You are on page 1of 18

EDP RENEWABLES NORTH AMERICA:

TAX EQUITY FINANCING AND ASSET


ROTATION

Presented By

NAME ID

Md. Safiul Hasan 31031

Md. Kamruzzaman 31041

Nur Mohammad Khandaker 31025


PROBLEM STATEMENT

Is the existing tax equity and Asset rotation


financing strategy perfect?
Are there any alternative financing strategy?

The new rising star project is feasible or not.


ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF
ACTION

EDP will kept its current tax equity and asset


rotation financing strategy
EDP will issue new common stock through the
IPO
EDP will issue some preferred stock along with
common stock.
ALT-1: ANALYSIS OF CURRENT STRATEGY:

weighted average cost of capital is 7.008%

NPV $16,454,094.0
5
IRR 8%

MIRR 7%
ALT-2: EDP WILL ISSUE NEW
COMMON STOCK THROUGH THE
IPO

Contribution to Retained Earning


Break Point Depreciation
Equity Fraction

42
141 357 million
0.194

We can see that the rising stars capital investment is 30


million (387-357) higher than break point so EDP should
issue 30000 common stock par value of $100. Lets
floatation cost adjustment factor is 2%
ALT-2: EDP WILL ISSUE NEW
COMMON STOCK THROUGH THE
IPO

weighted average cost of capital is 7.17%

NPV $12,586,920.45

IRR 8%

MIRR 7%
ALT-3: EDP WILL ISSUE SOME PREFERRED
STOCK ALONG WITH COMMON STOCK

Another alternative can be that EDP will issue


some preferred stock along with common stock.

weighted average cost of capital is 7.23%

NPV $11,173,448.16

IRR 8%
MIRR 7%
RECOMMENDATION:

By analyzing the available alternatives we see


that IRR and MIRR are same for each alternative
but the NPV is gradually decreasing when EDP
issue the new common stock as well as preferred
stock. So EDP should not go for IPO. That means
EDP should retain their current tax equity and
asset rotation strategy because the current
strategy increase the value of the firm with
greater amount.
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION
COUNTRY RISK ANALYSIS USING
ICRG METHOD

The Political Risk


The Economic Risk

Financial Risk
COUNTRY RISK ANALYSIS USING
ICRG METHOD

Component Point Max. Point


Obtained
The Political Risk 77 100

The Economic Risk 43 50

Financial Risk 39 50
THE COMPOSITE RISK RATING
CPFER (country X) = 0.5 (PR + FR + ER)
CPFER (U.S) = 0.5 (77 + 39+ 43) = 80

Risk Ratings Points Risk Premium


Very High Risk 00.0 to 49.9 points 3
High Risk 50.0 to 59.9 points 2
Moderate Risk 60.0 to 69.9 points 1.5
Low Risk 70.0 to 79.9 points 1
Very Low Risk 80.0 to 100 points 0

As the total composite risk score for U.S is 80 which


indicates country risk for U.S during 2015 is Very
low risk. So we did not add any risk premium with
our WACC.
VALUE OF REAL OPTIONS
A real option itself is the rightbut not the
obligation.
X (cost) 385000889.2
S (pv of future cashflow) $401,454,983.20

r (risk free rate) 3%


SD( sd of projrct return) 15%
T (time) 3

the value of the real option of new rising star


project is 56819487. So manager can make
additional cash flow of 56819487.
CONCLUSION

EDPs existing Tax equity and asset rotation


financing strategy is perfect.
By taking this project firms value will be greater
by 16 million
Country Risk is very low for this project.

manager can make additional cash flow of


56819487 by exercising the real option

You might also like