Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a critical approach to analyzing language and power relationships in society. It was developed by scholars like Norman Fairclough and focuses on how power, dominance, and inequality are reproduced through language. Fairclough proposed a three-dimensional model for CDA involving description, interpretation, and explanation of discourse as text, discursive practice, and social practice. While CDA aims to increase awareness of opaque power structures, some argue it makes vague assumptions and lacks methodological rigor.
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a critical approach to analyzing language and power relationships in society. It was developed by scholars like Norman Fairclough and focuses on how power, dominance, and inequality are reproduced through language. Fairclough proposed a three-dimensional model for CDA involving description, interpretation, and explanation of discourse as text, discursive practice, and social practice. While CDA aims to increase awareness of opaque power structures, some argue it makes vague assumptions and lacks methodological rigor.
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a critical approach to analyzing language and power relationships in society. It was developed by scholars like Norman Fairclough and focuses on how power, dominance, and inequality are reproduced through language. Fairclough proposed a three-dimensional model for CDA involving description, interpretation, and explanation of discourse as text, discursive practice, and social practice. While CDA aims to increase awareness of opaque power structures, some argue it makes vague assumptions and lacks methodological rigor.
CDA and Social Theory Theory and methodology: Norman Fairclough The Pros and Cons of CDA INTRODUCTION
CDA is an approach led by people
such as Norman Fairclough, Ruth Wodak, Teun van Dijk, Paul Chilton, and others. CDA is a critical approach on language in society. CDA especially focuses on power, dominance, and inequality. CDA: ORIGINS AND PROGRAMME
A. The Origins of CDA
1. Critical linguistics which was based on the Hallidayan linguistics 2. British Cultural Studies. The Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Culture Studies (headed by Stuart Hall) 3. Faircloughs book about Language and Power (1989) CDA: ORIGINS AND PROGRAM
B. The Program of CDA
The purpose of CDA is to analyze opaque as well as transparent structural relationships of dominance, discrimination, power and control as manifested in language (Wodak 1995: 204). CONTINUED. Some applied topics and social domains in CDA practitioners work are political discourse, Ideology, Racism, The discourse of economics, Advertisements and promotional culture, Media language, Gender, Institutional discourse, and Education. CDA-practitioners also interest in literacy. CDA AND SOCIAL THEORY
Theories of power and ideology
Theory of structuration THEORY AND METHODOLOGY: NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
1. Description 2. Interpretation 3. Explanation THE PROS AND CONS OF CDA
Two kinds of criticisms against CDA:
1. Specific critical comments on method, methodology, and analytical approaches. 2. More general criticisms relating to the potential offered by CDA for becoming a critical study of language. THE PROS AND CONS OF CDA Critical Debate in CDA about Theoretical and Methodological Defects: 1. Widdowson notes the vagueness of many concepts as well as the vagueness of the analytical models in CDA and argues CDA provides biased interpretations of discourse under the guise of critical analysis. CDA does not analyze how a text can be read in many ways, or under what social circumstances it is produced and consumed. He also stated that CDA collapses semantics and pragmatics. CONTINUED.. 2. Emanuel Schegloff (1997): there is a tendency to assume the priori relevance of aspects of context in CDA work. 3. Slembrouck (2001): He questions the explanatory level in CDA. CONTINUED. The Potential of CDA: 1. A critical language awareness 2. Dialogue between linguistic analysis and other social-scientific endeavors 3. Institutional environments CONTINUED.
The Problems of CDA:
1. The linguistic bias in CDA 2. Closure to particular kinds of societies 3. Closure to a particular time-frame
(Routledge Advances in Translation and Interpreting Studies) Binhua Wang (editor), Jeremy Munday (editor) - Advances in Discourse Analysis of Translation and Interpreting_ Linking Linguistic Approache
(Language and Globalization) Jan Blommaert, Sirpa Leppänen, Päivi Pahta, Tiina Räisänen (Eds.) - Dangerous Multilingualism - Northern Perspectives On Order, Purity and Normality