You are on page 1of 258

Applied Corporate Finance

AswathDamodaran
www.damodaran.com

What is corporate finance?

Everydecisionthatabusinessmakeshasfinancialimplications,and
anydecisionwhichaffectsthefinancesofabusinessisacorporate
financedecision.
Definedbroadly,everythingthatabusinessdoesfitsundertherubric
ofcorporatefinance.

The Traditional Accounting Balance Sheet

Otherlongtermobligations
Assetswhicharenotphysical,
LongLivedRealAssets
IntangibleAssets
Shorttermliabilitiesofthefirm
Equity
Debt
FixedAssets
Investmentsinsecurities&
FinancialInvestments
CurrentAssets
Current
Debtobligationsoffirm
Equityinvestmentinfirm
ShortlivedAssets
Other
Liabilities
Assets
TheBalanceSheet
likepatents&trademarks
assetsofotherfirms
Liabilties
Liabilities

The Financial View of the Firm

GrowthAssets
ExpectedValuethatwillbe
FixedClaimoncashflows
Equity
Debt
AssetsinPlace
ResidualClaimoncashflows
ExistingInvestments
Liabilities
Assets
createdbyfutureinvestments
LittleorNoroleinmanagement
SignificantRoleinmanagement
Generatecashflowstoday
FixedMaturity
PerpetualLives
Includeslonglived(fixed)and
TaxDeductible
shortlived(working
capital)assets

Tale of two companies


$6billion
$11billion
$7billion
Investmentsalready
$3billion
$15billion
Investmentsyetto
$77billion
$0.12billion
Equity
Debt
$71.12billion
EBaysFinancialBalanceSheet
Liabilities
Assets
ConEdsFinancialBalanceSheet
made
bemade

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgenerated
andthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositive
andnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

Objective:MaximizetheValueoftheFirm

The Objective in Decision Making

Intraditionalcorporatefinance,theobjectiveindecisionmakingisto
maximizethevalueofthefirm.
Anarrowerobjectiveistomaximizestockholderwealth.Whenthe
stockistradedandmarketsareviewedtobeefficient,theobjectiveis
tomaximizethestockprice.
Allothergoalsofthefirmareintermediateonesleadingtofirmvalue
maximization,oroperateasconstraintsonfirmvaluemaximization.

The Classical Objective Function


STOCKHOLDERS
Hire&fire
managers
Board
AnnualMeeting
BONDHOLDERS

LendMoney

Maximize
stockholder
wealth

Managers

Protect
bondholder
Interests
Reveal
information
honestlyand
ontime

NoSocialCosts
SOCIETY
Costscanbe
tracedtofirm

Marketsare
efficientand
assesseffecton
value

FINANCIALMARKETS

What can go wrong?


STOCKHOLDERS
Havelittlecontrol
overmanagers

BONDHOLDERS

LendMoney

Managersput
theirinterests
abovestockholders

Managers

SignificantSocialCosts
SOCIETY

Bondholderscan
Somecostscannotbe
getrippedoff
tracedtofirm
Delaybad
Marketsmake
newsor
mistakesand
provide
misleading canoverreact
information
FINANCIALMARKETS

Whos on Board? The Disney Experience 1997

10

Application Test: Who owns/runs your firm?


Lookat:BloombergprintoutHDSforyourfirm
Lookingatthetop15stockholdersinyourfirm,aretopmanagersin
yourfirmalsolargestockholdersinthefirm?
Isthereanyevidencethatthetopstockholdersinthefirmplayan
activeroleinmanagingthefirm?

11

Disneys top stockholders in 2003

12

When traditional corporate financial theory


breaks down, the solution is:

Tochooseadifferentmechanismforcorporategovernance
Tochooseadifferentobjectiveforthefirm.
Tomaximizestockprice,butreducethepotentialforconflictand
breakdown:
Makingmanagers(decisionmakers)andemployeesintostockholders
Byprovidinginformationhonestlyandpromptlytofinancialmarkets

13

An Alternative Corporate Governance System

GermanyandJapandevelopedadifferentmechanismforcorporate
governance,baseduponcorporatecrossholdings.
InGermany,thebanksformthecoreofthissystem.
InJapan,itisthekeiretsus
OtherAsiancountrieshavemodeledtheirsystemafterJapan,withfamily
companiesformingthecoreofthenewcorporatefamilies

Attheirbest,themostefficientfirmsinthegroupworkatbringingthe
lessefficientfirmsuptopar.Theyprovideacorporatewelfaresystem
thatmakesforamorestablecorporatestructure
Attheirworst,theleastefficientandpoorlyrunfirmsinthegrouppull
downthemostefficientandbestrunfirmsdown.Thenatureofthe
crossholdingsmakesitsverydifficultforoutsiders(including
investorsinthesefirms)tofigureouthowwellorbadlythegroupis
doing.

14

Choose a Different Objective Function

Firmscanalwaysfocusonadifferentobjectivefunction.Examples
wouldinclude

maximizingearnings
maximizingrevenues
maximizingfirmsize
maximizingmarketshare
maximizingEVA

Thekeythingtorememberisthattheseareintermediateobjective
functions.
Tothedegreethattheyarecorrelatedwiththelongtermhealthandvalue
ofthecompany,theyworkwell.
Tothedegreethattheydonot,thefirmcanendupwithadisaster

15

Maximize Stock Price, subject to ..

Thestrengthofthestockpricemaximizationobjectivefunctionisits
internalselfcorrectionmechanism.Excessesonanyofthelinkages
lead,ifunregulated,tocounteractionswhichreduceoreliminatethese
excesses
Inthecontextofourdiscussion,
managerstakingadvantageofstockholdershasleadtoamuchmore
activemarketforcorporatecontrol.
stockholderstakingadvantageofbondholdershasleadtobondholders
protectingthemselvesatthetimeoftheissue.
firmsrevealingincorrectordelayedinformationtomarketshasleadto
marketsbecomingmoreskepticalandpunitive
firmscreatingsocialcostshasleadtomoreregulations,aswellasinvestor
andcustomerbacklashes.

16

The Stockholder Backlash

InstitutionalinvestorssuchasCalpersandtheLensFundshave
becomemuchmoreactiveinmonitoringcompaniesthattheyinvestin
anddemandingchangesinthewayinwhichbusinessisdone
IndividualslikeMichaelPricespecializeintakinglargepositionsin
companieswhichtheyfeelneedtochangetheirways(Chase,Dow
Jones,ReadersDigest)andpushforchange
Atannualmeetings,stockholdershavetakentoexpressingtheir
displeasurewithincumbentmanagementbyvotingagainsttheir
compensationcontractsortheirboardofdirectors

17

In response, boards are becoming more


independent

Boardshavebecomesmallerovertime.Themediansizeofaboardof
directorshasdecreasedfrom16to20inthe1970stobetween9and11
in1998.Thesmallerboardsarelessunwieldyandmoreeffectivethan
thelargerboards.
There are fewer insiders on the board. In contrast to the 6 or more
insidersthatmanyboardshadinthe1970s,onlytwodirectorsinmost
boardsin1998wereinsiders.
Directors are increasingly compensated with stock and options in the
company, instead of cash. In 1973, only 4% of directors received
compensationintheformofstockoroptions,whereas78%didsoin
1998.
Moredirectorsareidentifiedandselectedbyanominatingcommittee
rather than being chosen by the CEO of the firm. In 1998, 75% of
boards had nominating committees; the comparable statistic in 1973
was2%.

18

Disneys Board in 2003


BoardMembers
RevetaBowers
JohnBryson
RoyDisney
MichaelEisner
JudithEstrin
StanleyGold
RobertIger
MonicaLozano
GeorgeMitchell
ThomasS.Murphy
LeoODonovan
SidneyPoitier
RobertA.M.Stern
AndreaL.VandeKamp
RaymondL.Watson
GaryL.Wilson

Occupation
HeadofschoolfortheCenterforEarlyEducation,
CEOandChairmanofConEdison
HeadofDisneyAnimation
CEOofDisney
CEOofPacketDesign(aninternetcompany)
CEOofShamrockHoldings
ChiefOperatingOfficer,Disney
ChiefOperationOfficer,LaOpinion(Spanishnewspaper)
Chairmanoflawfirm(Verner,Liipfert,etal.)
ExCEO,CapitalCitiesABC
ProfessorofTheology,GeorgetownUniversity
Actor,WriterandDirector
SeniorPartnerofRobertA.M.SternArchitectsofNewYork
ChairmanofSotheby'sWestCoast
ChairmanofIrvineCompany(arealestatecorporation)
Chairmanoftheboard,NorthwestAirlines.

19

The Counter Reaction


STOCKHOLDERS
1.Moreactivist
investors
2.Hostiletakeovers
Protectthemselves
BONDHOLDERS

1.Covenants
2.NewTypes

Managersofpoorly
runfirmsareput
onnotice.

Managers

Firmsare
punished
formisleading
markets

CorporateGoodCitizenConstraints
SOCIETY
1.Morelaws
2.Investor/CustomerBacklash

Investorsand
analystsbecome
moreskeptical

FINANCIALMARKETS

20

Picking the Right Projects:


Investment Analysis
Letuswatchwellourbeginnings,andresultswillmanage
themselves
AlexanderClark

21

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgeneratedand
thetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositiveand
negativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

22

The notion of a benchmark

Sincefinancialresourcesarefinite,thereisahurdlethatprojectshave
tocrossbeforebeingdeemedacceptable.
Thishurdlewillbehigherforriskierprojectsthanforsaferprojects.
Asimplerepresentationofthehurdlerateisasfollows:
Hurdlerate= RisklessRate+RiskPremium
Thetwobasicquestionsthateveryriskandreturnmodelinfinance
triestoanswerare:
Howdoyoumeasurerisk?
Howdoyoutranslatethisriskmeasureintoariskpremium?

23

What is Risk?

Risk,intraditionalterms,isviewedasanegative.Websters
dictionary,forinstance,definesriskasexposingtodangeror
hazard.TheChinesesymbolsforrisk,reproducedbelow,givea
muchbetterdescriptionofrisk

Thefirstsymbolisthesymbolfordanger,whilethesecondisthe
symbolforopportunity,makingriskamixofdangerand
opportunity.

24

Risk and Return Models in Finance


Riskless
Low
High
Risk
E(R)
The
Multi-Factor
Proxy
If
Beta
Since
Betas
In
Equation
Step
there
anAPM
risk
CAPM
Risk
that
Risk
of
3:
1:
2:
efficient
market
of
Models
is
are
asset
Measuring
Defining
Differentiating
asset
assets
Investment
in
is
relating
Investment
Investment
no
specific
anModels
risk
relative
market,
relative
investment
relative
Risk
affects
to
Market
toinvestment
between
can
Riskbe
Rewarded
(Firm
measured
Specific)
and
by Unrewarded
the variance
Risk Risk
that
in actual
affectsreturns
all investments
around an
(Market Risk)
expected
Can
1.
arbitrage
Market
most
to
differences
returns
unspecified
specified
nobe
or
private
portfolio
to
diversified
allopportunities
return
proxy
investments,
in
macro
information
returns
market
(from
away in a diversified portfolio
Cannot be diversified away since most assets
1.must
2.
then
a
itfactors
economic
across
variables
regression)
each
no
the
transactions
long
come
(from
investment
market
(from
factors
periods
afrom
factor
arisk
(from
cost
ismust
ofa small proportion of portfolio
are affected by it.
2.regression)
the
any
analysis)
macro
a
be
regression)
risk
due
optimal
asset
averages
economic
to market
must
diversified
be
out
factors.
riskacross investments in portfolio
The marginal
portfolio
captured
Market
differences.
Risk
includes
by Looking
betas
= investor
Risk
every
for is assumed to hold a diversified portfolio. Thus, only market risk will
be rewarded
traded
relative
exposures
variables
asset.
tocorrelated
factors
ofEveryone
and
anythat
priced.
with
will hold
affect
asset
returns
all
toshould
this
investments.
macro
market
then give
portfolio
Market
economic
us
proxies
Risk
for
factors.
=this
Risk
risk.
added by
exposures
Market
Risk
any
of= any
investment
to the to
asset
Captured
market
market
by the
portfolio:
factorsVariable(s)
Proxy

25

Who are Disneys marginal investors?

26

Limitations of the CAPM


1.Themodelmakesunrealisticassumptions
2.Theparametersofthemodelcannotbeestimatedprecisely
Definitionofamarketindex
Firmmayhavechangedduringthe'estimation'period'

3.Themodeldoesnotworkwell
Ifthemodelisright,thereshouldbe
alinearrelationshipbetweenreturnsandbetas
theonlyvariablethatshouldexplainreturnsisbetas

Therealityisthat
therelationshipbetweenbetasandreturnsisweak
Othervariables(size,price/bookvalue)seemtoexplaindifferencesinreturns
better.

27

Why the CAPM persists

TheCAPM,notwithstandingitsmanycriticsandlimitations,has
survivedasthedefaultmodelforriskinequityvaluationandcorporate
finance.Thealternativemodelsthathavebeenpresentedasbetter
models(APM,Multifactormodel..)havemadeinroadsinperformance
evaluationbutnotinprospectiveanalysisbecause:
Thealternativemodels(whicharericher)doamuchbetterjobthanthe
CAPMinexplainingpastreturn,buttheireffectivenessdropsoffwhenit
comestoestimatingexpectedfuturereturns(becausethemodelstendto
shiftandchange).
Thealternativemodelsaremorecomplicatedandrequiremore
informationthantheCAPM.
Formostcompanies,theexpectedreturnsyougetwiththethealternative
modelsisnotdifferentenoughtobeworththeextratroubleofestimating
fouradditionalbetas.

28

Application Test: Who is the marginal investor


in your firm?
Youcangetinformationoninsiderandinstitutionalholdingsinyourfirm
from:
http://finance.yahoo.com/
Enteryourcompanyssymbolandchooseprofile.

Lookingatthebreakdownofstockholdersinyourfirm,consider
whetherthemarginalinvestoris
Aninstitutionalinvestor
b) Anindividualinvestor
c) Aninsider
a)

29

Inputs required to use the CAPM

Thecapitalassetpricingmodelyieldsthefollowingexpectedreturn:
ExpectedReturn=RiskfreeRate+Beta*(ExpectedReturnontheMarket
PortfolioRiskfreeRate)

Tousethemodelweneedthreeinputs:
(a) Thecurrentriskfreerate
(b)Theexpectedmarketriskpremium(thepremiumexpectedforinvesting
inriskyassets(marketportfolio)overtherisklessasset)
(c)Thebetaoftheassetbeinganalyzed.

30

The Riskfree Rate and Time Horizon

Onariskfreeasset,theactualreturnisequaltotheexpectedreturn.
Therefore,thereisnovariancearoundtheexpectedreturn.
Foraninvestmenttoberiskfree,i.e.,tohaveanactualreturnbeequal
totheexpectedreturn,twoconditionshavetobemet
Therehastobenodefaultrisk,whichgenerallyimpliesthatthesecurity
hastobeissuedbythegovernment.Note,however,thatnotall
governmentscanbeviewedasdefaultfree.
Therecanbenouncertaintyaboutreinvestmentrates,whichimpliesthat
itisazerocouponsecuritywiththesamematurityasthecashflowbeing
analyzed.

31

Riskfree Rate in Practice

Theriskfreerateistherateonazerocoupongovernmentbond
matchingthetimehorizonofthecashflowbeinganalyzed.
Theoretically,thistranslatesintousingdifferentriskfreeratesforeach
cashflowthe1yearzerocouponrateforthecashflowinyear1,the
2yearzerocouponrateforthecashflowinyear2...
Practicallyspeaking,ifthereissubstantialuncertaintyaboutexpected
cashflows,thepresentvalueeffectofusingtimevaryingriskfreerates
issmallenoughthatitmaynotbeworthit.

32

The Bottom Line on Riskfree Rates

Usingalongtermgovernmentrate(evenonacouponbond)asthe
riskfreerateonallofthecashflowsinalongtermanalysiswillyielda
closeapproximationofthetruevalue.
Forshorttermanalysis,itisentirelyappropriatetouseashortterm
governmentsecurityrateastheriskfreerate.
Theriskfreeratethatyouuseinananalysisshouldbeinthesame
currencythatyourcashflowsareestimatedin.Inotherwords,ifyour
cashflowsareinU.S.dollars,yourriskfreeratehastobeinU.S.
dollarsaswell.
DataSource:YoucangetriskfreeratesfortheUSinanumberofsites.
Tryhttp://www.bloomberg.com/markets.

33

Measurement of the risk premium

Theriskpremiumisthepremiumthatinvestorsdemandforinvesting
inanaverageriskinvestment,relativetotheriskfreerate.
Asageneralproposition,thispremiumshouldbe
greaterthanzero
increasewiththeriskaversionoftheinvestorsinthatmarket
increasewiththeriskinessoftheaverageriskinvestment

34

What is your risk premium?


Assumethatstocksaretheonlyriskyassetsandthatyouareofferedtwo
investmentoptions:
arisklessinvestment(sayaGovernmentSecurity),onwhichyoucan
make5%
amutualfundofallstocks,onwhichthereturnsareuncertain
Howmuchofanexpectedreturnwouldyoudemandtoshiftyourmoneyfromthe
risklessassettothemutualfund?
a) Lessthan5%
b) Between57%
c) Between79%
d) Between911%
e) Between1113%
f) Morethan13%
Checkyourpremiumagainstthesurveypremiumonmywebsite.

