Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANAGEMENT
MATERNITY HOSPITAL
PROJECT
HALA ABUFARES
LINA ABOJARADEH
PRESENTED TO NAMAA QUDAH
PROJECT INDEX
1.Project Description
2. Stakeholders
3. Project Charter
4. Work Break Down Structure
5. Gantt Chart
6. Network Diagram
Project Description
Project title
Brief Project
Description
A modern and technologically advanced 100-bed Maternity hospital that takes into
account the importance of incorporating nature in healthcare design. Using the latest
technologies in information systems and with the top maternity surgeons on its staff, this
hospital aims to be the leading Maternity hospital in Jordan.
Location
Area
Project
Program
Stakeholders
ATCCO
Project manager:
Eng Hala Abufares
ARABTECH
JARADANA
Jordan
Engineers
Association
Project leader:
Eng. Eman
AbuAlfailat
Inpatients
Outpatients
Visitors
Medical Staff
Landscape:
MK
Associates
owner/client
architects
approval
committee
contractors
users
Design
Approval
Realizing
Use
quality
reviewers
developers
indirect
Technical
Designer
Neighborhood
Requirement
primary
stakeholders
Zain Al-Kilani
Head Surgeons
Investors
MEMCorp
DME Products
specialists
Healthcare
Development: HDP
Arabtech
Constructors : Ammoun
Jordan construction
Business advisers:
Arab Advisors Group
Information advisors:
Ministry of Information and
Communications Technology
Subcontractors
Emmar Real
Estate Property
Developer
Manages the
development from gaining
planning permission,
obtaining the land and
managing the Contracting
of any ground works and
building necessary.
Service Team
and Staff
PROJECT CHARTER
SCOPE
Deliverables
Planning
- Prepare general info
report
- Site
selection/analysis
- Regulations and
legislations
Documents
- Case Analysis
- Functional Planning
- Feasible studies and
feasibility report
Design
ASSUMPTIONS
- The plot of land is empty and is
easy to dig- saving time and
money
- Finishing materials will get
cheaper in winter
- Labor will be cheaper in the
winter
- Finish earlier than the set
deadline due to longer working
hours
- Export ready plants for the
landscaping
Execution
<date>
<sponsor>
Closing
-Check
Snagging
-Site clear up
-Performance
Evaluation
-Project
Documentation
Project Milestones
Proposed
Date
30/4/2017
31/07/2017
31/10/2017
30/06/2018
31/08/2018
Actual
Date
WBS
Maternity Hospital
Planning
Design
Execution
Closing
General Info
Conceptual
Enabling
Works
Site Clear-up
Site
Selection/Analysi
s
Preliminary
Design
Excavation
Snag Checking
Regulations
and
Legislations
Design
Development
Foundations
Project
Documentation
Case studies
Final Technical
Drawings (electrical,
construction,
mechanical)
External Works
Functional
Planning
Feasibility
Study
Tendering
Internal Works
Performance
Evaluation
Detailed WBS
Construction
Enabling
Works
Foundations
External
Works
Site Access
Excavations
Roofing
Electrical
Mechanical
Internal
Foundations
Building
Finishes
Wiring
HVAC
Partitions
Sanitary
Fittings
Floors
Site Survey
Site Setup
Steel works
Landscape
Internal
Works
Electrical
Appliances
Installation
Circuit
Breaker
Installation
Paving
Ceilings
Plumbing
Finishing
Car Park
Detailed WBS
Planning and Designing
Feasibility Study
Technical
Legal
Architectural
Structural
Economic
Operational
Mechanical
Electrical
Schedule
Market
Interior Design
Financial
Cultural
Resource
Gantt Chart
Milestones
Meetings
Critical Path
Critical Path
Critical Path
Float
Total Slack
Function Planning
0
0
start
0
0
1
General Info
0
1
1
0
end
Case Study
Site Selection
Feasibility
Regulations
Critical path : Start General Info Site Selection Function Planning Feasibility-End
Phase Duration: 4 months
E FLAOT LS
S Activity
EF
LF
DURATION
Technical Drawings
0
0
0
0
start
0
0
1
Concept
0
1
1
0
end
Tendering
Design Development
Preliminary Design
TRAX JO (FOOTBALL
PLAY FIELDS).
PROJECT
PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project name: Trax Jo
PROCUREMENT STRATEGY:
TRADITIONAL
In The Project :
The client choose the
contractor in the
tendering phase, the
contractor was
recommended by the
sister company.
The consultant designed
the project and was main
advisor to the client.
The consultant was a
delegate of the client at
site.
There were other
subcontractors that client
brought.
Conce
ptual
design
stage
Preliminary
design
stage
Design
developme
nt permit
stage
Working
drawing
stage
Tender
stage
stage
Constructio
n stage
Controllin
gg stage
stage
Project
Project In
In
Use
Use
Controlling stage
Tender stage
Construction stage
Controlling stage
Project In Use
The project supposed duration : from November 1 st 2015- June 4th 2016 (AL most 7 months)
The project actual duration is: from November 1st 2015- December 22nd 2016
( almost 11 months )
The November 1st 2015 is not when the execution starts its the tender
date, the execution date is February14th 2016
The proposed duration was 189 days and the actual duration was
327 days, the delay is 42% of the whole duration
The supposed duration was 217 days in comparison with the actual
one, the delay is 33% of the whole duration
4.BAD SUPERVISION BY
THE CONTRACTOR:
COST MANAGEMENT
We couldnt have any papers about the whole cost of the project
But by talking with the Arch. Omar Ghneim, he answered a lot of our
questions.
70000 JDS was the clear cost overrun which is 13% from the total project
cost
All of these losses the client take it but the contractor will be asked about
every delay day, but there is a limit that protect him in the contract
In the tendering contract the project total cost was 460 thousands JD
(Without the interior cafeteria)
At the end of the project the cost was almost 520 thousands JD
(not forgetting the summer seazon that the client had missed )