Professional Documents
Culture Documents
or
Water Distribution System
Protection
and
Once Through Cooling
A Division of Somebody
Supply Water System
Mill Supply or Distribution
System-- used for
Domestic Water
Firewater makeup
CT Makeup
Boiler System
Process Water
2
Distribution System Problems
Corrosion of the steel piping
delivering high soluble iron into
downstream processes
Iron Bacteria contamination of
the Water
3
What Affects Corrosion
pH
Alkalinity
Dissolved Solids
(conductivity)
Calcium Levels
4
Once Through Cooling
or low cycle recirc water
Common in power industry
Commonly raw water - not
clarified
High suspended solids
loading
5
Once-Through Cooling
Systems
Problems
Deposit Control
- CaCO3
- Iron
- Manganese
- Particulate Solids
Corrosion Control
Steel, Stainless Steel, Copper Alloys
6
Once-Through Cooling
Utility Systems
CaCO3 Deposition Control
HEDP - most cost-effective inhibitor
ppb HEDP = 102.16 LSI x 0.014
Examples:
LSI = 1 2.0 ppb HEDP1
LSI = 1.2 5.6 ppb HEDP
LSI = 1.5 24 ppb HEDP
LSI = 1.8 109 ppb HEDP
Notes: 1. Minimum recommended HEDP dosage
is 5 ppb
2. Equation is not adjusted for Fe, Mn, or Solids
7
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply
CaCO3 Deposit Control
HEDP most effective, but may be cost-
ineffective
0.5 ppm HEDP for LSIs < 2.2
Hexmeta - more cost-effective, but limited
applicability
0.5 - 1.5 ppm for LSIs < 1.5
8
Once-Through Cooling
Utility Systems
Manganese and Iron Deposition Control
Control by sequestering soluble metals
ppm HEDP = 2 (ppm Mn + ppm Fe)
Control by dispersing insoluble (precipitated)
metals
ppm HPS-1 = 4 x (ppm Mn + ppm Fe)
Generally, 2:1 blend of HPS -1:HEDP is used
Use higher ratio blends for suspended solids > 20
- 40 NTU
9
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply
Manganese and Iron Deposition Control
Control by sequestering soluble metals
ppm HEDP = 1/2 (ppm Mn + ppm Fe) for Ca < 50
ppm HEDP = ppm Mn + ppm Fe for Ca > 50
ppm pyro = 2 x (ppm Mn + ppm Fe) for Ca < 50
loss of effectiveness at Ca > 50
Control by dispersing insoluble (precipitated) metals
ppm HPS-1 = 2 x (ppm Mn + ppm Fe)
10
Mill Supply & Utility
Systems
Why the differences?
Utility Systems - not as prone to CaCO 3 Scaling
High Velocity
Copper And Stainless Steel - low fouling potential
Utility Systems - performance more sensitive to
fouling
must ensure adequate deposit control
metallurgy prone to scaling and localized corrosion
Mn induced corrosion
Under-deposit corrosion
makeup water not pretreated
11
Manganese & Iron
Monitoring
Millipore Filters
0.2 - 0.45 microns filtration
color intensity: brown-black
particulate
Polyester Bags
on-line monitor - timed exposure
staining - no staining
not sensitive to silt/clay fouling
Delta P monitor
sensitive to particulate and MB
fouling
12
Once -Through Cooling
Manganese
Manganese - causes corrosion and deposition
Control Techniques
Remove - Pretreatment
Precipitation & Clarification
Oxidize soluble Mn with halogen
O3 > ClO2= KMnO4 > > >> HOBr = HOCl >
O2 @pH<8.5
Sequester Soluble Species/Disperse
Insoluble
Minimize halogen - for corrosion control
13
Manganese Influenced
Corrosion
Mechanism Involves Mn + Oxidizing Biocides
Soluble Reduced Manganese Salts (Mn +2) In
Sediments or Well Water
Oxidized to Insoluble MnO2
MnO2 Deposits Autocatalytically Onto Copper Alloy
and Stainless Steel Surfaces
Further Oxidized to Soluble MnO 4- at Tube Surface
by Halogen
Permanganate Dissolves Metal
14
Effect of Metal on
Oxidation of Mn
8
7
6
5
Soluble Mn
(ppm) 4
3
2
1
0
No Metal Zinc Copper
16
Once -Through Cooling
Relative Performance
17 5 - most effective
Once-Through Cooling
Corrosion Control
Utility Systems
Copper Alloy Corrosion Inhibition
Intermittent feed of HRA
Frequency of feed depends on:
water chemistry, halogen
concentration, frequency of halogen
feed. Must be determine on-site.
Generally, not treated unless halogen
used or copper discharge a concern.
Steel Corrosion
Generally, not an issue.
Follow mill supply guidelines.