35

Risk Aversion and Risk Premiums

Ifthiswerethecapitalmarketline,theriskpremiumwouldbea
weightedaverageoftheriskpremiumsdemandedbyeachandevery
investor.
Theweightswillbedeterminedbythemagnitudeofwealththateach
investorhas.Thus,WarrenBuffetsriskaversioncountsmoretowards
determiningtheequilibriumpremiumthanyoursandmine.
Asinvestorsbecomemoreriskaverse,youwouldexpectthe
equilibriumpremiumtoincrease.

36

Risk Premiums do change..


Gobacktothepreviousexample.Assumenowthatyouaremakingthe
samechoicebutthatyouaremakingitintheaftermathofastock
marketcrash(ithasdropped25%inthelastmonth).Wouldyou
changeyouranswer?
a) Iwoulddemandalargerpremium
b) Iwoulddemandasmallerpremium
c) Iwoulddemandthesamepremium

37

Estimating Risk Premiums in Practice

Surveyinvestorsontheirdesiredriskpremiumsandusetheaverage
premiumfromthesesurveys.
Assumethattheactualpremiumdeliveredoverlongtimeperiodsis
equaltotheexpectedpremiumi.e.,usehistoricaldata
Estimatetheimpliedpremiumintodaysassetprices.

38

The Survey Approach

Surveyingallinvestorsinamarketplaceisimpractical.
However,youcansurveyafewinvestors(especiallythelarger
investors)andusetheseresults.Inpractice,thistranslatesintosurveys
ofmoneymanagersexpectationsofexpectedreturnsonstocksover
thenextyear.
Thelimitationsofthisapproachare:
therearenoconstraintsonreasonability(thesurveycouldproduce
negativeriskpremiumsorriskpremiumsof50%)
theyareextremelyvolatile
theytendtobeshortterm;eventhelongestsurveysdonotgobeyondone
year

39

The Historical Premium Approach

Thisisthedefaultapproachusedbymosttoarriveatthepremiumto
useinthemodel
Inmostcases,thisapproachdoesthefollowing
itdefinesatimeperiodfortheestimation(1926Present,1962Present....)
itcalculatesaveragereturnsonastockindexduringtheperiod
itcalculatesaveragereturnsonarisklesssecurityovertheperiod
itcalculatesthedifferencebetweenthetwo
andusesitasapremiumlookingforward

Thelimitationsofthisapproachare:
itassumesthattheriskaversionofinvestorshasnotchangedina
systematicwayacrosstime.(Theriskaversionmaychangefromyearto
year,butitrevertsbacktohistoricalaverages)
itassumesthattheriskinessoftheriskyportfolio(stockindex)hasnot
changedinasystematicwayacrosstime.

40

Historical Average Premiums for the United


States
Arithmeticaverage
GeometricAverage
Stocks
Stocks Stocks
Stocks
HistoricalPeriod T.Bills
T.Bonds
T.Bills
T.Bonds
19282004
7.92%
6.53%
6.02%
4.84%
19642004
5.82%
4.34%
4.59%
3.47%
19942004
8.60%
5.82%
6.85%
4.51%
Whatistherightpremium?
Gobackasfarasyoucan.Otherwise,thestandarderrorintheestimatewillbelarge.(
StdErrorinestimate =

AnnualizedStddeviationinStockprices
)
Numberofyearsofhistoricaldata

Beconsistentinyouruseofariskfreerate.

Usearithmeticpremiumsforoneyearestimatesofcostsofequityandgeometric
premiumsforestimatesoflongtermcostsofequity.
DataSource:Checkoutthereturnsbyyearandestimateyourownhistoricalpremiumsby
goingtoupdateddataonmywebsite.

41

What about historical premiums for other


markets?

HistoricaldataformarketsoutsidetheUnitedStatesisavailablefor
muchshortertimeperiods.Theproblemisevengreaterinemerging
markets.
Thehistoricalpremiumsthatemergefromthisdatareflectsthisand
thereismuchgreatererrorassociatedwiththeestimatesofthe
premiums.

42

One solution: Look at a countrys bond rating


and default spreads as a start

RatingsagenciessuchasS&PandMoodysassignratingstocountries
thatreflecttheirassessmentofthedefaultriskofthesecountries.
Theseratingsreflectthepoliticalandeconomicstabilityofthese
countriesandthusprovideausefulmeasureofcountryrisk.In
September2004,forinstance,BrazilhadacountryratingofB2.
Ifacountryissuesbondsdenominatedinadifferentcurrency(say
dollarsoreuros),youcanalsoseehowthebondmarketviewstherisk
inthatcountry.InSeptember2004,BrazilhaddollardenominatedC
Bonds,tradingataninterestrateof10.01%.TheUStreasurybond
ratethatdaywas4%,yieldingadefaultspreadof6.01%forBrazil.
ManyanalystsaddthisdefaultspreadtotheUSriskpremiumtocome
upwithariskpremiumforacountry.Usingthisapproachwouldyield
ariskpremiumof10.85%forBrazil,ifweuse4.84%asthepremium
fortheUS.

43

Beyond the default spread

Countryratingsmeasuredefaultrisk.Whiledefaultriskpremiumsand
equityriskpremiumsarehighlycorrelated,onewouldexpectequity
spreadstobehigherthandebtspreads.Ifwecancomputehowmuch
moreriskytheequitymarketis,relativetothebondmarket,wecould
usethisinformation.Forexample,

StandardDeviationinBovespa(Equity)=36%
StandardDeviationinBrazilCBond=28.2%
DefaultspreadonCBond=6.01%
CountryRiskPremiumforBrazil=6.01%(36%/28.2%)=7.67%

Notethatthisisontopofthepremiumyouestimateforamature
market.Thus,ifyouassumethattheriskpremiumintheUSis4.84%,
theriskpremiumforBrazilwouldbe12.51%.

44

Implied Equity Premiums

Wecanusetheinformationinstockpricestobackouthowriskaversethemarketisandhowmuch
ofariskpremiumitisdemanding.

Analystsexpectearningstogrow8.5%ayearforthenext5years.
January1,2005
52.85
48.71
44.89
41.37
38.13
In2004,dividends&stock
Afteryear5,wewillassumethat
S&P500isat1211.92
buybackswere2.90%of
earningsontheindexwillgrowat

Ifyoupaythecurrentleveloftheindex,youcanexpecttomakeareturnof7.87%onstocks(which
isobtainedbysolvingforrinthefollowingequation)

ImpliedEquityriskpremium=ExpectedreturnonstocksTreasurybondrate=7.87%4.22%=
3.65%

1211.92 =

38.13 41.37
44.89
48.71
52.85
52.85(1.0422)
+
+
+
+
+
(1+ r) (1+ r) 2 (1+ r) 3 (1 + r) 4 (1+ r) 5 (r .0422)(1+ r) 5

45

Implied Premiums in the US


7.00%

6.00%

5.00%

4.00%

3.00%

2.00%

1.00%

0.00%

46

Application Test: A Market Risk Premium

Baseduponourdiscussionofhistoricalriskpremiumssofar,therisk
premiumlookingforwardshouldbe:
a) About7.92%,whichiswhatthearithmeticaveragepremiumhasbeen
since1928,forstocksoverT.Bills
b) About4.84%,whichisthegeometricaveragepremiumsince1928,for
stocksoverT.Bonds
c) About3.7%,whichistheimpliedpremiuminthestockmarkettoday

47

Estimating Beta

Thestandardprocedureforestimatingbetasistoregressstockreturns
(Rj)againstmarketreturns(Rm)
Rj=a+bRm
whereaistheinterceptandbistheslopeoftheregression.

Theslopeoftheregressioncorrespondstothebetaofthestock,and
measurestheriskinessofthestock.

48

Estimating Performance

Theinterceptoftheregressionprovidesasimplemeasureof
performanceduringtheperiodoftheregression,relativetothecapital
assetpricingmodel.
Rj =Rf+b(RmRf)
=Rf(1b) +bRm
Rj =a
+bRm

...........
...........

CapitalAssetPricingModel
RegressionEquation

If
a>Rf(1b).... Stockdidbetterthanexpectedduringregressionperiod
a=Rf(1b).... Stockdidaswellasexpectedduringregressionperiod
a<Rf(1b).... Stockdidworsethanexpectedduringregressionperiod

ThedifferencebetweentheinterceptandRf(1b)isJensen'salpha.If
itispositive,yourstockdidperformbetterthanexpectedduringthe
periodoftheregression.

49

Firm Specific and Market Risk

TheRsquared(R2)oftheregressionprovidesanestimateofthe
proportionoftherisk(variance)ofafirmthatcanbeattributedto
marketrisk;
Thebalance(1R2)canbeattributedtofirmspecificrisk.

50

Setting up for the Estimation

Decideonanestimationperiod
Servicesuseperiodsrangingfrom2to5yearsfortheregression
Longerestimationperiodprovidesmoredata,butfirmschange.
Shorterperiodscanbeaffectedmoreeasilybysignificantfirmspecific
eventthatoccurredduringtheperiod(Example:ITTfor19951997)

Decideonareturnintervaldaily,weekly,monthly
Shorterintervalsyieldmoreobservations,butsufferfrommorenoise.
Noiseiscreatedbystocksnottradingandbiasesallbetastowardsone.

Estimatereturns(includingdividends)onstock
Return=(PriceEndPriceBeginning+DividendsPeriod)/PriceBeginning
Includeddividendsonlyinexdividendmonth

Chooseamarketindex,andestimatereturns(inclusiveofdividends)
ontheindexforeachintervalfortheperiod.

51

Choosing the Parameters: Disney

Periodused:5years
ReturnInterval=Monthly
MarketIndex:S&P500Index.
Forinstance,tocalculatereturnsonDisneyinDecember1999,

PriceforDisneyatendofNovember1999=$27.88
PriceforDisneyatendofDecember1999=$29.25
Dividendsduringmonth=$0.21(Itwasanexdividendmonth)
Return=($29.25$27.88+$0.21)/$27.88=5.69%

Toestimatereturnsontheindexinthesamemonth
Indexlevel(includingdividends)atendofNovember1999=1388.91
Indexlevel(includingdividends)atendofDecember1999=1469.25
Return=(1469.251388.91)/1388.91=5.78%

52

Disneys Historical Beta


Figure4.3:DisneyversusS&P500:19992003
30.00%

20.00%

Regressionline

10.00%

Disney
15.00%

0.00%
10.00%

5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%
S&P500

53

The Regression Output

Usingmonthlyreturnsfrom1999to2003,weranaregressionof
returnsonDisneystockagainsttheS*P500.Theoutputisbelow:
ReturnsDisney=0.0467%+1.01ReturnsS&P500(Rsquared=29%)

(0.20)

54

Analyzing Disneys Performance

Intercept=0.0467%
Thisisaninterceptbasedonmonthlyreturns.Thus,ithastobecompared
toamonthlyriskfreerate.
Between1999and2003,

MonthlyRiskfreeRate=0.313%(baseduponaverageT.Billrate:9903)
RiskfreeRate(1Beta)=0.313%(11.01)=..0032%

TheComparisonisthenbetween
Intercept
versus RiskfreeRate(1Beta)
0.0467%
versus 0.313%(11.01)=0.0032%
JensensAlpha=0.0467%(0.0032%)=0.05%

Disneydid0.05%betterthanexpected,permonth,between1999and
2003.
Annualized,Disneysannualexcessreturn=(1.0005)121=0.60%

55

A positive Jensens alpha Who is


responsible?

DisneyhasapositiveJensensalphaof0.60%ayearbetween1999
and2003.Thiscanbeviewedasasignthatmanagementinthefirm
didagoodjob,managingthefirmduringtheperiod.
a) True
b) False

56

Estimating Disneys Beta

SlopeoftheRegressionof1.01isthebeta
Regressionparametersarealwaysestimatedwitherror.Theerroris
capturedinthestandarderrorofthebetaestimate,whichinthecaseof
Disneyis0.20.
AssumethatIaskedyouwhatDisneystruebetais,afterthis
regression.
Whatisyourbestpointestimate?
Whatrangewouldyougiveme,with67%confidence?
Whatrangewouldyougiveme,with95%confidence?

57

The Dirty Secret of Standard Error


Distribution of Standard Errors: Beta Estimates for U.S. stocks
1600
1400

Number of Firms

1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0

<.10

.10 - .20

.20 - .30

.30 - .40

.40 -.50

.50 - .75

> .75

Standard Error in Beta Estimate

58

Breaking down Disneys Risk

RSquared=29%
Thisimpliesthat
29%oftheriskatDisneycomesfrommarketsources
71%,therefore,comesfromfirmspecificsources

Thefirmspecificriskisdiversifiableandwillnotberewarded

59

The Relevance of R Squared


Youareadiversifiedinvestortryingtodecidewhetheryoushouldinvest
inDisneyorAmgen.Theybothhavebetasof1.01,butDisneyhasan
RSquaredof29%whileAmgensRsquaredofonly14.5%.Which
onewouldyouinvestin?
a) Amgen,becauseithasthelowerRsquared
b) Disney,becauseithasthehigherRsquared
c) Youwouldbeindifferent

Wouldyouranswerbedifferentifyouwereanundiversifiedinvestor?

60

Beta Estimation: Using a Service (Bloomberg)

QuickTime and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

61

Estimating Expected Returns for Disney in


September 2004

Inputstotheexpectedreturncalculation
DisneysBeta=1.01
RiskfreeRate=4.00%(U.S.tenyearT.Bondrate)
RiskPremium=4.82%(Approximatehistoricalpremium:19282003)

ExpectedReturn

=RiskfreeRate+Beta(RiskPremium)
=4.00%+1.01(4.82%)=8.87%

62

Use to a Potential Investor in Disney


AsapotentialinvestorinDisney,whatdoesthisexpectedreturnof8.87%
tellyou?
a) ThisisthereturnthatIcanexpecttomakeinthelongtermonDisney,if
thestockiscorrectlypricedandtheCAPMistherightmodelforrisk,
b) ThisisthereturnthatIneedtomakeonDisneyinthelongtermtobreak
evenonmyinvestmentinthestock
c) Both

Assumenowthatyouareanactiveinvestorandthatyourresearch
suggeststhataninvestmentinDisneywillyield12.5%ayearforthe
next5years.Basedupontheexpectedreturnof8.87%,youwould
a) Buythestock
b) Sellthestock

63

How managers use this expected return

ManagersatDisney
needtomakeatleast8.87%asareturnfortheirequityinvestorstobreak
even.
thisisthehurdlerateforprojects,whentheinvestmentisanalyzedfrom
anequitystandpoint

Inotherwords,Disneyscostofequityis8.87%.
Whatisthecostofnotdeliveringthiscostofequity?

64

Application Test: Analyzing the Risk


Regression

UsingyourBloombergriskandreturnprintout,answerthefollowing
questions:
Howwellorbadlydidyourstockdo,relativetothemarket,duringthe
periodoftheregression?(Youcanassumeanannualizedriskfreerateof
4.8%duringtheregressionperiod)
Intercept(4.8%/n)(1Beta)=JensensAlpha
Wherenisthenumberofreturnperiodsinayear(12ifmonthly;52ifweekly)

Whatproportionoftheriskinyourstockisattributabletothemarket?
Whatproportionisfirmspecific?
Whatisthehistoricalestimateofbetaforyourstock?Whatistherange
onthisestimatewith67%probability?With95%probability?
Baseduponthisbeta,whatisyourestimateoftherequiredreturnonthis
stock?
RisklessRate+Beta*RiskPremium

65

A Quick Test
Youareadvisingaveryriskysoftwarefirmontherightcostofequityto
useinprojectanalysis.Youestimateabetaof3.0forthefirmand
comeupwithacostofequityof18.46%.TheCFOofthefirmis
concernedaboutthehighcostofequityandwantstoknowwhether
thereisanythinghecandotolowerhisbeta.
Howdoyoubringyourbetadown?

Shouldyoufocusyourattentiononbringingyourbetadown?
a) Yes
b) No

66

Beta: Exploring Fundamentals


Enron:
Beta
Real
Qwest
General
Microsoft:
Philip
Exxon
Harmony
Networks:
>Morris:
=
<
Mobil:
Communications:
00.95
1
Electric:
Gold
1..25
0.40
0.65
Mining:
3.24
1.10 - 0.10
2.60

67

Determinant 1: Product Type

IndustryEffects:Thebetavalueforafirmdependsuponthe
sensitivityofthedemandforitsproductsandservicesandofitscosts
tomacroeconomicfactorsthataffecttheoverallmarket.
Cyclicalcompanieshavehigherbetasthannoncyclicalfirms
Firmswhichsellmorediscretionaryproductswillhavehigherbetasthan
firmsthatselllessdiscretionaryproducts

68

Determinant 2: Operating Leverage Effects

Operatingleveragereferstotheproportionofthetotalcostsofthe
firmthatarefixed.
Otherthingsremainingequal,higheroperatingleverageresultsin
greaterearningsvariabilitywhichinturnresultsinhigherbetas.

69

Measures of Operating Leverage


FixedCostsMeasure=FixedCosts/VariableCosts
Thismeasurestherelationshipbetweenfixedandvariablecosts.The
highertheproportion,thehighertheoperatingleverage.
EBITVariabilityMeasure=%ChangeinEBIT/%ChangeinRevenues
Thismeasureshowquicklytheearningsbeforeinterestandtaxes
changesasrevenuechanges.Thehigherthisnumber,thegreaterthe
operatingleverage.

