You are on page 1of 20

2014-09-23

- -

1 2
1
1.
2. The Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

(www.skb.se)

2

Advection

hydrodynamic dispersion


Sorption Diffusion Decay
on fracture into micro-
walls or pores -
fillings

3
An international co-operative research project since 1992
Modeling of THMC processes in geological materials

Task C -- Characterization and modeling of HMC (hydro-


mechanical & chemical) processes in fractured rocks

Other research partners:


Imperial College London, UK
Technical University of Liberec, Czech
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA
Wuhan University, China
http://www.decovalex.org/
4
- -
1. Zhao Z., Jing L., Neretnieks I., Moreno L. 2011. Analytical solution of
coupled stress-flow-transport processes in a single fracture. Computers
and Geosciences. 37: 1437-1449.
2. Zhao Z., Jing L., Neretnieks I. 2012. Particle mechanics model for the
effects of shear on solute retardation coefficient in rock fractures.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 52: 92-
102.
3. Zhao Z., Liu L., Neretnieks I., Jing L. 2014. Solute transport in a single
fracture: impacted by chemically mediated changes. International Journal
of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 66: 69-75.
5
Top
Particles input
P
ar
ti
cle
si
npu
t

et
f

h
L

g
R
i t
UDEC

Bottom

Top
Particles input
P
a
rt
ic
le
si
npu
t

L
f
et

g
R
iht

Bottom
PTFR


6
UDEC: -

Rock Fractures
matrix
Discrete element
model

(a)
(b)

2b3 dp
Qx w
3 dx
8
: (1)
Pure advection
Vi Vi
t wi t wj t wi
Qi i i Qi
+ Advection and Matrix diffusion

ccf f((xx,,tt)) 1 Aq j
MPG
[ R]
1
Erfc
0
cc0
0
2 Q t j
t w
j 0.5


MPG p D p 1

Rejection
1 p K
p

method
+ (Advection and hydrodynamic dispersion)
cc ff (( xx,,tt)) 1 x vt xv x vt
[ R]
1
Erfc exp Erfc
0
cc0 2 2 Df t D 2 Df t
0 f

9
: (2) PTFR
i
Qout
i
P(Qout )
Qin


Domain and
Domai

n
Contact UDEC


- Contacts
Inlet flow

Outlet
flow


Full mixing assumption
10

5m 5m
30 m

K=0: 0 K=5:5 K=20


11
25 1.2

20
Particle percentage
Normalized flow rate

Normalized flow rate


Particle percentage
0.9

15

0.6

K=0:0
10

0.3
5

0 0.0
-2 -1 0 1 2
Left boundary
25 1.2

Particle percentage
Normalized flow rate
20

Normalized flow rate


Particle percentage
0.9

15

K=5:510 0.6

0.3
5

0 0.0
-2 -1 0 1 2
Left boundary

25 1.2
Particle percentage
Normalized flow rate
20

Normalized flow rate


Particle percentage
0.9

K=20:5
15
0.6

10

0.3

0 0.0
-2 -1 0 1 2
Left boundary
12

13

5 5 5

4 4 4

3 3 3

2 2 2

1 1 1
Y (m)

Y (m)
Y (m)
0 0 0

-1 -1 -1

-2 -2 -2

-3 -3 -3

-4 -4 -4

-5 -5 -5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
X (m) X (m) X (m)

1500 8000 1000


0s s s

D lim
1
t 2t
r t - r t r t - r t


14

5 5

4 4

3 3

2 2

1 1
Y (m)

Y (m)
0 0

-1 -1

-2 -2

-3 -3

-4 -4

-5 -5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
X (m) X (m)
K=5: K=15
5 :5

15

Zhao Z, Rutqvist J, Leung C, Hokr M, Liu Q, Neretnieks


I, Hoch A, Havlek J, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wu Y,
Zimmerman R. 2013. Impact of stress on solute
transport in a fracture network: A comparison study.
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical
Engineering. 5: 100-123.
DECOVALEX
KTH

16

1.0 1.0
c/c0

c/c0
0.8 0.8
IC IC
KTH KTH
TUL_1 LBNL
0.6 0.6
LBNL CAS
CAS

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0.0 0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Time (s) Time (s)


PTFR KTH

17

/

18
To see order out of disorder


19

-- Google scholar citation
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zkxKXxYAAAAJ&hl=en
: zhihong.weebly.com
Email: zhzhao@tsinghua.edu.cn

20

You might also like