Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Director Engineering
HB Software Solution India Pvt Ltd
For the discussion on Intelligent Transportation
Systems
Data Analytics and
Money
( )
Kitna Deti hai ( )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCkSenYtEMQ
Bus Location Detection Check
ROUTE _CHANGE_TI
Roue 1 ETM 1 20:41:38 Punjabi Bagh (T) 77,AD19,49 1B8,DD57,44 77,0,41 77,AD17,32
Roue 1 ETM 1 17:48:29 Kamruddin Nagar Crossing A4,B75A,56 A4,B759,37 A4,D162,39 A4,B758,40
Roue 1 ETM 1 10:18:44 Mundka Village Metro Station A4,C5BD,63 A4,B99D,56 A4,0,38 A4,C5BF,43
We will estimate P(FS), P(key combination) from the data and using this
information we can get the improved estimates of probability.
Posterior
Prior Probability
New Application of
Probability P (a FS
Information Bayes
P (a fare | Key)
(LAC, Cell ID) Theorem
stage)
Methodology
These two information have been concatenated to get a unique
combination key i.e. 10820C7
= 0.5444%
= 0.5329%
Using Bayes Theorem
= 0.5329%
= 5.121%
Methodology
Possibility of 10820C7 @FS Peeragarhi Chowk = 5.12%.
But the maximum likelihood of keys occurring At
Peeragarhi Chowk are 10820C8, 10820C9 with 24.12%,
23.90% respectively.
Probability of Peeragarhi Chowk given key 10820C7 was
97.89% but the occurrences of this key 10820C7 given at
fare stage say Peeragarhi chowk is much lower in
comparison with other keys like 10820C8/10820C9
meaning occurrence rate is highest for 10820C8 & 10820C9
keys at Fare stage Peeragarhi Chowk.
Conclusion
ETM trip data though does not contain geocodes,
Scheduled Vehicle Utilization Km Per day 140, 160, 170 (Min, Avg, Max)
Microsoft Excel
Macro-Enabled Worksheet
Conclusion
Summary Per Km Per Bus Per day Per Bus
Revenue per Km 58.02 9,087.04
Operational Expenditure per Km 52.53 8,226.49
Capital Expenditure per Km 24.18 3,786.77
Total Expenditure per Km 76.72 12,013.26
Gap per Km (Operational) 5.52 864.01
Gap per Km (Total ) (18.67) (2,922.76)
Actual Vehicle Utilization
(Km/day/Bus) 156.59 156.59
Km Efficiency (Actual Km /Scheduled
Km) 92.1% 92.1%