70

Disneys Operating Leverage: 1987- 2003


Year

Net Sales

1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1987-2003
1996-2003

2877
3438
4594
5844
6182
7504
8529
10055
12112
18739
22473
22976
23435
25418
25172
25329
27061

% Change
in Sales
19.50%
33.62%
27.21%
5.78%
21.38%
13.66%
17.89%
20.46%
54.71%
19.93%
2.24%
2.00%
8.46%
-0.97%
0.62%
6.84%
15.83%
11.73%

EBIT
756
848
1177
1368
1124
1287
1560
1804
2262
3024
3945
3843
3580
2525
2832
2384
2713

% Change
in EBIT
12.17%
38.80%
16.23%
-17.84%
14.50%
21.21%
15.64%
25.39%
33.69%
30.46%
-2.59%
-6.84%
-29.47%
12.16%
-15.82%
13.80%
10.09%
4.42%

71

Reading Disneys Operating Leverage

OperatingLeverage

=%ChangeinEBIT/%ChangeinSales
=10.09%/15.83%=0.64
Thisislowerthantheoperatingleverageforotherentertainmentfirms,
whichwecomputedtobe1.12.ThiswouldsuggestthatDisneyhas
lowerfixedcoststhanitscompetitors.
TheacquisitionofCapitalCitiesbyDisneyin1996maybeskewing
theoperatingleverage.Lookingatthechangessincethen:
OperatingLeverage199603=4.42%/11.73%=0.38
LookslikeDisneysoperatingleveragehasdecreasedsince1996.

72

Determinant 3: Financial Leverage

Asfirmsborrow,theycreatefixedcosts(interestpayments)thatmake
theirearningstoequityinvestorsmorevolatile.
Thisincreasedearningsvolatilitywhichincreasestheequitybeta

73

Equity Betas and Leverage

Thebetaofequityalonecanbewrittenasafunctionoftheunlevered
betaandthedebtequityratio
L=u(1+((1t)D/E))

where
L=LeveredorEquityBeta
u=UnleveredBeta
t=Corporatemarginaltaxrate
D=MarketValueofDebt
E=MarketValueofEquity

74

Effects of leverage on betas: Disney

TheregressionbetaforDisneyis1.01.Thisbetaisaleveredbeta
(becauseitisbasedonstockprices,whichreflectleverage)andthe
leverageimplicitinthebetaestimateistheaveragemarketdebtequity
ratioduringtheperiodoftheregression(1999to2003)
Theaveragedebtequityratioduringthisperiodwas27.5%.
TheunleveredbetaforDisneycanthenbeestimated(usingamarginal
taxrateof37.3%)
=CurrentBeta/(1+(1taxrate)(AverageDebt/Equity))
=1.01/(1+(10.373))(0.275))=0.8615

75

Disney : Beta and Leverage


DebttoCapital
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%

Debt/EquityRatio
0.00%
11.11%
25.00%
42.86%
66.67%
100.00%
150.00%
233.33%
400.00%
900.00%

Beta
0.86
0.92
1.00
1.09
1.22
1.40
1.67
2.12
3.02
5.72

EffectofLeverage
0.00
0.06
0.14
0.23
0.36
0.54
0.81
1.26
2.16
4.86

76

Betas are weighted Averages

Thebetaofaportfolioisalwaysthemarketvalueweightedaverageof
thebetasoftheindividualinvestmentsinthatportfolio.
Thus,
thebetaofamutualfundistheweightedaverageofthebetasofthe
stocksandotherinvestmentinthatportfolio
thebetaofafirmafteramergeristhemarketvalueweightedaverageof
thebetasofthecompaniesinvolvedinthemerger.

77

Bottom-up versus Top-down Beta

Thetopdownbetaforafirmcomesfromaregression
Thebottomupbetacanbeestimatedbydoingthefollowing:
Findoutthebusinessesthatafirmoperatesin
Findtheunleveredbetasofotherfirmsinthesebusinesses
Takeaweighted(bysalesoroperatingincome)averageofthese
unleveredbetas
Leverupusingthefirmsdebt/equityratio

Thebottomupbetawillgiveyouabetterestimateofthetruebeta
when
thestandarderrorofthebetafromtheregressionishigh(and)thebetafor
afirmisverydifferentfromtheaverageforthebusiness
thefirmhasreorganizedorrestructureditselfsubstantiallyduringthe
periodoftheregression
whenafirmisnottraded

78

Disneys business breakdown

UnleveredBeta
(1 Cash/FirmValue)

Unle vered
Ave rage
beta
Numbe r levered Media n Unle vered Cash/Firm correct ed
for cash
of firms beta
D/E
beta
Value

Business

Comparab le
firms

Medi a
Networks

Rad ia and TV
br oadcasting
companies

24

1.22

Parks an d
Resorts

Theme p ark &


Entertainment
firms

1.58

11

1.16

27.96%

77

1.06

9.18%

Studio
Movie
Entertainment companies

Consumer
Products

Toy and
apparel
retail ers;
Entertainment
software

20.45%

1.0768

0.75%

1.0850

120.76% 0.8853

2.77%

0.9105

0.9824

14.08%

1.1435

0.9981

12.08%

1.1353

79

Disneys bottom up beta


EV/Sales =

(MarketValueofEquity + Debt Cash)


Sales

Business
MediaNetworks
ParksandResorts
Studio
Entertainment
ConsumerProducts
Disney

Disneys
Revenues
$10,941
$6,412
$7,364
$2,344
$27,061

Estimated
EV/Sales
Value
3.41
$37,278.62
2.37
$15,208.37
2.63
1.63

$19,390.14
$3,814.38
$75,691.51

FirmValue
Proportion
49.25%
20.09%

Unlevered
beta
1.0850
0.9105

25.62%
5.04%
100.00%

1.1435
1.1353
1.0674

80

Disneys Cost of Equity

Business
Medi a Networks
Parksan d
Resorts
Studio
Entertainment

Consumer
Products
Disn e y

D/E
UnleveredBeta Ratio

1.08 5 0
26.6 2 %

Lever e d
Beta
1.26 6 1

Costof
Equit y
10.1 0 %

0.91 0 5

26.6 2 %

1.06 2 5

9.12%

1.14 3 5

26.6 2 %

1.33 4 4

10.4 3 %

1.13 5 3
1.06 7 4

26.6 2 %
26.6 2 %

1.32 4 8
1.24 5 6

10.3 9 %
10.0 0 %

81

Discussion Issue

IfyouwerethechieffinancialofficerofDisney,whatcostofequity
wouldyouuseincapitalbudgetinginthedifferentdivisions?
a) ThecostofequityforDisneyasacompany
b) ThecostofequityforeachofDisneysdivisions?

82

Estimating Betas for Non-Traded Assets

Theconventionalapproachesofestimatingbetasfromregressionsdo
notworkforassetsthatarenottraded.
Therearetwowaysinwhichbetascanbeestimatedfornontraded
assets
usingcomparablefirms
usingaccountingearnings

83

Using comparable firms to estimate beta for


Bookscape
Assumethatyouaretryingtoestimatethebetaforaindependent
bookstoreinNewYorkCity.
Firm
Beta
Debt
Equity
Cash
BooksAMillion 0.532
$45
$45
$5
BordersGroup 0.844
$182
$1,430
$269
Barnes&Noble 0.885
$300
$1,606
$268
CourierCorp
0.815
$1
$285
$6
InfoHoldings
0.883
$2
$371
$54
JohnWiley&Son 0.636
$235
$1,662
$33
ScholasticCorp 0.744
$549
$1,063
$11
Sector
0.7627 $1,314
$6,462
$645
UnleveredBeta=0.7627/(1+(1.35)(1314/6462))=0.6737
CorrectedforCash=0.6737/(1645/(1314+6462))=0.7346

84

Estimating Bookscape Levered Beta and Cost


of Equity

Sincethedebt/equityratiosusedaremarketdebtequityratios,andthe
onlydebtequityratiowecancomputeforBookscapeisabookvalue
debt equity ratio, we have assumed that Bookscape is close to the
industryaveragedebttoequityratioof20.33%.
Using a marginal tax rate of 40% (based upon personal income tax
rates)forBookscape,wegetaleveredbetaof0.82.
LeveredbetaforBookscape=0.7346(1+(1.40)(.2033))=0.82

Usingariskfreerateof4%(UStreasurybondrate)andahistorical
riskpremiumof4.82%:
CostofEquity=4%+0.82(4.82%)=7.95%

85

Is Beta an Adequate Measure of Risk for a


Private Firm?

Theownersofmostprivatefirmsarenotdiversified.Betameasures
theriskaddedontoadiversifiedportfolio.Therefore,usingbetato
arriveatacostofequityforaprivatefirmwill
a) Underestimatethecostofequityfortheprivatefirm
b) Overestimatethecostofequityfortheprivatefirm
c) Couldunderoroverestimatethecostofequityfortheprivatefirm

86

Total Risk versus Market Risk

Adjustthebetatoreflecttotalriskratherthanmarketrisk.This
adjustmentisarelativelysimpleone,sincetheRsquaredofthe
regressionmeasurestheproportionoftheriskthatismarketrisk.
TotalBeta=MarketBeta/Correlationofthesectorwiththemarket

IntheBookscapeexample,wherethemarketbetais0.82andthe
averageRsquaredofthecomparablepubliclytradedfirmsis16%,
MarketBeta
Rsquared

0.82
.16

= 2.06

TotalCostofEquity=4%+2.06(4.82%)=13.93%

87

Application Test: Estimating a Bottom-up


Beta

Baseduponthebusinessorbusinessesthatyourfirmisinrightnow,
anditscurrentfinancialleverage,estimatethebottomupunlevered
betaforyourfirm.

DataSource:Youcangetalistingofunleveredbetasbyindustryon
mywebsitebygoingtoupdateddata.

88

From Cost of Equity to Cost of Capital

Thecostofcapitalisacompositecosttothefirmofraisingfinancing
tofunditsprojects.
Inadditiontoequity,firmscanraisecapitalfromdebt

89

What is debt?

GeneralRule:Debtgenerallyhasthefollowingcharacteristics:
Commitmenttomakefixedpaymentsinthefuture
Thefixedpaymentsaretaxdeductible
Failuretomakethepaymentscanleadtoeitherdefaultorlossofcontrol
ofthefirmtothepartytowhompaymentsaredue.

Asaconsequence,debtshouldinclude
Anyinterestbearingliability,whethershorttermorlongterm.
Anyleaseobligation,whetheroperatingorcapital.

90

Estimating the Cost of Debt

Ifthefirmhasbondsoutstanding,andthebondsaretraded,theyield
tomaturityonalongterm,straight(nospecialfeatures)bondcanbe
usedastheinterestrate.
Ifthefirmisrated,usetheratingandatypicaldefaultspreadonbonds
withthatratingtoestimatethecostofdebt.
Ifthefirmisnotrated,
andithasrecentlyborrowedlongtermfromabank,usetheinterestrate
ontheborrowingor
estimateasyntheticratingforthecompany,andusethesyntheticratingto
arriveatadefaultspreadandacostofdebt

Thecostofdebthastobeestimatedinthesamecurrencyasthecostof
equityandthecashflowsinthevaluation.

91

Estimating Synthetic Ratings

Theratingforafirmcanbeestimatedusingthefinancial
characteristicsofthefirm.Initssimplestform,theratingcanbe
estimatedfromtheinterestcoverageratio
InterestCoverageRatio=EBIT/InterestExpenses
Forafirm,whichhasearningsbeforeinterestandtaxesof$3,500
millionandinterestexpensesof$700million
InterestCoverageRatio=3,500/700=5.00
In2003,Bookscapehadoperatingincomeof$2millionafterinterest
expensesof500,000.Theresultinginterestcoverageratiois4.00.
Interestcoverageratio=2,000,000/500,000=4.00

92

Interest Coverage Ratios, Ratings and Default


Spreads: Small Companies
InterestCoverageRatio
>12.5
9.5012.50
7.509.50
6.007.50
4.506.00
4.004.50
3.504.00
3.003.50
2.503.00
2.002.50
1.502.00
1.251.50
0.801.25
0.500.80
<0.65

Rating
AAA
AA
A+
A
A
BBB
BB+
BB
B+
B
B
CCC
CC
C
D

Typicaldefaultspread
0.35%
0.50%
0.70%
0.85%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.25%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
20.00%

93

Synthetic Rating and Cost of Debt for


Bookscape

Ratingbasedoninterestcoverageratio=BBB
DefaultSpreadbaseduponrating=1.50%
Pretaxcostofdebt=RiskfreeRate+DefaultSpread=4%+1.50%=
5.50%
Aftertaxcostofdebt=Pretaxcostofdebt(1taxrate)=5.50%
(1.40)=3.30%

94

Estimating Cost of Debt with rated companies

Forthethreepubliclytradedfirmsinoursample,wewillusethe
actualbondratingstoestimatethecostsofdebt:
S&PRating

Disney
BBB+
DeutscheBank AA
Aracruz
B+

RiskfreeRate
4%($)
4.05%(Eu)
4%($)

Default
Spread
1.25%
1.00%
3.25%

Costof
Debt
5.25%
5.05%
7.25%

Tax Aftertax
Rate CostofDebt
37.3% 3.29%
38% 3.13%
34% 4.79%

WecomputedthesyntheticratingsforDisneyandAracruzusingthe
interestcoverageratios:
Disney:Coverageratio=2,805/758=3.70
Syntheticrating=A
Aracruz:Coverageratio=888/339=2.62
Syntheticrating=BBB
Disneyssyntheticratingisclosetoitsactualrating.Aracruzhastwo
ratingsoneforitslocalcurrencyborrowingsofBBBandoneforits
dollarborrowingsofB+.

95

Application Test: Estimating a Cost of Debt

Baseduponyourfirmscurrentearningsbeforeinterestandtaxes,its
interestexpenses,estimate

Aninterestcoverageratioforyourfirm
Asyntheticratingforyourfirm(usetheinterestcoveragetable)
Apretaxcostofdebtforyourfirm
Anaftertaxcostofdebtforyourfirm

96

Weights for Cost of Capital Calculation

Theweightsusedinthecostofcapitalcomputationshouldbemarket
values.
Therearethreespeciousargumentsusedagainstmarketvalue
Book value is more reliable than market value because it is not as
volatile: While it is true that book value does not change as much as
marketvalue,thisismoreareflectionofweaknessthanstrength
Using book value rather than market value is a more conservative
approach to estimating debt ratios: For most companies, using book
valueswillyieldalowercostofcapitalthanusingmarketvalueweights.
Since accounting returns are computed based upon book value,
consistency requires the use of book value in computing cost of capital:
While it may seem consistent to use book values for both accounting
returnandcostofcapitalcalculations,itdoesnotmakeeconomicsense.

97

Estimating Market Value Weights

MarketValueofEquityshouldincludethefollowing
MarketValueofSharesoutstanding
MarketValueofWarrantsoutstanding
MarketValueofConversionOptioninConvertibleBonds

MarketValueofDebtismoredifficulttoestimatebecausefewfirms
haveonlypubliclytradeddebt.Therearetwosolutions:
Assumebookvalueofdebtisequaltomarketvalue
Estimatethemarketvalueofdebtfromthebookvalue
ForDisney,withbookvalueof13,100million,interestexpensesof$666
million,acurrentcostofborrowingof5.25%andanweightedaverage
maturityof11.53years.

(1

13,100
(1.0525)11.53

666
+
= $12, 915million
EstimatedMVofDisneyDebt=
.0525

(1.0525)11.53

98

Converting Operating Leases to Debt

Thedebtvalueofoperatingleasesisthepresentvalueofthelease
payments,ataratethatreflectstheirrisk.
Ingeneral,thisratewillbeclosetoorequaltotherateatwhichthe
companycanborrow.

99

Operating Leases at Disney


ThepretaxcostofdebtatDisneyis5.25%
Year
Commitment
PresentValue
1
$271.00
$257.48
2
$242.00
$218.46
3
$221.00
$189.55
4
$208.00
$169.50
5
$275.00
$212.92
69
$258.25
$704.93
DebtValueofleases=
$1,752.85
DebtoutstandingatDisney=$12,915+$1,753=$14,668million

100

Application Test: Estimating Market Value

Estimatethe
MarketvalueofequityatyourfirmandBookValueofequity
Marketvalueofdebtandbookvalueofdebt(Ifyoucannotfindthe
averagematurityofyourdebt,use3years):Remembertocapitalizethe
valueofoperatingleasesandaddthemontoboththebookvalueandthe
marketvalueofdebt.

Estimatethe
Weightsforequityanddebtbaseduponmarketvalue
Weightsforequityanddebtbaseduponbookvalue

101

Current Cost of Capital: Disney

Equity
CostofEquity=Riskfreerate+Beta*RiskPremium
=4%+1.25(4.82%)=10.00%
MarketValueofEquity=
$55.101Billion
Equity/(Debt+Equity)=
79%

Debt
AftertaxCostofdebt=(Riskfreerate+DefaultSpread)(1t)
=(4%+1.25%)(1.373)= 3.29%
MarketValueofDebt=
$14.668Billion
Debt/(Debt+Equity)=
21%

CostofCapital=10.00%(.79)+3.29%(.21)=8.59%
55.101/
(55.101+14.668)

102

Disneys Divisional Costs of Capital


Business

Costof
Equity
MediaNetworks
10.10%
ParksandResorts
9.12%
StudioEntertainment 10.43%
ConsumerProducts 10.39%
Disney
10.00%

Aftertax
costofdebt
3.29%
3.29%
3.29%
3.29%
3.29%

E/(D+E)

D/(D+E)

Costofcapital

78.98%
78.98%
78.98%
78.98%
78.98%

21.02%
21.02%
21.02%
21.02%
21.02%

8.67%
7.90%
8.93%
8.89%
8.59%

103

Application Test: Estimating Cost of Capital

Usingthebottomupunleveredbetathatyoucomputedforyourfirm,
andthevaluesofdebtandequityyouhaveestimatedforyourfirm,
estimateabottomupleveredbetaandcostofequityforyourfirm.

Baseduponthecostsofequityanddebtthatyouhaveestimated,and
theweightsforeach,estimatethecostofcapitalforyourfirm.

