presented by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle in his N.E part company with Plato and explain the concept of virtue that takes care of the diversity and play an action guiding role in an individuals life. He clearly states that virtue is a trait of character manifested in habitual action. The habitual is the key concern here. To become a virtuous person one requires the antecedent knowledge that produces virtuous conduct. Virtue is essential to conditions of living tolerably, and of critical importance for all peoples every where. The examples he cites for moral virtues are: liberty, temperance and courage. Wisdom, understanding and practical wisdom are illustrated as intellectual virtues. Aristotle broadly distinguishes virtues into moral virtues and intellectual virtues. The moral virtues are just those traits of character we need in order to have best chance of making our live good. Moral virtues, he says, are virtues of character. When we talk about someone's character we always mean whether he is courageous or coward, whether he is good tempered or ill tempered. So while judging someone's character we never say whether he is wise or say whether he has understanding. Of course, we commend wise persons for their state of mind (N.E. 1103a, 3-10). This has a similarity with the Upanishadic concept of dharma (duty), as an intrinsic value in Kants notion of categorical impetrative (duty of duty sake). Indian ethics Value System also lays down practical means of attaining a life of perfection here and now. Rigveda as well as Atharva Veda mention honesty, non-violence, truthfulness, modesty, agreeable speech, Brahmacharya (celibacy), religious conviction, and purity of heart as the important virtues that are praiseworthy. These very virtues are mentioned in the Bhagavadgita as divine qualities. Thus the Vedic philosophy lays emphasis on right conduct as the means of the development of the personality of the individual. Hence in a way the ethics of the Vedas is the ethics of right action. The concept of duty or Dharma in the Upanishads is not negative but out and out positive. It does not command us to give up or renounce the world, but rather to engage in the worldly strife, always aiming at the goal and subordinating all other desires to the strongest desire, or love for duty. The Bhagavadgita follows the philosophy of Samadarsana (the unitive view of the Ultimate Reality) and Visamavarttana (differentiated behaviour in the empirical world) to the core. Referring to this devotion to duty, it has been remarked in the Bhagavad-Gita that one should prefer death, while performing ones own Dharma to a change of professional duty. The four ends of life(Purusarthas), viz.:-- Artha, or wealth, for the development of body, Kama, or the fulfillment of desires, for the development of mind, Dharma, or morality, for the development of intellect, and finally Moksa, or spiritual perfection, for the development of the soul. Purusarthas Thus this ethico-metaphysical system is present clearly in the Rigvedic philosophy and it is also reflected in the Upanishads, which emphasize the oneness of the universe and hence entail the same non-dual reality as the goal of the cosmos, of society, and of the individual. Wealth becomes evil only when it is misused on account of lack of wisdom. The Upanishads repeatedly point out that everything that is desired is desired for the sake of the self. In the Upanishad notion of Kama represents: Kama, which we are asked to renounce, is not desire as such, but only the animal desire, lust, the impulsive craving of the brute man. Freedom from Kama is enjoined, but this is not blank passivity. To sum up, we may say that Artha, Kama, and Dharma are instrumental values, but at the same time essential methods for the attainment of Moksa. Neither the path of indulgence (Pravirtti Marga) nor that of asceticism (Nivirti Marga ) is desirable. Indulgence in the enjoyment of the pluralistic spatio-temporal world without insight into its spiritual monistic basis is as harmful, antisocial, and anti-ethical. Too much of indulgence equating good with evil without recognition of pluralistic nature of the empirical world is disastrous. The Bhagavadgita follows the philosophy of Samadarsana (the unitive view of the Ultimate Reality) and Visamavarttana (differentiated behaviour in the empirical world) to the core. 1) Right Resolve (sankalpa) 2) Right Intention (samyag drsti) 3) Right Speech (vak) 4) Right Action (karmanta) The Eight- fold Path (Buddhism) 5) Right Livelihood or right living (ajiva) 6)) Right Concentration (samadhi) 7) Right Effort (vyayama) The Eight-fold 8) Right Path or Mindedness (Buddhism) Right Thought (smrti) Eightfold Path Of Discipline (Astanga Yoga)
1) Yama: It means abstention and includes five vow of
Jainism. It is abstention from injury through thought, word or deed (ahimsa), from false hood (satya), from stealing (asteya), from passions or lust (brahmacharya), from avarice (aparigraha). 2)Niyama: It is self-culture and includes external and internal purification(shucha),contentment(santosha),austerity(tapa s) Study (svadhyaya),and devotion to God(Ishvaraparinidhan). 3)Asana:This is dicipline of the body. 4)Pranayama:This is highly conducive to the concentration of mind. 5)Pratyahara : It is control of senses and consist in withdrawing the senses from their object. 6)Dharana It is fixing the mind on the object of meditation.It is the steadfast like the unflickering flame of the lamp. 7)Dhyana:it is steadfast contemplation without any break. 8)Samadhi:It means concentration. Samadhi is of two kinds: a)conscious or samparajnata b)Supraconscious or asamprajnata. The former is ekagra, the latter is nirudha. The highest goal, the summum bonum is not only the well being, of human beings but of all the living creatures. The following Sanskrit verse sums up the Indian ethical ideal. Sarve bhabantu sukhinah sarve santu niramayah Sarve bhadrani pasyantu makaschit dukhabhagabhavet.
May all be at ease; may all be in good health;
may all experience happiness; may none experience suffering.