Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Introduction
Expulsion
Standard methodologies
e_GENESI device
Sample characteristics
Main activities
Step-wise experiments
Sample set
Comparison with standard methodologies (CSVP)
Generation and expulsion profiles
Compression/expansion of the source rock
Expulsion indicators
Porosity
Summary
Ongoing project
Poor
Poor understood
understood
ongoing
subsidence
(pressure
increase)
Closed System
Pyrolysis (MSSV)
(used by Eni)
Helium Flow
Generated HCs
no expulsion
no secondary
cracking
Generated HCs
no expulsion
Source Rock Fragments
Numerical:
based on theoretical assumptions (no consensus on primary migration process)
lack of primary migration experimental calibration.
Controlling
unit
HP-unit
Hydraulic
unit
technology
Cell
Sampling
8
outlet
inlet
artificial
reservoir
rock
disc
600 bar
750 bar
900 bar
200 bar
250 bar
300 bar
300 C
330 C
360 C
72 h
72 h
120 h
Possibility to simulate a
variety of geological
processes (subsidence & uplift
with different rates, isobar &
isothermal conditions,
different heating and cooling
rates, etc.)
Catagenesis simulation by a
step-wise experiments
Subsidence simulation by a
ramp experiments
Simulation of uplift
10
Samples
The e_GENESI device is designed for samples with a diameter of 50 mm ( 4 mm).
Processing of samples with smaller diameter involves the risk of inaccurate pressure
application and incomparable expulsion behavior.
The ideal sample quantity is based upon the OM content of the sample:
For Type-I and II kerogen: Between 5 to 7 g
TOC within the cell (~ 60 g for a sample with 10
% TOC).
For Type-III kerogen: Between 8 to 12 g TOC
within the cell (~ 20 g for a sample with 50 %
TOC).
Barnett
Shale
(very
sturdy)
17.0 mm
15.1 mm
after
10.9 mm
after
16.5 mm
before
Posidonia
Shale
(ductile)
before
13
Main Activities
Kiel University:
e_GENESI experiments on
different source rocks
Analysis of the expelled
hydrocarbons
Eni laboratories (source rock
samples characterization):
Optical analysis of organic
matter (GEOLAB)
RAMAN and FTIR
spectroscopy (GEOLAB and
DOW-R&D)
SEM-microscopy analysis
(DOW-R&D)
Numerical source rock model
calibration (RIGE)
Expelled HCs
(
Optical analysis
HR-SEM
Ro%=0.2
Ro%=0.5
Oil
Gas
Ro%=1.3
FTIR spectroscopy
1.4 Ro%
Ro%=2.0
Vitrinite
Reflectance (VRo
%)
Alteration colours
of palinomorphs
(SCI and TAI)
0.29 Ro%
14
~1.3%Rocalc
~0.9%Rocalc
~0.7%Rocalc
15
Type-I
Type-I/II
&
Type-II
Formation
Note
lacustrine lamosite,
limestone/dolostone (brittle)
Type-IIS
Type-III
Lithology
16
excellent source
rock quality for
type-I and type-II
kerogens
still good source
rock quality for
Tettegras Fm.
Quality of Inden
lignite in the
excepted ranch.
17
18
19
Type I
Green River
Type I/II
Posidonia Shale
Type II
Barnett Shale
Malmian Limest.
Type IIS
Besano Fm.
Tettegras Fm.
Type III
Lignite
In situ bitumen
Type IIS
Malmian L.
Type III
Tettegras Fm
21
Type II
Barnett Shale
no generation, only
expulsion of in-situ bitumen
(in line with literature)
Type I
Green River
Type IIS
Malmian L.
Type III
Tettegras Fm
22
Type II
Barnett Shale
Type I
Green River
Type IIS
Malmian L.
Type III
Tettegras Fm
23
Type II
Barnett Shale
Bimodal peak
Type IIS
Malmian L.
Type III
Tettegras Fm
24
Type II
Barnett Shale
Type I
Green River
Type IIS
Malmian L.
Type III
Tettegras Fm
25
Type II
Barnett Shale
Generation-Expulsion
delayed in comparison to
the generated
hydrocarbons in second
and third steps
25
20
ROCK EVAL TOTAL YIELD (mg/g TOC)
15
10
5
0
Time (h)
26
Summary - 1
The e_GENESI represents a unique method to simulate the generation and
expulsion of oil and gas under nature near pressure conditions with an intact
rock specimen.
A variety of data is delivered by an e_GENESI experiment, including
expansion-compression data, gas yields and extract quantities.
Pressure and temperature regimes are freely programmable, opening the
possibility to simulate a variety of geological processes.
Summary - 2
Generation & Expulsion efficiency depends on the nature of the organic matter
and of the lithology.
Sturdy and/or low-permeable lithology reduces expulsion efficiency.
Differences in the generation profiles were caused by kerogen type and by the
lithology of the rock sample.
Expulsion profiles do not always meet expectations or textbook knowledge!
Bitumen, HC-gas and CO2 composition in dependence of simulated depth shows
unique pattern for every kerogen type.
Generation dependent ratios are still applicable as expulsion indicators (e.g.
Pr/n-C17).
32
Ongoing project
Increase of data density concerning lithotypes and kerogen types:
Posidonia Shale
Vaca Muerta Fm.
Norwegian coal sample
Bonarelli Level
Ramp experiments different heating rates
33