Howdifferentwouldyourcostofcapitalhavebeen,ifyouusedbook
valueweights?

104

Choosing a Hurdle Rate

Eitherthecostofequityorthecostofcapitalcanbeusedasahurdle
rate,dependinguponwhetherthereturnsmeasuredaretoequity
investorsortoallclaimholdersonthefirm(capital)
Ifreturnsaremeasuredtoequityinvestors,theappropriatehurdlerate
isthecostofequity.
Ifreturnsaremeasuredtocapital(orthefirm),theappropriatehurdle
rateisthecostofcapital.

105

Back to First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgeneratedand
thetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositiveand
negativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

106

Measuring Investment Returns

Showmethemoney
JerryMaguire

107

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflows
generatedandthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalso
considerbothpositiveandnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

108

Measures of return: earnings versus cash flows

PrinciplesGoverningAccountingEarningsMeasurement
AccrualAccounting:Showrevenueswhenproductsandservicesaresold
orprovided,notwhentheyarepaidfor.Showexpensesassociatedwith
theserevenuesratherthancashexpenses.
OperatingversusCapitalExpenditures:Onlyexpensesassociatedwith
creatingrevenuesinthecurrentperiodshouldbetreatedasoperating
expenses.Expensesthatcreatebenefitsoverseveralperiodsarewritten
offovermultipleperiods(asdepreciationoramortization)

Togetfromaccountingearningstocashflows:
youhavetoaddbacknoncashexpenses(likedepreciation)
youhavetosubtractoutcashoutflowswhicharenotexpensed(suchas
capitalexpenditures)
youhavetomakeaccrualrevenuesandexpensesintocashrevenuesand
expenses(byconsideringchangesinworkingcapital).

109

Measuring Returns Right: The Basic Principles

Usecashflowsratherthanearnings.Youcannotspendearnings.
Useincrementalcashflowsrelatingtotheinvestmentdecision,i.e.,
cashflowsthatoccurasaconsequenceofthedecision,ratherthantotal
cashflows.
Usetimeweightedreturns,i.e.,valuecashflowsthatoccurearlier
morethancashflowsthatoccurlater.

TheReturnMantra:Timeweighted,IncrementalCashFlow
Return

110

Earnings versus Cash Flows: A Disney Theme


Park

ThethemeparkstobebuiltnearBangkok,modeledonEuroDisneyin
Paris,willincludeaMagicKingdomtobeconstructed,beginning
immediately,andbecomingoperationalatthebeginningofthesecond
year,andasecondthemeparkmodeledonEpcotCenteratOrlandoto
beconstructedinthesecondandthirdyearandbecomingoperational
atthebeginningofthefifthyear.
TheearningsandcashflowsareestimatedinnominalU.S.Dollars.

111

Earnings on Project

MagicKing d om
Seco n d The m e Pa rk
Resort&Prop e rties
TotalRevenues
Magic Kingdom:Operating
Expenses
EpcotII:Operating
Expenses
Resort&Prop e rty:
OperatingExpenses

Depreciation&Amortization
AllocatedG&ACosts

OperatingIncome

Taxes
OperatingIncom
e aft e r
Taxes

Now(0)1

$0

$0

$0

$0

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$1,0 0 0 $1,4 0 0 $1,7 0 0 $2,0 0 0 $2,2 0 0 $2,4 2 0 $2,6 6 2 $2,9 2 8 $2,9 8 7
$0
$0
$300 $500 $550 $605 $666 $732 $747
$250 $350 $500 $625 $688 $756 $832 $915 $933
$1,2 5 0 $1,7 5 0 $2,5 0 0 $3,1 2 5 $3,4 3 8 $3,7 8 1 $4,1 5 9 $4,5 7 5 $4,6 6 7

$600 $840 $1,0 2 0 $1,2 0 0 $1,3 2 0 $1,4 5 2 $1,5 9 7 $1,7 5 7 $1,7 9 2

$0

$0

$0

$180 $300 $330 $363 $399 $439 $448

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0

$188
$537
$188
$262
$98

$263
$508
$263
$123
$46

$375
$430
$375
$120
$45

$164 $77

$75

$469
$359
$469
$329
$1 23

$516
$357
$516
$399
$149

$567
$358
$567
$473
$177

$624
$361
$624
$554
$206

$6 86
$366
$686
$641
$239

$700
$369
$700
$657
$245

$206 $250 $297 $347 $402 $412

112

And the Accounting View of Return

Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

After -tax
Operating
Income
$0
-$165
-$77
$75
$206
$251
$297
$347
$402
$412
$175

BV of
Capital:
Beginning
$2,500
$3,500
$4,294
$4,616
$4,524
$4,484
$4,464
$4,481
$4,518
$4,575

BV of
Capital:
Ending
$3,500
$4,294
$4,616
$4,524
$4,484
$4,464
$4,481
$4,518
$4,575
$4,617

Ave rage BV
of Capital
$3,000
$3,897
$4,455
$4,570
$4,504
$4,474
$4,472
$4,499
$4,547
$4,596
$4,301

ROC
NA
-4.22%
-1.73%
1.65%
4.58%
5.60%
6.64%
7.72%
8.83%
8.97%
4.23%

113

Should there be a risk premium for foreign


projects?

Theexchangerateriskshouldbediversifiablerisk(andhenceshould
notcommandapremium)if
thecompanyhasprojectsisalargenumberofcountries(or)
theinvestorsinthecompanyaregloballydiversified.
ForDisney,thisriskshouldnotaffectthecostofcapitalused.Consequently,
wewouldnotadjustthecostofcapitalforDisneysinvestmentsinother
maturemarkets(Germany,UK,France)

Thesamediversificationargumentcanalsobeappliedagainstpolitical
risk,whichwouldmeanthatittooshouldnotaffectthediscountrate.
Itmay,however,affectthecashflows,byreducingtheexpectedlife
orcashflowsontheproject.
ForDisney,thisistheriskthatweareincorporatingintothecostof
capitalwhenitinvestsinThailand(oranyotheremergingmarket)

114

Estimating a hurdle rate for the theme park

Wedidestimateacostofequityof9.12%fortheDisneythemepark
businessinthelastchapter,usingabottomupleveredbetaof1.0625
forthebusiness.
This cost of equity may not adequately reflect the additional risk
associatedwiththethemeparkbeinginanemergingmarket.
Tocounterthisrisk,wecomputethecostofequityforthethemepark
using a risk premium that includes a country risk premium for
Thailand:
The rating for Thailand is Baa1 and the default spread for the country bond
is 1.50%. Multiplying this by the relative volatility of 2.2 of the equity
market in Thailand (strandard deviation of equity/standard devaiation of
country bond) yields a country risk premium of 3.3%.

CostofEquityinUS$=4%+1.0625(4.82%+3.30%)=12.63%
CostofCapitalinUS$=12.63%(.7898)+3.29%(.2102)=10.66%

115

Would lead us to conclude that...

Donotinvestinthispark.Thereturnoncapitalof4.23%islower
thanthecostofcapitalforthemeparksof10.66%;Thiswould
suggestthattheprojectshouldnotbetaken.
Giventhatwehavecomputedtheaverageoveranarbitraryperiodof
10years,whilethethemeparkitselfwouldhavealifegreaterthan10
years,wouldyoufeelcomfortablewiththisconclusion?
a) Yes
b) No

116

From Project to Firm Return on Capital: Disney


in 2003

Justasacomparisonofprojectreturnoncapitaltothecostofcapital
yieldsameasureofwhethertheprojectisacceptable,acomparison
canbemadeatthefirmlevel,tojudgewhethertheexistingprojectsof
thefirmareaddingordestroyingvalue.
Disney,in2003,hadearningsbeforeinterestandtaxesof$2,713
million,hadabookvalueofequityof$23,879millionandabook
valueofdebtof14,130million.Withataxrateof37.3%,weget
ReturnonCapital=2713(1.373)/(23879+14130)=4.48%
CostofCapitalforDisney=8.59%
ExcessReturn=4.48%8.59%=4.11%

Thiscanbeconvertedintoadollarfigurebymultiplyingbythecapital
invested,inwhichcaseitiscalledeconomicvalueadded
EVA=(..0448.0859)(23879+14130)=$1,562million

117

Application Test: Assessing Investment


Quality
Forthemostrecentperiodforwhichyouhavedata,computetheafter
taxreturnoncapitalearnedbyyourfirm,whereaftertaxreturnon
capitaliscomputedtobe
AftertaxROC=EBIT(1taxrate)/(BVofdebt+BVofEquity) previousyear

Forthemostrecentperiodforwhichyouhavedata,computethe
returnspreadearnedbyyourfirm:
ReturnSpread=AftertaxROCCostofCapital
Forthemostrecentperiod,computetheEVAearnedbyyourfirm
EVA=ReturnSpread*((BVofdebt+BVofEquity) previousyear

118

The cash flow view of this project..

Operating Income after Taxes


+ Depreciation & Amortization
- Capital Expenditures
$2,500 $1,000
- Change in Working Capital
$0
$0
Cashflow to Firm
-$2,500 -$1,000

2
-$165
$537
$1,269
$63
-$960

3
-$77
$508
$805
$25
-$399

4
$75
$430
$301
$38
$166

5
$206
$359
$287
$31
$247

6
$251
$357
$321
$16
$271

Togetfromincometocashflow,we
addedbackallnoncashchargessuchasdepreciation
subtractedoutthecapitalexpenditures
subtractedoutthechangeinnoncashworkingcapital

119

The incremental cash flows on the project


$500millionhasalreadybeenspent

OperatingIncomeafterTaxes

Now(0)

$537 $508 $430 $359 $357 $358 $361 $366 $369

+ Depreciation & ortization


Am
- CapitalExpenditures
- ChangeniWorkingCapital

$2,500 $1,000 $1,269 $805 $301 $287 $321 $358 $379 $403 $406
$0

+ Non
-incrementa
l Allocated
Expense
(1-t)
+ Sun
k Costs
Cashflow to Firm

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-$165 -$77 $75 $206 $251 $297 $347 $402 $412

$0

$63

$25

$38 $31 $16 $17 $19 $21

$5

$0

$78

$110 $157 $196 $216 $237 $261 $287 $293

500
-$2,000 -$1,000 -$880 -$289 $324 $443 $486 $517 $571 $631 $663

2/3rdofallocatedG&Aisfixed.
Addbackthisamount(1t)

Togetfromcashflowtoincrementalcashflows,we
Takenoutofthesunkcostsfromtheinitialinvestment
Addedbackthenonincrementalallocatedcosts(inaftertaxterms)

120

To Time-Weighted Cash Flows

Incrementalcashflowsintheearlieryearsareworthmorethan
incrementalcashflowsinlateryears.
Infact,cashflowsacrosstimecannotbeaddedup.Theyhavetobe
broughttothesamepointintimebeforeaggregation.
Thisprocessofmovingcashflowsthroughtimeis
discounting,whenfuturecashflowsarebroughttothepresent
compounding,whenpresentcashflowsaretakentothefuture

Thediscountingandcompoundingisdoneatadiscountratethatwill
reflect
Expectedinflation:HigherInflation>HigherDiscountRates
Expectedrealrate:Higherrealrate>HigherDiscountrate
Expecteduncertainty:Higheruncertainty>HigherDiscountRate

121

Present Value Mechanics


CashFlowType
1.SimpleCF
2.Annuity

3.GrowingAnnuity

DiscountingFormula
CFn/(1+r)n

CompoundingFormula
CF (1+r)n
0

1
n

(1+ r)
A

(1 + g)n
1

(1 + r)n
A(1 + g)
r g

(1
+ r) 1
A

4.Perpetuity
A/r
5.GrowingPerpetuity ExpectedCashflownextyear/(rg)

122

Discounted cash flow measures of return

NetPresentValue(NPV):Thenetpresentvalueisthesumofthe
presentvaluesofallcashflowsfromtheproject(includinginitial
investment).
NPV=Sumofthepresentvaluesofallcashflowsontheproject,including
theinitialinvestment,withthecashflowsbeingdiscountedatthe
appropriatehurdlerate(costofcapital,ifcashflowiscashflowtothe
firm,andcostofequity,ifcashflowistoequityinvestors)
DecisionRule:AcceptifNPV>0

InternalRateofReturn(IRR):Theinternalrateofreturnisthe
discountratethatsetsthenetpresentvalueequaltozero.Itisthe
percentagerateofreturn,baseduponincrementaltimeweightedcash
flows.
DecisionRule:AcceptifIRR>hurdlerate

123

Closure on Cash Flows

Inaprojectwithafiniteandshortlife,youwouldneedtocomputea
salvagevalue,whichistheexpectedproceedsfromsellingallofthe
investmentintheprojectattheendoftheprojectlife.Itisusuallyset
equaltobookvalueoffixedassetsandworkingcapital
Inaprojectwithaninfiniteorverylonglife,wecomputecashflows
forareasonableperiod,andthencomputeaterminalvalueforthis
project,whichisthepresentvalueofallcashflowsthatoccurafterthe
estimationperiodends..
Assumingtheprojectlastsforever,andthatcashflowsafteryear9
grow2%(theinflationrate)forever,thepresentvalueattheendof
year10ofcashflowsafterthatcanbewrittenas:
TerminalValueinyear10=CFinyear11/(CostofCapitalGrowthRate)
=663(1.02)/(.1066.02)=$7,810million

124

Which yields a NPV of..


Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Annual
Cashflo w
-$2,000
-$1,000
-$880
-$289
$324
$443
$486
$517
$571
$631
$663

Terminal
Value

$7,810

Present
Value
-$2,000
-$904
-$719
-$213
$216
$267
$265
$254
$254
$254
$3,076
$749

125

Which makes the argument that..

Theprojectshouldbeaccepted.Thepositivenetpresentvalue
suggeststhattheprojectwilladdvaluetothefirm,andearnareturnin
excessofthecostofcapital.
Bytakingtheproject,Disneywillincreaseitsvalueasafirmby$749
million.

126

The IRR of this project


Figure5.5:NPVProfileforDisneyThemePark
$4,000.00

$3,000.00

$2,000.00

InternalRateofReturn

$1,000.00
NPV
$0.00
8%

9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 20% 21% 22% 23% 24% 25% 26% 27% 28% 29% 30%

$1,000.00

$2,000.00

$3,000.00
DiscountRate

127

The IRR suggests..

Theprojectisagoodone.Usingtimeweighted,incrementalcash
flows,thisprojectprovidesareturnof11.97%.Thisisgreaterthanthe
costofcapitalof10.66%.
TheIRRandtheNPVwillyieldsimilarresultsmostofthetime,
thoughtherearedifferencesbetweenthetwoapproachesthatmay
causeprojectrankingstovarydependingupontheapproachused.

128

Currency Choices and NPV

Theanalysiswasdoneindollars.Wouldtheconclusionshavebeen
anydifferentifwehaddonetheanalysisinThaiBaht?
a) Yes
b) No

129

Disney Theme Park: Thai Baht NPV


InflationrateinThailand=10%
InflationrateinUS=2%

Bt/$inyear1=42.09(1.10/1.02)=45.39

Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Cashflow ($)
-2000
-1000
-880
-289
324
443
486
517
571
631
8474

Bt/$
42.09
45.39
48.95
52.79
56.93
61.40
66.21
71.40
77.01
83.04
89.56

Cashflow (Bt) Present Value


-84180
-84180
-45391
-38034
-43075
-30243
-15262
-8979
18420
9080
27172
11223
32187
11140
36920
10707
43979
10687
52412
10671
758886
129470
31542

NPV=31,542Bt/42.09Bt=$749Million
NPVisequaltoNPVindollarterms

130

The Role of Sensitivity Analysis

Ourconclusionsonaprojectareclearlyconditionedonalargenumber
ofassumptionsaboutrevenues,costsandothervariablesoververy
longtimeperiods.
Tothedegreethattheseassumptionsarewrong,ourconclusionscan
alsobewrong.
Onewaytogainconfidenceintheconclusionsistochecktoseehow
sensitivethedecisionmeasure(NPV,IRR..)istochangesinkey
assumptions.

131

Side Costs and Benefits

Mostprojectsconsideredbyanybusinesscreatesidecostsand
benefitsforthatbusiness.
Thesidecostsincludethecostscreatedbytheuseofresourcesthatthe
businessalreadyowns(opportunitycosts)andlostrevenuesforother
projectsthatthefirmmayhave.
Thebenefitsthatmaynotbecapturedinthetraditionalcapital
budgetinganalysisincludeprojectsynergies(wherecashflowbenefits
mayaccruetootherprojects)andoptionsembeddedinprojects
(includingtheoptionstodelay,expandorabandonaproject).
Thereturnsonaprojectshouldincorporatethesecostsandbenefits.

132

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflows
generatedandthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalso
considerbothpositiveandnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

133

Finding the Right Financing Mix: The


Capital Structure Decision

134

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgenerated
andthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositive
andnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

Objective:MaximizetheValueoftheFirm

135

Growthstage
Stage2
Time
Stage1
Stage4
Stage5
External
OwnersEquity
Earnings
Revenues
VentureCapital
Retiredebt
Debt
Externalfunding
High,but
High,relative
Moderate,relative
Declining,asa
Low,asprojectsdry
Internalfinancing
Commonstock
Stage3
Low,relativeto
High,relativeto
Financing
Bondissues
Seasonedequityissue
InitalPublicoffering
Accessingprivateequity
Morethanfundingneeds
$Revenues/
Negativeor
FinancingChoicesacrossthelifecycle
RapidExpansion
Startup
MatureGrowth
Decline
Financing
BankDebt
CommonStock
Repurchasestock
needs
constrainedby
tofirmvalue.
percentoffirm
up.
Warrants
HighGrowth
low
fundingneeds
Transitions
Earnings

136

Measuring a firms financing mix

Thesimplestmeasureofhowmuchdebtandequityafirmisusing
currentlyistolookattheproportionofdebtinthetotalfinancing.This
ratioiscalledthedebttocapitalratio:
DebttoCapitalRatio=Debt/(Debt+Equity)
Debtincludesallinterestbearingliabilities,shorttermaswellaslong
term.
Equitycanbedefinedeitherinaccountingterms(asbookvalueof
equity)orinmarketvalueterms(baseduponthecurrentprice).The
resultingdebtratioscanbeverydifferent.