18
Once-Through Cooling
Corrosion Control
Mill Supply
Steel Corrosion - generally, most significant
issue
Most significant factors in choosing program:
Water Hardness
< 20 ppm Ca - difficult to treat without
zinc
Conductivity
Water Temperature
< 16-18 oC transition temperature
pH
< 7.2 - difficult to treat without Zinc
19
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply Systems
Steel Corrosion Inhibitors
Premier Program
3 ppm ortho-PO4/1 ppm Zinc
3 ppm pyro -PO4/1 ppm Zn
cost-prohibitive
Typical Program
Dictated mostly by COST $$$$$$$
20
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply Systems
Steel Corrosion Inhibitor Programs
Calcium < 15 - 20 ppm
Ortho-PO4 more effective than pyro-PO 4
> 1.5 ppm required
addjust pH if possible to 8.0 > pH > 7.5
pyro-PO4 alone will increase copper corrosion rate
ortho-PO4/Zn and pyro-PO4 are preferred
ortho-PO4/Zn most effective
Zn eliminates pyro-PO4s effect on copper
T < 25 - 30 C
1-1.5 ppm PO4 and 0.3 to 0.5 ppm Zn effective
as temp decreases - inhibitor level decreases
hot water systems may require supplemental
inhibitor
21
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply Systems
Mississippi Paper Mill
Water Chem: 15-17 ppm TH, pH7.2-7.4,
0.2-0.5 ppm Cl2, 120 ppm M alk.
Treatment:
1 ppm pyro / 0.5 ppm HPS-1 / 0.25-0.45
ppm Zn
Steel Corrosion Rates < 1 mpy @ 25 oC
0.5 ppm pyro/1 ppm HPS-1
supplemental feed to hot steel bundles
(>56oC) to suppress localized corrosion
22
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply Systems
Louisiana Paper Mill
Water Chem: 20-30 ppm Ca, pH6.2-
6.8, 0.5 ppm Cl2, 8-14 M alk., 200-
300 micromhos, 0.1-0.3 ppm Fe,
0.06-0.07 ppm Mn.
Treatment:
1.5 ppm ortho / 0.4-0.5 ppm
pyro / 0.35 ppm Zn
Steel Corrosion Rates < 1 mpy @ <
32oC
23
Once-Through Cooling
Mill Supply Systems
Steel Corrosion Inhibitor Programs
Ca > 20 ppm
If Zinc is allowed - always use it, no matter
how low the concentration!!
Ortho or pyro can be used
Dosage: 0.75 - 1.5 ppm ortho or 1 - 2
ppm pyro.
HPS-1 required for CaPO4 control if
T>32oC or Ca > 40 ppm
24
Once-Through Cooling
In General
Diagnose the problem! Dont treat the
symptom!
Symptom = Steel Corrosion
Water Chemistry? Poor Inhibitor Program? MIC?
Conduct On-Site Corrosion Studies
Optimize Inhibitor Program
Adjust Inhibitor to system parameters
Satellite feed of dispersant/corrosion inhibitor.
Dont mistake MIC for traditional corrosion
25
Once-Through Cooling
Cleaning -
High pyro dosages periodically
-Too costly
Low pyro levels (0.5 to2) with/without
polymer - continuously
- not very effective
- some removal of soft iron deposits
- largest effect - reduced corrosion
26
Open Recirculating
Systems
27
Low Hardness Programs
Recirculating Systems
Corrosion!
Copper Alloy Corrosion
not problematic - azole chemistry
does not depend on Calcium
28
Low Hardness Programs
Recirculating Systems
Steel Corrosion Inhibitor
Programs
Low Hardness = < 50 ppm Ca
29
Low Hardness
Dianodic III Guidelines
Low Temperature Systems (<38oC)
ppm Ca pH Cond ppm o-PO4 ppm Zn
mmhos
<20 7-7.5 <1250 15 2
<20 7 - 7.5 > 1250 15 4
<20 7 -7.5 < 1250 25-30 0
<20 7-7.5 >1250 30-35 0
<20 7.5-9 <1250 7.0-9.0 2
<20 7.5-9 >1250 7.0-9.0 4
<20 7.5-9 <1250 20-30 0
<20 7.5-9.0 >1250 25-30 0
20-50 7-7.5 <1250 17-21 2.5
20-50 7-7.5 >1250 25-27 3.5
20-50 7-7.5 >1250 28-30 0
20-50 7.5-9 all 15-16 2
20-50 7.5-9 all 17-20 0
30
Low Hardness
Dianodic III Guidelines
High Temperature Systems (38 - 50oC)
ppm Ca pH Cond ppm o-PO4 ppm Zn
mmhos
<20 7-7.5 <1250 15 3.5
<20 7 - 7.5 <1250 40-45 0
20-50 7 -7.5 < 1250 12 3
20-50 7-7.5 <1250 30-35 0
<20 7.5-8.5 <1250 12 3
<20 7.5-8.5 <1250 35-40 0
20-50 7.5-8.5 <1250 10 2.5
20-50 7.5-8.5 <1250 25-30 0
20-50 7-7.5 <1250 25-30 0
<20 >8.5 <1250 10 2.5
<20 >8.5 <1250 30-35 0
20-50 >8.5 <1250 8 2
20-50 >8.5 <1250 20-25 0
31
Low Hardness
Continuum AEC
Corrosion Treatments
15 ppm AEC, 3-4 ppm Zn, 3 ppm o-PO 4 ,
HRA or TTA + 7.5 - 10 ppm HPS-1.
pH > 8.6
Cond. < 1250 mmhos
Ca = 5 -50 ppm
15 ppm AEC, 3-4 Zn, HRA or TTA + 5-7.5
ppm HPS-1.
pH > 8.9 when Ca<20
pH > 8.6 when Ca = 20 to 75 ppm
32
Programs
Recirculating Systems
50 - 100 ppm Ca
Follow Dianodic II and Continuum
AEC Guidelines
Dianodic II - control at 20 ppm o-PO 4
pH ~ 7.5
Continuum AEC -
control at 8-10 ppm o-PO4 or
33