Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feed-effluent
Exothermic reaction
exchanger
Heat recovery
Distillation
Reflux condenser
Top product
Feed Column
Reboiler
Bottom product
Naphtha
and gases
Typical crude oil distillation
Top pump
Kerosene
around
Desalter E2
Distillation tower
Light
Top pump gas oil
around Heavy gas oil Bottom
pump
around
E2 E3 Heavy
E5 gas oil
Light gas oil
Kerosene
E4
E1 Bottom pump
Furnace
around
Reduced
E5 E6 crude
Feedwater
heater
Nuclear Power Plant
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Contoh sebuah APK
Hot utilities
Boiler generating service steam (maybe a combined
heat and power plant)
Direct fired heaters (furnace)
Electric heaters
Cold utilities
Cooling tower (wet or dry) providing service cooling
water
Direct air-cooled heat exchanger
Jenis-Jenis Alat Penukar Kalor
KATEGORI UTAMA ALAT PENUKAR KALOR
Heat exchangers
Recuperator Regenerators
s
Wall
Wall separating
separating streams
streams Direct contact
Recuperative
Has separate flow paths for each
fluid which flow simultaneously
through the exchanger transferring
heat between the streams Rotating wheel
Regenerative
Has a single flow path which the hot
and cold fluids alternately pass
through.
Compactness
Alat Penukar Kalor tipe shell and tube yang biasa digunakan pada industri proses
Shell-side flow
Baffle
Fin Tube
Complete shell-and-tube
Plate and frame
Corrugations on plate
improve heart transfer
give rigidity
Many points of
contact and a
tortuous flow path
Chevron Washboard
General view of plate
exchanger
Plate exchanger
normally refers to
a gasketted plate-
and-frame
exchanger
Flow Arrangement within a PHE
Gaskets
arranged for
each stream to
flow between
alternate plates
Finned tubes
ACHE bundle
Plate-fin exchanger
Waste Heat
Boilers Other Heat
Cooling Towers Recovery
5%
9% 10%
Air Coolers
10%
Other Proprietary
2%
Other Plate
4%
Other Tubular
5%
Preliminary points on selection
Processor/
end user
Design the process flow flow-
sheet
Specify the heat exchanger
requirements
Select the best exchanger type Contractor
for the job
Thermal design of exchanger
Mechanical design of exchanger
Manufacturer
The design of a process heat exchanger usually
proceeds through the following steps:
Coarse filter
Buang Jenis Alat Penukar Kalor yang
tidak memenuhi ketentuan tekanan dan
temperatur operasi, fluid-material
compatibilitas, kondisi termal yang
extrem
Fine filter
Estimasi Harga
Coarse filter
T2,out T2,in
Double Pipe
Tipe APK ini adalah yang paling simpel, memiliki satu tube di
dalam dan satu tube pada bagian luar, Tube paling dalam bisa
memiliki sirip secara longitudinal pada bagian luarnya
Ukuran Normal
0.25 to 200m2 (2.5 to 2000 ft2) per unit
Note multiple units are often used
Built of carbon steel where possible
Advantages/disadvantages of double-pipe
Advantages
Easy to obtain counter-current flow
Can handle high pressure
Modular construction
Easy to maintain and repair
Many suppliers
Disadvantage
Become expensive for large duties (above 1MW)
Scope of double pipe
Maximum pressure
300 bar(abs) (4500 psia) on shell side
1400 bar(abs) (21000 psia) on tubeside
Temperature range
-100 to 600oC (-150 to 1100oF)
possibly wider with special materials
Fluid limitations
Few since can be built of many metals
Maximum = 0.9
Minimum T = 5 K
Shell and tube
Maximum pressure
300 bar(abs) (4500 psia) on shell side
1400 bar(abs) (21000 psia) on tubeside
Temperature range
-100 to 600oC (-150 to 1100oF)
possibly wider with special materials
Fluid limitations
Few since can be built of many metals
Maximum = 0.9 (less with multipass)
Minimum T = 5 K
Plate and frame
Plates pressed from stainless steel
or higher grade material
titanium
incoloy
hastalloy
Gaskets are the weak point. Made
of
nitrile rubber
hypalon
viton
neoprene
Advantages of plate and frame
High heat transfer - turbulence on both sides
High thermal effectiveness - 0.9 - 0.95 possible
Low T - down to 1K
Compact - compared with a S&T
Cost - low because plates are thin
Accessibility - can easily be opened up for inspection and
cleaning
Flexibility - Extra plates can be added
Short retention time with low liquid inventory hence
good for heat sensitive or expensive liquids
Less fouling - low r values often possible
Disadvantages of plate & frame
Pressure - maximum value limited by the sealing of the
gaskets and the construction of the frame.