137

Debt: Summarizing the Trade Off


AdvantagesofBorrowing

DisadvantagesofBorrowing

1.TaxBenefit:

1.BankruptcyCost:

Highertaxrates>Highertaxbenefit

Higherbusinessrisk>HigherCost

2.AddedDiscipline:

2.AgencyCost:

Greatertheseparationbetweenmanagers

Greatertheseparationbetweenstock

andstockholders>Greaterthebenefit

holders&lenders>HigherCost
3.LossofFutureFinancingFlexibility:
Greatertheuncertaintyaboutfuture

financingneeds>HigherCost

138

A Hypothetical Scenario

Assumeyouoperateinanenvironment,where
(a)therearenotaxes
(b)thereisnoseparationbetweenstockholdersandmanagers.
(c)thereisnodefaultrisk
(d)thereisnoseparationbetweenstockholdersandbondholders
(e)firmsknowtheirfuturefinancingneeds

139

The Miller-Modigliani Theorem

Inanenvironment,wheretherearenotaxes,defaultriskoragency
costs,capitalstructureisirrelevant.
Thevalueofafirmisindependentofitsdebtratio.

140

Implications of MM Theorem

Leverageisirrelevant.Afirm'svaluewillbedeterminedbyitsproject
cashflows.
Thecostofcapitalofthefirmwillnotchangewithleverage.Asafirm
increasesitsleverage,thecostofequitywillincreasejustenoughto
offsetanygainstotheleverage

141

Pathways to the Optimal

TheCostofCapitalApproach:Theoptimaldebtratioistheonethat
minimizesthecostofcapitalforafirm.
TheSectorApproach:Theoptimaldebtratioistheonethatbringsthe
firmclosestoitspeergroupintermsoffinancingmix.

142

I. The Cost of Capital Approach

ValueofaFirm=PresentValueofCashFlowstotheFirm,
discountedbackatthecostofcapital.
Ifthecashflowstothefirmareheldconstant,andthecostofcapitalis
minimized,thevalueofthefirmwillbemaximized.

143

Applying Cost of Capital Approach: The


Textbook Example
D/(D+E)

ke

kd

AftertaxCostofDebt WACC

10.50%

8%

4.80%

10.50%

10%

11%

8.50%

5.10%

10.41%

20%

11.60% 9.00%

5.40%

10.36%

30%

12.30% 9.00%

5.40%

10.23%

40%

13.10% 9.50%

5.70%

10.14%

50%

14%

10.50%

6.30%

10.15%

60%

15%

12%

7.20%

10.32%

70%

16.10% 13.50%

8.10%

10.50%

80%

17.20%

15%

9.00%

10.64%

90%

18.40%

17%

10.20%

11.02%

100%

19.70%

19%

11.40%

11.40%

144

WACC and Debt Ratios

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

11.40%
11.20%
11.00%
10.80%
10.60%
10.40%
10.20%
10.00%
9.80%
9.60%
9.40%
0

WACC

WeightedAverageCostofCapitalandDebtRatios

DebtRatio

145

Current Cost of Capital: Disney

Equity
CostofEquity=Riskfreerate+Beta*RiskPremium
=4%+1.25(4.82%)=10.00%
MarketValueofEquity=
$55.101Billion
Equity/(Debt+Equity)=
79%

Debt
AftertaxCostofdebt=(Riskfreerate+DefaultSpread)(1t)
=(4%+1.25%)(1.373)= 3.29%
MarketValueofDebt=
$14.668Billion
Debt/(Debt+Equity)=
21%

CostofCapital=10.00%(.79)+3.29%(.21)=8.59%
55.101/
(55.101+14.668)

146

Mechanics of Cost of Capital Estimation


1.EstimatetheCostofEquityatdifferentlevelsofdebt:
Equitywillbecomeriskier>Betawillincrease>CostofEquitywill
increase.
Estimationwilluseleveredbetacalculation

2.EstimatetheCostofDebtatdifferentlevelsofdebt:
Defaultriskwillgoupandbondratingswillgodownasdebtgoesup>Cost
ofDebtwillincrease.
Toestimatingbondratings,wewillusetheinterestcoverageratio
(EBIT/Interestexpense)

3.EstimatetheCostofCapitalatdifferentlevelsofdebt
4.CalculatetheeffectonFirmValueandStockPrice.

147

Estimating Cost of Equity


UnleveredBeta=1.0674(BottomupbetabaseduponDisneysbusinesses)
Marketpremium=4.82%
T.BondRate=4.00%
Taxrate=37.3%
DebtRatio
D/ERatio
LeveredBeta
CostofEquity
0.00%
0.00%
1.0674
9.15%
10.00%
11.11%
1.1418
9.50%
20.00%
25.00%
1.2348
9.95%
30.00%
42.86%
1.3543
10.53%
40.00%
66.67%
1.5136
11.30%
50.00%
100.00%
1.7367
12.37%
60.00%
150.00%
2.0714
13.98%
70.00%
233.33%
2.6291
16.67%
80.00%
400.00%
3.7446
22.05%
90.00%
900.00%
7.0911
38.18%

148

Estimating Cost of Debt


Startwiththecurrentmarketvalueofthefirm=55,101+14668=$69,769mil
D/(D+E)
0.00%
10.00%
Debttocapital
D/E
0.00%
11.11%
D/E=10/90=.1111
$Debt
$0
$6,977
10%of$69,769

EBITDA
$3,882
$3,882
Sameas0%debt
Depreciation
$1,077
$1,077
Sameas0%debt
EBIT
$2,805
$2,805
Sameas0%debt
Interest
$0
$303
Pretaxcostofdebt*$Debt

PretaxInt.cov

9.24
EBIT/InterestExpenses
LikelyRating
AAA
AAA
FromRatingstable
Pretaxcostofdebt
4.35%
4.35%
RisklessRate+Spread

149

The Ratings Table


Interest Co verage Ratin
Ratio
g
> 8.5
AAA
6.50 - 6.50
AA
5.50 6.50
A+
4.25 5.50
A
3.00 4.25
A2.50 3.00
BBB
2.05 - 2.50
BB+
1.90 2.00
BB
1.75 1.90
B+
1.50 - 1.75
B
1.25 1.50
B0.80 1.25
CCC
0.65 0.80
CC
0.20 0.65
C
< 0.20
D

Typical de fault
spread
0.35%
0.50%
0.70%
0.85%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.25%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
20.00%

Market inte rest rate


on d ebt
4.35%
4.50%
4.70%
4.85%
5.00%
5.50%
6.00%
6.50%
7.25%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
24.00%

150

A Test: Can you do the 20% level?


D/(D+E)

0.00%

10.00%

20.00% 2ndIteration 3rd?

D/E
$Debt

EBITDA
Depreciation
EBIT
Interest

PretaxInt.cov
LikelyRating
Costofdebt

0.00%
$0

$3,882
$1,077
$2,805
$0

AAA
4.35%

11.11%
$6,977

25.00%
$13,954

$3,882
$1,077
$2,805
$303

$3,882
$1,077
$2,805
$606 .0485*13954=676

9.24
AAA
4.35%

4.62
2805/676=4.15
A
A
4.85% 5.00%

151

Bond Ratings, Cost of Debt and Debt Ratios


Debt
Ratio
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%

Interest
Interest Coverage
Debt expense Ratio
$0
$0

$6,977 $303
9.24
$13,954 $698
4.02
$20,931 $1,256
2.23
$27,908 $3,349
0.84
$34,885 $5,582
0.50
$41,861 $6,698
0.42
$48,838 $7,814
0.36
$55,815 $8,930
0.31
$62,792 $10,047
0.28

Interest
Bond rate on
debt
Rating
AAA
4.35%
AAA
4.35%
A5.00%
BB+
6.00%
CCC
12.00%
C
16.00%
C
16.00%
C
16.00%
C
16.00%
C
16.00%

Cost of
Tax
Debt
Rate (after -tax)
37.30% 2.73%
37.30% 2.73%
37.30% 3.14%
37.30% 3.76%
31.24% 8.25%
18.75% 13.00%
15.62% 13.50%
13.39% 13.86%
11.72% 14.13%
10.41% 14.33%

152

Stated versus Effective Tax Rates

Youneedtaxableincomeforinteresttoprovideataxsavings
IntheDisneycase,considertheinterestexpenseat30%and40%
30%DebtRatio
40%DebtRatio
EBIT
$2,805m
$2,805m
InterestExpense
$1,256m
$3,349m
TaxSavings
$1,256*.373=468 2,805*.373=$1,046
TaxRate

37.30%
1,046/3,349=31.2%
Pretaxinterestrate
6.00%
12.00%
AftertaxInterestRate 3.76%
8.25%

Youcandeductonly$2,805millionofthe$3,349millionofthe
interestexpenseat40%.Therefore,only37.3%of$2,805millionis
consideredasthetaxsavings.

153

Disneys Cost of Capital Schedule


DebtRatio
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%

CostofEquity
9.15%
9.50%
9.95%
10.53%
11.50%
13.33%
15.66%
19.54%
27.31%
50.63%

CostofDebt(aftertax)
2.73%
2.73%
3.14%
3.76%
8.25%
13.00%
13.50%
13.86%
14.13%
14.33%

CostofCapital
9.15%
8.83%
8.59%
8.50%
10.20%
13.16%
14.36%
15.56%
16.76%
17.96%

154

Disney: Cost of Capital Chart


Figure8.3:DisneyCostofCapitalatdifferentDebtRatios
60.00%

20.00%
18.00%

50.00%

16.00%
14.00%

40.00%

Costofequity
climbsas
leveredbeta
increases

OptimalDebtratioisatthispoint

12.00%

30.00%

10.00%
8.00%

Costsofdebtandequity
20.00%

CostofCapital

6.00%
4.00%

10.00%

Aftertaxcostofdebtincreasesas
interestcoverageratiodeteriorates
andwithitthesyntheticrating.

0.00%

2.00%
0.00%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

DebtRatio
CostofEquity

AftertaxCostofDebt

CostofCapital

155

Effect on Firm Value

FirmValuebeforethechange=55,101+14,668=$69,769
WACCb=8.59%
WACCa=8.50%
WACC=0.09%

AnnualCost=$69,769*8.59%=$5,993million
AnnualCost=$69,769*8.50%=$5,930million
ChangeinAnnualCost
=$63million

Ifthereisnogrowthinthefirmvalue,(ConservativeEstimate)
Increaseinfirmvalue=$63/.0850=$741million
ChangeinStockPrice=$741/2047.6=$0.36pershare

Ifweassumeaperpetualgrowthof4%infirmvalueovertime,
Increaseinfirmvalue=$63/(.0850.04)=$1,400million
ChangeinStockPrice=$1,400/2,047.6=$0.68pershare

ImpliedGrowthRateobtainedby
FirmvalueToday=FCFF(1+g)/(WACCg):Perpetualgrowthformula
$69,769=$1,722(1+g)/(.0859g):Solveforg>Impliedgrowth=5.98%

156

A Test: The Repurchase Price

LetussupposethattheCFOofDisneyapproachedyouaboutbuying
backstock.Hewantstoknowthemaximumpricethatheshouldbe
willingtopayonthestockbuyback.(Thecurrentpriceis$26.91)
Assumingthatfirmvaluewillgrowby4%ayear,estimatethe
maximumprice.

Whatwouldhappentothestockpriceafterthebuybackifyouwere
abletobuystockbackat$26.91?

157

The Downside Risk

DoingWhatifanalysisonOperatingIncome
A.StandardDeviationApproach

StandardDeviationInPastOperatingIncome
StandardDeviationInEarnings(IfOperatingIncomeIsUnavailable)
ReduceBaseCaseByOneStandardDeviation(OrMore)

B.PastRecessionApproach

LookAtWhatHappenedToOperatingIncomeDuringTheLastRecession.
(HowMuchDidItDropIn%Terms?)
ReduceCurrentOperatingIncomeBySameMagnitude

ConstraintonBondRatings

158

Disneys Operating Income: History


Year

EBIT

1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

756
848
1177
1368
1124
1287
1560
1804
2262
3024
3945
3843
3580
2525
2832
2384
2713

% Change
in EBIT
12.17%
38.80%
16.23%
-17.84%
14.50%
21.21%
15.64%
25.39%
33.69%
30.46%
-2.59%
-6.84%
-29.47%
12.16%
-15.82%
13.80%

159

Disney: Effects of Past Downturns


Recession
2002
1991
198182
WorstYear

DeclineinOperatingIncome
Dropof15.82%
Dropof22.00%
Increased
Dropof29.47%

Thestandarddeviationinpastoperatingincomeisabout20%.

160

Disney: The Downside Scenario


%DropinEBITDA

EBIT

OptimalDebtRatio

0%

$2,805

30%

5%

$2,665

20%

10%

$2,524

20%

15%

$2385

20%

20%

$2,245

20%

161

Constraints on Ratings

Managementoftenspecifiesa'desiredRating'belowwhichtheydo
notwanttofall.
Theratingconstraintisdrivenbythreefactors
itisonewayofprotectingagainstdownsideriskinoperatingincome(so
donotdoboth)
adropinratingsmightaffectoperatingincome
thereisanegofactorassociatedwithhighratings

Caveat:EveryRatingConstraintHasACost.
ProvideManagementWithAClearEstimateOfHowMuchTheRating
ConstraintCostsByCalculatingTheValueOfTheFirmWithoutThe
RatingConstraintAndComparingToTheValueOfTheFirmWithThe
RatingConstraint.

162

Ratings Constraints for Disney


Atitsoptimaldebtratioof30%,Disneyhasanestimatedratingof
BB+.
AssumethatDisneyimposesaratingconstraintofAorgreater.
TheoptimaldebtratioforDisneyisthen20%(seenextpage)
Thecostofimposingthisratingconstraintcanthenbecalculatedas
follows:
Valueat30%Debt
=$71,239million
Valueat20%Debt
=$69,837million
CostofRatingConstraint
=$1,376million

163

Effect of Ratings Constraints: Disney


DebtRatio
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%

Rating
AAA
AAA
A
BB+
CCC
C
C
C
C
C

FirmValue
$62,279
$66,397
$69,837
$71,239
$51,661
$34,969
$30,920
$27,711
$25,105
$22,948

164

What if you do not buy back stock..

Theoptimaldebtratioisultimatelyafunctionoftheunderlying
riskinessofthebusinessinwhichyouoperateandyourtaxrate.
Willtheoptimalbedifferentifyouinvestedinprojectsinsteadof
buyingbackstock?
No.Aslongastheprojectsfinancedareinthesamebusinessmixthatthe
companyhasalwaysbeeninandyourtaxratedoesnotchange
significantly.
Yes,iftheprojectsareinentirelydifferenttypesofbusinessesorifthetax
rateissignificantlydifferent.

165

Analyzing Financial Service Firms

Theinterestcoverageratios/ratingsrelationshipislikelytobedifferent
forfinancialservicefirms.
Thedefinitionofdebtismessyforfinancialservicefirms.Ingeneral,
usingalldebtforafinancialservicefirmwillleadtohighdebtratios.
Useonlyinterestbearinglongtermdebtincalculatingdebtratios.
Theeffectofratingsdropswillbemuchmorenegativeforfinancial
servicefirms.
Therearelikelytoregulatoryconstraintsoncapital

166

Interest Coverage ratios, ratings and Operating


income
LongTermInterestCoverageRatio Ratingis Spreadis OperatingIncomeDecline
<0.05
D
16.00%
50.00%
0.050.10
C
14.00%
40.00%
0.100.20
CC
12.50%
40.00%
0.200.30
CCC
10.50%
40.00%
0.300.40
B
6.25%
25.00%
0.400.50
B
6.00%
20.00%
0.500.60
B+
5.75%
20.00%
0.600.75
BB
4.75%
20.00%
0.750.90
BB+
4.25%
20.00%
0.901.20
BBB
2.00%
20.00%
1.201.50
A
1.50%
17.50%
1.502.00
A
1.40%
15.00%
2.002.50
A+
1.25%
10.00%
2.503.00
AA
0.90%
5.00%
>3.00
AAA
0.70%
0.00%

167

Deutsche Bank: Optimal Capital Structure

Debt
Ratio
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%

Beta
0.44
0.47
0.50
0.55
0.62
0.71
0.84
1.07
1.61
3.29

Costof
Equity
6.15%
6.29%
6.48%
6.71%
7.02%
7.45%
8.10%
9.19%
11.83%
19.91%

Bond
Interest
Tax CostofDebt
Firm
Rating rateondebt Rate (aftertax) WACC Value(G)
AAA
4.75% 38.00% 2.95%
6.15% $111,034
AAA
4.75% 38.00% 2.95%
5.96% $115,498
AAA
4.75% 38.00% 2.95%
5.77% $120,336
AAA
4.75% 38.00% 2.95%
5.58% $125,597
AAA
4.75% 38.00% 2.95%
5.39% $131,339
A+
5.30% 38.00% 3.29%
5.37% $118,770
A
5.45% 38.00% 3.38%
5.27% $114,958
A
5.45% 38.00% 3.38%
5.12% $119,293
BB+
8.30% 32.43% 5.61%
6.85% $77,750
BB
8.80% 27.19% 6.41%
7.76% $66,966

168

Determinants of Optimal Debt Ratios

FirmSpecificFactors

1.TaxRate
Highertaxrates
>HigherOptimalDebtRatio
Lowertaxrates
>LowerOptimalDebtRatio
2.PreTaxCFonFirm=EBITDA/MVofFirm
HigherPretaxCF >HigherOptimalDebtRatio
LowerPretaxCF >LowerOptimalDebtRatio
3.VarianceinEarnings[Showsupwhenyoudo'whatif'analysis]
HigherVariance >LowerOptimalDebtRatio
LowerVariance
>HigherOptimalDebtRatio

MacroEconomicFactors

1.DefaultSpreads
Higher
Lower

>LowerOptimalDebtRatio
>HigherOptimalDebtRatio

169

Application Test: Your firms optimal


financing mix

Usingtheoptimalcapitalstructurespreadsheetprovided:

Estimatetheoptimaldebtratioforyourfirm
Estimatethenewcostofcapitalattheoptimal
Estimatetheeffectofthechangeinthecostofcapitalonfirmvalue
Estimatetheeffectonthestockprice

Intermsofthemechanics,whatwouldyouneedtodotogettothe
optimalimmediately?

