1.1957E+05 >
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

92

Combined Forces
ASD
WEIGHT = 46.566 kips

LRFD
WEIGHT = 33.874 kips
93

Deflection Design
ASD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< Active Units
Weight Unit = KIP
Length Unit = INCH
>
<
>
< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE
>
< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members
>
<
>
< Profile Names
Total Length
Total Volume
Total Weight
# of Members >
< W10x33
2.1600E+03
2.0974E+04
5.9418E+00
12
>
< W12x58
1.4400E+03
2.4480E+04
6.9352E+00
4
>
< W12x65
1.4400E+03
2.7504E+04
7.7919E+00
4
>
< W12x72
2.1600E+03
4.5576E+04
1.2912E+01
12
>
< W14x43
1.4400E+03
1.8144E+04
5.1402E+00
4
>
< W14x48
1.4400E+03
2.0304E+04
5.7521E+00
4
>
< W6x9
3.2400E+03
8.6832E+03
2.4600E+00
18
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< ACTIVE UNITS
WEIGHT KIP
LENGTH INCH
>
<
>
< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS
>
<
>
< LENGTH =
1.3320E+04
WEIGHT =
4.6933E+01
VOLUME =
1.6566E+05 >
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

94

Deflection Design
LRFD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< Active Units
Weight Unit = KIP
Length Unit = INCH
>
<
>
< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE
>
< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members
>
<
>
< Profile Names
Total Length
Total Volume
Total Weight
# of Members >
< W10x33
2.1600E+03
2.0974E+04
5.9418E+00
12
>
< W10x49
1.4400E+03
2.0736E+04
5.8745E+00
8
>
< W10x54
7.2000E+02
1.1376E+04
3.2228E+00
4
>
< W12x40
1.4400E+03
1.6992E+04
4.8138E+00
4
>
< W14x43
2.8800E+03
3.6288E+04
1.0280E+01
8
>
< W14x48
1.4400E+03
2.0304E+04
5.7521E+00
4
>
< W6x9
3.2400E+03
8.6832E+03
2.4600E+00
18
>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
< ACTIVE UNITS
WEIGHT KIP
LENGTH INCH
>
<
>
< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS
>
<
>
< LENGTH =
1.3320E+04
WEIGHT =
3.8345E+01
VOLUME =
1.3535E+05 >
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

95

Deflection Design
ASD
WEIGHT = 46.933 kips

LRFD
WEIGHT = 38.345 kips
96

Compare Design without and with


Deflection Design
ASD
Without Deflection Design
With Deflection Design

WEIGHT = 46.566 kips


WEIGHT = 46.933 kips

LRFD
Without Deflection Design
With Deflection Design

WEIGHT = 33.874 kips


WEIGHT = 38.345 kips

97

Design same example based on


Cb = 1.0
Code and deflection design with C b = 1.0
ASD
Compute Cb
Specify Cb = 1.0

WEIGHT = 46.933 kips


WEIGHT = 51.752 kips

LRFD
Compute Cb
Specify Cb = 1.0

WEIGHT = 38.345 kips


WEIGHT = 48.421 kips
98

Design Similar example based on


Cb = 1.0 and LL5
Code and deflection design with Cb = 1.0 and increase the live
load by a factor of 5.
Area loads are distributed using two way option instead of one
way
Also change the 2 bays in the Z direction from 30 ft to 15 ft.
ASD

WEIGHT = 25.677 kips

LRFD

WEIGHT = 22.636 kips


Difference = 3.041 kips
99

Design Similar example based on


Cb = 1.0 and LL10
Code and deflection design with Cb = 1.0 and increase the live
load by a factor of 10.
Area loads are distributed using two way option instead of one
way
Also change the 2 bays in the Z direction from 30 ft to 15 ft.
ASD

WEIGHT = 31.022 kips

LRFD

WEIGHT = 29.051 kips


Difference = 1.971 kips
100

Stiffness Analysis
versus
Nonlinear Analysis
Stiffness Analysis Load Combinations or Form
Loads can be used.
Nonlinear Analysis Form Loads must be used.
Load Combinations are not valid.
Nonlinear Analysis Specify type of Nonlinearity.
Nonlinear Analysis Specify Maximum Number of
Cycles.
Nonlinear Analysis Specify Convergence Tolerance.
101

Nonlinear Analysis
Commands
NONLINEAR EFFECT
TENSION ONLY
COMPRESSION ONLY
GEOMETRY AXIAL

MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CYCLES


CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS
102

Design using Nonlinear Analysis


Input File # 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Geometry, Material Type, Properties,


Loading SW, LL, and WL
FORM LOAD A FROM SW 1.4
FORM LOAD B FROM SW 1.2 LL 1.6
FORM LOAD C FROM SW 1.2 WL 1.6 LL 0.5
FORM LOAD D FROM SW 0.9 WL 1.6
DEFINE PHYSICAL MEMBERS
PARAMETERS
MEMBER CONSTRAINTS
LOAD LIST A B C D
$ Activate only the FORM loads
STIFFNESS ANALYSIS
SAVE
103

Design using Nonlinear Analysis


Input File # 2
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

RESTORE
LOAD LIST A B C D
SELECT MEMBERS
SMOOTH PHYSICAL MEMBERS
DELETE LOADINGS A B C D
SELF WEIGHT LOADING RECOMPUTE
FORM LOAD A FROM SW 1.4
FORM LOAD B FROM SW 1.2 LL 1.6
FORM LOAD C FROM SW 1.2 WL 1.6 LL 0.5
FORM LOAD D FROM SW 0.9 WL 1.6
LOAD LIST A B C D
STIFFNESS ANALYSIS
CHECK MEMBERS
STEEL TAKE OFF
SAVE
104

Design using Nonlinear Analysis


Input File # 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

RESTORE
LOAD LIST A B C D
SELECT MEMBERS
SMOOTH PHYSICAL MEMBERS
DELETE LOADINGS A B C D
SELF WEIGHT LOADING RECOMPUTE
FORM LOAD A FROM SW 1.4
FORM LOAD B FROM SW 1.2 LL 1.6
FORM LOAD C FROM SW 1.2 WL 1.6 LL 0.5
FORM LOAD D FROM SW 0.9 WL 1.6

105

Design using Nonlinear Analysis


Input File # 3 (continue)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

NONLINEAR EFFECT
GEOMETRY ALL MEMBERS
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CYCLES
CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT
LOAD LIST A B C D
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS
CHECK MEMBERS
STEEL TAKE OFF
SAVE
106

General Comparison between AISC


LRFD and ASD

Questions

107

You might also like