Temperature - limited by the gasket material.
Capacity - limited by the size of the ports
Block easily when solids in suspension unless special
wide gap plates are used
Corrosion - Plates good but the gaskets may not be
suitable for organic solvents
Leakage - Gaskets always increase the risk
Fire resistance - Cannot withstand prolonged fire
(usually not considered for refinery duties)
Scope of plate-frame
Maximum pressure
25 bar (abs) normal (375 psia)
40 bar (abs) with special designs (600 psia)
Temperature range
-25 to +1750C normal (-13 to +3500F)
-40 t0 +2000C special (-40 to +3900F)
Fluid limitations
Mainly limited by gasket
Maximum = 0.95
Minimum T = 1 K
Welded plates
Wide variety of proprietary types each with one or
two manufactures
Overcomes the gasket problem but then cannot be
opened up
Pairs of plates can be welded and stacked in
conventional frame
Conventional plate and frame types with all-welded
(using lasers) construction have been developed
Many other proprietary types have been developed
Tend to be used in niche markets as replacement to
shell-and-tube
Air-cooled exchangers
Advantages of ACHEs
Air is always available
Maintenance costs normally less than for water
cooled systems
In the event of power failure they can still transfer
some heat due to natural convection
The mechanical design is normally simpler due to
the pressure on the air side always being closer to
atmospheric.
The fouling of the air side of can normally be
ignored
Disadvantages of ACHEs
Tb Ta
Ta Tb
Tm
ln(Ta / Tb )
FT correction factor
This correction accounts for the two streams not
following pure counter-current flow
At the estimation stage, we do not know the detailed
flow/pass arrangement so we use
FT = 1.0 for counter flow which includes most compact and
double-pipe
FT = 0.7 for pure cross flow which includes air-cooled and
other types when operated in pure cross flow (e.g. shell-and-
tube)
FT = 0.9 for multi-pass
FT = 1.0 if one stream is isothermal (typically boiling and
condensation)
Estimating U
ln(C1)
ln(C)
ln(C2)
q UT
KESELURUHAN ALAT PENUKA KALOR
Q T U m AT Tm
Q = U A Tk
yw
Thot
Tcold
1 1 yw 1
rcold rhot
U cold w hot
Integral terhadap area alat penukar kalor
dQ
Persamaan Lokal q UT
dA dQ
dQ dA
Rearranging UdA
T
dQ
Integral Q T UdA
AT
Total area AT
T
Definisi dari harga rata-rata (mean values )
dQ
Bandingkan dua sides Q T A UdA
T T
1 1 dQ
Tm Q T Q T Um
1
UdA
AT AT
Kasus Khusus dimana Ts linear terhadap Q
Eqn. integrates to
give log. mean
Temperature
Ta
temperature
difference - LMTD
Ta Tb Q
Tm TLM Tb
ln( Ta / Tb )
Pararel Flow
Counter Flow
Cross Flow
Multipass exchangers
T1
Untuk single-phase duties, T2
Faktor correction teoritis, FT,
Temp.