170

II. Relative Analysis


I.IndustryAveragewithSubjectiveAdjustments
Thesafestplaceforanyfirmtobeisclosetotheindustryaverage
Subjectiveadjustmentscanbemadetotheseaveragestoarriveatthe
rightdebtratio.

Highertaxrates>Higherdebtratios(Taxbenefits)
Lowerinsiderownership>Higherdebtratios(Greaterdiscipline)
Morestableincome>Higherdebtratios(Lowerbankruptcycosts)
Moreintangibleassets>Lowerdebtratios(Moreagencyproblems)

171

Comparing to industry averages

Disney Entertainment Aracruz


MarketDebtRatio 21.02%
19.56%
30.82%
BookDebtRatio 35.10%
28.86%
43.12%

PaperandPulp(Emerging
Market)
27.71%
49.00%

172

A Framework for Getting to the Optimal


Is the actual debt ratio greater than or lesser than the optimal debt ratio?

Actual > Optimal


Overlevered

Actual < Optimal


Underlevered

Is the firm under bankruptcy threat?


Yes

No

Reduce Debt quickly


1. Equity for Debt swap
2. Sell Assets; use cash
to pay off debt
3. Renegotiate with lenders

Does the firm have good


projects?
ROE > Cost of Equity
ROC > Cost of Capital

Yes
No
Take good projects with
1. Pay off debt with retained
new equity or with retained earnings.
earnings.
2. Reduce or eliminate dividends.
3. Issue new equity and pay off
debt.

Is the firm a takeover target?


Yes
Increase leverage
quickly
1. Debt/Equity swaps
2. Borrow money&
buy shares.

No
Does the firm have good
projects?
ROE > Cost of Equity
ROC > Cost of Capital

Yes
Take good projects with
debt.

No
Do your stockholders like
dividends?

Yes
Pay Dividends

No
Buy back stock

173

Disney: Applying the Framework


Is the actual debt ratio greater than or lesser than the optimal debt ratio?

Actual > Optimal


Overlevered

Actual < Optimal


Underlevered

Is the firm under bankruptcy threat?


Yes

No

Reduce Debt quickly


1. Equity for Debt swap
2. Sell Assets; use cash
to pay off debt
3. Renegotiate with lenders

Does the firm have good


projects?
ROE > Cost of Equity
ROC > Cost of Capital

Yes
No
Take good projects with
1. Pay off debt with retained
new equity or with retained earnings.
earnings.
2. Reduce or eliminate dividends.
3. Issue new equity and pay off
debt.

Is the firm a takeover target?


Yes
Increase leverage
quickly
1. Debt/Equity swaps
2. Borrow money&
buy shares.

No
Does the firm have good
projects?
ROE > Cost of Equity
ROC > Cost of Capital

Yes
Take good projects with
debt.

No
Do your stockholders like
dividends?

Yes
Pay Dividends

No
Buy back stock

174

Application Test: Getting to the Optimal

Baseduponyouranalysisofboththefirmscapitalstructureand
investmentrecord,whatpathwouldyoumapoutforthefirm?
Immediatechangeinleverage
Gradualchangeinleverage
Nochangeinleverage
Wouldyourecommendthatthefirmchangeitsfinancingmixby
Payingoffdebt/Buyingbackequity
Takeprojectswithequity/debt

175

Designing Debt: The Fundamental Principle

Theobjectiveindesigningdebtistomakethecashflowsondebt
matchupascloselyaspossiblewiththecashflowsthatthefirm
makesonitsassets.
Bydoingso,wereduceourriskofdefault,increasedebtcapacityand
increasefirmvalue.

176

Design the perfect financing instrument

Theperfectfinancinginstrumentwill
Haveallofthetaxadvantagesofdebt
Whilepreservingtheflexibilityofferedbyequity

CommodityBonds
EffectofInflation
Duration
Designdebttohavecashflowsthatmatchuptocashflowsontheassetsfinanced
Cyclicality&
GrowthPatterns
DefineDebt
Duration/
Currency
Fixedvs.FloatingRate
Straightversus
SpecialFeatures
Startwiththe
UncertaintyaboutFuture
OtherEffects
Characteristics
Maturity
Mix
*Morefloatingrate
Convertible
onDebt
CashFlows
CatastropheNotes
ifCFmovewith
Convertibleif
Optionstomake
onAssets/
inflation
cashflowslow
cashflowsondebt
Projects
withgreateruncertainty
nowbuthigh
matchcashflows
onfuture
exp.growth
onassets

177

Ensuring that you have not crossed the line


drawn by the tax code

Allofthisdesignworkislost,however,ifthesecuritythatyouhave
designeddoesnotdeliverthetaxbenefits.
Inaddition,theremaybeatradeoffbetweenmismatchingdebtand
gettinggreatertaxbenefits.

Iftaxadvantagesarelargeenough,youmightoverrideresultsofpreviousstep
Overlaytax
ZeroCoupons
Deductibilityofcashflows
Differencesintaxrates
preferences
fortaxpurposes
acrossdifferentlocales

178

While keeping equity research analysts, ratings


agencies and regulators applauding

Ratingsagencieswantcompaniestoissueequity,sinceitmakesthem
safer.Equityresearchanalystswantthemnottoissueequitybecauseit
dilutesearningspershare.Regulatoryauthoritieswanttoensurethat
youmeettheirrequirementsintermsofcapitalratios(usuallybook
value).Financingthatleavesallthreegroupshappyisnirvana.

Cansecuritiesbedesignedthatcanmakethesedifferententitieshappy?
OperatingLeases
Consider
AnalystConcerns
RatingsAgency
RegulatoryConcerns
MIPs
ratingsagency
EffectonEPS
EffectonRatios
Measuresused
SurplusNotes
&analystconcerns
Valuerelativetocomparables
Ratiosrelativetocomparables

179

Debt or Equity: The Strange Case of Trust


Preferred

Trustpreferredstockhas
Afixeddividendpayment,specifiedatthetimeoftheissue
Thatistaxdeductible
Andfailingtomakethepaymentcancause?(Canitcausedefault?)

Whentrustpreferredwasfirstcreated,ratingsagenciestreateditas
equity.Astheyhavebecomemoresavvy,ratingsagencieshave
startedgivingfirmsonlypartialequitycreditfortrustpreferred.

180

Debt, Equity and Quasi Equity

Assumingthattrustpreferredstockgetstreatedasequitybyratings
agencies,whichofthefollowingfirmsisthemostappropriatefirmto
beissuingit?
Afirmthatisunderlevered,buthasaratingconstraintthatwouldbe
violatedifitmovedtoitsoptimal
Afirmthatisoverleveredthatisunabletoissuedebtbecauseofthe
ratingagencyconcerns.

181

Soothe bondholder fears

Therearesomefirmsthatfaceskepticismfrombondholderswhen
theygoouttoraisedebt,because
Oftheirpasthistoryofdefaultsorotheractions
Theyaresmallfirmswithoutanyborrowinghistory

Bondholderstendtodemandmuchhigherinterestratesfromthese
firmstoreflecttheseconcerns.

Ifagencyproblemsaresubstantial,considerissuingconvertiblebonds
Convertibiles
Factorinagency
ObservabilityofCashFlows
TypeofAssetsfinanced
ExistingDebtcovenants
PuttableBonds
conflictsbetweenstock
byLenders
Tangibleandliquidassets
RestrictionsonFinancing
RatingSensitive
andbondholders
Lessobservablecashflows
createlessagencyproblems
leadtomoreconflicts
Notes
LYONs

182

And do not lock in market mistakes that work


against you

Ratingsagenciescansometimesunderrateafirm,andmarketscan
underpriceafirmsstockorbonds.Ifthisoccurs,firmsshouldnot
lockinthesemistakesbyissuingsecuritiesforthelongterm.In
particular,
Issuingequityorequitybasedproducts(includingconvertibles),when
equityisunderpricedtransferswealthfromexistingstockholderstothe
newstockholders
Issuinglongtermdebtwhenafirmisunderratedlocksinratesatlevels
thatarefartoohigh,giventhefirmsdefaultrisk.

Whatisthesolution
Ifyouneedtouseequity?
Ifyouneedtousedebt?

183

Designing Debt: Bringing it all together


Startwiththe

CashFlows
onAssets/
Projects

DefineDebt
Characteristics

Duration

Currency

EffectofInflation
UncertaintyaboutFuture

Duration/
Maturity

Currency
Mix

Fixedvs.FloatingRate
*Morefloatingrate
ifCFmovewith
inflation
withgreateruncertainty
onfuture

Cyclicality&
OtherEffects

GrowthPatterns

Straightversus
Convertible
Convertibleif
cashflowslow
nowbuthigh
exp.growth

SpecialFeatures
onDebt
Optionstomake
cashflowsondebt
matchcashflows
onassets

CommodityBonds
CatastropheNotes

Designdebttohavecashflowsthatmatchuptocashflowsontheassetsfinanced

Overlaytax
preferences
Consider
ratingsagency
&analystconcerns

Deductibilityofcashflows
fortaxpurposes

Differencesintaxrates
acrossdifferentlocales

ZeroCoupons

Iftaxadvantagesarelargeenough,youmightoverrideresultsofpreviousstep
AnalystConcerns
EffectonEPS
Valuerelativetocomparables

RatingsAgency
EffectonRatios
Ratiosrelativetocomparables

RegulatoryConcerns
Measuresused

OperatingLeases
MIPs
SurplusNotes

Cansecuritiesbedesignedthatcanmakethesedifferententitieshappy?

Factorinagency
conflictsbetweenstock
andbondholders

ObservabilityofCashFlows
byLenders
Lessobservablecashflows
leadtomoreconflicts

TypeofAssetsfinanced
Tangibleandliquidassets
createlessagencyproblems

ExistingDebtcovenants
RestrictionsonFinancing

Ifagencyproblemsaresubstantial,considerissuingconvertiblebonds

ConsiderInformation
Asymmetries

UncertaintyaboutFutureCashflows
Whenthereismoreuncertainty,it
maybebettertouseshorttermdebt

Credibility&QualityoftheFirm
Firmswithcredibilityproblems
willissuemoreshorttermdebt

Convertibiles
PuttableBonds
RatingSensitive
Notes
LYONs

184

The Right Debt for Disney


Business
Movies

Broadcasting

ProjectCashFlowCharacteristics
Projectsarelikelyto
1. Be short term
2. Have cash outflows primaril
y in dollars (sinceDisneymakesmostof
its movies in theU.S.) but cashinflows could havea substantial
foreign currency component (becausef overseas
o
sales)
3. Have net cash flows thatear
heavily driven by whether the movie is a
hit, which is often difficul t to predict.
Projects are likel
y to be
1. Short term
2. Primarily in dollars, though foreign componentis growing
3. Driven by advertising revenuesandshowsuccess

TypeofFinancing
Debt should be
1. Short term
2. Primarily dollar debt.
3. If possible,tied to the success
of movies.(Lion King or
Nemo Bonds)

Debt should be
1. Short term
2. Primarily dollar debt
3. If possible,linked to network
ratings.
Theme Parks
Projects are likel
y to be
Debt should be
1. Very long term
1. Long term
2. Primarily in dollars, but a significant proportion of revenues come 2. Mix of currencies,basedupon
from foreign tourists, who are likely to stay away if the dollar
tourist make up.
strengthens
3. Affected by success of movie and
broadcast
ing divisions.
Consumer Products Projectsare likely to be shor
t to mediumterm and linked to the success ofDebt should be
the movie division. Most of Disneys product offerings are derived from a. Medium term
their movieproductions.
b. Dollar debt.

185

Analyzing Disneys Current Debt

Disney has $13.1 billion in debt with an average maturity of 11.53


years. Even allowing for the fact that the maturity of debt is higher
thantheduration,thiswouldindicatethatDisneysdebtisfartoolong
termforitsexistingbusinessmix.
Ofthedebt,about12%isEurodebtandnoyendenominateddebt.
Baseduponouranalysis,alargerportionofDisneysdebtshouldbe
inforeigncurrencies.
Disney has about $1.3 billion in convertible debt and some floating
rate debt, though no information is provided on its magnitude. If
floating rate debt is a relatively small portion of existing debt, our
analysiswouldindicatethatDisneyshouldbeusingmoreofit.

186

Adjusting Debt at Disney

Itcanswapsomeofitsexistinglongterm,fixedrate,dollardebtwith
shorter term, floating rate, foreign currency debt. Given Disneys
standing in financial markets and its large market capitalization, this
shouldnotbedifficulttodo.
If Disney is planning new debt issues, either to get to a higher debt
ratio or to fund new investments, it can use primarily short term,
floating rate, foreign currency debt to fund these new investments.
While it may be mismatching the funding on these investments, its
debtmatchingwillbecomebetteratthecompanylevel.

187

Returning Cash to the Owners:


Dividend Policy

188

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgenerated
andthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositive
andnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

Objective:MaximizetheValueoftheFirm

189

Steps to the Dividend Decision


Cashflow
Cashflows
Reinvestment
Cash
Stock
Dividends
How
What
much
good
is
do
available
held
Paid
Buybacks
ayour
reasonable
are
back
out
to
from
didDebt
back
your
you borrow?
investment
cash balance?
choices?
stockholders
from
(Principal
Operations
into
for
by
the
return
thecompany
business
to
repaid,
toprefer?
Operations
Interest
Equity
stockholders
Investors

190

I. Dividends are sticky

191

II. Dividends tend to follow earnings


60.00

50.00

40.00

30.00

Earnings
Dividends

20.00

10.00

0.00

192

III. More and more firms are buying back stock,


rather than pay dividends...
$300,000.00

$250,000.00

$200,000.00

$150,000.00

$100,000.00

$50,000.00

$
1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

StockBuybacks

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Dividends

193

IV. But the change in dividend tax law in 2003


may cause a shift back to dividends

194

Measures of Dividend Policy

DividendPayout:
measuresthepercentageofearningsthatthecompanypaysindividends
=Dividends/Earnings

DividendYield

measuresthereturnthataninvestorcanmakefromdividendsalone
=Dividends/StockPrice

195

Dividend Payout Ratios: January 2005


PayoutRatio:UScompaniesinJanuary2005
300

250

200

150

100

50

0
010%

1020%

2030%

3040%

4050%

5060%

6070%

7080%

8090%

90100%

>100%

196

Dividend Yields in the United States: January


2005
140
5362companiespaidnodividendsin2004
1729companiespaiddividends
120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0
02 0.4 0.6
0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8%

0.8
1%

1
1.2 1.4 1.6
1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8%

1.8
2%

2
2.2 2.4 2.6
2.2% 2.4% 2.6% 2.8%

2.8
3%

3
3.5%

3.5
4%

4
4.5%

4.5
5%

>5%

197

Three Schools Of Thought On Dividends

1.If
(a)therearenotaxdisadvantagesassociatedwithdividends
(b)companiescanissuestock,atnocost,toraiseequity,whenever
needed
Dividendsdonotmatter,anddividendpolicydoesnotaffectvalue.

2.Ifdividendshaveataxdisadvantage,

Dividendsarebad,andincreasingdividendswillreducevalue

3.Ifstockholderslikedividends,ordividendsoperateasasignaloffutureprospects,

Dividendsaregood,andincreasingdividendswillincreasevalue

198

The balanced viewpoint

Ifacompanyhasexcesscash,andfewgoodinvestmentopportunities
(NPV>0),returningmoneytostockholders(dividendsorstock
repurchases)isgood.
Ifacompanydoesnothaveexcesscash,and/orhasseveralgood
investmentopportunities(NPV>0),returningmoneytostockholders
(dividendsorstockrepurchases)isbad.

199

Assessing Dividend Policy

Approach1:TheCash/TrustNexus
Assesshowmuchcashafirmhasavailabletopayindividends,relative
whatitreturnstostockholders.Evaluatewhetheryoucantrustthe
managersofthecompanyascustodiansofyourcash.

Approach2:PeerGroupAnalysis
Pickadividendpolicyforyourcompanythatmakesitcomparableto
otherfirmsinitspeergroup.

200

I. The Cash/Trust Assessment

Step1:Howmuchcouldthecompanyhavepaidoutduringtheperiod
underquestion?
Step2:Howmuchdidthethecompanyactuallypayoutduringthe
periodinquestion?
Step3:HowmuchdoItrustthemanagementofthiscompanywith
excesscash?
Howwelldidtheymakeinvestmentsduringtheperiodinquestion?
Howwellhasmystockperformedduringtheperiodinquestion?

