You are on page 1of 41

A Framework for Human Resource

Management,
4th ed.
Gary Dessler
2006 Prentice Hall

Managing Equal Opportunity


and Diversity
Ch 2

2006 Prentice Hall

When you finish studying this chapter, you should be


able to:
Summarize the basic equal employment opportunity
laws regarding age, race, sex, national origin, religion,
and handicap discrimination.
Explain the basic defenses against discrimination
allegations.
Present a summary of what employers can and cannot
do with respect to illegal recruitment, selection, and
promotion and layoff practices.
Explain the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission enforcement process.

2006 Prentice Hall

Selected Equal Employment


Opportunity Laws
Fifth Amendment
states that no person shall . . . be
deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of the law.

2006 Prentice Hall

The Equal Pay Act of 1963


Cannot
discriminate in
pay on the basis
of sex

2006 Prentice Hall

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights


Act
An employer cannot discriminate based
on race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin

2006 Prentice Hall

Equal Employment Opportunity


Commission (EEOC)
Enhanced the federal governments
ability to enforce equal employment
opportunity laws
Receives and investigates job
discrimination complaints from
aggrieved individuals

2006 Prentice Hall

Executive Orders
Executive Orders
11246 and 11375
Require that
contractors take
affirmative action to
ensure equal
employment
opportunity

2006 Prentice Hall

Age Discrimination in
Employment Act
Makes it unlawful to discriminate
against employees or applicants for
employment who are 40 years of age
or older

2006 Prentice Hall

Vocational Rehabilitation Act


Requires employers with federal
contracts over $2,500 to take
affirmative action for the employment
of handicapped persons

2006 Prentice Hall

Pregnancy Discrimination Act


Broadened the definition of sex
discrimination to encompass
pregnancy, childbirth, or related
medical conditions

2006 Prentice Hall

Federal Agency Guidelines


Specify procedures federal agencies
recommend employers follow in
complying with the equal opportunity
laws

2006 Prentice Hall

Sexual Harassment
Conduct that has the purpose of
substantially interfering with a
persons work performance or creating
an intimidating, hostile, or offensive
work environment

2006 Prentice Hall

Sexual Harassment
Employers have a duty to maintain
workplaces free of sexual harassment
and intimidation

2006 Prentice Hall

Proving Sexual Harassment


Quid Pro Quo
Hostile environment created by
supervisors
Hostile environment created by coworkers

2006 Prentice Hall

Court Decisions
Burlington Industries v. Ellerth
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

2006 Prentice Hall

What the Manager/Employer


Should Do
(1) Should take steps to ensure
harassment does not take place
(2) Should take immediate corrective
action

2006 Prentice Hall

What the Employee Can Do


File a verbal complaint or protest with
the harasser and the harassers boss
Write a letter to the accused
File claim with EEOC

2006 Prentice Hall

Selected Court Decisions


Regarding Equal Employment
Opportunity
Griggs v. Duke Power Company
Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody

2006 Prentice Hall

Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA


1991)
CRA 1991 addressed the issue of burden of
proof
Makes it easier to sue for money damages in
certain cases

2006 Prentice Hall

Americans with Disabilities


Act (ADA)
Prohibits employers from
discriminating against qualified
disabled individuals
Employers must make reasonable
accommodations

2006 Prentice Hall

Reasonable Accommodation
Redesigning the job
Modifying work
schedules

2006 Prentice Hall

Modifying or
acquiring equipment
to assist the person
in performing the job

Implications for Managers


May not make pre-employment
inquiries about a persons disability
Should review job application forms,
interview procedures, and job
descriptions
Must make a reasonable
accommodation

2006 Prentice Hall

Practical Implications for ADA


Disabilities will be defined quite
narrowly
Employers do not need to allow
misconduct
Employer does not have to create a
new job

2006 Prentice Hall

State and Local EEO Laws


Effect is to further restrict employers
regarding their treatment of job
applicants and employees

2006 Prentice Hall

Adverse impact
Total employment process that
results in a significantly higher
percentage of a protected group
being rejected for employment,
placement, or promotion

2006 Prentice Hall

Disparate impact
Employer engages in an employment
practice or policy that has a greater
adverse impact (effect) on the
members of a protected group

2006 Prentice Hall

Disparate Treatment
Intentional discrimination

2006 Prentice Hall

Employer Defenses
Bona Fide Occupational
Qualification
Business Necessity

2006 Prentice Hall

Recruitment Practices to Watch


Word of Mouth
Misleading Information
Help Wanted Ads

2006 Prentice Hall

Selection Standards
Educational Requirements
Tests
Preferences to Relatives
Physical Characteristics
Health Questions
Arrest Records
Application Forms
2006 Prentice Hall

EEOC Enforcement Process


Processing a Charge
Charge must be filed in writing
within 180 days
EEOC has 10 days to serve notice
EEOC determines reasonable cause
within 120 days
EEOC attempts to conciliate
EEOC may bring civil suit in federal
court
2006 Prentice Hall

Voluntary Mediation Mechanism


3 responses
1. Agree to mediate charge
2. Make a settlement offer
3. Prepare a position statement

2006 Prentice Hall

Responding to
Discrimination Charges
Be methodical
Investigators arent judges
Meet with employee who made
complaint
Give the EEOC a position statement

2006 Prentice Hall

Responding to
Discrimination Charges
Ensure there is information
demonstrating lack of merit
Limit information to only those issues
in the charge itself
Seek as much information as possible
Prepare for the EEOCs fact-finding
conference

2006 Prentice Hall

Managing Diversity
Maximizing diversitys potential
advantages while minimizing the
potential barriers

2006 Prentice Hall

Diversity Management Program


Provide strong leadership
Assess the situation
Provide diversity training
Change culture and management
systems
Evaluate the program

2006 Prentice Hall

Affirmative Action
Requires the employer to make
an extra effort to hire and promote
those in a protected group

2006 Prentice Hall

Suggested Affirmative Action


Program
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Issue a written equal employment policy


Appoint a top official
Publicize policy
Survey present minority and female
employment
Develop goals and timetables

2006 Prentice Hall

Suggested Affirmative Action


Program
6.
7.
8.

Develop and implement specific


programs to achieve goals
Develop support of in-house and
community programs
Establish an internal audit and reporting
system

2006 Prentice Hall

Sample Metrics for HRIS


EEOC claims per year
Cost of HR-related litigation
Percent of minority promotions
Survival/loss rate
among employee
groups

2006 Prentice Hall

You might also like