t2
sudah diturunkan (lihar
referensi) t1
Harga FT Kurang dari 1
Q
Jangan Merancang untuk FT
kurang dari 0.8
Tm FT TLM
Typical FT correction factor curves
For shell and tube with 2 or more tube-side passes
T2,out T2,in
ALAT PENUKAR KALOR
Shell-and-Tube
Tubes
Baffle
Shell-side flow
Tube layouts
pitch
Triangul Rotated Rotate
Squar d
ar triangul e square
30o ar 90o 45o
60o
Typically, 1 in tubes on a 1.25 in pitch or 0.75 in tubes
on a 1 in pitch
Triangular layouts give more tubes in a given shell
Square layouts give cleaning lanes with close pitch
TEMA standards
The design and construction is usually based on
TEMA 8th Edition 1998
Supplements pressure vessel codes like ASME and BS
5500
Sets out constructional details, recommended tube
sizes, allowable clearances, terminology etc.
Provides basis for contracts
Tends to be followed rigidly even when not strictly
necessary
Many users have their own additions to the standard
which suppliers must follow
TEMA terminology
Rear
Front end Shell end
stationary head head
type type
B N D
Shell type
E-type shell should be used if possible but
F shell gives pure counter-current flow with two
tube passes (avoids very long exchangers)
Longitudinal baffle
E F
G H
Longitudinal
Split flow baffles Double split flow
J X
150
T
100
Clearance, mm
P and S
50
Fixed and U-tube
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Shell diameter, m
Example
BES
Bonnet front end, single shell pass and split
backing ring floating head
Apakah ini ?
Allocation of fluids
Put dirty stream on the tube side - easier to clean
inside the tubes
Put high pressure stream in the tubes to avoid
thick, expensive shell
When special materials required for one stream,
put that one in the tubes to avoid expensive shell
Cross flow gives higher coefficients than in plane
tubes, hence put fluid with lowest coefficient on
the shell side
If no obvious benefit, try streams both ways and
see which gives best design
Example 1
Debutaniser overhead condenser
Velocity Velocity
Avoiding vibration
Inlet support baffles - partial baffles in first few
tube rows under the nozzles
Double segmental baffles - approximately halve
cross flow velocity but also reduce heat transfer
coefficients
Patent tube-support devices
No tubes in the window (with intermediate support
baffles)
J-Shell - velocity is halved for same baffle spacing
as an E shell but decreased heat transfer coefficients
Avoiding vibration (cont.)
Windows
with no tubes Tubes
Twisted tape
Wire-wound inserts (HiTRAN)
Both mixes the core (radial mixing) and
breaks up the boundary layer
Available in range of wire densities for
different duties
Problems of Conventional S & T
Zigzag path on shell side leads to
Poor use of shell-side pressure drop
Possible vibration from cross flow
Dead spots
Poor heat transfer
Allows fouling
Recirculation zones
Poor thermal effectiveness,
Conventional Shell-side Flow
Shell-side axial flow
Some problems can be overcome by having axial flow
Good heat transfer per unit pressure drop but
for a given duty may get very long thin units
problems in supporting the tube
RODbaffles (Phillips petroleum)
introduced to avoid vibrations by providing
additional support for the tubes
also found other advantages
low pressure drop
low fouling and easy to clean
high thermal effectiveness
RODbaffles
Tend to be about 10% more expensive for the
same shell diameter
Twisted tube (Brown Fintube)
Overview of design
Single phase rating methods used in
DEVIZE
Tube side
Shell side
Design envelope concept in DEVIZE
Demonstration of DEVIZE
Overall design process
DEVIZE
Do a rating using DEVIZE
Review the envelope and the rating in
order to improve your initial guess
Finally select the best design
Starting point of rating