201

A Measure of How Much a Company Could


have Afforded to Pay out: FCFE

TheFreeCashflowtoEquity(FCFE)isameasureofhowmuchcash
isleftinthebusinessafternonequityclaimholders(debtandpreferred
stock)havebeenpaid,andafteranyreinvestmentneededtosustain
thefirmsassetsandfuturegrowth.
NetIncome
+Depreciation&Amortization
=CashflowsfromOperationstoEquityInvestors
PreferredDividends
CapitalExpenditures
WorkingCapitalNeeds
PrincipalRepayments
+ProceedsfromNewDebtIssues
=FreeCashflowtoEquity

202

Estimating FCFE when Leverage is Stable


NetIncome
(1)(CapitalExpendituresDepreciation)
(1)WorkingCapitalNeeds
=FreeCashflowtoEquity
=Debt/CapitalRatio
Forthisfirm,
Proceedsfromnewdebtissues=PrincipalRepayments+(Capital
ExpendituresDepreciation+WorkingCapitalNeeds)

203

An Example: FCFE Calculation

ConsiderthefollowinginputsforMicrosoftin1996.In1996,
MicrosoftsFCFEwas:

NetIncome=$2,176Million
CapitalExpenditures=$494Million
Depreciation=$480Million
ChangeinNonCashWorkingCapital=$35Million
DebtRatio=0%

FCFE= NetIncome(CapexDepr)(1DR)ChgWC(!DR)
= $2,176
(494480)(10)
= $2,127Million

$35(10)

204

Microsoft: Dividends?

Bythisestimation,Microsoftcouldhavepaid$2,127Millionin
dividends/stockbuybacksin1996.Theypaidnodividendsandbought
backnostock.Wherewillthe$2,127millionshowupinMicrosofts
balancesheet?

205

Dividends versus FCFE: U.S.


Figure11.2:Dividendspaidas%ofFCFE
300

250

200

150

100

50

206

The Consequences of Failing to pay FCFE


$3,000

$9,000
$8,000

$2,500

$7,000
$2,000
$6,000
$1,500

$5,000

$1,000

$4,000

$3,000
$500
$2,000
$0
1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

($500)

$1,000
$0

= Free CF to Equity

= Cash to Stockholders

Cumulated Cash

207

Application Test: Estimating your firms FCFE


InGeneral,
NetIncome
+Depreciation&Amortization
CapitalExpenditures
ChangeinNonCashWorkingCapital
PreferredDividend
PrincipalRepaid
+NewDebtIssued
=FCFE

Compareto
Dividends(Common)
+StockBuybacks

Ifcashflowstatementused
NetIncome
+Depreciation&Amortization
+CapitalExpenditures
+ChangesinNoncashWC
+PreferredDividend
+IncreaseinLTBorrowing
+DecreaseinLTBorrowing
+ChangeinSTBorrowing
=FCFE

CommonDividend

DecreaseinCapitalStock
+IncreaseinCapitalStock

208

A Practical Framework for Analyzing Dividend


Policy
How much did the firm pay out? How much could it have afforded to pay out?
What it could have paid out
What it actually paid out
Net Income
Dividends
- (Cap Ex - Deprn) (1-DR)
+ Equity Repurchase
- Chg Working Capital (1-DR)
= FCFE
Firm pays out too little
FCFE > Dividends

Firm pays out too much


FCFE < Dividends

Do you trust managers in the company with


your cash?
Look at past project choice:
Compare ROE to Cost of Equity
ROC to WACC

What investment opportunities does the


firm have?
Look at past project choice:
Compare ROE to Cost of Equity
ROC to WACC

Firm has history of


good project choice
and good projects in
the future

Firm has history


of poor project
choice

Firm has good


projects

Give managers the


flexibility to keep
cash and set
dividends

Force managers to
justify holding cash
or return cash to
stockholders

Firm should
cut dividends
and reinvest
more

Firm has poor


projects

Firm should deal


with its investment
problem first and
then cut dividends

209

A Dividend Matrix
real out
setting
pay
any,
problem
to stockholders
dividend
more istoinpolicy
investment policy.
stockholders
as
dividends or stock

210

Disney: An analysis of FCFE from 1994-2003


Year
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

Net
Capital
Income Depreciation Expend
itures
$1,110.40 $1,608.30 $1,026.11
$1,380.10 $1,853.00
$896.50
$1,214.00 $3,944.00 $13,464.00
$1,966.00 $4,958.00 $1,922.00
$1,850.00 $3,323.00 $2,314.00
$1,300.00 $3,779.00 $2,134.00
$920.00 $2,195.00 $2,013.00
($158.00) $1,754.00 $1,795.00
$1,236.00 $1,042.00 $1,086.00
$1,267.00 $1,077.00 $1,049.00

Average $1,208.55 $2,553.33

$2,769.96

Changein
FCFE
FCFE
non-cash
(befor
e
Net CF
(after
WC
debtCF)
fromDebt DebtCF)
$654.10 $1,038.49 $551.10 $1,589.59
($270.70
)
$2,607.30 $14.20 $2,621.50
$617.00 ($8,923.00) $8,688.00 ($235.00)
($174.00) $5,176.00 ($1,641.00)$3,535.00
$939.00 $1,920.00 $618.00 $2,538.00
($363.00) $3,308.00 ($176.00) $3,132.00
($1,184.00) $2,286.00 ($2,118.00) $168.00
$244.00 ($443.00)
$77.00 ($366.00)
$27.00
$1,165.00 $1,892.00 $3,057.00
($264.00) $1,559.00 ($1,145.00) $414.00
$22.54

$969.38

$676.03 $1,645.41

211

Disneys Dividends and Buybacks from 1994 to


2003

Disney

Year

Dividends(in$)

EquityRepurchases(in
$)

CashtoEquity

1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

$153
$180
$271
$342
$412
$0
$434
$438
$428
$429

$571
$349
$462
$633
$30
$19
$166
$1,073
$0
$0

$724
$529
$733
$975
$442
$19
$600
$1,511
$428
$429

Average

$308.70

$330.30

$639

212

Disney: Dividends versus FCFE

Disneypaidout$330millionlessindividends(andstockbuybacks)
thanitcouldaffordtopayout(Dividendsandstockbuybackswere
$639million;FCFEbeforenetdebtissueswas$969million).How
muchcashdoyouthinkDisneyaccumulatedduringtheperiod?

213

Disneys track record on projects and


stockholder wealth
DisneyacquiredCap
Citiesin1996

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%
1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

214

Can you trust Disneys management?

GivenDisneystrackrecordoverthelast10years,ifyouwerea
Disneystockholder,wouldyoubecomfortablewithDisneysdividend
policy?
Yes
No

215

The Bottom Line on Disney Dividends

Disneycouldhaveaffordedtopaymoreindividendsduringthe
periodoftheanalysis.
Itchosenotto,andusedthecashforacquisitions(CapitalCities/ABC)
andillfatedexpansionplans(Go.com).
Whilethecompanymayhaveflexibilitytosetitsdividendpolicya
decadeago,itsactionsoverthatdecadehavefritteredawaythis
flexibility.
Bottomline:Largecashbalanceswillnotbetoleratedinthis
company.Expecttofacerelentlesspressuretopayoutmore
dividends.

216

Aracruz: Dividends and FCFE: 1998-2003

Year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

Net
Income
$3.45
$90.77
$201.71
$18.11
$111.91
$148.09

Average $95.67

Change in FCFE
Capital
non-cash (before net Net Debt
DepreciationExpenditures WC
Debt CF) Cashflow
$152.80
$88.31
$76.06
($8.11)
$174.27
$158.83
$56.47
$2.18
$190.95 ($604.48)
$167.96
$219.37
$12.30
$138.00 ($292.07)
$162.57
$421.49
($56.76) ($184.06) $318.24
$171.50
$260.70
($5.63)
$28.34
$36.35
$162.57
$421.49
($7.47)
($103.37) $531.20
$162.70

$244.64

$3.45

$10.29

$27.25

FCFE
(after net
Debt CF)
$166.16
($413.53)
($154.07)
$134.19
$64.69
$427.83
$37.54

217

Aracruz: Cash Returned to Stockholders

Year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1998
2003

Net IncomeDividendsPayout Ra
tio
$3.45
$90.77
$201.71
$18.11
$111.91
$148.09
$574.04

$24.39
$18.20
$57.96
$63.17
$73.80
$109.31
$346.83

FCFE

Cash retur
nedto Cash Returned/FCFE
Stockholders
707.51% $166.16
$50.79
30.57%
20.05% ($413.53)
$18.20
NA
28.74% ($154.07)
$80.68
NA
348.87% $134.19
$63.17
47.08%
65.94%
$64.69
$75.98
117.45%
73.81%
$427.83
$112.31
26.25%
60.42%
$225.27
$401.12
178.07%

218

Aracruz: Stock and Project Returns


40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%
1998

1999

2000
ROE

2001
Returnonstock

2002

2003

19982003

CostofEquity

219

Aracruz: Its your call..

AssumethatyouarealargestockholderinAracruz.Theyhavebeen
payingmoreindividendsthantheyhaveavailableinFCFE.Their
projectchoicehasbeenacceptableandyourstockhasperformedwell
overtheperiod.Wouldyouacceptacutindividends?
Yes
No

220

Mandated Dividend Payouts

Therearemanycountrieswherecompaniesaremandatedtopayouta
certainportionoftheirearningsasdividends.Givenourdiscussionof
FCFE,whattypesofcompanieswillbehurtthemostbytheselaws?
Largecompaniesmakinghugeprofits
Smallcompanieslosingmoney
Highgrowthcompaniesthatarelosingmoney
Highgrowthcompaniesthataremakingmoney

221

BP: Dividends- 1983-92


1
NetIncome

10

$712.00

$947.00

$1,256.00

$1,626.00 $2,309.00 $1,098.00

$2,076.00

(Cap.ExpDepr)*(1DR) $1,499.00

$1,281.00 $1,737.50 $1,600.00

$580.00

WorkingCapital*(1DR)

$369.50

($286.50)

$678.50

=FreeCFtoEquity

($612.50)

$631.50

($107.00) ($584.00) $3,764.00

$1,940.50 $1,022.00

Dividends

$831.00

$949.00

$1,079.00 $1,314.00

$1,391.00

$1,961.00 $1,746.00 $1,895.00 $2,112.00 $1,685.00

$831.00

$949.00

$1,079.00 $1,314.00

$1,391.00

$1,961.00 $1,746.00 $1,895.00 $2,112.00 $1,685.00

66.16%

58.36%

$82.00

$2,140.00 $2,542.00 $2,946.00

$1,184.00 $1,090.50 $1,975.50 $1,545.50 $1,100.00

($2,268.00) ($984.50)

$429.50

$1,047.50
($77.00)

($305.00) ($415.00)
($528.50)

$262.00

+EquityRepurchases
=CashtoStockholders
DividendRatios
PayoutRatio
CashPaidas%ofFCFE

135.67%

46.73%

119.67%

67.00%

91.64%

68.69%

64.32%

296.63%

177.93%

150.28% 1008.41% 225.00%

36.96%

101.06%

170.84% 2461.04% 399.62%

643.13%

PerformanceRatios
1.AccountingMeasure
ROE

9.58%

12.14%

19.82%

9.25%

12.43%

15.60%

21.47%

19.93%

4.27%

7.66%

Requiredrateofreturn

19.77%

6.99%

27.27%

16.01%

5.28%

14.72%

26.87%

0.97%

25.86%

7.12%

Difference

10.18%

5.16%

7.45%

6.76%

7.15%

0.88%

5.39%

20.90%

21.59%

0.54%

222

BP: Summary of Dividend Policy

Summaryofcalculations
Average

StandardDeviation

$571.10

$1,382.29

$3,764.00

($612.50)

Dividends

$1,496.30

$448.77

$2,112.00

$831.00

Dividends+Repurchases

$1,496.30

$448.77

$2,112.00

$831.00

11.49%

20.90%

21.59%

FreeCFtoEquity

DividendPayoutRatio

84.77%

CashPaidas%ofFCFE

262.00%

ROERequiredreturn

1.67%

Maximum Minimum

223

BP: Just Desserts!

224

The Limited: Summary of Dividend Policy:


1983-1992
Summaryofcalculations
Average

StandardDeviation

Maximum Minimum

FreeCFtoEquity

($34.20)

$109.74

$96.89

($242.17)

Dividends

$40.87

$32.79

$101.36

$5.97

Dividends+Repurchases

$40.87

$32.79

$101.36

$5.97

DividendPayoutRatio

18.59%

19.07%

29.26%

19.84%

CashPaidas%ofFCFE 119.52%
ROERequiredreturn

1.69%

225

Growth Firms and Dividends


Highgrowthfirmsaresometimesadvisedtoinitiatedividendsbecause
itsincreasesthepotentialstockholderbaseforthecompany(since
therearesomeinvestorslikepensionfundsthatcannotbuystocks
thatdonotpaydividends)and,byextension,thestockprice.Doyou
agreewiththisargument?
Yes
No
Why?

226

Summing up
Figure11.5:AnalyzingDividendPolicy

PoorProjects

GoodProjects

Increasepayout
Flexibilityto
ReduceInvestment
accumulate

cash

Disney
CashReturned<FCFE
Microsoft

Aracruz

CashReturned>FCFE

Cutpayout

Cutpayout

ReduceInvestment

InvestinProjects

ROECostofEquity

227

Valuation
AswathDamodaran

228

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgenerated
andthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositive
andnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

Objective:MaximizetheValueoftheFirm
229

Discounted Cashflow Valuation: Basis for


Approach
t = n CF
t
Value =
t
t = 1 (1 + r)

where,

n=Lifeoftheasset

CFt=Cashflowinperiodt

r=Discountratereflectingtheriskinessoftheestimatedcashflows

230

Equity Valuation

Thevalueofequityisobtainedbydiscountingexpectedcashflowsto
equity,i.e.,theresidualcashflowsaftermeetingallexpenses,tax
obligationsandinterestandprincipalpayments,atthecostofequity,
i.e.,therateofreturnrequiredbyequityinvestorsinthefirm.
t=n

CFtoEquity t
(1+ k e )t
t=1

ValueofEquity =

where,
CFtoEquityt=ExpectedCashflowtoEquityinperiodt
ke=CostofEquity

Thedividenddiscountmodelisaspecializedcaseofequityvaluation,
andthevalueofastockisthepresentvalueofexpectedfuture
dividends.

231

Firm Valuation

Thevalueofthefirmisobtainedbydiscountingexpectedcashflowsto
thefirm,i.e.,theresidualcashflowsaftermeetingalloperating
expensesandtaxes,butpriortodebtpayments,attheweighted
averagecostofcapital,whichisthecostofthedifferentcomponents
offinancingusedbythefirm,weightedbytheirmarketvalue
proportions.
t=n

CFtoFirm t
t
t=1 (1+ WACC)

ValueofFirm =

where,
CFtoFirmt=ExpectedCashflowtoFirminperiodt
WACC=WeightedAverageCostofCapital

232

Generic DCF Valuation Model


Value
Length
Cash
Expected
Firm
Forever
Terminal
CF
Discount
.........
inofValue
stable
Rate
Growth
Period
growth:
of High
Growth
1 isflows
2
3
4
5
n
DISCOUNTED
CASHFLOW
GrowsValue
Firm:Cost
Firm:
Pre-debt
Growth
at constant
ofofCapital
inFirm
cashrate
flow
Operating
forever
Earnings
Equity: Value
After of
Growth
Cost
debt
ofEquity
inEquity
cashIncome/EPS
Net
flows

VALUATION

233

Estimating Inputs:
I. Discount Rates

Criticalingredientindiscountedcashflowvaluation.Errorsin
estimatingthediscountrateormismatchingcashflowsanddiscount
ratescanleadtoseriouserrorsinvaluation.
Atanintuitivelevel,thediscountrateusedshouldbeconsistentwith
boththeriskinessandthetypeofcashflowbeingdiscounted.
Thecostofequityistherateatwhichwediscountcashflowstoequity
(dividendsorfreecashflowstoequity).Thecostofcapitalistherate
atwhichwediscountfreecashflowstothefirm.

