Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Procedures
1. Manner of counting votes [Sec. 25, R.A. 7166]: In
reading the individual official ballots during the counting,
the chairman, poll clerk and the third member shall
assume such positions as to provide the watchers and the
members of the public as may be conveniently
accommodated in the polling place, unimpeded view of
the ballot being read by the chairman, of the election
returns and the tally board being simultaneously
accomplished by the poll clerk and the third member
respectively, without touching any of these election
documents. The table shall be cleared of all unnecessary
writing paraphernalia. Any violation of this requirement
shall constitute an election offense punishable under
Secs. 263 and 264 of the Omnibus Election Code.
B. Some rulings on appreciation of ballots:
1. Some Rules :
A) Idem sonsas . A name or surname
incorrectly written which, when read, has a
sound similar to the name or surname of a
candidate when correctly written shall be
counted in his favor
B) when two or more words are written on the
same line on the ballot, all of which surnames
of two or more candidates, the same shall not
be counted for any of them, unless on is the
surname of an incumbent who has served for
atleast one year in which case it shall be
counted in favor of latter.
C)when the ballot is written a single word which is
the first name of the and which is at the same time
the surname of his opponent , the vote shall be
counted in favor of the latter.
D) when two words are written on the ballot, one of
which is the first name of the candidate and the
other is the surname of his opponent, the vote shall
not be counted to either.
E) ballots which contain prefixes such as Sr., Mr.,
Datu,Ginoo, ect., shall be valid.
F) the use of nicknames and appellation and
friendship, if accompanied by the first name or
surname of the candidate, does not annul such vote,
except when they were used as a means to identify
the voter, in which case, the whole ballots is invalid.
G) if the candidates voted for exceed the
number of those to be elected, the ballot
is valid, but the votes shall be counted
only in favor of the candidates whose
names were firstly written by the voter
within the space provided for said office
in the ballot until the authorized number
is covered.
2. Some rulings on appreciation
of ballots:
a) Appreciation of ballots is a function of the BEI, not of the
Board of Canvassers [Sanchez v. Comelec, 153 SCRA 67],
b) Where the name of the candidate is not written in the
proper space in the ballot but is preceded by the name of the
office for which he* is a candidate, the vote shall be
considered valid for such candidate. In appreciating a ballot,
the object should be to ascertain and carry into effect the
intention of the voter if it can be determined with reasonable
certainty. Thus, the name of the candidate preceded by the
words Bo. Barangay should be interpreted to mean Po. (Or
Punong) Barangay, and should be counted for the candidate
[Bautista v. Castro, 206 SCRA 305]. But where the name of
the candidate is written seven times in the ballot, it is clear
that the same is intended to identify the ballot, and thus, the
vote should be invalidated [Bautista v. Castro, supra.].
c) In Villagracia v. Comelec, G.R. No. 168296, January
31, 2006, it was held that a distinction must be made
between marks that were apparently carelessly or
innocently made, which do not invalidate the ballot,
and marks purposely placed thereon by the voter with
a view to possible future identification, which
invalidates it. In this case, the invalidated ballots are
marked with the words Joker (14 ballots), Alas (6
ballots), Queen (7 ballots), and Kamatis (7 ballots),
all written in the number 7 slot of the list of Kagawad
for Sangguniang Barangay, and appearing only in
ballots wherein the Punong Barangay voted for was
petitioner. Clearly, the marks indicate no other
intention than to identify the ballots; indubitably, these
are marked ballots and were properly invalidated.
d) In Bautista v. Comelec, G.R. No.
133840, November 13, 1998, the
Supreme Court upheld the use of
separate tallies for votes considered stray
(because of the pendency of a motion for
reconsideration filed by the candidate
who was declared a nuisance candidate).
After the motion for reconsideration was
denied by the Comelec, the votes in the
separate tally were allowed to be credited
as part of the valid votes cast in favor of
the petitioner.
C. ELECTION RETURN. THE BEI SHALL PREPARE THE
ELECTION RETURN SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE
COUNTING OF THE VOTES IN THE POLLING PLACE.
1. In the election for President, Vice 2. in the election of local officials:
President, Senators, and Members of the
House of Representatives, and parties, 1st - to the city or municipal board of
organizations or coalitions participating
canvassers;
under the party-list system, the returns
shall be prepared in seven copies, and
2nd - to the Commission on Elections 3rd -
distributed as follows: to the provincial board of canvassers
1st - to city or municipal board of canvassers; 4 theCommission; to the dominant
2nd - to Congress, directed to the President of the majority party as determined by the
Senate; 5th - Commission; to the dominant
3rd - to the Commission on Elections;
minority party as determined by the
4th - to the dominant majority party as
determined by the Commission; 6th - to the citizens arm authorized by the
5th - to the dominant minority party as Commission to conduct an unofficial count;
determined by the Commission; 7th - to be deposited inside the
6th - to the citizens arm authorized by the
Commission to conduct an unofficial count; 7th -
compartment of the ballot box for valid
deposited inside the compartment of the ballot box ballots.
for valid Ballots.
1. Congress shall determine the authenticity and due execution of the certificates of canvass
for President and Vice President as accomplished and transmitted to it by the local boards of
canvassers, on a showing that:
Each certificate of canvass was executed, signed and thumb marked by the chairman and
transmitted to Congress by them; (b) Each certificate of canvass contains the names of all the
candidates for President and Vice President and their corresponding votes in words and in
figures; and (c) There exists no discrepancy in other authentic copies of the certificates of
canvass or discrepancy in the votes of any candidate in words and figures in the same
certificate.
2. When the certificate of canvass, duly certified by the board of canvassers of each province,
city or district, appears to be incomplete, the Senate President shall require the board of
canvassers concerned to transmit by personal delivery, the election returns from polling
places that were not included in the certificate of canvass and supporting statements.