We know
The duty which we need to achieve (i.e. flow
rates and temperature changes of the two
streams)
The full exchanger geometry
The allowable pressure drops for the two streams
We are checking whether that exchanger can do
that duty within the imposed constraints
The thermal rating
Tcold Do
Stainless Steel 15
Copper 390
Aluminium 208
Carbon Steel 50
General equation
L u 2
p 4 f
di 2
Laminar flow
(transition taken as
crossover with 16
f ,Re 837
turbulent equation) Re
u 2
p K
2
K is taken as 1.8 per tube-side pass to allow
for tube entry, tube exit and header losses
10% of the total pressure drop is assumed to
occur in the nozzles
Shell side - the Bell Method
DEVIZE uses the Bell-Delaware method as
set out by Taborek in HEDH
This method starts with the coefficients and
pressure drops for ideal cross flow and
then corrects these for the non-idealities
which occur in real shell-side flows
The method gives reasonable accuracy
while remaining simple
More accurate proprietary methods have
been developed based on network models
Shell-side non-idealties
Window
effects
Tube-to-
baffle
leakage
Shell-to-baffle
Bypass leakage
Bell method for heat transfer
Ideal JW J L JB J Lam
Where
Jw corrects for some tubes being in the window
JL corrects for leakage through and around the baffle
JB corrects for flow around the bundle
JLam corrects for special effects which occur at very
low Reynolds numbers (not applied in DEVIZE)
What do the factors depend upon?
Jw - ratio of tubes in cross flow to tubes in windows
JL - ratio of leakage areas to cross-flow area
JB - ratio of bypass flow area to cross flow area and the
number of pairs of sealing strips
Re = umin di /
Pressure drop
The Bell method for pressure drop is similar to
that for heat transfer but with some extra
complications in the end zones
An additional 10% is assumed for the nozzles
Vibration
DEVIZE uses the methods in ESDU Data Item
87019 for fluid-elastic instability
Outputs of rating
Area ratio (already discussed): RA = Ao / Areq
Pressure drop ratios for the shell side and the tube
side: Rp= pcalc/ pspec
Velocity ratio for vibration ratio: Rv = u / ucrit
For an acceptable design,
RA > 1, RpT < 1, RpS < 1, Rv < 1
The closer these ratios are to 1, the tighter the
design (i.e. the lower the safety margins)
Thermal resistance diagram
1 1 yw Do Do 1 Do
ro ri
Uo o w Dw Di i Di
Shell Side Tube Side
Tube length
Tube-side pressure drop limit
Shell diameter Repeating for range of shell diameters gives curve
Tube length
Shell-side pressure drop limit
We can do similar thing for the shell side
Shell-side p limit
Shell diameter
Tube-side p limit
Tube length
Heat transfer limit
And then for the heat transfer
dr op l im its
Pressure
Tube length
Add limits on tube-side velocity
Shell diameter
Min.
Valid
Valid
Max.
Tube length
Danger areas for vibration may also be shown
Shell diameter
Min.
Max.
Vibration
Tube length
Highlight valid design region
Shell diameter
Min.
Design envelope
Max.
Tube length
Rating at optimum point
Min.
Max.
Tube length
Preferred shell diameters and tube lengths
Shell diameter
Min.
A
B
Max.
Tube length
Design process
Start with a set of assumptions about number of
passes, baffle configuration, etc.
Generate envelope
Change initial assumptions to obtain better
envelopes
Then Rate good geometries within the best
envelopes
Consider advantages of ratings outside the
envelope assuming constraint may be relaxed
Select the best Rating
Hambatan Termal pada Radiator
1 1 Rf "h Rf "c 1
Rw
UA (o .h. A) h (o A) h (o A) c (o .h. A) c
1 1 1
Rw
UA (h. A) h (o .h. A)c
q h.DH l NA f tanh mL
UA Nu Rw 0 1 1
(Tlm ) k kA At mL
Nu C. Re 0.8 . Pr 0.4 1 1
hP 2 2h t f
2
C . Re h Prh
0.8 0.4
kh m 1
hh h kftf w f
kAc
DH ,h