234

Reviewing Disneys Costs of Equity & Debt

Business
Medi a Networks
Parksan d
Resorts
Studio
Entertainment

Consumer
Products
Disn e y

D/E
UnleveredBeta Ratio

1.08 5 0
26.6 2 %

Lever e d
Beta
1.26 6 1

Costof
Equit y
10.1 0 %

0.91 0 5

26.6 2 %

1.06 2 5

9.12%

1.14 3 5

26.6 2 %

1.33 4 4

10.4 3 %

1.13 5 3
1.06 7 4

26.6 2 %
26.6 2 %

1.32 4 8
1.24 5 6

10.3 9 %
10.0 0 %

DisneysCostofDebt(baseduponrating)=5.25%
Disneystaxrate=37.3%

235

Current Cost of Capital: Disney

Equity
CostofEquity=Riskfreerate+Beta*RiskPremium
=4%+1.25(4.82%)=10.00%
MarketValueofEquity=
$55.101Billion
Equity/(Debt+Equity)=
79%

Debt
AftertaxCostofdebt=(Riskfreerate+DefaultSpread)(1t)
=(4%+1.25%)(1.373)= 3.29%
MarketValueofDebt=
$14.668Billion
Debt/(Debt+Equity)=
21%

CostofCapital=10.00%(.79)+3.29%(.21)=8.59%
55.101/
(55.101+14.668)

236

II. Estimating Cash Flows


EBIT
To
The
Equity
Firm
Strict
Broader
(1-t)
View
View
Cash
Flows
Dividends
-Net
( Cap
Income
Ex +- Depreciation)
-Stock
Net Cap
Change
Buybacks
in
ExWorking
(1-Debt Capital
Ratio)
- Chg
=
FreeWC
Cashflow
(1 - Debt
to Firm
Ratio)
= Free Cashflow to Equity

237

Estimating FCFF in 2003: Disney

EBIT=$2,805Million
Taxrate=37.30%
Capitalspending=$1,735Million
Depreciation=$1,254Million
IncreaseinNoncashWorkingcapital=$454Million
EstimatingFCFF
EBIT*(1taxrate)
NetCapitalExpenditures
ChangeinWorkingCapital
FreeCashflowtoFirm

$1,759
$481
$454
$824

:2805(1.373)
:(17351254)

TotalReinvestment=NetCapEx+ChangeinWC=481+454=935
ReinvestmentRate=935/1759=53.18%

238

III. Expected Growth


Net
Operating
Retention
Return
R
X
Income
on Ratio=
Equity
Income
Capital
=
Eeinvestment
xpected
Growth
1 - Dividends/Net
Net
Rate
EBIT(1-t)/Book
Income/Book
= (Net CapValue
Value
of of
Income
Equity
Ex
Capital
+ Chg in
WC/EBIT(1-t)

239

Estimating Growth in EBIT: Disney

Webeginbyestimatingthereinvestmentrateandreturnoncapitalfor
Disney in 2003, using the numbers from the latest financial
statements.Wedidconvertoperatingleasesintodebtandadjustedthe
operatingincomeandcapitalexpenditureaccordingly.
ReinvestmentRate2003=(CapExDepreciation+ChginnoncashWC)/
EBIT(1t)=(17351253+454)/(2805(1.373))=53.18%
Returnoncapital2003 =EBIT(1t)2003/(BVofDebt2002+BVofEquity2002)
=2805(1.373)/(15,883+23,879)=4.42%
ExpectedGrowthRatefromexistingfundamentals= 53.18%*4.42%=
2.35%

WewillassumethatDisneywillbeabletoearnareturnoncapitalof
12% on its new investments and that the reinvestment rate will be
53.18%fortheimmediatefuture.
Expected Growth Rate in operating income = Return on capital *
ReinvestmentRate=12%*.5318=6.38%

240

IV. Getting Closure in Valuation

Apubliclytradedfirmpotentiallyhasaninfinitelife.Thevalueis
thereforethepresentvalueofcashflowsforever.
t = CFt
Value =
t
t = 1 (1+ r)

Sincewecannotestimatecashflowsforever,weestimatecashflows
foragrowthperiodandthenestimateaterminalvalue,tocapture
thevalueattheendoftheperiod:
CF
t
Value =

t

(1 + r)

241

Stable Growth and Terminal Value

Whenafirmscashflowsgrowataconstantrateforever,the
presentvalueofthosecashflowscanbewrittenas:
Value=ExpectedCashFlowNextPeriod/(rg)
where,
r=Discountrate(CostofEquityorCostofCapital)
g=Expectedgrowthrate

Thisconstantgrowthrateiscalledastablegrowthrateandcannot
behigherthanthegrowthrateoftheeconomyinwhichthefirm
operates.
Whilecompaniescanmaintainhighgrowthratesforextendedperiods,
theywillallapproachstablegrowthatsomepointintime.
Whentheydoapproachstablegrowth,thevaluationformulaabove
canbeusedtoestimatetheterminalvalueofallcashflowsbeyond.

242

Growth Patterns

Akeyassumptioninalldiscountedcashflowmodelsistheperiodof
highgrowth,andthepatternofgrowthduringthatperiod.Ingeneral,
wecanmakeoneofthreeassumptions:
thereisnohighgrowth,inwhichcasethefirmisalreadyinstablegrowth
therewillbehighgrowthforaperiod,attheendofwhichthegrowthrate
willdroptothestablegrowthrate(2stage)
therewillbehighgrowthforaperiod,attheendofwhichthegrowthrate
willdeclinegraduallytoastablegrowthrate(3stage)

Theassumptionofhowlonghighgrowthwillcontinuewilldepend
uponseveralfactorsincluding:
thesizeofthefirm(largerfirm>shorterhighgrowthperiods)
currentgrowthrate(ifhigh>longerhighgrowthperiod)
barrierstoentryanddifferentialadvantages(ifhigh>longergrowth
period)

243

Firm Characteristics as Growth Changes


Variable
Risk
DividendPayout
NetCapEx
ReturnonCapital
Leverage

HighGrowthFirmstendto
beaboveaveragerisk
paylittleornodividends
havehighnetcapex
earnhighROC(excessreturn)
havelittleornodebt

StableGrowthFirmstendto
beaveragerisk
payhighdividends
havelownetcapex
earnROCclosertoWACC
higherleverage

244

Estimating Stable Growth Inputs

Startwiththefundamentals:
Profitabilitymeasuressuchasreturnonequityandcapital,instable
growth,canbeestimatedbylookingat

industryaveragesforthesemeasure,inwhichcaseweassumethatthisfirmin
stablegrowthwilllookliketheaveragefirmintheindustry
costofequityandcapital,inwhichcaseweassumethatthefirmwillstop
earningexcessreturnsonitsprojectsasaresultofcompetition.

Leverageisatoughercall.Whileindustryaveragescanbeusedhereas
well,itdependsuponhowentrenchedcurrentmanagementisandwhether
theyarestubbornabouttheirpolicyonleverage(Iftheyare,usecurrent
leverage;iftheyarenot;useindustryaverages)

Usetherelationshipbetweengrowthandfundamentalstoestimate
payoutandnetcapitalexpenditures.

245

Estimating Stable Period Inputs: Disney

Thebetaforthestockwilldroptoone,reflectingDisneysstatusasamature
company.Thiswilllowerthecostofequityforthefirmto8.82%.
CostofEquity=RiskfreeRate+Beta*RiskPremium=4%+4.82%=8.82%

ThedebtratioforDisneywillriseto30%.Thisistheoptimalwecomputed
for Disney earlier and we are assuming that investor pressure will be the
impetus for this change. Since we assume that the cost of debt remains
unchangedat5.25%,thiswillresultinacostofcapitalof7.16%
Costofcapital=8.82%(.70)+5.25%(1.373)(.30)=7.16%
ThereturnoncapitalforDisneywilldropfromitshighgrowthperiodlevelof
12% to a stable growth return of 10%. This is still higher than the cost of
capitalof7.16%butthecompetitiveadvantagesthatDisneyhasareunlikely
todissipatecompletelybytheendofthe10thyear.Theexpectedgrowthratein
stable growth will be 4%. In conjunction with the return on capital of 10%,
thisyieldsastableperiodreinvestmentrateof40%:
ReinvestmentRate=GrowthRate/ReturnonCapital=4%/10%=40%

246

Disney: Inputs to Valuation

HighGrowthPhase

TransitionPhase

5years

5years

LengthofPeriod
TaxRate

37.3%

ReturnonCapital

12% (lastyearsreturno

StableGrowthPhase
Foreverafter10years

37.3%

37.3%

n Declineslinearlyto10%

StableROCof10%

capitalwas4.42%)
ReinvestmentRate

53.18%

(Last

years Declines to40%asROCan d 40% ofafte rtax operating

(NetCapEx+WorkingCapita l reinvestmentrate)

growthratesdrop:

income, estimatedfromstabl e

Investments/EBIT)

ReinvestmentRate=g/ROC

growth rateof4%and return


oncapitalof10%.
Reinvestmentrate=4/10=40%

ExpectedGrowthRateinEBIT ROC *ReinvestmentRate

= Linear

declinet

Stable 4%:Settoriskfreerate

12%*0.5318=6.38%

GrowthRateof4%

Debt/CapitalRatio

21%(Existingdebtratio)

Increaseslinearlyto30%

RiskParameters

Beta=1.25,ke=10%

Betadecreaseslinearlyto1.00; Beta=1.00;k e=8.82%

CostofDebt=5.25%

Costofdebtstaysat5.25%

Costofdebtstaysat5.25%

Costofcapital=8.59%

Costofcapitaldropsto7.16%

Costofcapital=7.16%

Stabledebtratioof30%

247

Disney: FCFF Estimates

Year
Current
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Expected
Growth
6.38 %
6.38 %
6.38 %
6.38 %
6.38 %
5.90 %
5.43 %
4.95 %
4.48 %
4.00 %

EBIT
$2,805
$2,984
$3,174
$3,377
$3,592
$3,822
$4,047
$4,267
$4,478
$4,679
$4,866

EBIT (1t)
$1,871
$1,990
$2,117
$2,252
$2,396
$2,538
$2,675
$2,808
$2,934
$3,051

Reinvestment
Rate

Reinvestment

53.18 %
53.18 %
53.18 %
53.18 %
53.18 %
50.54 %
47.91 %
45.27 %
42.64 %
40.00 %

$994.92
$1,058.41
$1,125.94
$1,197.79
$1,274.23
$1,282.59
$1,281.71
$1,271.19
$1,250.78
$1,220.41

FCFF
$876.06
$931.96
$991.43
$1,054.70
$1,122.00
$1,255.13
$1,393.77
$1,536.80
$1,682.90
$1,830.62

248

Disney: Costs of Capital and Present Value

Year

Cost of c apital
FCFF
1
8.59 %
$876.06
2
8.59 %
$931.96
3
8.59 %
$991.43
4
8.59 %
$1,054.70
5
8.59 %
$1,122.00
6
8.31 %
$1,255.13
7
8.02 %
$1,393.77
8
7.73 %
$1,536.80
9
7.45 %
$1,682.90
10
7.16 %
$1,830.62
PV of cashflows during high growth =

PV of FCFF
$806.74
$790.31
$774.21
$758.45
$743.00
$767.42
$788.91
$807.42
$822.90
$835.31
$7,894.66

249

Disney: Terminal Value and Firm Value

TerminalValue
FCFF11=EBIT11(1t)(1ReinvestmentRateStableGrowth)/
=4866(1.04)(1.40)=$1,903.84million
TerminalValue=FCFF11/(CostofcapitalStableGrowthg)
=1903.84/(.0716.04)=$60,219.11million

Valueoffirm
PVofcashflowsduringthehighgrowthphase
=$7,894.66
PVofterminalvalue
=$27,477.81
+CashandMarketableSecurities
=$1,583.00
+NonoperatingAssets(Holdingsinothercompanies)=$1,849.00
Valueofthefirm
=$38,804.48

250

From Firm to Equity Value: What do you


subtract out?

Thefirstthingyouhavetosubtractoutisthedebtthatyoucomputed(and
usedinestimatingthecostofcapital).Ifyouhavecapitalizedoperatingleases,
youshouldcontinuetotreatoperatingleasesasdebtinthisstageinthe
process.
Thisisalsoyourlastchancetoconsiderotherpotentialliabilitiesthatmaybe
facedbythefirmincluding
Expected liabilities on lawsuits: You could be analyzing a firm that is the defendant
in a lawsuit, where it potentially could have to pay tens of millions of dollars in
damages. You should estimate the probability that this will occur and use this
probability to estimate the expected liability.
Unfunded Pension and Health Care Obligations: If a firm has significantly under
funded a pension or a health plan, it will need to set aside cash in future years to
meet these obligations. While it would not be considered debt for cost of capital
purposes, it should be subtracted from firm value to arrive at equity value.
Deferred Tax Liability: The deferred tax liability that shows up on the financial
statements of many firms reflects the fact that firms often use strategies that reduce
their taxes in the current year while increasing their taxes in the future years.

251

From Equity Value to Equity Value per share:


The Effect of Options

Whentherearewarrantsandemployeeoptionsoutstanding,the
estimatedvalueoftheseoptionshastobesubtractedfromthevalueof
theequity,beforewedividebythenumberofsharesoutstanding.
Therearetwoalternativeapproachesthatareusedinpractice:
Oneistodividethevalueofequitybythefullydilutednumberofshares
outstanding rather than by the actual number. This approach will
underestimatethevalueoftheequity,becauseitfailstoconsiderthecash
proceedsfromoptionexercise.
Theothershortcut,whichiscalledthetreasurystockapproach,addsthe
expected proceeds from the exercise of the options (exercise price
multipliedbythenumberofoptionsoutstanding)tothenumeratorbefore
dividing by the number of shares outstanding. While this approach will
yieldamorereasonableestimatethanthefirstone,itdoesnotincludethe
timevalueoftheoptionsoutstanding.

252

Valuing Disneys options

Attheendof2003,Disneyhad219millionoptionsoutstanding,with
aweightedaverageexercisepriceof$26.44andweightedaveragelife
of6years.
Using the current stock price of $26.91, an estimated standard
deviationof40,adividendyieldof1.21%.ariskfreerateof4%and
the BlackScholes option pricing model we arrived at a value of
$2,129million.
Since options expenses are taxdeductible, we used the tax rate of
37.30%toestimatethevalueoftheemployeeoptions:
Valueofemployeeoptions=2129(1.373)=$1334.67million

253

Disney: Value of Equity per Share

Subtracting out the market value of debt (including operating leases)


of$14,668.22millionandthevalueoftheequityoptions(estimatedto
be worth $1,334.67 million in illustration 12.10) yields the value of
thecommonstock:
Value of equity in common stock = Value of firm Debt Equity
Options=$38,804.48 $14,668.22$1334.67=$22,801.59
Dividing by the number of shares outstanding (2047.60 million), we
arriveatavaluepershareo$11.14,wellbelowthemarketpriceof$
26.91atthetimeofthisvaluation.

254

Intransitionphase,
Current
Growthdropsto4%
Expected
Stable
Terminal
Cost
Weights
Discount
Op.
RiskfreeRate
Beta
M
X
UnleveredBetafor
FirmsD/E
ReinvestmentRate
ReturnonCapital
TermYr
Disneywastradingatabout
EBIT(1t)
Cashflows
aturemarket
Assets
ofGrowth
Equity
Debt
Cashflow
Value
atGrowth
35,373
Cost
$1,871
: =
of1,904/(.0716-.04)
to
Capital
$1,990
Firm $2,117
(WACC)
$2,252
==10.00%
60,219
$2,396(.79)
$2,538
+ 3.29%
$2,675 (0.21)
$2,808 =$2,934
8.59 $3,051
10
+
Disney:Valuation
EBIT(1-t)
in
g
(4.00%+1.25%)(1-.373)
E
+Cash:
RiskfreeRate=4%
1.2456
premium
Sectors:1.0674
Ratio:24.77%
53.18%%
12%
3089
$26atthetimeofthis
debtratioincreasesto30%andcost
Reinvestment
10%
==EBIT
4%;
79%(1-t)
Beta
D: = $995
3,432
21%
= 1.00;$1,058
1,759$1,126 $1,198 $1,274 $1,283 $1,282 $1,271 $1,251 $1,220

255

CostFinancing
Current
The
Investment
Return
Reinvestment
Expected
Existing
New
Financing
Investment
Dividend
Investments
of on
capital
EBIT
Growth
Mix
Choices
Capital
decision
(1-t)
Rate
Decision
=Decision
10%
Decision
Rate
affects
(.79)
= Financing
12%
+risk
3.29%
* 53.18%
of assets
(.21)
being
= 8.59%
finance
andFirm
financing
decision affects hurdle rate
Disney:
Corporate
Decisiions
and
Value
$ you
Invest
If
Choose
12%
53.18%
=
Investments
D=21%;
Fxed
1,759
6.38%
rate
cannot
in aE=
projects
US
financing
79%
find
$ that
investments
mix
earn
thata that earn

256

Year
Expected
EBIT
E
BIT
Reinvestment
Growth
(1-t)
Reinvestment
FCFF
Cost
PV
of
Rate
of
cap
FC
Current$5,327
1
7.98%
$5,752
$3,606
53.18%
$1,918
$1,688
8.40%
$1,558
2
7.98%
$6,211
$3,894
53.18%
$2,071
$1,823
8.40%
$1,551
3
7.98%
$6,706
$4,205
53.18%
$2,236
$1,969
8.40%
$1,545
4
7.98%
$7,241
$4,540
53.18%
$2,414
$2,126
8.40%
$1,539
5
7.98%
$7,819
$4,902
53.18%
$2,607
$2,295
8.40%
$1,533
6
7.18%
$8,380
$5,254
50.54%
$2,656
$2,599
8.16%
$1,605
7
6.39%
$8,915
$5,590
47.91%
$2,678
$2,912
7.91%
$1,667
8
5.59%
$9,414
$5,902
45.27%
$2,672
$3,230
7.66%
$1,717
9
4.80%
$9,865
$6,185
42.64%
$2,637
$3,548
7.41%
$1,756
104.00%
$10,260
$6,433
40.00%
$2,573
$3,860
7.16%
$1,783
Terminal Value
$126,967
$58,64
Value
of
$74,90
Oper
+
Cash
$3,432
&
No
Value
of
$78,33
firm
Debt
$14,64
Options
$1,335
Value
of
$62,34
equit
Value per
sha
$30.45
257

First Principles

Investinprojectsthatyieldareturngreaterthantheminimum
acceptablehurdlerate.
Thehurdlerateshouldbehigherforriskierprojectsandreflectthe
financingmixusedownersfunds(equity)orborrowedmoney(debt)
Returnsonprojectsshouldbemeasuredbasedoncashflowsgenerated
andthetimingofthesecashflows;theyshouldalsoconsiderbothpositive
andnegativesideeffectsoftheseprojects.

Chooseafinancingmixthatminimizesthehurdlerateandmatchesthe
assetsbeingfinanced.
Iftherearenotenoughinvestmentsthatearnthehurdlerate,returnthe
cashtostockholders.
Theformofreturnsdividendsandstockbuybackswilldependupon
thestockholderscharacteristics.

Objective:MaximizetheValueoftheFirm
258

You might also like