Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineers in Society
TOPIC 2
ETHICS IN ENGINEERING
Engineers in Society
The study of moral issues and decisions faced individuals and organizations
engaged in engineering activities.
Issue of ethics arise because of the specialist knowledge of the professional, and
how the use of this knowledge should be governed when providing a service to
the public
Engineers in Society
1. REGISTRATION
2. CONSULTANCY
3. SUPERVISION
4. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
5. CODE OF ETHICS
Engineers in Society
1. REGISTRATION
DO
An engineering graduate with accredited engineering degree must
register with the BEM to take up employment as an engineer
DONT
An engineer should not be the Submitting Person for designs beyond
his/her area of competency
An engineer should not endorse his PE Stamp and sign on reports or
plans not prepared by him
An engineer must not practise in the branch of engineering he is not
registered in
Engineers in Society
2. CONSULTANCY
DO
An engineer should be transparent his work if requested/required by
the client/authorities.
An engineer should take full responsibility for the checking of the work
himself.
An engineer should undertake continuing professional development to
enhance his knowledge and capability.
Engineers in Society
2. CONSULTANCY
DONT
An engineer should not accept work not within his area of competency
as well as work that he is not familiar with.
An engineering consultant should not carry out projects for fees below
the minimum outlined in the scale of fees.
An engineer should not endorse any work not performed and/or
supervised by him.
Engineers in Society
3. SUPERVISION
DO
An engineer who is the Submitting Person should be responsible for the
project regardless of whether it is self-supervised and/or delegated
supervision.
An engineer must be familiar with and knowledgeable in the work he is
to supervise.
An engineer supervising a project shall keep proper records of all
documents and correspondence pertaining to the project.
Engineers in Society
3. SUPERVISION
DONT
An engineer must not over or under certify progress of works.
An engineer must not certify work not within his expertise.
An engineer must not accept site supervisory staff who are not qualified
or are incompetent.
Engineers in Society
4. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
DO
An engineer should notify the relevant authorities changes in designs or
withdrawal of services.
An engineer should submit completed forms in time for inspection and
approval for Certificate of Fitness / Certificate of Completion and
Compliance.
An engineer should ensure that environmental, health and safety
measures are implemented as per drawings and
specifications.
Engineers in Society
4. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
DONT
An engineer should not allow works to proceed before plans are
submitted to and/or approved by the relevant authorities.
An engineer should not undertake a project for which the client is not
going to fulfill statutory requirements.
Engineers in Society
5. CODE OF ETHICS
DO
An engineer must be familiar with the Code of Conduct of Engineers.
An engineer must understand the need for responsibility and liability as
stipulated in the Code of Conduct.
An engineer must respond promptly to complaints and enquiries by
clients /authorities.
Engineers in Society
5. CODE OF ETHICS
DONT
An engineer should not knowingly mislead the public by giving
misrepresented information so as to gain commercial
advantage/mileage.
An engineer should not respond to an open advertisement to bid for
provision of professional service if such provision for the service
requires bidding fees or equivalent as is usually imposed on contractors.
An engineer should avoid favoritism among vendors and other
suppliers.
Project Realization
conflict
Design
conflict
Start
Conception
Manufacturing/
Fabrication
conflict
conflict
Sales &
Service
Testing
conflict
Engineers in Society
Terminologies
Constructor
Owner
Contractors
Client
Owner
Client
Consultant/
Contractor
Consultants
P.Eng
P.Eng
Designer
Designer
Constructor
Engineers in Society
BACKGROUND
The Highland Towers Condominium is located in the district of Hulu
Kelang, Selangor.
The Highland Towers consisted of three blocks 12 storey high apartments
named simply Block 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Directly behind the 3 blocks
was a steep hill with a stream flowing west, which would have passed to the
south of the Highland Towers site if it was allowed to follow its natural
course.
It was constructed between 1975 and 1978. Block 1 was completed and
occupied in 1979.
On Saturday, the 11th December 1993, at about 1.30p.m., after 10 days of
continuous rainfall, Block 1 collapsed 14 years after completion and killed
48 people.
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
MAIN CAUSE
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Defendants
1st Developer
2n
Draftsman
d
3rd Engineer
4th
Remarks
Properties Sdn Bhd
Engaged by the developer as the
architect for the project
Engaged by the developer as the
engineer for the project
MPAJ was the local authority for
approvals related to the project
Owner of 50 lots of bungalow
land directly at the rear of site.
The company that carried out
clearing works on the 5th
defendants land in 1992
The higher land adjacent to the
5th defendants land
Was in charge of the
development of the Metrolux
land
Engineers in Society
Liable Defendants
Liability Percentage
1st Developer
15
2n
Draftsman
d
10
3rd Engineer
10
15
30
6th Tropic
10
10
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Summary
Engineers in Society
Lesson Learned
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
Engineers in Society
DESIGN
The Architects conceptual design was accepted and used by the maincontractors in-house Korean sub-contractor to design-and-build the space
frame structure. At no point during the design process did the Contractor
say the design was unbuildable. The design therefore did not contribute to
the collapse.
CONSTRUCTION
It was determined that PWD Terengganu was both Superintending Officer
(SO) and Project Manager for the Stadium Project. Sufficient evidence was
adduced that the consultants were not required to carry out day to day
supervision. They were only required to advise the SO/PWD when required.
The Architects request to have his representative appointed on site was
rejected initially. Instructions and queries, if any, had to go through the
SO/PWD. It appears that the Architect did not have authority to supervise,
or even give instructions during the construction of the roof.
Engineers in Society